101 research outputs found

    The mechanism of impact of summative assessment on medical students’ learning

    Get PDF
    It has become axiomatic that assessment impacts powerfully on student learning, but there is a surprising dearth of research on how. This study explored the mechanism of impact of summative assessment on the process of learning of theory in higher education. Individual, in-depth interviews were conducted with medical students and analyzed qualitatively. The impact of assessment on learning was mediated through various determinants of action. Respondents’ learning behaviour was influenced by: appraising the impact of assessment; appraising their learning response; their perceptions of agency; and contextual factors. This study adds to scant extant evidence and proposes a mechanism to explain this impact. It should help enhance the use of assessment as a tool to augment learning

    Exploring Relationships Among Belief in Genetic Determinism, Genetics Knowledge, and Social Factors

    Get PDF

    Relations among Tasks Assessing Young Children's Number Concepts

    No full text

    Enhancing the Learning Achievements and Attitudes of Taiwan Vocational School Students in Accounting with the Dynamic Assessment System

    No full text
    [[abstract]]We investigate how the computerized dynamic assessment system improves the learning achievements of vocational high school students studying accounting. Our experiment was conducted under the one-group pretest-posttest design of 34 junior students. The questionnaire results were analyzed to determine student-learning attitudes and reactions toward "self-knowledge of accounting," "dynamic assessment system design," "dynamic assessment system learning effects," and "user satisfaction." The results show that the continuous assessments designed for the accounting course using error identification, feedback, and guidance greatly assist in building student-learning concepts. However, certain students are either unfamiliar with using computers or refuse guided instructions for learning, which leads to little performance improvement. Nearly 85.3% of the participants consider that this system is worth recommending.[[notice]]èŁœæ­ŁćźŒç•ą[[journaltype]]ćœ‹ć€–[[incitationindex]]SSCI[[ispeerreviewed]]Y[[booktype]]é›»ć­ç‰ˆ[[booktype]]çŽ™æœŹ[[countrycodes]]US
    • 

    corecore