Parps: Rapidly Evolving Weapons in the War against Viral Infection

Post-translational protein modifications such as phosphorylation and ubiquitinylation are common molecular targets of conflict between viruses and their hosts. However, the role of other post-translational modifications, such as ADP-ribosylation, in host-virus interactions is less well characterized. ADP-ribosylation is carried out by proteins encoded by the PARP (also called ARTD) gene family. The majority of the 17 human PARP genes are poorly characterized. However, one PARP protein, PARP13/ZAP, has broad antiviral activity and has evolved under positive (diversifying) selection in primates. Such evolution is typical of domains that are locked in antagonistic 'arms races' with viral factors. To identify additional PARP genes that may be involved in host-virus interactions, we performed evolutionary analyses on all primate PARP genes to search for signatures of rapid evolution. Contrary to expectations that most PARP genes are involved in 'housekeeping' functions, we found that nearly one-third of PARP genes are evolving under strong recurrent positive selection. We identified a >300 amino acid disordered region of PARP4, a component of cytoplasmic vault structures, to be rapidly evolving in several mammalian lineages, suggesting this region serves as an important host-pathogen specificity interface. We also found positive selection of PARP9, 14 and 15, the only three human genes that contain both PARP domains and macrodomains. Macrodomains uniquely recognize, and in some cases can reverse, protein mono-ADP-ribosylation, and we observed strong signatures of recurrent positive selection throughout the macro-PARP macrodomains. Furthermore, PARP14 and PARP15 have undergone repeated rounds of gene birth and loss during vertebrate evolution, consistent with recurrent gene innovation. Together with previous studies that implicated several PARPs in immunity, as well as those that demonstrated a role for virally encoded macrodomains in host immune evasion, our evolutionary analyses suggest that addition, recognition and removal of ADP-ribosylation is a critical, underappreciated currency in host-virus conflicts

Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.

Abstract BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular effects of adding once-weekly treatment with exenatide to usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes are unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes, with or without previous cardiovascular disease, to receive subcutaneous injections of extended-release exenatide at a dose of 2 mg or matching placebo once weekly. The primary composite outcome was the first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. The coprimary hypotheses were that exenatide, administered once weekly, would be noninferior to placebo with respect to safety and superior to placebo with respect to efficacy. RESULTS: In all, 14,752 patients (of whom 10,782 [73.1%] had previous cardiovascular disease) were followed for a median of 3.2 years (interquartile range, 2.2 to 4.4). A primary composite outcome event occurred in 839 of 7356 patients (11.4%; 3.7 events per 100 person-years) in the exenatide group and in 905 of 7396 patients (12.2%; 4.0 events per 100 person-years) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.00), with the intention-to-treat analysis indicating that exenatide, administered once weekly, was noninferior to placebo with respect to safety (P<0.001 for noninferiority) but was not superior to placebo with respect to efficacy (P=0.06 for superiority). The rates of death from cardiovascular causes, fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome, and the incidence of acute pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, medullary thyroid carcinoma, and serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with type 2 diabetes with or without previous cardiovascular disease, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events did not differ significantly between patients who received exenatide and those who received placebo. (Funded by Amylin Pharmaceuticals; EXSCEL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01144338 .)

Assessment of Intracellular Auto-Modification Levels of ARTD10 Using Mono-ADP-Ribose-Specific Macrodomains 2 and 3 of Murine Artd8

Mono-ADP-ribosylation is a posttranslational modification, which is catalyzed in cells by certain members of the ADP-ribosyltransferase diphtheria toxin-like family (ARTD) of ADP-ribosyltransferases (aka PARP enzymes). It involves the transfer of a single residue of ADP-ribose (ADPr) from the cofactor NAD+ onto substrate proteins. Although 12 of the 17 members of the ARTD family have been defined as mono-ARTDs in in vitro assays, relatively little is known about their exact cellular functions. A major challenge is the detection of mono-ADP-ribosylated (MARylated) proteins in cells as no antibodies are available that detect exclusively MARylated proteins. As an alternative to classical antibodies, the MAR-specific binding domains macro2 and macro3 of Artd8 can be utilized alone or in combination, to demonstrate intracellular auto-modification levels of ARTD10 in cells in both co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization experiments. Here we demonstrate that different macrodomain constructs of human ARTD8 and murine Artd8, alone or in combination, exert differences with regard to their interaction with ARTD10 in cells. Precisely, while the macrodomains of murine Artd8 interacted with ARTD10 in cells in a MARylation-dependent manner, the macrodomains of human ARTD8 interacted with ARTD10 independent of its catalytic activity. Moreover, we show that a combination of macro2 and macro3 of murine Artd8 was recruited more efficiently to ARTD10 during co-localization experiments compared to the single domains. Therefore, murine Artd8 macrodomain constructs can serve as a tool to evaluate intracellular ARTD10 auto-modification levels using the described methods, while the human ARTD8 macrodomains are less suited because of ADPr-independent binding to ARTD10. Protocols for co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization experiments are described in detail