Sacroiliac joint involvement in osteochondromatosis: identifying its prevalence and characteristics from cross-sectional imaging

PURPOSEApart from a few case reports, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) involvement in osteochondromatosis has not been studied. We aimed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of such involvement using cross-sectional imaging.METHODSIn this retrospective study, three observers (one junior radiologist and two musculoskeletal radiologists) independently reviewed computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients in our database who had osteochondromatosis (≥2 osteochondromas across the skeleton) for SIJ involvement. The final decision was reached by the consensus of the two musculoskeletal radiologists in a later joint session.RESULTSOf the 36 patients with osteochondromatosis in our database, 22 (61%) had cross-sectional imaging covering SIJs (14 females, 8 males; age range 7–66 years; mean age 23 years; 13 MRI, 9 CT). Of these, 16 (73%) had intra-articular osteochondromas. For identifying SIJ osteochondromas on cross-sectional imaging, interobserver agreement was substantial [κ = 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34, 1.00] between the musculoskeletal radiologists and moderate (κ = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.94) between the junior radiologist and the final consensus decision of the two musculoskeletal radiologists. In the cohort with cross-sectional imaging, the anatomical variations of the accessory SIJ (n = 6, 27%) and iliosacral complex (n = 2, 9%) were identified in six different patients with (n = 2) and without (n = 4) sacroiliac osteochondromas.CONCLUSIONCross-sectional imaging shows frequent (73%) SIJ involvement in osteochondromatosis, which, although a rare disorder, nevertheless needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis of such SIJ anatomical variants as the accessory SIJ and iliosacral complex. Differentiating these variants from osteochondromas is challenging in patients with osteochondromatosis

Mild encephalitis/encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion in children

PURPOSE:We aimed to present clinical and radiologic characteristics of mild encephalitis/encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion (MERS) in children.METHODS:Eight children (5 boys and 3 girls; median age, 5.9 years; age range, 8 months to 14.1 years) diagnosed with MERS between September 2015 and June 2017 were included in the study. We reviewed the patient’s data, including demographic characteristics, prodromal and neurologic symptoms, neurologic examination, magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography findings, laboratory findings, treatment, and prognosis.RESULTS:Prodromal symptoms were nausea and vomiting (n=6), diarrhea (n=6), and fever (n=3). Initial neurologic symptoms were seizures (n=4), delirious behavior (n=1), drowsiness (n=1), ataxia (n=1), transient blindness (n=2), abnormal speech (n=2), and headache (n=1). Two patients had a suspected infective agent: urinary tract infection caused by Escherichia coli and gastroenteritis caused by rotavirus. Seven patients had type I lesions, comprising characteristic symmetric ovoid (n=6) and band-shaped (n=1) T2-weighted hyperintense lesions at the spenium of corpus callosum, and one patient had type II lesion with additional symmetric posterior periventricular lesions. The lesions were isointense to mildly hypointense on T1-weighted imaging and did not show enhancement. All lesions displayed restricted diffusion. In all patients, neurologic symptoms completely normalized <48 hours from the onset of symptoms without any sequelae.CONCLUSION:MERS has characteristic imaging features and favorable outcome