Pattern of disease progression during third-line or later chemotherapy with nivolumab associated with poor prognosis in advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan

[Background] Accelerated tumor growth during immunotherapy in pre-existing measurable lesions, hyperprogressive disease (HPD), has been reported. However, progression of non-measurable lesions and new lesions are frequently observed in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). [Methods] This retrospective study involved AGC patients at 24 Japanese institutions who had measurable lesions and received nivolumab after ≥ 2 lines of chemotherapy. HPD was defined as a ≥ two-fold increase in the tumor growth rate of measurable lesions. The pattern of disease progression was classified according to new lesions in different organs and ascites appeared/increase of ascites. [Results] Of 245 patients, 147 (60.0%) showed progressive disease (PD) as the best response and 41 (16.7%) showed HPD during nivolumab monotherapy. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients with HPD and those with PD other than HPD (median OS 5.0 vs 4.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6–1.5; p = 1.0). Fifty-three patients developed new lesions in different organs and 58 had appearance/increase of ascites; these patients showed shorter OS than those without each of these features (median OS 3.3 vs 7.1 months, HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2–2.7, p = 0.0031 for new lesions, and 3.0 vs 7.8 months, HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.8–3.8, p < 0.0001 for ascites). Thirty-one patients who had both features showed the worst prognosis (median OS 2.6 months). [Conclusions] New lesions in different organs and appearance/increase of ascites, rather than the original definition of HPD, are the patterns of disease progression associated with poor prognosis in AGC patients receiving nivolumab whose best response was PD

Treatment sequences of patients with advanced colorectal cancer and use of second-line FOLFIRI with antiangiogenic drugs in Japan: A retrospective observational study using an administrative database.

The objectives were to describe treatment sequences for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), use of second-line FOLFIRI (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan) plus antiangiogenic drug (bevacizumab, ramucirumab, aflibercept beta) therapy, and the factors associated with the duration of antitumor drug treatment from second-line antiangiogenic therapy in Japan. This retrospective observational study was conducted using a Japanese hospital-based administrative database. Patients were enrolled if they started adjuvant therapy (and presumably experienced early recurrence) or first-line treatment for advanced CRC between May 2016 and July 2019, and were analysed until September 2019. Factors associated with overall treatment duration from second-line treatment with FOLFIRI plus antiangiogenic drugs were explored with multivariate Cox regression analysis. The most common first-line treatments were FOLFOX (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin) with bevacizumab (presumed RAS-mutant CRC) and FOLFOX with panitumumab (presumed RAS-wild type CRC). The most common second-line treatments were FOLFIRI-based. Many patients did not transition to subsequent lines of therapy. For second-line treatment, antiangiogenic drugs were prescribed more often for patients with presumed RAS-mutant CRC, right-sided CRC, and independent activities of daily living (ADL). The median duration of second-line FOLFIRI plus antiangiogenic drug treatment was 4.5 months; 66.2% of patients transitioned to third-line therapy. Low body mass index and not fully independent ADL were significantly associated with shorter overall duration of antitumor drug treatment from second-line therapy. Left-sided CRC, presumed RAS-wild type CRC, previous use of oral fluoropyrimidines and use of proteinuria qualitative tests, antihypertensives, or anticholinergics during second-line therapy were significantly associated with longer treatment. Treatment of advanced CRC in Japan is consistent with both international and Japanese guidelines, but transition rates to subsequent therapies need improvement. In addition to antitumor drug treatment, better ADL, higher body mass index, management of hypertension, and proteinuria tests were associated with continuation of sequential therapy that included antiangiogenic drugs

Renal impairment as a risk factor for trifluridine/tipiracil-induced adverse events in metastatic colorectal cancer patients from the REGOTAS study

Abstract Renal impairment may be associated with an increased risk of hematologic events (AEs) in patients undergoing treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI). This study aimed to investigate the specific types of AEs linked to renal impairment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving FTD/TPI, using real-world data. Among the patients included in the REGOTAS study (a retrospective study of FTD/TPI versus regorafenib), those treated with FTD/TPI were evaluated. Creatinine clearance values of  90 mL/min were defined as severe, moderate, mild renal impairment, and normal renal function, respectively. Renal impairment was analyzed as a risk factor for grade 3 or higher AEs using a logistic regression model. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) based on renal impairment were evaluated. A total of 309 patients were included in the analysis, with 124, 130, and 55 patients divided into the normal, mild, and moderate-to-severe groups, respectively. The risk of grade 3 or higher neutropenia was significantly higher in the moderate-to-severe group (odds ratio 3.47; 95% confidence interval 1.45–8.30; P = 0.005), but there was no significant increase in the risk of non-hematologic AEs in any of the groups. The OS and PFS of patients in the mild and moderate-to-severe groups were comparable to those in the normal group. Patients with mCRC and moderate/severe renal impairment receiving FTD/TPI therapy may develop severe neutropenia; however, FTD/TPI remains a viable treatment option due to its clinical benefit

