Skeletonized versus pedicled left internal mammary artery harvesting and risk of sternal wound infection after coronary artery bypass surgery

Background: The left internal mammary artery (LIMA) is the gold standard conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There are two harvesting methods, either pedicled or skeletonized. The choice of any technique must consider its complication profile, especially sternal wound infections (SWI). This study aims to evaluate and compare the occurrence of SWI after pedicled and skeletonized LIMA harvesting techniques for CABG. Methods: This prospective observational study included 300 patients who had CABG between 2016 and 2019. We included patients who had pedicled LIMA (n=200) in group 1 and who had skeletonized LIMA (n=100) in group 2. All patients completed a follow-up period of 3 months after CABG. The evaluation during follow-up included: sternal instability, signs of wound infection, temperature, the microbiological study of wound discharge, and chest computed tomography scan. Results: There was no significant differences in age (p = 0.20), male to female ratio (p = 0.43), body mass index (p = 0.12), NYHA I/II (p = 0.50), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.28), ejection  fraction (p= 0.14), and EuroSCORE II (p= 0.09) between groups. No significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.24), and cross-clamp time (p= 0.19) between groups. There was a significant increase in the total operating time in skeletonized LIMA group (212.77±75.25 min vs. 190.78±55 minutes, p= 0.004). Skeletonized LIMA was significantly associated lower incidence of SWI than that with pedicled LIMA (4% vs 15.5%, p= 0.003), and non-significantly lower incidence of deep SWI (1% vs 4.5%, p= 0.11). The risk factors for SWI in patients who had pedicled IMA were obesity (OR: 13.06, 95%CI: 3.98-42.89), diabetes mellitus (OR: 10.51, 95%CI: 2.35-46.84), and excessive diathermy (OR: 12.62, 95%CI: 3.93-40.54). Conclusion: Obesity, diabetes, and the use of excessive diathermy for hemostasis may increase the risk of sternal wound infection with pedicled LIMA harvest compared to skeletonized LIMA in patients undergoing CABG

Video-assisted Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery versus Conventional Mitral Surgery in Rheumatic Patients

Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery became an attractive option because of its cosmetic advantages over the conventional approach. The superiority of the minimally invasive approach regarding other aspects is still debatable. The aim of our study was to determine the potential benefits of minimally invasive mitral valve replacement with intraoperative video assistance over conventional surgery. Methods: This is a single-center prospective cohort study that included 60 patients with rheumatic heart disease who underwent mitral valve replacement. Patients were divided into two groups: group (A) included patients who had conventional sternotomy (n= 30), and group (B) included patients who had video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve replacement (n= 30). Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between both groups. Results: Mortality occurred in one patient in the group (A). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 118.93 ± 29.84 minutes vs. 64.73 ± 19.16 minutes in group B and A respectively (p< 0.001), and ischemic time was 102.27 ± 30.03 minutes vs. 53.67± 18.46 minutes in group B and A respectively (P < 0.001). Ventilation time was 2.77± 2.27 vs. 6.28 ± 4.48 hours in group B and A respectively (p< 0.001) and blood transfusion was 0.50 ± 0.63 vs. 2.83 ± 1.34 units in group B and A respectively (p< 0.001).  ICU stay was 1.73 ± 0.64 days in the group (B) vs. 4.47 ± 0.94 days in group A (p< 0.001). Postoperative bleeding was 353.33 ± 146.77 ml in the group (B) vs. 841.67 ± 302.03 ml in group A (p <0.001). No conversion to full sternotomy was reported in group B. In group (B), two cases (6.6%) required re-exploration for bleeding vs. four cases (13.2%) in group (A) (p=0.67). The hospital stay was 6.13 ± 1.59 days in the group (B) vs. 13.27 ± 7.62 days in group A (p< 0.001). Four cases (13.3%) developed mediastinitis in group A and in the group (B), there was one case of acute right lower limb embolic ischemia. Conclusion: Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral operations could be a safe alternative to conventional sternotomy with the potential of lesser morbidity and earlier hospital discharge

A randomized controlled trial (PAMI trial) on our new trend periareolar minimally invasive (PAMI) technique versus inframammary approach for minimally invasive cardiac surgery

