6 research outputs found
Understanding the Edge Effect in Wetting: A Thermodynamic Approach
Edge effect is known to hinder spreading of a sessile
drop. However,
the underlying thermodynamic mechanisms responsible for the edge effect
still is not well-understood. In this study, a free energy model has
been developed to investigate the energetic state of drops on a single
pillar (from upright frustum to inverted frustum geometries). An analysis
of drop free energy levels before and after crossing the edge allows
us to understand the thermodynamic origin of the edge effect. In particular,
four wetting cases for a drop on a single pillar with different edge
angles have been determined by understanding the characteristics of
FE plots. A wetting map describing the four wetting cases is given
in terms of edge angle and intrinsic contact angle. The results show
that the free energy barrier observed near the edge plays an important
role in determining the drop states, i.e., (1) stable or metastable
drop states at the pillarâs edge, and (2) drop collapse by
liquid spilling over the edge completely or staying at an intermediate
sidewall position of the pillar. This thermodynamic model presents
an energetic framework to describe the functioning of the so-called
âre-entrantâ structures. Results show good consistency
with the literature and expand the current understanding of Gibbsâ
inequality condition
Modeling Liquid Bridge between Surfaces with Contact Angle Hysteresis
This paper presents the behaviors
of a liquid bridge when being
compressed and stretched in a quasi-static fashion between two solid
surfaces that have contact angle hysteresis (CAH). A theoretical model
is developed to obtain the profiles of the liquid bridge given a specific
separation between the surfaces. Different from previous models, both
contact lines in the upper and lower surfaces were allowed to move
when the contact angles reach their advancing or receding values.
When the contact angles are between their advancing and receding values,
the contact lines are pinned while the contact angles adjust to accommodate
the changes in separation. Effects of CAH on both asymmetric and symmetric
liquid bridges were analyzed. The model was shown to be able to correctly
predict the behavior of the liquid bridge during a quasi-static compression/stretching
loading cycle in experiments. Because of CAH, the liquid bridge can
have two different profiles at the same separation during one loading
and unloading cycle, and more profiles can be obtained during multiple
cycles. The maximum adhesion force generated by the liquid bridge
is found to be influenced by the CAH of surfaces. CAH also leads to
energy cost during a loading cycle of the liquid bridge. In addition,
the minimum separation between the two solid surfaces is shown to
affect how the contact radii and angles change on the two surfaces
as the liquid bridge is stretched
Fast Liquid Transfer between Surfaces: Breakup of Stretched Liquid Bridges
In this work, a systematic experimental
study was performed to
understand the fast liquid transfer process between two surfaces.
According to the value of the Reynolds number (<i>Re</i>), the fast transfer is divided into two different scenarios, one
with negligible inertia effects (<i>Re</i> ⪠1) and
the other with significant inertia effects (<i>Re</i> >
1). For <i>Re</i> ⪠1, the influences of the capillary
number (<i>Ca</i>) and the dimensionless minimum separation
(<i>H</i><sub>min</sub>* = <i>H</i><sub>min</sub>/<i>V</i><sup>1/3</sup>, where <i>H</i><sub>min</sub> is the minimum separation between two surfaces and <i>V</i> is the volume of liquid) on the transfer ratio (Îą, the volume
of liquid transferred to the acceptor surface over the total liquid
volume) are discussed. On the basis of the roles of each physical
parameter, an empirical equation is presented to predict the transfer
ratio, Îą = <i>f</i>(<i>Ca</i>). This equation
involves two coefficients which are affected only by the surface contact
angles and <i>H</i><sub>min</sub>* but not by the liquid
viscosity or surface tension. When <i>Re</i> > 1, it
is
shown for the first time that the transfer ratio does not converge
to 0.5 with the increase in the stretching speed
Shedding of Water Drops from a Surface under Icing Conditions
A sessile water drop exposed to an
air flow will shed if the adhesion
is overcome by the external aerodynamic forces on the drop. In this
study, shedding of water drops were investigated under icing conditions,
on surfaces with different wettabilities, from hydrophilic to superhydrophobic.
A wind tunnel was used for experiments in a temperature range between
â8 and 24.5 °C. Results indicate that the temperature
has a major influence on the incipient motion of drop shedding. The
critical air velocity (<i>U</i><sub>c</sub>) at which a
drop first starts to shed generally increases under icing conditions,
indicating an increase in the adhesion force. The contact angle hysteresis
(CAH) and the drop base length (<i>L</i><sub>b</sub>) are
found to be the controlling factors for adhesion. A correlation was
also developed to deduce the drag coefficient, <i>C</i><sub>D</sub> for the drop. It was found that <i>C</i><sub>D</sub> can decrease under icing conditions. In general, a lower <i>C</i><sub>D</sub> and higher adhesion together lead to a higher
critical air velocity. However, there are systems such as water on
Teflon for which the critical air velocity remains practically unaffected
by temperature because of similar adhesion and <i>C</i><sub>D</sub> values, at all temperatures tested
Drop Rebound after Impact: The Role of the Receding Contact Angle
Data from the literature suggest
that the rebound of a drop from
a surface can be achieved when the wettability is low, i.e., when
contact angles, measured at the triple line (solidâliquidâair),
are high. However, no clear criterion exists to predict when a drop
will rebound from a surface and which is the key wetting parameter
to govern drop rebound (e.g., the âequilibriumâ contact
angle, θ<sub>eq</sub>, the advancing and the receding contact
angles, θ<sub>A</sub> and θ<sub>R</sub>, respectively,
the contact angle hysteresis, Îθ, or any combination of
these parameters). To clarify the conditions for drop rebound, we
conducted experimental tests on different dry solid surfaces with
variable wettability, from hydrophobic to superhydrophobic surfaces,
with advancing contact angles 108° < θ<sub>A</sub> <
169° and receding contact angles 89° < θ<sub>R</sub> < 161°. It was found that the receding contact angle is
the key wetting parameter that influences drop rebound, along with
surface hydrophobicity: for the investigated impact conditions (drop
diameter 2.4 < <i>D</i><sub>0</sub> < 2.6 mm, impact
speed 0.8 < <i>V</i> < 4.1 m/s, Weber number 25 < <i>We</i> < 585), rebound was observed only on surfaces with
receding contact angles higher than 100°. Also, the drop rebound
time decreased by increasing the receding contact angle. It was also
shown that in general care must be taken when using statically defined
wetting parameters (such as advancing and receding contact angles)
to predict the dynamic behavior of a liquid on a solid surface because
the dynamics of the phenomenon may affect surface wetting close to
the impact point (e.g., as a result of the transition from the CassieâBaxter
to Wenzel state in the case of the so-called superhydrophobic surfaces)
and thus affect the drop rebound