Preconception counselling resource for women with diabetes

Women with diabetes need to plan for pregnancy if they are to reduce their risk of poor pregnancy outcome. While care providers have focused on setting up specialist pre-pregnancy planning clinics to help women prepare for pregnancy, the majority of women do not attend, entering pregnancy unprepared. A major barrier to accessing this care, and a consequence of poor preconception counselling, is a lack of knowledge as to the need to plan and the reasons why. This project addressed an urgent need to raise awareness of the importance of planning for pregnancy among women with diabetes and among the healthcare professionals (HCPs) caring for them. Focus groups with the target groups informed the development of a preconception counselling resource for women with diabetes. Originally produced as a DVD (Diabetes UK funding), this resource has been embedded in routine care in Northern Ireland (NI) since 2010. A subsequent service evaluation of pregnancy planning indicators undertaken across all five antenatal-metabolic clinics in NI indicated that women who viewed the resource were better prepared for pregnancy. In order to increase the positive impact of the resource and to ensure longer term sustainability the DVD was converted to a website, http://www.womenwithdiabetes.net (Public Health Agency NI funding). The evaluation also highlighted that women with type 2 diabetes were a hard to reach group. As these women are often cared for outside of specialist clinics, it is pertinent that all HCPs caring for women with diabetes are aware of the importance of preconception counselling. Funding also supported the development of an e-learning continuing professional development (CPD) resource within the website. The e-learning resource has since been embedded into existing CPD programmes and is an important tool to ensure that all HCPs caring for women with diabetes are empowered to provide preconception counselling at every opportunity

Prevalence of perinatal post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: To systematically synthesise the evidence on prevalence of perinatal post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Global Health, Global Index Medicus and the grey literature were searched with no language or date restrictions. The final search was carried out on 3 May 2022. Eligibility criteria: Cross-sectional, cohort or case–control studies that assessed the prevalence of PTSD in pregnant or postpartum women in LMICs were included. Data extraction and synthesis: Screening, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated with 95% CIs and prediction intervals (PI) using random-effects meta-analyses. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to explore possible sources of statistical heterogeneity. Results: 39 studies were included in the systematic review of which 38 were included in meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of clinically diagnosed perinatal PTSD was 4.2% (95% CI 2.2% to 6.8%; 95% PI 0–18%; 15 studies). The pooled prevalence of self-reported perinatal PTSD symptoms was 11.0% (95% CI 7.6% to 15.0%; 95% PI 0–36%; 23 studies). There was no evidence of differences in prevalence according to perinatal stage (antenatal versus postnatal), geographical region, type of setting or study quality. Conclusions: Findings of this review suggest 1 in 10 perinatal women experiences symptoms of PTSD and 1 in 20 experiences clinically diagnosed PTSD. Statistical heterogeneity between studies persisted in subgroup analyses and results should be interpreted with caution. More research from low-income countries is needed to improve understanding of the burden of perinatal PTSD in these settings. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022325072

Editorial: Reflections on a successful year of the Society for Reproductive and Infant Psychology.

As 2023 is drawing to a close, it is timely for us, the committee of the Society for Reproductive and Infant Psychology (SRIP), to pause and reflect upon what has been achieved this year and update our Society members and readers of our affiliated journal ‘The Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology (JRIP)’ on the plans outlined earlier in the year (Garthus-Niegel & Horsch, 2023

Right from the start: protocol for a pilot study for a randomised trial of the New Baby Programme for improving outcomes for children born to socially vulnerable mothers:protocol for a pilot study for a randomised trial of the New Baby Programme for improving outcomes for children born to socially vulnerable mothers

Background: Children born to mothers who experience social complexity (e.g. substance misuse, intimate partner violence, mental ill health, a history of maltreatment) are at increased risk for a range of adverse outcomes at birth and during development. Home visiting programmes have been advocated as a strategy for improving outcomes for disadvantaged mothers and children, such as the Nurse-Family Partnership for young, socially disadvantaged first-time mothers. However, no evidence-based programme is available for multiparous women or older first-time mothers. The New Baby Programme was developed in Northern Ireland. It augments the universal health visiting service available in the UK with a content designed to promote maternal health and well-being in pregnancy, maximise secure attachments of children and parents and enhance sensitive parenting and infant cognitive development.Methods/Design: This pilot study is designed to investigate whether it is possible to recruit and retain socially vulnerable mothers in a randomised trial that compares the effects of the New Baby Programme with standard antenatal and postnatal care. Feasibility issues include the referral/recruitment pathway (including inclusion and exclusion criteria), the consent and randomisation, the ability to maintain researcher blinding, the acceptability of the intervention to participants, and the feasibility and acceptability of the outcome measures. The results of the study will inform a definitive phase-3 RCT.Discussion: Trials of complex social interventions often encounter challenges that lead to the trial being abandoned (e.g. because of problems in recruitment) or present considerable analytic challenges relating to dropout, attrition and bias. This pilot study aims to maximise the chances of successful implementation.Trial registration: ISRCTN35456296 retrospectively registered.</p

