18 research outputs found

    Is there a relationship between periodontal conditions and number of medications among the elderly?

    Get PDF
    Objective: To investigate possible correlations of clinical attachment level and pocket depth with number of medications in elderly individuals.Methods: Intra-oral examinations for 139 patients visiting Tufts dental clinic were done. Periodontal assessments were performed with a manual UNC-15 periodontal probe to measure probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) at 6 sites. Complete lists of patients’ medications were obtained during the examinations. Statistical analysis involved Kruskal-Wallis, chi square and multivariate logistic regression analyses.Results: Age and health status attained statistical significance (p< 0.05), in contingency table analysis with number of medications. Number of medications had an effect on CAL: increased attachment loss was observed when 4 or more medications were being taken by the patient. Number of medications did not have any effect on periodontal PD. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, 6 or more medications had a higher risk of attachment loss (>3mm) when compared to the no-medication group, in crude OR (1.20, 95% CI:0.22-6.64), and age adjusted (OR=1.16, 95% CI:0.21-6.45), but not with the multivariate model (OR=0.71, 95% CI:0.11-4.39).Conclusion: CAL seems to be more sensitive to the number of medications taken, when compared to PD. However, it is not possible to discriminate at exactly what number of drug combinations the breakdown in CAL will happen. We need to do further analysis, including more subjects, to understand the possible synergistic mechanisms for different drug and periodontal responses.Keywords: periodontal disease, medications, elderly, clinical attachment level, probing dept

    Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Preserving Alveolar Ridge Volume and Reducing Postoperative Pain in Site Preservation of Post-Extracted Sockets

    Full text link
    Background and Objectives: In socket preservation, the goal is to minimize bone resorption after tooth extraction to maintain the volume and contour of the alveolar ridge. The use of PRF in post extraction sites may reduce ridge resorption by encouraging the growth of new bone and acting as a scaffold for tissue. In addition, PRF may enhance healing and minimize postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in maintaining the ridges’ dimensions at the extraction site, in the maxilla and mandible, as well as its impact on post-extraction discomfort. Methods: The study was conducted on 60 patients presenting for extraction of posterior teeth and was randomly divided into three groups: group I PRF (n = 20), group II PRF + collagen (n = 20), and group III control (n = 20). Sockets were filled with PRF (group I) and PRF + collagen (group II). At baseline and follow-up after 3 months, CBCT was used to assess the bone dimensions. The postoperative pain evaluations were performed at 24 h, 3 days, and 7 days after the tooth extraction. The pain rate was evaluated using a numerical rating scale from the British Pain Society. Results: The study examined the effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and PRF combined with collagen on the height and width of the ridges, as well as the pain experienced by the patients following alveolar ridge preservation surgery. ANOVA and t-tests were used to evaluate and compare the ridge dimensions. Comparing the results to the control group, there were no significant differences in the height or width of the ridges. However, both the PRF and PRF + Collaplug¼ treatments effectively reduced the short-term postoperative pain. Conclusions: The study findings suggest that platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and PRF combined with collagen do not exert significant effects on ridge width and height compared to the standard treatment following alveolar ridge preservation. However, it is noteworthy that both the PRF and PRF + collagen treatments demonstrated efficacy in reducing postoperative pain in the short term, offering a potential advantage over standard treatment protocols

    The Radiographic Assessment of Furcation Area in Maxillary and Mandibular First Molars while Considering the New Classification of Periodontal Disease

    Full text link
    This study aimed to evaluate the radiographic reliability in the diagnosis of furcation involvement in first molars. A total of 52 subjects were included in the current study. Personal history regarding smoking was recorded and a periodontal examination was performed. Pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession, and furcation involvement in all first molars were assessed for each patient. Periodontal staging and grading were evaluated using the new classification of periodontal disease. Class II and Class III furcation classification were more frequently observed in radiographs than the Class I furcation; however, no significant differences were observed. Radiographic observation of the furcation was seen more when PD and CAL were >5 mm in all molars. The presence of gingival recession and its relation to the radiographic assessment did not reveal any statistically significant association (p > 0.05) except for tooth #16. The trend of visibility of furcation radiographically was more as the grade of staging was increased. Moreover, the presence of smoking habits and visibility of furcation radiographically did not have any statistical significance. Smoking may not be a factor in the furcation involvement. There is a direct relationship between the staging and grading of the periodontitis and furcation involvement

