History of clinical transplantation

How transplantation came to be a clinical discipline can be pieced together by perusing two volumes of reminiscences collected by Paul I. Terasaki in 1991-1992 from many of the persons who were directly involved. One volume was devoted to the discovery of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), with particular reference to the human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) that are widely used today for tissue matching.1 The other focused on milestones in the development of clinical transplantation.2 All the contributions described in both volumes can be traced back in one way or other to the demonstration in the mid-1940s by Peter Brian Medawar that the rejection of allografts is an immunological phenomenon.3,4 © 2008 Springer New York

Analysis of the cardiovascular risk profile in stable kidney transplant recipients after 50% cyclosporine reduction.

BACKGROUND: Long-term use of cyclosporine (CsA) contributes to post-transplant cardiovascular disease (CVD). Hence, a reduction in CsA dosage in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) may improve long-term outcomes. We analyzed the effects of 50% CsA dose reduction on the CVD risk profile in stable KTR. METHOD: Thirty-one KTR on a regimen of CsA, prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were studied. Patients were randomized to either a) continue their previously determined CsA dose (control group, n = 15) or b) lower their CsA dose by 50% (CsA reduction group, n = 16). Renal function, blood pressure, lipid profile, plasma homocysteine (HCY), C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, and uric acid were compared at baseline and at 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, there was a significant improvement in allograft function, systolic blood pressure, number of anti-hypertensive medications and serum uric acid levels in the CsA reduction group. No significant decrease in plasma HCY, CRP, fibrinogen or improvement in lipid profile was found. In contrast, in the Control group, there was a significant increase in HCY, uric acid, and triglycerides. No acute rejection occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: A greater reduction in CsA dose could further improve CVD risk profiles, although this may increase the risk of acute or subclinical rejection