Screening for distant metastases in patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence: the impact of different imaging modalities on distant recurrence-free interval

Purpose In patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), the detection of distant disease determines whether the intention of the treatment is curative or palliative. Therefore, adequate preoperative staging is imperative for optimal treatment planning. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of conventional imaging techniques, including chest X-ray and/or CT thorax-(abdomen), liver ultrasonography(US), and skeletal scintigraphy, on the distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) in patients with IBTR, and to compare conventional imaging with 18F-FDG PET-CT or no imaging at all. Methods This study was exclusively based on the information available at time of diagnoses of IBTR. To adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between the three imaging groups, a propensity score (PS) weighted method was used. Results Of the 495 patients included in the study, 229 (46.3%) were staged with conventional imaging, 89 patients (19.8%) were staged with 18F-FDG PET-CT, and in 168 of the patients (33.9%) no imaging was used (N=168). After a follow-up of approximately 5 years, 14.5% of all patients developed a distant recurrence as frst event after IBTR. After adjusting for the PS weights, the Cox regression analyses showed that the diferent staging methods had no signifcant impact on the DRFI. Conclusions This study showed a wide variation in the use of imaging modalities for staging IBTR patients in the Netherlands. After using PS weighting, no statistically signifcant impact of the diferent imaging modalities on DRFI was shown. Based on these results, it is not possible to recommend staging for distant metastases using 18F-FDG PET-CT over conventional imaging technique

Perception of burden experienced during diagnostic tests by melanoma patients with lymph node metastases

Melanoma patients with lymph node metastases have to deal with diagnostic tests to exclude the presence of distant metastases; results of the tests could have major implications for their prognosis and treatment There are, however, few studies concerning the patients' psychological issues and perception of diagnostic tests. The aim of this study was to describe the burden of diagnostic tests [radiograph, computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET)] experienced by melanoma patients with lymph node metastases. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning satisfaction and burden experienced during the diagnostic tests. The levels of embarrassment, discomfort and anxiety for the different tests, as well as total scores for each burden were calculated. Logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with the degree of experienced burden. Fifty-nine of the 68 patients completed the questionnaire and the response rate was 87%. The overall mean scores on satisfaction and quality of life were high. More than half of the patients experienced no burden during PET, 65% no burden during computed tomography and 80% no burden during chest radiograph. Patients experienced significantly more discomfort during the PET scan than during the CT (P=0.003). Less burden was experienced (in univariate analysis) by patients who were more satisfied. The overall experienced burden by patients is low and should therefore not interfere with primary choice for a diagnostic test based on accuracy, costs and percentage of patients upstaged. Attention should be paid in explaining the procedure and answering questions of the patients to reduce burden. Melanoma Res 19:36-41 (C) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins