Mechanical properties and energy absorption characteristics of additively manufactured lightweight novel re-entrant plate-based lattice structures

In this work, three novel re-entrant plate lattice structures (LSs) have been designed by transforming conventional truss-based lattices into hybrid-plate based lattices, namely, flat-plate modified auxetic (FPMA), vintile (FPV), and tesseract (FPT). Additive manufacturing based on stereolithography (SLA) technology was utilized to fabricate the tensile, compressive, and LS specimens with different relative densities (ρ). The base material’s mechanical properties obtained through mechanical testing were used in a finite element-based numerical homogenization analysis to study the elastic anisotropy of the LSs. Both the FPV and FPMA showed anisotropic behavior; however, the FPT showed cubic symmetry. The universal anisotropic index was found highest for FPV and lowest for FPMA, and it followed the power-law dependence of ρ. The quasi-static compressive response of the LSs was investigated. The Gibson–Ashby power law (≈ρn) analysis revealed that the FPMA’s Young’s modulus was the highest with a mixed bending–stretching behavior (≈ρ1.30), the FPV showed a bending-dominated behavior (≈ρ3.59), and the FPT showed a stretching-dominated behavior (≈ρ1.15). Excellent mechanical properties along with superior energy absorption capabilities were observed, with the FPT showing a specific energy absorption of 4.5 J/g, surpassing most reported lattices while having a far lower density

Effect of Processing Techniques on the Microstructure and Mechanical Performance of High-Density Polyethylene

The versatility of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) makes it one of the most used polymers for vast applications ranging from food packaging to human implants. However, there still is confusion regarding the proper selection of processing techniques to produce HDPE specimens for high-end applications. Herein, we compare the processing of HDPE by two relevant techniques: compression and injection molding. The fabricated samples were studied using uniaxial tensile testing to determine their mechanical performance. Furthermore, the microstructure of samples was analyzed using different characterization techniques. Compression-molded specimens recorded a higher degree of crystallinity (DC) using two different characterization techniques such as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). With this information, critical processing factors were determined, and a general structure–property relationship was established. It was demonstrated that having a higher DC resulted in higher yield strength and Young’s modulus. Furthermore, premature failure was observed in the injection-molded specimens, resulting in lower mechanical performance. This premature failure was caused due to flow marks observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Therefore, it is concluded that compression molding produces superior samples compared to injection molding