Epidemiological and clinical features, response to HAART, and survival in HIV-infected patients diagnosed at the age of 50 or more

BACKGROUND: Over the last years, the mean age of subjects with HIV infection and AIDS is increasing. Moreover, some epidemiological and clinical differences between younger and older HIV-infected individuals have been observed. However, since introduction of HAART therapy, there are controversial results regarding their response to HAART. The aim of the present study is to evaluate epidemiological and clinical features, response to HAART, and survival in elderly HIV-infected patients with regard to younger HIV-infected patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study (1998–2003) was performed on patients from Sabadell Hospital, in Northeast of Spain. The cohort includes newly attended HIV-infected patients since January 1, 1998. For the purpose of this analysis, data was censured at December 31, 2003. Taking into account age at time of diagnosis, it was considered 36 HIV-positive people aged 50 years or more (Group 1, G1) and 419 HIV-positive people aged 13–40 years (Group 2, G2). Epidemiological, clinical, biological and therapy data are recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared test and Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kaplan-Meier, Log Rank test, and Two-Way ANOVA from random factors. RESULTS: G1 showed higher proportion of men than G2. The most common risk factors in G1 were heterosexual transmission (P = 0.01) and having sex with men or women (P < 0.001). G1 and G2 show parallel profiles through the time regarding immunological response (P = 0.989) and virological response (P = 0.074). However, older people showed lower CD4 cell counts at first clinic visit (P < 0.001) and, eventually, they did not achieve the same counts as G2. G1 presented faster progression to AIDS (P < 0.001) and shorter survival (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Older patients have different epidemiological features. Their immunological and virological responses are good. However, older patients do not achieve the same CD4 cell counts likely due to they have lower counts at first clinic visit. Thus, it is essential physicians know older HIV-infected patients features to consider the possibility of HIV infection in these patients with the aim of treatment would not be delayed

Disparities in HIV Treatment and Physician Attitudes About Delaying Protease Inhibitors for Nonadherent Patients

BACKGROUND: Current HIV treatment guidelines recommend delaying antiretroviral therapy for nonadherent patients, which some fear may disproportionately affect certain populations and contribute to disparities in care. OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship of physician's attitude toward prescribing protease inhibitors (PIs) to nonadherent patients with disparities in PI use and with health outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A national probability sample of HIV-infected adults in the United States and their health care providers was surveyed between January 1996 and January 1998. We analyzed data on 1,717 patients eligible for PI treatment and the 367 providers who cared for them. MEASUREMENTS: Providers’ attitude toward prescribing PIs to nonadherent patients, time until patients’ first receipt of PIs, mortality, and physical health status. MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of providers agreed that patient adherence is important in their decision to prescribe PIs (Selective) while 11% disagreed (Nonselective). Patients who had a Selective provider received PIs later than those with a Nonselective provider (P = .05). Adjusting for patient demographics and health characteristics and provider demographics, HIV knowledge, and experience, Latinos, women, and poor patients received PIs later if their provider had a Selective attitude but as soon as others if their provider had a Nonselective attitude. African-American patients received PIs later than whites, irrespective of their providers’ prescribing attitude. Patients with Selective providers had similar odds of mortality than those with Nonselective providers (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.6 to 2.0), but had slightly worse adjusted physical health status at follow-up (49.1 vs 50.4, respectively; P = .04), after controlling for baseline physical health status and other patient and provider covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Most providers consider patient adherence an important factor in their decision to prescribe PIs. This attitude appears to account for the relatively later use of PI treatment among Latinos, women, and the poor. Given the rising HIV infection rates among minorities, women, and the poor, further investigation of this treatment strategy and its impact on HIV resistance and outcomes is warranted