Nocturnal enuresis—theoretic background and practical guidelines

Nocturnal polyuria, nocturnal detrusor overactivity and high arousal thresholds are central in the pathogenesis of enuresis. An underlying mechanism on the brainstem level is probably common to these mechanisms. Enuretic children have an increased risk for psychosocial comorbidity. The primary evaluation of the enuretic child is usually straightforward, with no radiology or invasive procedures required, and can be carried out by any adequately educated nurse or physician. The first-line treatment, once the few cases with underlying disorders, such as diabetes, kidney disease or urogenital malformations, have been ruled out, is the enuresis alarm, which has a definite curative potential but requires much work and motivation. For families not able to comply with the alarm, desmopressin should be the treatment of choice. In therapy-resistant cases, occult constipation needs to be ruled out, and then anticholinergic treatment—often combined with desmopressin—can be tried. In situations when all other treatments have failed, imipramine treatment is warranted, provided the cardiac risks are taken into account

Medical outcome after immediate computed tomography or admission for observation in patients with mild head injury: randomised controlled trial

Objective To compare immediate computed tomography during triage for admission with observation in hospital in patients with mild head injury. Design Multicentre, pragmatic, non-inferiority randomised trial. Setting 39 acute hospitals in Sweden. Participants 2602 patients (aged ≥ 6) with mild head injury. Interventions Immediate computed tomography or admission for observation. Main outcome measure Dichotomised extended Glasgow outcome scale (1-7 v 8). The non-inferiority margin was 5 percentage points. Results At three months, 275 patients (21.4%) in the computed tomography group had not recovered completely compared with 300 (24.2%) admitted for observation. The difference was - 2.8 percentage points, non-significantly in favour of computed tomography (95% confidence interval - 6.1% to 0.6%). The worst outcomes (mortality and more severe loss of function) were similar between the groups. In the patients admitted for observation, there was a considerable delay in time to treatment in those who required surgery. None of the patients with normal findings on immediate computed tomography had complications later. Patients' satisfaction with the two strategies was similar. Conclusions The use of computed tomography in the management of patients with mild head injury is feasible and leads to similar clinical outcomes compared with observation in hospital. Trial registration ISRCTN81464462

Immediate computed tomography or admission for observation after mild head injury: cost comparison in randomised controlled trial

Objective To compare the costs of immediate computed tomography during triage for admission with those of observation in hospital in patients with mild head injury. Design Prospective cost effectiveness analysis within a multicentre, pragmatic randomised trial. Setting 39 acute hospitals in Sweden Participants 2602 patients (aged ≥ 6) with mild head injury. Interventions Immediate computed tomography or admission for observation. Main outcome measures Direct and indirect costs related to the mild head injury during the acute and three month follow-up period. Results Outcome after three months was similar for both strategies (non-significantly in favour of computed tomography). For the acute stage and complications, the cost was 461 euros (£314, $582) per patient in the computed tomography group and 677 euros (£462,$854) in the observation group; an average of 32% less in the computed tomography group (216 euros, 95% confidence interval -272 to -164; P < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis showed that computed tomography was the most cost effective strategy under a broad range of assumptions. After three months, total costs were 718 euros and 914 euros per patient—that is, 196 euros less in the computed tomography group (- 281 to - 114; P < 0.001). The lower cost of the computed tomography strategy at the acute stage thus remained unchanged during follow-up. Conclusion Patients with mild head injury attending an emergency department can be managed more cost effectively with computed tomography rather than admission for observation in hospital. Trial registration ISRCTN81464462