Internal Supply-chain Competition In Remanufacturing: Operations Strategies, Performance And Environmental Effects

This paper investigates the competitive and environmental effects of different operations strategies of original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and semi-independent remanufacturers, which simultaneously cooperate and compete in different stages of a closed-loop supply chain. In particular, a co-opetitive situation, in which remanufacturing is undertaken only by retailers while the OEMs' role is restricted to recycling is considered. After adopting a resource-based perspective of competition, investigations are accomplished using system dynamics simulation modelling. The results of simulations indicate that, in the long run, OEMs, regardless of the operation strategy they adopt, are unable to (re)capture the market gained by the remanufacturers. However, some of these strategies contribute to the improvement of the environmental performance of the entire supply chain

Critical realism in supply chain research: Understanding the dynamics of a seasonal goods supply chain

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how a critical realist paradigmatic stance and its associated research methodology can contribute to supply‐chain research by providing explanations for specific supply‐chain‐ and logistics‐related dynamic phenomena. / Design/methodology/approach – Initially, the case for a critical realist research paradigm is made, and then a retroductive pluralistic research methodology is used for demonstrating its application. Starting from an observation in the distribution part of a seasonal goods supply chain, ethnographic‐like field research suggested deeper social structures as being responsible for the events observed. The operation of event‐generating mechanisms related to these structures was matched to existing behavioural theories using dynamic modelling and simulation. / Findings – The adoption of the critical realist perspective and its pluralistic research methodology can bring into surface the root causes of, and explain, complex supply chain phenomena. In the particular case presented, it provided an explanation for the inventories observed in a supply chain of perishable seasonal goods as results of two underlying interacting mechanisms: one related to the promotions bias of the manufacturer, and one related to the risk management attitude of resellers. / Research limitations/implications – As far as underpinning philosophy and research methodology are concerned, the research presented is globally significant and valid. Nevertheless, any supply‐chain management policies derived in the demonstrative case as results of the explanation may be significant only to specific industries and geo‐historical contexts. / Practical implications – Results obtained by employing the critical realist perspective may be used in managers' education for developing intellectual frameworks to better understand the causes of complex supply chain phenomena. Of the same importance to practitioners is the methodology and inference process used for explaining real abnormal situations and intervening accordingly. / Originality/value – The paper shows how a critical realist perspective and its associated methodology can be used for extracting/researching deeper mechanisms responsible for observed behaviours in supply chains. Such an approach is in the opposite direction with respect to the hypothetico‐deductive approaches that dominate supply chain research. The paper demonstrates the adoption of the critical realist perspective in supply chain research using a real case

Collaborating for Innovation: the socialised management of knowledge

Although the importance of diverse knowledge is widely recognised for open innovation, there may be a gap in our understanding of the social processes that shape how collaborators engage in knowledge exchange. This social gap may be significant because of the powerful, but largely unexplained, role attributed to trust as a social artefact. Moreover, we see trust as a process and that different types of trust are involved in the collaborative process. Thus, this paper uses a qualitative methodology to capture the experiences of innovation collaborators. As explanation of the dynamic interplays of knowledge and trust, we offer a description of phases in the process. Our analysis finds that the relationship moves from transactional to social. The early phases are characterised by technical knowledge, but the later and mature phases are identified with knowledge of the person and by personal trust. The success of innovation is a result of relationships with augmented trust. We found that a fabric of trust is woven from the weft of professional knowledge and the warp of personal knowledge to support innovation. We propose that this developing of relationships might be conceived as becoming more open in the sense of sharing with one another. If so, we seem to have described and offered a social dimension of open innovation

Simulation based life cycle cost modelling as a decision support tool

This paper summarizes the work that has been carried out as part of the FLAVIIR project, a 5year research program looking at technologies for future unmanned air vehicles. This is a UKEPSRC funded project sponsored by BAE systems. A framework is presented in which a life cyclecost model can be integrated into the design process to facilitate the comparison between differentconfigurations. The architecture to estimate the life cycle cost and the associated models aredescribed. The acquisition costs are estimated using a hierarchical structure and a discretesimulation model is used to estimate the maintenance and operation costs. It is then demonstratedhow the framework can be used to evaluate the cost penalty of different design concepts