Abrupt vessel closure complicating coronary angioplasty: Clinical, angiographic and therapeutic profile

AbstractTo assess the clinical, angiographic and procedural correlates of outcome after abrupt vessel closure during coronary angioplasty, results were analyzed of 109 patients (8.3%) who had abrupt vessel closure during 1,319 consecutive coronary angioplasty procedures performed between July 1, 1988 and June 30, 1990. These 109 patients had a mean age of 59 ± 11 years; 63% were male, 57% had had a prior myocardial infarction and 61% had multivessel disease. Coronary angioplasty was performed in the settings of acute myocardial infarction (14%), recent myocardial infarction (36%), unstable angina (34%) and stable ischemia (29%).Abrupt vessel closure occurred at a median of 27 min (range 0 min to 5 days) from the first balloon inflation. By angiographic criteria, thrombus or coronary dissection was identified in 20% and 28% of cases, respectively; both thrombus and dissection were present in 7% of closures, and 45% were due to indeterminate mechanisms. Successful reversal of abrupt vessel closure, defined as restoration of normal Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow without resultant Q wave myocardial infarction, emergency bypass surgery or death, was achieved in 47 patients (43%). By hierarchal analysis, the incidence of death, emergency coronary bypass surgery, Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction was 8%, 20%, 9% and 11%, respectively.Univariate analysis using 23 clinical, morphologic and procedural variables demonstrated that successful outcome after abrupt closure was associated with prolonged balloon inflations (>120 s) (odds ratio = 6.87, p < 0.001), unstable angina (odds ratio = 2.37, p = 0.034) and placement of an intracoronary stent (odds ratio = 5.33, p = 0.062). By multivariate analysis, independent correlates of successful outcome were prolonged balloon inflations (odds ratio = 5.11, p = 0.001) and intracoronary stenting (odds ratio = 4.37, p = 0.049).Thus, although prolonged balloon inflations and intracoronary stents may improve outcome after abrupt vessel closure, the cumulative risk of morbidity or mortality remains significant and mandates investigation into improved strategies for its prevention and treatment

Abciximab reduces mortality in diabetics following percutaneous coronary intervention

AbstractOBJECTIVESWe sought to determine whether abciximab therapy at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) would favorably affect one-year mortality in patients with diabetes.BACKGROUNDDiabetics are known to have increased late mortality following PCI.METHODSData from three placebo-controlled trials of PCI, EPIC, EPILOG, and EPISTENT, were pooled. The one-year mortality rate for patients with a clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was compared with the rate for nondiabetic patients treated with either abciximab or placebo.RESULTSIn the 1,462 diabetic patients, abciximab decreased the mortality from 4.5% to 2.5%, p = 0.031, and in the 5,072 nondiabetic patients, from 2.6% to 1.9%, p = 0.099. In patients with the clinical syndrome of insulin resistance—defined as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity—mortality was reduced by abciximab treatment from 5.1% to 2.3%, p = 0.044. The beneficial reduction in mortality with abciximab use in diabetics classified as insulin-requiring was from 8.1% to 4.2%, p = 0.073. Mortality in diabetics who underwent multivessel intervention was reduced from 7.7% to 0.9% with use of abciximab, p = 0.018. In a Cox proportional hazards survival model, the risk ratio for mortality with abciximab use compared with placebo was 0.642 (95% confidence interval 0.458–0.900, p = 0.010).CONCLUSIONSAbciximab decreases the mortality of diabetic patients to the level of placebo-treated nondiabetic patients. This beneficial effect is noteworthy in those diabetic patients who are also hypertensive and obese and in diabetics undergoing multivessel intervention. Besides its potential role in reducing repeat intervention for stented diabetic patients, abciximab therapy should be strongly considered in diabetic patients undergoing PCI to improve their survival

Evidence for Prevention of Death and Myocardial Infarction With Platelet Membrane Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade by Abciximab (c7E3 Fab) Among Patients With Unstable Angina Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization fn1fn1This study was supported by Centocor, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania.

AbstractObjectives. We sought to evaluate whether patients with unstable angina undergoing coronary intervention derive particular clinical benefit from potent platelet inhibition.Background. Plaque rupture and platelet aggregation are pathogenetic processes common to unstable angina and ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention.Methods. Of the 2,099 patients undergoing a coronary intervention in the Evaluation of 7E3 in Preventing Ischemic Complications (EPIC) trial, 489 were enrolled with the diagnosis of unstable angina and randomized to receive placebo, an abciximab (c7E3) bolus immediately before the intervention or an abciximab bolus followed by a 12-h infusion. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or urgent repeat revascularization within 30 days of randomization. The occurrence of death, MI or any revascularization within 6 months was also assessed.Results. Compared with placebo, the bolus and infusion of abciximab resulted in a 62% reduction in the rate of the primary end point (12.8% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.012) among patients with unstable angina, due primarily to a reduction in the incidences of death (3.2% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.164) and MI (9% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.004). By 6 months, cumulative death and MI were further reduced by abciximab (6.6% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.018 and 11.1% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.002, respectively). The magnitude of the risk reduction with abciximab was greater among the patients with unstable angina than among other patients in the EPIC trial without unstable angina for the end points of death (interaction: p = 0.008 at 30 days, p = 0.002 at 6 months) and MI (interaction: p = 0.004 at 30 days, p = 0.003 at 6 months).Conclusions. The syndrome of unstable angina identifies patients who will experience particularly marked reductions in the risk of death and MI with abciximab during coronary intervention.(J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:149–56

Clinical outcomes after detection of elevated cardiac enzymes in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention

AbstractObjectives. We examined the relations of elevated creatine kinase (CK) and its myocardial band isoenzyme (CK-MB) to clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients enrolled in Integrilin (eptifibatide) to Minimize Platelet Aggregation and Coronary Thrombosis-II (trial) (IMPACT-II), a trial of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide.Background. Elevation of cardiac enzymes often occurs after PCI, but its clinical implications are uncertain.Methods. Patients undergoing elective, scheduled PCI for any indication were analyzed. Parallel analyses investigated CK (n = 3,535) and CK-MB (n = 2,341) levels after PCI (within 4 to 20 h). Clinical outcomes at 30 days and 6 months were stratified by postprocedure CK and CK-MB (multiple of the site’s upper normal limit).Results. Overall, 1,779 patients (76%) had no CK-MB elevation; CK-MB levels were elevated to 1 to 3 times the upper normal limit in 323 patients (13.8%), to 3 to 5 times normal in 84 (3.6%), to 5 to 10 times normal in 86 (3.7%), and to >10 times normal in 69 patients (2.9%). Elevated CK-MB was associated with an increased risk of death, reinfarction, or emergency revascularization at 30 days, and of death, reinfarction, or surgical revascularization at 6 months. Elevated total CK to above three times normal was less frequent, but its prognostic significance paralleled that seen for CK-MB. The degree of risk correlated with the rise in CK or CK-MB, even for patients with successful procedures not complicated by abrupt closure.Conclusions. Elevations in cardiac enzymes, including small increases (between one and three times normal) often not considered an infarction, are associated with an increased risk for short-term adverse clinical outcomes after successful or unsuccessful PCI