Monkeys and Humans Share a Common Computation for Face/Voice Integration

Speech production involves the movement of the mouth and other regions of the face resulting in visual motion cues. These visual cues enhance intelligibility and detection of auditory speech. As such, face-to-face speech is fundamentally a multisensory phenomenon. If speech is fundamentally multisensory, it should be reflected in the evolution of vocal communication: similar behavioral effects should be observed in other primates. Old World monkeys share with humans vocal production biomechanics and communicate face-to-face with vocalizations. It is unknown, however, if they, too, combine faces and voices to enhance their perception of vocalizations. We show that they do: monkeys combine faces and voices in noisy environments to enhance their detection of vocalizations. Their behavior parallels that of humans performing an identical task. We explored what common computational mechanism(s) could explain the pattern of results we observed across species. Standard explanations or models such as the principle of inverse effectiveness and a “race” model failed to account for their behavior patterns. Conversely, a “superposition model”, positing the linear summation of activity patterns in response to visual and auditory components of vocalizations, served as a straightforward but powerful explanatory mechanism for the observed behaviors in both species. As such, it represents a putative homologous mechanism for integrating faces and voices across primates

Acute Mitochondrial Actions of Glitazones on the Liver: a Crucial Parameter for their Antidiabetic Properties

Background/aims: Glitazones are synthetic insulin-sensitizing drugs which act as agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). However, TZDs action does not exclude independent PPARγ-activation effects. Remarkably, direct mitochondrial action of these agents has not been fully studied yet. Methods: Oxygen consumption rates (JO 2 ) were measured using a Clark-type oxygen electrode in intact hepatocytes and isolated liver mitochondria. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was quantified by fluorescence assay. Moreover, activities of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I, II and III were spectrometrically determined. Results: Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone inhibited JO 2 in liver cells and mitochondria. This inhibition affected the state 3 of respiration (in the presence of ADP) and the uncoupled state (after addition of dinitrophenol). Moreover, these agents dramatically reduced mitochondrial ROS production in all situations tested. We also demonstrated that both glitazones specifically inhibited the activities of complex I and complex III, by 50% and 35% respectively. Additionally, they do not modify neither the oxidative phosphorylation yield nor the permeability transition pore opening. Conclusions: Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone reduce both respiration intensity and ROS production, acutely and by a probable PPARγ-independent way, through inhibition of complex I and III activities. This new finding could positively contribute to their anti-diabetic properties. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel