260 research outputs found
Report of the 11th Liaison Meeting
The 11thLiaison Meeting between the Chairs of the RCMs, the ICES PGCCDBS,
PGMED and PGECON, the STECF EWGs on the DCF, the Regional Database Steering
Committees, the ICES and GFCM representatives and the European Commission was
held at the DG Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Brussels from 8th to 9th October 2014. The 11th Liaison meeting was held in Brussels on 8th and 9th October 2014 to address the
following terms of reference:
TOR 1. Discussion on possible follow-‐‑up to the main outputs/recommendations of:
• The 2014 RCMs and to the sp ecific re commenda tions a ddr e sse d to th e Liaison
Meeting
• P G ECO N , PG CCDBS, PG Med – ou tcome s an d r e commendation s fr om the ir
2014 meeting
• STECF EWG and STEC F Plen ary -‐‑ ou tcome s a n d r e commendation s fr om the ir
2014 meeting
• Data end-‐‑ users (IC ES, G F C M, RC Ms)
TOR 2. Compilation of recommendations on the DCF
A compilation of DCF recommendations will be established by the COM by end 2014.
LM needs to agree on which recommendations should be included (i.e. from which
bodies) & covering which years.
TOR 3. Regional cooperation
• G r ants for str eng thene d reg ion al coop eration
• R e g ional da ta b ases
o O ver view of use of the Reg ional Datab ases for R CMs in 2014, and p rob lems
identified
o O ther deve lop ments (RDB training s in 2014, RDB Med&BS develop ment)
o Chang es for the fu tu re – an y re commen da tions from th e LM?
• R C M data calls – ove rview of h ow MS r esp onde d.
TOR 4. Recommended meetings/workshops
• P r ep a r e a list of r ecommen ded me etin g s for 2015 as g u idance for MS
TOR 5. Studies
• O ver view of p rocess
• LM comme nts and p r ioritization of studies p r op osed b y RC Ms, PG ECO N , ICES,
GFCM
TOR 6. AOB
1. The DCF website has been revamped by the JRC. Any comments on this?
2. Access to the RCM SharePoint
3. Derogations – List of derogations by Member State has been prepared by DG
MARE. Have any RCMs updated this?
4. ICES will provide an update on their plans to re-‐‑evaluate surveys. Should this
be followed by STECF work on surveys to be included in future EU MAP?
5. Annual reports – simplification: presentation of process. 6. Data transmission:
a. new platform for information exchanges between COM, MS and end-‐‑
users
b. new tool for reporting on how MS complied with the DG MARE/JRC
data calls
In addition to the above Terms of Reference, an item was added at the start of the
meeting, regarding the implication of the Landing Obligation on data collection and
the Discard Plans.
Report of the 12th Liaison Meeting
The 12th Liaison meeting was held in Brussels on 8th and 9th October 2015 to address the following Terms
of Reference:
TOR 1. Discussion on possible follow-‐‑up to the main outputs/recommendations of:
• The 2015 RCMs -‐‑ specific recommendations addressed to the Liaison Meeting
• PGECON, PGDATA, PGMed – outcomes and recommendations from their 2015 meeting
• STECF EWG and STECF Plenary -‐‑ outcomes and recommendations from their 2015 meetings
• Data end users (ICES, STECF, RFMOs – GFCM, IATTC, ICCAT, IOTC, WCPFC, NAFO,
SPRFMO, CECAF, WECAFC)
TOR2. End user feedback on data transmission and related issues
• Discuss feedback received from data end-‐‑users on data transmission: main issues and possible
harmonization of end user feedback to the Commission
• JRC data transmission IT platform: experience gained and future steps
• Discuss best practices on automatization of data upload by MS: data validation tools used by
end users
• Discussion on new set-‐‑up for STECF evaluation of AR2014 & data transmission 2014 used in
2015 – continue like this next year?
• Harmonisation and dissemination of DCF metadata: codelists, metiers, nomenclatures, best
practices, standards
• RCM data calls – overview of how MS responded
TOR 3. Regional cooperation
• Call for proposals MARE/2014/19 'ʹStrengthening Regional Cooperation in the area of fisheries
data collection– state of play'ʹ. Presentation by a representative of the two RCG grants and
discussions by LM thereafter. What should be the way forward?
• Regional databases
• Overview of use of the Regional Databases for RCMs in 2015 and problems identified
• Other developments (RDB trainings in 2015, RDB Med&BS development)
• Changes for the future – any recommendations from the LM?
