40 research outputs found

    Migrants, State Responsibilities, and Human Dignity

    Get PDF
    This article addresses two questions: First, how does the value of human dignity distinctively bear on a state’s responsibilities in relation to migrants; and, secondly, how serious a wrong is it when a state fails to respect the dignity of migrants? In response to these questions, a view is presented about the distinction between wrongs that violate cosmopolitan standards and wrongs that violate the standards that are distinctive to a particular community; about when and how the contested concept of human dignity might be engaged; and, elaborating a three-tiered and lexically ordered scheme of state responsibilities, about how we should assess the seriousness of a state’s failure to respect the dignity of migrants

    Observ-Europe-Agence. Supplément économique et financier...

    Full text link
    Etat de collection : 28 mars-25 avr. 1934 ; mq 11 avr

    Methodologie des campagnes de mesures: annexe A4

    Full text link
    CNRS RP 400 (719) / INIST-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et TechniqueSIGLEFRFranc

    Methodologie des campagnes de mesures

    Full text link
    CNRS RP 400 (720) / INIST-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et TechniqueSIGLEFRFranc

    Perspectives futures de la geothermie non traditionnelle en France

    Full text link
    SIGLEINIST RP 400 (1375) / INIST-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et TechniqueFRFranc

    Perspectives futures de la geothermie non traditionnelle en France

    Full text link
    SIGLEAvailable at INIST (FR), Document Supply Service, under shelf-number : RP 400 (1375) / INIST-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et TechniqueFRFranc

    The limits of the European Union's normative myth in Armenia and Georgia

    Full text link
    This chapter seeks to identify several endogenous and exogenous factors that hampered the EU’s democracy promotion in Georgia and Armenia between September 2013 and December 2015. Georgia and Armenia have reacted differently to the EU’s intended norm diffusion. While Georgia adopted some of the EU’s reforms for the price of future integration with the EU, Armenia chose to align with Russia, which was exemplified by its accession to the Eurasian Union. These divergent integrative approaches demonstrate that the effect of the EU’s normative power is challenged by several factors
    corecore