The cost of Corporate Social Responsibility: the case of the Community Reinvestment Act

A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) cost minimization model is employed to estimate the cost to thrift institutions of achieving a rating of ‘outstanding’ under the anti-redlining Community Reinvestment Act, which is viewed as an act of voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). There is no difference in overall cost efficiency between ‘outstanding’ and minimally compliant ‘satisfactory’ thrifts. However, the sources of cost inefficiency do differ, and an ‘outstanding’ rating involves annual extra cost of $6.547 million or, 1.2% of total costs. This added cost is the shadow price of CSR since it is not an explicit output or input in the DEA cost model. Before and after-tax rates of return are the same for the ‘outstanding’ and ‘satisfactory’ thrifts, which implies a recoupment of the extra cost. The findings are consistent with CSR as a management choice based on balancing marginal cost and marginal revenue. An incidental finding is that larger thrifts are less efficient. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006Corporate Social Responsibility, Community Reinvestment Act, Data Envelopment Analysis, Cost efficiency, M14, G28, D21,

How Much Do Banks Use Credit Derivatives to Hedge Loans?

Credit derivatives, Hedge, Loans, Banks,

New Evidence on the Determinants of Bank Risk

Commercial banks, risk, transparency, volatility,

The Informational Efficiency of the Equity Market As Compared to the Syndicated Bank Loan Market

Informational efficiency, Market integration, Granger causality, Syndicated bank loans, Equity, G14,