X-ray Structures and Computational Studies of Two Bioactive 2-(Adamantane-1-carbonyl)-N-substituted Hydrazine-1-carbothioamides

Two biologically active adamantane-linked hydrazine-1-carbothioamide derivatives, namely 2-(adamantane-1-carbonyl)-N-(tert-butyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide) 1 and 2-(adamantane-1-carbonyl)-N-cyclohexylhydrazine-1-carbothioamide 2, have been synthesized. X-ray analysis was conducted to study the effect of the t-butyl and cyclohexyl moieties on the intermolecular interactions and conformation of the molecules in the solid state. X-ray analysis reveals that compound 1 exhibits folded conformation, whereas compound 2 adopts extended conformation. The Hirshfeld surface analysis indicates that the contributions of the major intercontacts involved in the stabilization of the crystal structures do not change much as a result of the t-butyl and cyclohexyl moieties. However, the presence and absence of these contacts is revealed by the 2D-fingerprint plots. The CLP–Pixel method was used to identify the energetically significant molecular dimers. These dimers are stabilized by different types of intermolecular interactions such as N–H···S, N–H···O, C–H···S, C–H···O, H–H bonding and C–H···π interactions. The strength of these interactions was quantified by using the QTAIM approach. The results suggest that N–H···O interaction is found to be stronger among other interactions. The in vitro assay suggests that both compounds 1 and 2 exhibit urease inhibition potential, and these compounds also display moderate antiproliferative activities. Molecular docking analysis shows the key interaction between urease enzyme and title compounds. Keywords: adamantane; hydrazine-1-carbothioamide; Hirshfeld surface; CLP–Pixel; QTAIM; molecular docking; urease inhibition; antiproliferative agents; H-H bondin

A combined crystallographic and theoretical investigation of noncovalent interactions in 1,3,4-oxadiazole-2-thione-<i>N</i>-Mannich derivatives: <i>in vitro</i> bioactivity and molecular docking

Qualitative and quantitative analyses of hydrogen, halogen and unconventional noncovalent interactions in two 3-arylaminomethyl N-Mannich bases are described in addition to antibacterial and anticancer properties. Two 1,3,4-oxadiazole-2-thione-N-Mannich derivatives, specifically 5-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-[(2-trifluoromethylphenylamino)methyl]-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2(3H)-thione (1) and 5-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-[(2,5-difluorophenylamino)methyl]-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2(3H)-thione (2), were synthesized and then characterized by elemental analysis and NMR (1H and 13C) spectroscopy and the single crystal X-ray diffraction method. The formed weak intermolecular interactions in the solid-state structures of these derivatives were thoroughly investigated utilizing a variety of theoretical tools such as Hirshfeld surface analysis and quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM). Furthermore, the CLP-PIXEL and density functional theory calculations were used to study the energetics of molecular dimers. Numerous weak intermolecular interactions such as C-H⋯S/Cl/F/π interactions, a directional C-Cl⋯Cl halogen bond, π-stacking, type C-F⋯F-C contact and a short F⋯O interaction, help to stabilize the crystal structure of 1. Crystal structure 2 also stabilizes with several weak intermolecular contacts, including N-H⋯S, C-H⋯N//Cl/F interactions, a highly directional C1-Cl1⋯C(π) halogen bond and C(π)⋯C(π) interaction. In vitro antimicrobial potency of compounds 1 and 2 was assessed against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains and the pathogenic yeast-like Candida albicans. Both compounds showed marked activity against all tested Gram-positive bacteria and weak activity against Escherichia coli and lacked inhibitory activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In addition, compounds 1 and 2 displayed good in vitro anti-proliferative activity against hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG-2) and mammary gland breast cancer (MCF-7) cancer cell lines. Molecular docking studies revealed the binding modes of title compounds at the active sites of prospective therapeutic targets

Crystallographic and Theoretical Exploration of Weak Hydrogen Bonds in Arylmethyl N′-(adamantan-1-yl)piperidine-1-carbothioimidates and Molecular Docking Analysis

Crystal structures of two potential chemotherapeutic agents, namely 4-nitrobenzyl N′-(adamantan-1-yl)piperidine-1-carbothioimidate 1 and 4-bromobenzyl N′-(adamantan-1-yl)piperidine-1-carbothioimidate 2, have been analyzed in detail. X-ray analysis reveals that the molecular conformations of these compounds are strikingly different. These two structures are compared with two of their closely related structures. In the related structures, morpholine replaces piperidine. Based on the Hirshfeld surface analysis and two-dimensional (2D) fingerprint plots, we describe the effects of piperidine/morpholine and Br/NO2 groups on the intermolecular interactions. An analysis of the CLP-PIXEL energy provides insight into the energetics of the dimers observed in the title compounds and their related structures. Compound 1 stabilizes with bifurcated C–H···S, C–H···O, and O(lp)···C(π) interactions, whereas compound 2 stabilizes with C–H···N, C–H···Br, and C–H···C interactions. The energy frameworks for the crystal structures of the title compounds reveal differences. The atoms-in-molecules (AIM) analysis was performed to confirm the intermolecular interactions found in the crystal structures of 1 and 2. Additionally, docking analysis suggests that the title compounds bind at the active site of human sphingosine kinase 1, a well-known cancer target

X-ray Structures and Computational Studies of Two Bioactive 2-(Adamantane-1-carbonyl)-N-substituted Hydrazine-1-carbothioamides

Two biologically active adamantane-linked hydrazine-1-carbothioamide derivatives, namely 2-(adamantane-1-carbonyl)-N-(tert-butyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide) 1 and 2-(adamantane-1-carbonyl)-N-cyclohexylhydrazine-1-carbothioamide 2, have been synthesized. X-ray analysis was conducted to study the effect of the t-butyl and cyclohexyl moieties on the intermolecular interactions and conformation of the molecules in the solid state. X-ray analysis reveals that compound 1 exhibits folded conformation, whereas compound 2 adopts extended conformation. The Hirshfeld surface analysis indicates that the contributions of the major intercontacts involved in the stabilization of the crystal structures do not change much as a result of the t-butyl and cyclohexyl moieties. However, the presence and absence of these contacts is revealed by the 2D-fingerprint plots. The CLP&ndash;Pixel method was used to identify the energetically significant molecular dimers. These dimers are stabilized by different types of intermolecular interactions such as N&ndash;H&middot;&middot;&middot;S, N&ndash;H&middot;&middot;&middot;O, C&ndash;H&middot;&middot;&middot;S, C&ndash;H&middot;&middot;&middot;O, H&ndash;H bonding and C&ndash;H&middot;&middot;&middot;&pi; interactions. The strength of these interactions was quantified by using the QTAIM approach. The results suggest that N&ndash;H&middot;&middot;&middot;O interaction is found to be stronger among other interactions. The in vitro assay suggests that both compounds 1 and 2 exhibit urease inhibition potential, and these compounds also display moderate antiproliferative activities. Molecular docking analysis shows the key interaction between urease enzyme and title compounds