Rationale and design of the PRAETORIAN-COVID trial:A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial with valsartan for PRevention of Acute rEspiraTORy dIstress syndrome in hospitAlized patieNts with SARS-COV-2 Infection Disease

There is much debate on the use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)–infected patients. Although it has been suggested that ARBs might lead to a higher susceptibility and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, experimental data suggest that ARBs may reduce acute lung injury via blocking angiotensin-II–mediated pulmonary permeability, inflammation, and fibrosis. However, despite these hypotheses, specific studies on ARBs in SARS-CoV-2 patients are lacking. Methods: The PRAETORIAN-COVID trial is a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled 1:1 randomized clinical trial in adult hospitalized SARS-CoV-2–infected patients (n = 651). The primary aim is to investigate the effect of the ARB valsartan compared to placebo on the composite end point of admission to an intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, or death within 14 days of randomization. The active-treatment arm will receive valsartan in a dosage titrated to blood pressure up to a maximum of 160 mg bid, and the placebo arm will receive matching placebo. Treatment duration will be 14 days, or until the occurrence of the primary end point or until hospital discharge, if either of these occurs within 14 days. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04335786, 2020). The PRAETORIAN-COVID trial is a double-blind, placebo-controlled 1:1 randomized trial to assess the effect of valsartan compared to placebo on the occurrence of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and death in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2–infected patients. The results of this study might impact the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 patients globally

Implementation of the ESC 0 h/1h algorithm and the HEART score in the emergency department: A prospective cohort study

Background: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0 h/1h algorithm is the preferred diagnostic strategy for chest pain patients in the emergency department (ED). It is suggested that adding clinical information to the algorithm improves its diagnostic performance. This study evaluates implementation of the ESC 0 h/1h algorithm in the ED and investigates the potential advantages of combining it with a clinical decision rule, which might be especially relevant in the heterogenous observation category. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, chest pain patients in whom the ESC 0 h/1h algorithm was applied were enrolled. HEART score components were collected. Diagnostic characteristics were determined for the algorithm with and without addition of the HEART score. Primary endpoint was a composite endpoint at 30-day follow-up, consisting of myocardial infarction and death. Results: A total of 668 patients were enrolled. The rule-in and rule-out categories consisted of 8.2% and 54.9% of the patients, respectively. Positive predictive value and specificity of the rule-in category were 67.3% and 97.1%, respectively. Negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity of the rule-out category were both 100%. In the observation category, a HEART score ≤ 3 yielded a NPV and sensitivity of 97.1% and 93.8%, respectively. Conclusion: The ESC 0 h/1h algorithm yielded a NPV and sensitivity of 100% for myocardial infarction and death at 30-day follow-up. Addition of the HEART score did not provide clinically relevant advantages. Although the HEART score can be used to guide diagnostic testing in the observation category, a low HEART score did not yield an NPV of > 99%