Continuous Flow vs. Static Chamber μPCR Devices on Flexible Polymeric Substrates

This paper was presented at the 4th Micro and Nano Flows Conference (MNF2014), which was held at University College, London, UK. The conference was organised by Brunel University and supported by the Italian Union of Thermofluiddynamics, IPEM, the Process Intensification Network, the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, the Heat Transfer Society, HEXAG - the Heat Exchange Action Group, and the Energy Institute, ASME Press, LCN London Centre for Nanotechnology, UCL University College London, UCL Engineering, the International NanoScience Community, www.nanopaprika.eu.Two types of μPCR devices, a continuous flow and a static chamber device, fabricated on flexible polymeric substrates are compared in the current computational study. Laminar flow, heat transfer in both solid and fluid, mass conservation of species, and reaction kinetics of PCR are coupled using COMSOL. The comparison is performed under same conditions; same material stack (based on flexible polymeric films with integrated microheaters), same species initial concentrations, amplification of the same volume of fluid sample, and implementation of the same PCR protocol. Performance is quantified in terms of DNA amplification, energy consumption, and total operating time. The calculations show that the efficiency of DNA amplification is higher in the continuous flow device. However, the continuous flow device requires (~6 times) greater energy consumption which is justified by the smaller thermal mass of the static chamber device. As regards the speed, the total time required for the static chamber μPCR is comparable to the time for the continuous flow μPCR

Fabrication and modeling of a continuous-flow microfluidic device for on-chip DNA amplification

This paper was presented at the 3rd Micro and Nano Flows Conference (MNF2011), which was held at the Makedonia Palace Hotel, Thessaloniki in Greece. The conference was organised by Brunel University and supported by the Italian Union of Thermofluiddynamics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University of Thessaly, IPEM, the Process Intensification Network, the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, the Heat Transfer Society, HEXAG - the Heat Exchange Action Group, and the Energy Institute.The fabrication process and heat transfer computations for a continuous flow microfluidic device for DNA amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are described. The building blocks are thin polymeric materials aiming at a low cost and low power consumption device. The fabrication is performed by standard pattern transfer techniques (lithography and etching) used for microelectronics fabrication. The DNA sample flows in a meander shaped microchannel formed on a 100μm thick polyimide (PI) layer through three temperature regions defined by the integrated resistive heaters. The heat transfer computations are performed in a unit cell of the device. They show that, for the fabricated device, the variation of the temperature inside the channel zones where each step (denaturation, annealing, or extension) of PCR occur is less than 1.3K. This variation increases when the thickness of the PI layer increases. The computations also show that similar Silicon-based devices lead to lower temperature difference between the heaters and the DNA sample compared to the polymer-based fabricated device. However, the power consumption is estimated much greater for Silicon-based devices.This work was co-financed by Hellenic Funds and by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under the Hellenic National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) 2007-2013, according to Contract no. MICRO2-45 of the Project “Microelectronic Components for Lab-on-chip molecular analysis instruments for genetic and environmental applications” within the Programme "Hellenic Technology Clusters in Microelectronics – Phase-2 Aid Measure"

A Passive Micromixer for Bioanalytical Applications

This paper was presented at the 4th Micro and Nano Flows Conference (MNF2014), which was held at University College, London, UK. The conference was organised by Brunel University and supported by the Italian Union of Thermofluiddynamics, IPEM, the Process Intensification Network, the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, the Heat Transfer Society, HEXAG - the Heat Exchange Action Group, and the Energy Institute, ASME Press, LCN London Centre for Nanotechnology, UCL University College London, UCL Engineering, the International NanoScience Community, www.nanopaprika.eu.Three passive micromixers with different geometries, i.e. zigzag, spiral, and split and merge (SaM) with labyrinthine channels, are compared with respect to their mixing efficiency by means of a computational study. The specifications are imposed from flexible printed circuit (FPC) technology which is used for their fabrication and from the applications to be implemented, i.e. the mixing of biochemical reagents. The computations include the numerical solution of continuity, Navier-Stokes, and mass conservation equations in 3d by ANSYS Fluent. The highest mixing efficiency is calculated for the SaM micromixer with the labyrinthine channel. Compared to a linear micromixer, the spiral micromixer improves the mixing efficiency by 8%, the zigzag by 11%, and the SaM by 92%; the diffusion coefficient of the biomolecule is 10-10 m2/s, the Reynolds number is 0.5, and the volume of each micromixer is 2.54 μl. The best of the three designs is realized by FPC technology and is experimentally evaluated by fluorescence microscopy