A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats [ISRCTN40455708

BACKGROUND: Medical education is increasingly being conducted in community-based teaching sites at diverse locations, making it difficult to provide a consistent curriculum. We conducted a randomized trial to assess whether students who viewed digital lectures would perform as well on a measure of cognitive knowledge as students who viewed live lectures. Students' perceptions of the digital lecture format and their opinion as whether a digital lecture format could serve as an adequate replacement for live lectures was also assessed. METHODS: Students were randomized to either attend a lecture series at our main campus or view digital versions of the same lectures at community-based teaching sites. Both groups completed the same examination based on the lectures, and the group viewing the digital lectures completed a feedback form on the digital format. RESULTS: There were no differences in performance as measured by means or average rank. Despite technical problems, the students who viewed the digital lectures overwhelmingly felt the digital lectures could replace live lectures. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence digital lectures can be a viable alternative to live lectures as a means of delivering didactic presentations in a community-based setting

How to improve medical education website design

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Internet provides a means of disseminating medical education curricula, allowing institutions to share educational resources. Much of what is published online is poorly planned, does not meet learners' needs, or is out of date.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Applying principles of curriculum development, adult learning theory and educational website design may result in improved online educational resources. Key steps in developing and implementing an education website include: 1) Follow established principles of curriculum development; 2) Perform a needs assessment and repeat the needs assessment regularly after curriculum implementation; 3) Include in the needs assessment targeted learners, educators, institutions, and society; 4) Use principles of adult learning and behavioral theory when developing content and website function; 5) Design the website and curriculum to demonstrate educational effectiveness at an individual and programmatic level; 6) Include a mechanism for sustaining website operations and updating content over a long period of time.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>Interactive, online education programs are effective for medical training, but require planning, implementation, and maintenance that follow established principles of curriculum development, adult learning, and behavioral theory.</p

The Structure and Content of the Medical Subinternship: A National Survey

OBJECTIVE: To describe the educational and administrative structure and content of internal medicine subinternship (SI) programs at medical schools throughout the United States. DESIGN: A cross-sectional mailed survey of internal medicine SI directors at U.S. medical schools. MAIN RESULTS: Responses were received from 100 (80%) of 125 eligible programs. Seventy-five percent of schools require a SI for graduation; 26% of these schools require the completion of a medical SI. Nationally, about 75% of all medical students opt to complete a medical SI. Dedicated SI administrative committees exist at 46% of medical schools. A minority of programs provide students with explicit curricula (31%) or exclusive conference time (36%). In 44% of programs, subinterns are used by hospital departments of medicine as intern substitutes. Subinterns are responsible for sign-out and cross-coverage in about half of the programs, and all patient orders entered by subinterns require cosignature. Subintern evaluation criteria include attending evaluation (100%), resident evaluation (80%), case write-ups (27%), supervised clinical examination (20%), written examination (14%), and oral examination (3%). CONCLUSION: Although most medical schools offer an SI in internal medicine and many require it, the experience often lacks clearly defined curricular goals and often does not provide medical students with house-staff–level responsibilities. In an effort to ease the transition from undergraduate to postgraduate training, further studies are needed to define which educational and structural components of the medicine SI should be developed and emphasized

Evaluation of a National Curriculum Reform Effort for the Medicine Core Clerkship

BACKGROUND: In 1995, the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) and the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM) developed and disseminated a new model curriculum for the medicine core clerkship that was designed to enhance learning of generalist competencies and increase interest in general internal medicine. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dissemination and use of the resulting SGIM/CDIM Core Medicine Clerkship Curriculum Guide. DESIGN: Survey of internal medicine clerkship directors at the 125 medical schools in the United States. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The questionnaire elicited information about the use and usefulness of the Guide and each of its components, barriers to effective use of the Guide, and outcomes associated with use of the Guide. Responses were received from 95 clerkship directors, representing 88 (70%) of the 125 medical schools. Eighty-seven (92%) of the 95 respondents were familiar with the Guide, and 80 respondents had used it. The 4 components used most frequently were the basic generalist competencies (used by 83% of those familiar with the Guide), learning objectives for these competencies (used by 83%), learning objectives for training problems (used by 70%), and specific training problems (used by 67%); 74% to 85% of those using these components found them moderately or very useful. The most frequently identified barriers to use of the Guide were insufficient faculty time, insufficient number of ambulatory care preceptors and training sites, and need for more faculty development. About 30% or more of those familiar with the Guide reported that use of the Guide was associated with improved ability to meet clerkship accreditation criteria, improved performance of students on the clerkship exam, and increased clerkship time devoted to ambulatory care. CONCLUSION: This federally supported initiative that engaged the collaborative efforts of the SGIM and the CDIM was successful in facilitating significant changes in the medicine core clerkship across the United States