Hair analysis for detection of triptans occasionally used or overused by migraine patients-a pilot study

Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the detection rate of almotriptan, eletriptan, frovatriptan, sumatriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan in the hair of migraineurs taking these drugs; the degree of agreement between type of self-reported triptan and triptan found in hair; if the concentrations in hair were related to the reported cumulative doses of triptans; and whether hair analysis was able to distinguish occasional use from the overuse of these drugs. Methods Out of 300 headache patients consecutively enrolled, we included 147 migraine patients who reported to have taken at least one dose of one triptan in the previous 3 months; 51 % of the patients overused triptans. A detailed pharmacological history and a sample of hair were collected for each patient. Hair samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) by a method that we developed. Results All the triptans could be detected in the hair of the patients. The agreement between type of self-reported triptan and type of triptan found in hair was from fair to good for frovatriptan and zolmitriptan and excellent for almotriptan, eletriptan, sumatriptan, and rizatriptan (P < 0.01, Cohen’s kappa). The correlation between the reported quantities of triptan and hair concentrations was statistically significant for almotriptan, eletriptan, rizatriptan, and sumatriptan (P < 0.01, Spearman’ s rank correlation coefficient). The accuracy of hair analysis in distinguishing occasionally users from overusers was high for almotriptan (ROC AUC = 0.9092), eletriptan (ROC AUC = 0.8721), rizatriptan (ROC AUC = 0.9724), and sumatriptan (ROC AUC = 0.9583). Conclusions Hair analysis can be a valuable system to discriminate occasional use from triptan overuse

Chronic Migraine: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Treatment

Chronic migraine is a debilitating primary headache disorder associated with high personal, familial, and social impact. The diagnosis is made when there are at least 15 headache days monthly including 8 migraine days per month for at least 3 months. The prevalence is 1.4–2.2% in the population. Among individuals diagnosed with chronic migraine, there may be significant variability in headache days with a potential to remit, remain unchanged, or progress to even greater disability. Most chronic migraine progresses from episodic migraine, with several identified risk factors for chronic migraine and migraine progression. The exact mechanism of chronic migraine is unknown but is associated with an increased cortical excitability, central sensitization, alternations in nociceptive signaling, as well as physiological, structural, and functional brain changes. There is evidence for both nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatment options to restore function. The best currently established pharmacologic evidence for the treatment of chronic migraine is onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate. Behavioral treatments may improve headache symptoms and comorbidities. Emerging data shows potential benefit for neurostimulation, and large well-designed studies are needed. Multicenter randomized placebo-controlled studies of monoclonal antibodies to the calcitonin gene-related peptide, or its receptor, have demonstrated efficacy, tolerability, and safety. Biomarkers are needed to guide prognosis, treatment response, and clinical trials. The concept and management of refractory chronic migraine is discussed, and clinically meaningful endpoints are reviewed