Phase I dose‐escalation study of capmatinib ( INC

Capmatinib is a highly specific, potent and selective MET inhibitor. This was an open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation, phase I study conducted in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (not selected based on their MET status). Primary objective was to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or highest studied dose being safe. Secondary objectives included safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary anti-tumor activity. Dose-escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model dependent on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1. Forty-four adult Japanese patients with confirmed advanced solid tumors were enrolled; 29 patients received capmatinib capsules (doses ranging from 100 mg once daily [qd] to 600 mg twice daily [bid]), and 15 patients received tablets (200 mg bid and 400 mg bid). DLTs occurred in 2 patients: grade 2 suicidal ideation (600 mg bid capsule) and grade 3 depression (400 mg bid tablet). MTD was not reached. The highest studied dose determined to be safe in tablets was 400 mg bid, while it was not yet determined with capsules. Most common adverse events suspected to be drug related were blood creatinine increased, nausea, decreased appetite, vomiting, and diarrhea. Following repeated daily dosing up to day 15 by qd or bid regimen using capsules, median Tmax ranged from 1.0 to 4.0 hours, while absorption was more rapid after dosing using tablet, with median Tmax of 1.0 hour on both day 1 and day 15. Eight patients had a best overall response of stable disease. These data support further clinical development of capmatinib. (Trial registration no. NCT01546428

Phase I dose-escalation study of capmatinib (INC280) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Capmatinib is a highly specific, potent and selective MET inhibitor. This was an open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation, phase I study conducted in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (not selected based on their MET status). Primary objective was to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or highest studied dose being safe. Secondary objectives included safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary anti-tumor activity. Dose-escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model dependent on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1. Forty-four adult Japanese patients with confirmed advanced solid tumors were enrolled; 29 patients received capmatinib capsules (doses ranging from 100 mg once daily [qd] to 600 mg twice daily [bid]), and 15 patients received tablets (200 mg bid and 400 mg bid). DLTs occurred in 2 patients: grade 2 suicidal ideation (600 mg bid capsule) and grade 3 depression (400 mg bid tablet). MTD was not reached. The highest studied dose determined to be safe in tablets was 400 mg bid, while it was not yet determined with capsules. Most common adverse events suspected to be drug related were blood creatinine increased, nausea, decreased appetite, vomiting, and diarrhea. Following repeated daily dosing up to day 15 by qd or bid regimen using capsules, median Tmax ranged from 1.0 to 4.0 hours, while absorption was more rapid after dosing using tablet, with median Tmax of 1.0 hour on both day 1 and day 15. Eight patients had a best overall response of stable disease. These data support further clinical development of capmatinib. (Trial registration no. NCT01546428

An Investigator-Initiated Phase 2 Study of Nivolumab Plus Low-Dose Ipilimumab as First-Line Therapy for Microsatellite Instability—High Advanced Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer (NO LIMIT, WJOG13320G/CA209-7W7)

Nivolumab (NIVO) plus low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) has shown a promising survival benefit in first-line treatment of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer. We hypothesized that this regimen might also be beneficial for MSI-H gastric cancer (GC), which accounts for ~5% of all GC cases. NO LIMIT (WJOG13320G/CA209-7W7) is an investigator-initiated, single-arm, open-label, 14-center phase 2 trial of NIVO plus low-dose IPI for MSI-H GC in the first-line setting. Eligibility criteria include unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma; confirmed MSI-H status with the MSI-IVD Kit (FALCO); no prior systemic anticancer therapy; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; and a measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1. The primary objective of the study is to determine the overall response rate (ORR) for the NIVO+IPI regimen as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points include progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, safety, tolerability, and biomarkers. The number of patients was set at 28 on the basis of the threshold and expected ORR values of 35 and 65%, respectively, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.025 and power of 0.80. Subjects will receive treatment with nivolumab (240 mg) biweekly in combination with ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) every 6 weeks. The results of this study should clarify the therapeutic potential of NIVO+IPI for MSI-H GC in the first-line setting. Trial registration: JapicCTI-205400

A phase II multicenter trial assessing the efficacy and safety of first-line S-1 + ramucirumab in elderly patients with advanced/recurrent gastric cancer: KSCC1701

Background: The mainstream first-line chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer (ARGC) is combination therapy including platinum-based agents. With the progressive aging of the society, the incidence of gastric cancer in elderly patients is increasing. However, elderly patients cannot tolerate these agents because of renal dysfunction or low quality of life. The KSCC1701 study explored the efficacy and safety of S1 þ ramucirumab in elderly patients with ARGC. Patients and methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients aged 70 years with ARGC were eligible. Patients received S-1 (40e60 mg twice daily for 4 weeks in 6-week cycles) and ramucirumab (8 mg/kg every 2 weeks) until disease progression. The primary end-point was the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate. The anticipated lower threshold of 1-year survival was set at 40% in light of previous S-1ebased regimens. The secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), OS, the overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: Between September 2017 and November 2019, 48 patients (34 men and 14 women) were enrolled in this study. The median patient age was 77.5 years, and all patients had a performance status of 0 (n Z 20) or 1 (n Z 28). The 1-year OS rate was 65.2%, which met the primary end-point. The median survival time and median PFS were 16.4 and 5.8 months, respectively. The ORR was 41.9%. The most frequent grade 3/4 (15%) adverse events were neutropenia, anorexia and anaemia. Conclusion: Considering these findings, S-1 þ ramucirumab appears to be an excellent treatment option for elderly patients with ARGC. (250 words). This trial has been registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Registry under the number jRCTs071180066.European Journal of Cancer, 166, pp.279-286; 202