2 research outputs found

    Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ Ρ€Π°Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ исслСдования Π½Π°Π΄Π³ΠΎΡ€Ρ‚Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄ΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ поколСния ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ остСосинтСза ΠΎΡ€Π±ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹

    Get PDF
    The objective: to assess and compare supraglottic airways of LMA-Supreme and i-gel during orbital osteosynthesis.Subjects and methods. 91 patients were included into the study. All of them underwent osteosynthesis of the orbit. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. LMA-Supreme group included 42 patients, while i-gel group included 49 patients.Results. The parameters of hemodynamics, gas exchange, and artificial pulmonary ventilation (APV) did not basically differ between the groups at different stages of the study. The oropharyngeal leak pressure differed between the groups at the end of surgery and made (Me – median, Q1 and Q3 – upper and lower quartiles): 28.0 (22.0; 30.0) and 21.0 (19.0; 27.0) mm WG the LMA-Supreme and i-gel groups, respectively; p = 0.021. A significant difference was observed in the insertion time of supraglottic airways (Me is the median, Q1 and Q3 are the upper and lower quartiles): 27.5 (19.3; 36.5) sec. for LMA-Supreme and 15.0 (13.8; 25.0) sec. – for i-gel; p = 0.001. When inserting the LMA-Supreme duct in 33 (78.6%) patients, jaw thrust maneuver, extension of the neck, etc. were required; while in the i-gel group, similar maneuvers were necessary in 18 (36.7%) patients; p < 0.001. The number of postoperative complications was minimal in both groups.Conclusion. Both supraglottic airways can be used with equal efficacy in osteosynthesis of the orbit. At the same time, the i-gel duct has an advantage over the LMA-Supreme in speed and simplicity of insertion. The LMA-Supreme had greater leak pressure at the end of surgery, which might be an advantage in patients requiring greater peak inspiratory pressure to provide effective APV.ЦСль: провСсти ΡΡ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΡƒΡŽ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΡƒ Π½Π°Π΄Π³ΠΎΡ€Ρ‚Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄ΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² LMA-Supreme ΠΈ i-gel ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ остСосинтСза ΠΎΡ€Π±ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π’ исслСдованиС Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ 91 больной. ВсСм ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡŒ опСрация остСосинтСза ΠΎΡ€Π±ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹. ΠŸΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹ Ρ€Π°Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ‹ Π½Π° Π΄Π²Π΅ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹: 42 – составили Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡƒ LMA-Supreme, 49 β€’ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡƒ i-gel.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. ΠŸΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€Ρ‹ Π³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ, Π³Π°Π·ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΈ искусствСнной вСнтиляции Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΈΡ… (Π˜Π’Π›) Π² основном Π½Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ°- ΠΌΠΈ Π½Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… этапах исслСдования. ΠžΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ½Π³Π΅Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡƒΡ‚Π΅Ρ‡ΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡŒ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ составляло (Me – ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π½Π°, Q1 ΠΈ Q3 – Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ…Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠ²Π°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ): 28,0 (22,0; 30,0) ΠΈ 21,0 (19,0; 27,0) ΠΌΠΌ Π²ΠΎΠ΄. ст. Π² Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ°Ρ… LMA-Supreme ΠΈ i-gel соот- вСтствСнно; p = 0,021. ΠŸΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π° достовСрная Ρ€Π°Π·Π½ΠΈΡ†Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ установки Π½Π°Π΄Π³ΠΎΡ€Ρ‚Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄ΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Π° (Me – ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π½Π°, Q1 ΠΈ Q3 – Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ…Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠ²Π°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ): 27,5 (19,3; 36,5) с. для LMA-Supreme ΠΈ 15,0 (13,8; 25,0) с – для i-gel; p = 0,001. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ установкС Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄ΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Π° LMA-Supreme Ρƒ 33 (78,6%) ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ Π²Ρ‹Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ½Π΅ΠΉ Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΡŽΡΡ‚ΠΈ, Ρ€Π°Π·Π³ΠΈΠ±Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ шСи ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π΅, Π² Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ΅ i-gel Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΌΠ°Π½Π΅Π²Ρ€Ρ‹ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Ρƒ 18 (36,7%) ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ²; p < 0,001. ΠšΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎ послСопСрационных ослоТнСний Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΈΡ… Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ°Ρ….Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Оба устройства c ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ опСрациях остСосинтСза ΠΎΡ€Π±ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ этом Π²ΠΎΠ·- Π΄ΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ i-gel ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π΅Ρ‚ прСимущСство ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π΄ LMA-Supreme Π² скорости ΠΈ простотС установки. Π’ΠΎΠ·Π΄ΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ LMA-Supreme продСмонстрировал большСС Π΄Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡƒΡ‚Π΅Ρ‡ΠΊΠΈ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡˆΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²Π°, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΡŒ прСимущСством Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… большСго ΠΏΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ давлСния Π½Π° Π²Π΄ΠΎΡ…Π΅ для эффСктивной Π˜Π’Π›

    Results of the randomized comparative study of second-generation supraglottic airways in orbital osteosynthesis

    Get PDF
    The objective: to assess and compare supraglottic airways of LMA-Supreme and i-gel during orbital osteosynthesis.Subjects and methods. 91 patients were included into the study. All of them underwent osteosynthesis of the orbit. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. LMA-Supreme group included 42 patients, while i-gel group included 49 patients.Results. The parameters of hemodynamics, gas exchange, and artificial pulmonary ventilation (APV) did not basically differ between the groups at different stages of the study. The oropharyngeal leak pressure differed between the groups at the end of surgery and made (Me – median, Q1 and Q3 – upper and lower quartiles): 28.0 (22.0; 30.0) and 21.0 (19.0; 27.0) mm WG the LMA-Supreme and i-gel groups, respectively; p = 0.021. A significant difference was observed in the insertion time of supraglottic airways (Me is the median, Q1 and Q3 are the upper and lower quartiles): 27.5 (19.3; 36.5) sec. for LMA-Supreme and 15.0 (13.8; 25.0) sec. – for i-gel; p = 0.001. When inserting the LMA-Supreme duct in 33 (78.6%) patients, jaw thrust maneuver, extension of the neck, etc. were required; while in the i-gel group, similar maneuvers were necessary in 18 (36.7%) patients; p < 0.001. The number of postoperative complications was minimal in both groups.Conclusion. Both supraglottic airways can be used with equal efficacy in osteosynthesis of the orbit. At the same time, the i-gel duct has an advantage over the LMA-Supreme in speed and simplicity of insertion. The LMA-Supreme had greater leak pressure at the end of surgery, which might be an advantage in patients requiring greater peak inspiratory pressure to provide effective APV
    corecore