    <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> coinfection is a confounder, modulating mucosal inflammation in oral submucous fibrosis

    Full text link
    The oral cavity has been considered a potential reservoir for <i> Helicobacter pylori (H pylori)</i> ,<i> </i> from where the organism causes recurrent gastric infections. Aim: With this case-control study we tried to evaluate the role of <i> H pylori</i> in the etiology of mucosal inflammation, a condition that compounds the morbid state associated with oral submucous fibrosis (OSF). <b> Materials and Methods<i> : </b></i> Subjects (<i> n</i> = 150) were selected following institutional regulations on sample collection and grouped into test cases and positive and negative controls based on the presence of mucosal fibrosis and inflammation. The negative controls had none of the clinical signs. All patients underwent an oral examination as well as tests to assess oral hygiene/periodontal disease status; a rapid urease test (RUT) of plaque samples was also done to estimate the <i> H pylori </i> bacterial load. We used univariate and mutivariate logistic regression for statistical analysis of the data and calculated the odds ratios to assess the risk posed by the different variables. <b> Results<i> : </b></i> The RUT results differed significantly between the groups, reflecting the variations in the bacterial loads in each category. The test was positive in 52&#x0025; in the positive controls (where nonspecific inflammation of oral mucosa was seen unassociated with fibrosis), in 46&#x0025; of the test cases, and in 18&#x0025; of the negative controls (healthy volunteers) (&#967;<sup>2 </sup> = 13.887; <i> P </i> &lt; 0.01). A positive correlation was seen between the oral hygiene/periodontal disease indices and RUT reactivity in all the three groups. <b> Conclusions:<i> </b></i> The contribution of the <i> H pylori </i> in dental plaque to mucosal inflammation and periodontal disease was significant. Logistic regression analysis showed gastrointestinal disease and poor oral hygiene as being the greatest risk factors for bacterial colonization, irrespective of the subject groups. A positive correlation exists between RUT reactivity and the frequency of mucosal inflammation

    Assessment of halitosis using the organoleptic method and volatile sulfur compounds monitoring

    Full text link
    Introduction: Halitosis can be tested using two main methods, organoleptic and assessment of volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs), using an electronic meter like Halimeter. Therefore, the present study was conducted to measure the oral malodor of volunteers by means of the organoleptic method and VSCs monitoring and to evaluate the diagnostic value of the Halimeter in the diagnosis of halitosis. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted to compare the two diagnostic aids for halitosis. The study population included 110 volunteers, all males, between the ages of 18 and 45 years selected from academic staff, students, and patients of college. Evaluation and comparison of two main methods for halitosis were done, namely, organoleptic and Halimeter. Specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and disease prevalence were calculated for the sulfide monitor test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the diagnostic values of Halimeter to differentiate individuals with and without halitosis. Results: The correlation coefficient between VSC grading and organoleptic score (Kendallâ€Čs tau-b) was −0.1090, which was not significant (P = 0.2170). Sensitivity and specificity of sulfide monitor grades for detecting individuals with and without halitosis were 20.75% and 66.67%, respectively. The PPV for the Halimeter was 36.67%, and the NPV was 47.50%. A total of 48.18% of all subjects were accurately identified and differentiated. The area under the ROC curve was 0.5790 (95% confidence interval: 0.4600-0.6980). Conclusion: In the present study, the Halimeter was not found to have a good correlation with the organoleptic method. However, due to the diverse influencing factors, proof of halitosis should always be obtained with two different methods

    Clinical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Coronally Advanced Flap in Combination with Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane in the Treatment of Miller Class I Gingival Recessions

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Gingival recession has been associated with dentinal hypersensitivity, root caries, and esthetic compromise. Root coverage procedures aim at providing both tangible and intangible benefits to the patients. Various procedures have been tried to obtain root coverage of single-rooted teeth. Miller Classes I and II gingival recessions hold out the best promise for root coverage as there is no interdental bone and soft-tissue loss associated with these recessions. AIM: The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of coronally advanced flap (CAF) with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane with CAF + connective tissue graft (CTG) on recession coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 16 patients required recession coverage for a single tooth were divided into two groups. The test group received CAF + PRF while the control group got CAF + CTG. Different parameters were taken preoperatively (amount of recession, width, and thickness of attached gingiva) and repeated for the two groups 2 months after surgery. RESULTS: Comparing the two groups after 2 months from surgery showed that the PRF not only has an effect in the management of recession but also has a greater effect on tissue thickness. CONCLUSION: PRF is a minimum invasive approach and a promising material for root coverage and manipulating the gingival biotype. &nbsp