Postpartum haemorrhage and risk of cardiovascular disease in later life: A population‐based record linkage cohort study

Objective: To investigate the association between postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and subsequent cardiovascular disease. Design: Population‐based retrospective cohort study, using record linkage between Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank (AMND) and Scottish healthcare data sets. Setting: Grampian region, Scotland. Population: A cohort of 70 904 women who gave birth after 24 weeks of gestation in the period 1986–2016. Methods: We used extended Cox regression models to investigate the association between having had one or more occurrences of PPH in any (first or subsequent) births (exposure) and subsequent cardiovascular disease, adjusted for sociodemographic, medical, and pregnancy and birth‐related factors. Main Outcome Measures: Cardiovascular disease identified from the prescription of selected cardiovascular medications, hospital discharge records or death from cardiovascular disease. Results: In our cohort of 70 904 women (with 124 795 birth records), 25 177 women (36%) had at least one PPH. Compared with not having a PPH, having at least one PPH was associated with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease, as defined above, in the first year after birth (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.51–2.53; p < 0.001). The association was attenuated over time, but strong evidence of increased risk remained at 2–5 years (aHR 1.19, 95% CI 1.11–1.30, P < 0.001) and at 6–15 years after giving birth (aHR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05–1.30, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Compared with women who have never had a PPH, women who have had at least one episode of PPH are twice as likely to develop cardiovascular disease in the first year after birth, and some increased risk persists for up to 15 years

Assessing the validity of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ) in women during pregnancy and the first year following birth

Background: The aim of this study was to validate a generic patient-reported outcome measure, the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ), among pregnant and postpartum women living with a pre-existing long-term condition (LTC). Methods: Cognitive interviews were conducted with women who were currently pregnant or had given birth within the past year and living with a pre-existing LTC (n=11) and with healthcare professionals working in maternal care (n=11) to explore the acceptability of LTCQ items. An online survey was subsequently administered among women who were pregnant or had given birth within the past year and living with a pre-existing LTC (n=718). Tests of validity were performed including assessing correlations between the LTCQ and reference measures, the Well-being in Pregnancy (WiP) Questionnaire and the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L. Internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach’s alpha statistic. Results: All LTCQ items were considered relevant and appropriate for use with women who were pregnant or had given birth within the past year. The most commonly reported LTC among the online survey sample (n=718) was a mental health condition (n=350, 48.7%) followed by joint, bone and connective tissues (n= 212, 29.5%) and gastrointestinal (n=143, 19.9%) condition. Data indicated LTCQ scores behaved in a predictable pattern, demonstrating poorer scores for women reporting a greater number of LTCs; mean (SD) scores, one LTC= 61.86 (17.8), two LTCs= 55.29 (16.0), three LTCs= 49.84 (15.52) and four LTCs= 44.94 (12.2). Poorer scores were also reported for women living with at least one mental health condition compared to those reporting no mental health condition, mean score = 66.18 (SD 16.7) v 48.64 (SD 13.3), p< 0.001 respectively. As anticipated, LTCQ scores demonstrated significant correlations in the expected direction with both the EQ-5D-5L and WiP scores. For all LTCQ items, the Cronbach’s alpha statistic was 0.93. Conclusion: Data presented here indicate that the LTCQ, which assesses living well with one or more LTC, is suitable for use among pregnant and postpartum women, from both the woman’s perspective and from the perspectives of maternity healthcare professionals. Use of the LTCQ would facilitate the identification of unmet needs within this high-risk cohort and support the exploration of how LTCs may affect women throughout the pregnancy and post-natal period. Understanding unmet needs within this cohort of women provides an opportunity to link up specialist care within maternity services and enhance personalised care

Anxiety in couples undergoing IVF: evidence from E-Freeze randomised controlled trial

