Rural Australian community pharmacists' views on complementary and alternative medicine: a pilot study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) are being used increasingly across the world. In Australia, community pharmacists are a major supplier of these products but knowledge of the products and interactions with other medicines is poor. Information regarding the use of CAMs by metropolitan pharmacists has been documented by the National Prescribing Service (NPS) in Australia but the views of rural/regional community pharmacists have not been explored. The aim of this pilot study was to explore the knowledge, attitudes and information seeking of a cohort of rural community pharmacists towards CAMs and to compare the findings to the larger NPS study.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross sectional self-administered postal questionnaire was mailed to all community pharmacists in one rural/regional area of Australia. Using a range of scales, data was collected regarding attitudes, knowledge, information seeking behaviour and demographics.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Eighty eligible questionnaires were returned. Most pharmacists reported knowing that they should regularly ask consumers if they are using CAMs but many lacked the confidence to do so. Pharmacists surveyed for this study were more knowledgeable in regards to side effects and interactions of CAMs than those in the NPS survey. Over three quarters of pharmacists surveyed reported sourcing CAM information at least several times a month. The most frequently sought information was drug interactions, dose, contraindications and adverse effects. A variety of resources were used to source information, the most popular source was the internet but the most useful resource was CAM text books.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Pharmacists have varied opinions on the use of CAMs and many lack awareness of or access to good quality CAMs information. Therefore, there is a need to provide pharmacists with opportunities for further education. The data is valuable in assisting interested stakeholders with the development of initiatives to address the gaps in attitudes, knowledge and to improve effectiveness of information seeking behaviour.</p

Amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity

AIMS. A number of factors have been hypothesized to increase the risk of amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity (AIPT). This study aimed to confirm these risk factors and determine whether a cohort of tertiary hospital patients diagnosed with AIPT demonstrated comparable characteristics. METHODS. Phase I of this study involved compilation of a database of adverse reactions to amiodarone reported to the Australian and US drug agencies, and identification of risk factors for AIPT using logistic regression analysis. In Phase II, AIPT cases were identified via a retrospective review of medical records of patients discharged from Fremantle Hospital and Health Service,Western Australia (FHHS) between 2000 and 2005 with diagnosed interstitial lung disease. Data were collected regarding these patients’ risk factors for AIPT and compared with those previously identified in Phase I. RESULTS. A total of 237 cases of AIPT were identified from agency data. Patients aged > 60 years and those on amiodarone for 6–12 months (odds ratio 18.28, 95% confidence interval 6.42, 52.04) were determined to be at the highest risk of AIPT. Australian data also suggested increased risk in patients who had received cumulative doses of 101–150 g. The seven AIPT cases identified among the FHHS patients were all at high risk of AIPT based on their age and duration of amiodarone therapy. CONCLUSION. Contrary to previous findings, only patient age and the duration of amiodarone therapy were confirmed as significant risk factors for AIPT. Targeted monitoring of these patients may facilitate early identification and management of AIPT