    Evaluation of alveolar bone level after orthodontic clear aligners treatment: A retrospective study

    Full text link
    Introduction: Clear aligners have increased in popularity as an alternative to conventional fixed equipment in orthodontic treatment. However, the impact of clear aligner orthodontic therapy on the periodontium, particularly the periodontal tissues, has generated curiosity in research. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between clear aligner orthodontic treatment and the height of the alveolar bone level. Materials and Method: Ninety-two panoramic radiographs (pretreatment and posttreatment) from 46 adult patients treated with clear aligner therapy were selected for the current study. Linear measurements have been performed in the panoramic radiographs to measure the alveolar bone. Patient data, including age, gender, type of malocclusion, duration of the orthodontic treatment, inter-proximal striping done or not during the orthodontic treatment, and changes in alveolar bone level in millimeters, were documented. Results and Discussion: Posttreatment significantly increased alveolar defects (p=0.05). Pretreatment and posttreatment mean differences in alveolar bone defects were statistically significant across all the studied variables (p<0.05) except in the Class III malocclusion (p=0.082). Moreover, there is a significant positive correlation observed between the age of the study participants and pretreatment (p=0.007) and posttreatment bone defects (p=0.002) along with pretreatment and posttreatment alveolar bone defect (p= <0.001). Conclusion: This study advances the understanding of the complexities surrounding malocclusion, clear aligner orthodontic treatment, and alveolar bone height

    Periodontal parameters in prediabetes, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and non-diabetic patients

    Full text link
    Abstract The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical and radiographic periodontal parameters in prediabetes, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and non-diabetic patients. Forty-one patients with prediabetes (Group 1), 43 patients with T2DM (Group 2), and 41 controls (Group 3) were included. Demographic data were recorded using a questionnaire. Full-mouth clinical (plaque index [PI], bleeding on probing [BOP], probing depth [PD], clinical attachment loss [CAL], missing teeth [MT]) and radiographic (marginal bone loss [MBL]) parameters were measured on digital radiographs. In all groups, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were also measured. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The mean age and HbA1c levels of participants in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 53.4±3.5, 60.1 ± 0.6, and 56.6 ± 2.5 years and 6.1%, 8.4%, and 4.8%, respectively. The mean duration of prediabetes and T2DM in patients from Groups 1 and 2 were 1.9 ± 0.3 and 3.1 ± 0.5 years, respectively. PI, BOP, PD, MT, CAL, and MBL were significantly higher in Groups 1 (p < 0.05) and 2 (p < 0.05) than in Group 3. There was no statistically significant difference in these parameters in Groups 1 and 2. Periodontal parameters were worse between prediabetes and T2DM patients compared with controls; however, these parameters were comparable between prediabetes and T2DM patients

    A Prospective Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Intra-Ligamentary Anesthetic Solutions in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed as Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis with Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis

    Full text link
    Accomplishing painless endodontic treatment, especially in the mandibular molar region, is challenging. Hence, the aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of 2% lidocaine and 4% articaine when used as supplemental intra-ligamentary (IL) anesthesia in mandibular molars having symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with symptomatic apical periodontitis after failed Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) injection. In this prospective study, one-hundred and forty-seven adult patients diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis in a mandibular tooth were included who received IANB with 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Patients who experienced pain were recorded using the Heft&ndash;Parker visual analog scale (HP-VAS score &ge; 55 mm) and received supplement intra-ligament injection with either4% articaine or 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Supplementary intra-ligament injections resulted in 82.6% and 91.3% of profound anesthesia in the first molar region for 2% lidocaine and 4% articaine, respectively. Similarly, an additional IL injection of articaine success percent (78.9%) in the second molar region was higher than lidocaine (63.1%). The overall success ratio revealed no significant difference in achieving profound anesthesia of either solution. In this study population, there was no difference in the success ratio of anesthesia between 2% lidocaine and 4% articaine when used as supplemental IL injection
    corecore