Study question What are the risk factors and impacts of anxiety in women and men in heterosexual couples undergoing IVF as part of a randomised trial, with a delay in embryo transfer in one arm? Summary answer Duration of infertility, ethnicity, and male partner’s anxiety levels were associated with women’s anxiety at the start of treatment, while initial anxiety score, partner’s anxiety score at embryo transfer, ethnicity, and clinic location were associated with women’s anxiety levels at embryo transfer; although women undergoing IVF were more anxious than their partners for slightly different reasons, their self-reported state anxiety was not associated with achieving clinical pregnancy, nor with switching from delayed frozen embryo transfer to fresh embryo transfer in an IVF trial. What is known already Use of IVF treatment continues to rise and patients undergoing IVF are anxious. Participating in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with uncertainty of arm randomisation might increase their anxiety, while a delay in treatment may add further to anxiety. Study design, size, duration A mixed methods study was conducted using data from the multi-centre E-Freeze RCT cohort conducted across 13 clinics in the UK from 2016 to 2019. A regression analysis on anxiety scores of couples undergoing the IVF trial and a qualitative analysis of participant questionnaires were performed. Participants/materials, setting, methods Six hundred and four couples participating in the E-Freeze trial, who had at least one useable State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State Anxiety subscale (STAI-S) standardised self-report questionnaire for at least one of the partners, were included in the study. STAI-S scores were measured at consent for trial (T1) and again at embryo transfer (T2). Linear and log-binomial regression were used to explore the association between characteristics and STAI-S scores, and the associations between STAI-S scores and non-compliance and clinical pregnancy, respectively. Responses to the open text question were qualitatively analysed inductively using content analysis. Main results and the role of chance Women’s STAI-S scores at T1 (consent) were associated with their ethnicity, duration of infertility, and their male partner’s STAI-S score at T1. Women’s STAI-S scores at T2 (embryo transfer) were associated with their ethnicity, location of fertility clinic, their STAI-S score at consent, and their male partner’s STAI-S score at embryo transfer. The adjusted coefficient (95% CI) for women’s STAI-S scores at T2 was −4.75 (−7.29, −2.20, P  Limitations, reasons for caution Data were not available on education level or social support, which might influence anxiety scores. Men’s baseline characteristics were not collected. Wider implications of the findings Identifying couples at increased risk of emotional distress may be improved by using standardised anxiety measures at the start of the fertility treatment. Women can be reassured that their self-reported state anxiety does not affect their chances of achieving clinical pregnancy through IVF, and this may help to reduce anxiety levels. The psychological wellbeing and experiences of couples undergoing IVF could be supported by patient-centred care: making information about the whole process of treatment and choices available to both partners in accessible formats; ensuring interactions with staff are kind and supportive; and acknowledging and addressing the different concerns of women undergoing IVF and their partners. Study funding/competing interest(s) This study was an NIHR HTA (National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment) funded study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. Trial registration number ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN61225414

Use of weaning protocols for reducing duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult patients: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To investigate the effects of weaning protocols on the total duration of mechanical ventilation, mortality, adverse events, quality of life, weaning duration, and length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital

What supports mothers of very preterm babies to start and continue breast milk feeding neonatal units? A qualitative COM-B analysis of mothers’ experiences

Background: It is challenging for mothers who give birth very preterm to produce sufficient breast milk by expressing for weeks before their baby is able to feed from the breast, and then to transition from tube feeding to breastfeeding. Lactation is most successful when stimulated shortly after birth, established within 72 h, and maintained by expressing 6–8 times a day. This study explored mothers’ experiences of how breast milk feeding and breastfeeding for very preterm babies can be supported by staff and the facilities of a neonatal unit. Methods: Twenty-three mothers of very preterm babies were interviewed, from four neonatal units in England with high or low rates of breast milk feeding at discharge. Interviews were analysed using the COM-B framework to consider how mothers’ behaviour (breast milk feeding and breastfeeding) is affected by capability, opportunity and motivation. Results: Mothers’ motivation in the traumatic situation of very preterm birth was strongly affected by information from staff about the benefits of breast milk for their baby, the importance of early and frequent expressing, and how to assess the effectiveness of direct breastfeeding. It was maintained through positive feedback about their efforts which built their confidence, and reassurance about what is ‘normal’ growth when a baby begins direct breastfeeding. Motivation needed to be supported by opportunity, including access to equipment for expressing and facilities to stay near the neonatal unit, and also by capability, which required proactive and skilled information and support from staff. Specialist support and facilities varied between units, and some mothers were not given necessary information or had their motivation undermined by staff comments. Conclusions: Interventions to increase breast milk feeding and breastfeeding for very preterm babies should address mothers’ motivation, capability and opportunity, aiming for systematic elimination of obstacles. Mothers value personalised and skilled specialist support, but also need other staff to be able to give consistent information and affirmation focused on their efforts rather than their success, with a trauma-informed approach. Investing in rooming-in facilities that minimise the separation of mothers and babies is likely to overcome a key obstacle