Abstract Background A minimally invasive approach has become standard for mitral valve surgery. The periareolar approach has grown in popularity regarding the cosmesis for patients. We have adopted a new modification to the periareolar approach: the periareolar minimally invasive (PAMI) technique. The objectives of the current study are to test the hypothesis that the PAMI approach is more feasible and safer than the inframammary approach in addition to identify risk factors and assess outcomes of both periareolar and inframammary approach. Methods A randomized controlled trial of 3 months compared the PAMI technique to the inframammary approach for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Results A total of 102 patients were enrolled and randomized into two groups: 53 received minimally invasive cardiac surgery through the periareolar approach, and 49 were the control group using the inframammary approach. Using intention-to-treat analysis, the periareolar approach was superior to the inframammary approach in surgical site infection (two cases in comparison to 8 with P = 0.004), and the number needed to treat for effectiveness was 8. No early deaths occurred, 97 cases (95.1%) needed no reoperation, and 5 cases (4.9%) were reopened for bleeding. The primary endpoints compared were the duration of procedure, duration of mechanical ventilation, amount of bleeding, ICU stay, and hospital stay. We found no statistically significant differences between the groups. At 3 months, the secondary endpoints evaluated were the rate of surgical site infection, respiratory complications, groin complications, pericardial effusion, breast hematoma, and cosmoses using a Likert scale. We found no statistically significant difference between the groups, except for surgical site infection (P = 0.004) and cosmesis (P < 0.001). Conclusions The results of this PAMI trial are suggestive that the PAMI technique is most probably applicable for the right side of the heart, such as in atrial septal defect closure, tricuspid disease, and mitral valve surgery. Trial registration PAMI Trial NCT04726488 Registered January 27, 202

Arthroscopic Single-Tunnel Pullout Suture Fixation for Tibial Eminence Avulsion Fracture

Various arthroscopic techniques have been devised for fixation of tibial eminence avulsions, namely percutaneous K-wires, arthroscopy-guided screw fixation, staples, TightRope (Arthrex)–suture button fixation, and transosseous suture fixation. Such techniques provide well-pronounced advantages including less postoperative pain, a reduced hospital stay, and minimal scar with resultant earlier and more compliant rehabilitation. As for transosseous suture fixation, the standard technique comprises the creation of 2 tibial tunnels exiting on both sides of the footprint of the avulsion fracture using an anterior cruciate ligament tibial guide with the angle set at 45°. Our technique entails the creation of a single tibial tunnel directed from the proximal anteromedial tibia to the center of the tibial eminence. The technique uses Ethibond suture (No. 5) and/or FiberWire suture (Arthrex) to fix the tibial eminence by pulling the anterior cruciate ligament fibers and tightening the pullout suture at the tibial exit of the tunnel with a 4-hole button. This modified single-tunnel pullout suture technique is an appealing option that has proved to be effective and economical with a shorter operative time. Moreover, it provides a less invasive option for skeletally immature patients

The effect of combined ultrasound-guided transverse thoracic muscle plane block and rectus sheath plane block on the peri-operative consumption of opioids in open heart surgeries with median sternotomy

ABSTRACTBackground Patients undergoing heart surgery with a midline sternotomy typically get intravenous opioids as their primary form of post-operative pain management. Due to its possible drawbacks, regional neuraxial anesthesia is still controversial. There have been reports on the impact of rectus sheath plane (RSP) block in conjunction with ultrasound-guided transverse thoracic muscle plane (TTP) block on postoperative pain following sternotomy.Aim Of The Study The efficiency of combining TTP and RSP blocks in lowering the targeted patients’ perioperative requirement for opioids, minimizing opioid adverse effects, and attaining a potential Fast-Tract Extubation.Patients And Methods 50 patients undergoing open cardiac surgery via median sternotomy were randomly assigned to one of two groups in this randomized, prospective, comparative trial. Group (B) got combined ultrasound-guided TTP and RSP blocks, while Group (S) received saline in the same planes before to the incision.Results There was no significant difference between the groups for the demographic information, postoperative opioid consumption, or VAS pain scores, however there was a very significant difference between the groups for intraoperative opioid intake and time to extubation.Conclusion Combining TTP and RSP blocks has improved fast-track extubation, decreased hemodynamic changes in response to surgical stress, and decreased intraoperative opioid usage. The blocks directed by routine pain score evaluation did not, however, have a significant impact on postoperative opioid use