• Future role of RCMs and DCF-‐‑related meetings: best practices, coordination, cohesion and
common structure in line with emerging needs of DCF
TOR 4. EU MAP
• Discuss recommendations/ output of RCMs: List of proposed stocks, landing obligation, metiers
• Discuss design-‐‑based sampling in relation to DCF: does it fulfil DCF requirements?
TOR 5. Availability of data
• Overview of latest developments (DCF Database Feasibility Study and plans for a follow-‐‑up
study to this)
TOR 6. AOB
• Agree on a list of recommendations relating to DCF (that MS will need to report on in their
AR2015) – COM will provide a compilation of proposed recommendations from LM & STECF
Plenaries in 2014 as input
• Prepare a list of recommended meetings for 2016 as guidance for MS
• Review and prioritize DCF-‐‑related study proposals from RCMs, PGECON, EGs etc
• ICES update on workshop on concurrent sampling and plans to re-‐‑evaluate survey
Serious fungal infections in Thailand
The burden of serious fungal infection in Thailand is increasing but data regarding its incidence and prevalence are lacking. In this study we aimed to estimate the burden of serious fungal diseases in Thailand based on the size of the populations at risk and available epidemiological databases. Data derived from The Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Thai Ministry of Public Health, World Health Organisation, international and local reports, and some unreported data were used. When no data existed, risk populations were used to estimate frequencies of fungal infections, using previously described methodology by LIFE. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (>4 episodes per year) is estimated to occur in 3,310 per 100,000 population. Using a previously described rate that 14/10,000 admissions are with fungaemia and 94% of those are Candida, we estimated 8,650 patients with candidaemia. The prevalence of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis is relatively high with a total of 19,044, approximately half subsequent to pulmonary tuberculosis. Invasive aspergillosis is estimated to affect 941 patients following leukaemia therapy, transplantations, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, approximately 1.4/100,000. In addition, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and severe asthma with fungal sensitisation were estimated at approximately 58.4/100,000 and 77/100,000, respectively. Given approximately 8,134 new cases of AIDS annually, cryptococcal meningitis, Pneumocystis pneumonia, and Talaromyces marneffei infection are estimated at 1.9/100,000, 2.6/100,000, and 0.3/100,000, respectively. The present study indicates that about 1.93% (1,254,562) of the population is affected by serious fungal infections. Owing to the lack of data, reports, and statistics, the number of patients with mycoses in Thailand can only be estimated
Report of the Working Group on Commercial Catches (WGCATCH)
The Working Group on Commercial Catches (WGCATCH), chaired by Mike Arm-
strong (UK) and Hans Gerritsen (Ireland), met in ICES HQ, Copenhagen, Denmark,
10–14 November 2014. The meeting was attended by 34 experts from 21 laboratories
or organizations, covering 16 countries.
Currently, an important task for WGCATCH is to improve and review sampling sur-
vey designs for commercial fisheries, particularly those for estimating quantities and
size or age compositions of landings and discards and providing data quality indica-
tors. However, the scope of WGCATCH is broader than this, covering many other
aspects of collection and analysis of data on fishing activities and catches. This will be
end-user driven, and coordinated with the work of other ICES data EGs such as the
Working Group on Biological Parameters (WGBIOP), the Planning Group on Data
Needs for Assessments and Advice (PGDATA) and the Working Group on Recrea-
tional Fisheries Surveys (WGRFS) to ensure synergy and efficiency.
The report of the meeting commences with background information on the formation
of WGCATCH and its overall role. The remainder of the report provides the out-
comes for each of the Terms of Reference (ToRs) and responses to external requests,
the proposed future work plan and the ToRs for the 2015 meeting.
The group formed two large subgroups to deal with the two major terms of reference
which are the development of guidelines for carrying out sampling of catches on
shore and the provision of advice on adapting sampling programmes to deal with the
landing obligation.
In order to evaluate methods and develop guidelines for best practice in carrying out
sampling of commercial sampling of commercial fish catches onshore, a question-
naire was circulated before the meeting. This questionnaire was structured around
guidelines developed by the ICES Workshop on Practical Implementation of Statisti-
cally Sound Catch Sampling Programmes (WKPICS) for best practice at each stage of
the sampling process, and asked for a description of current practices at each of these
stages. Based on these questionnaires, common and specific problems were cata-
logued and potential solutions were identified. At the same time, the discussion of
the questionnaires provided a form of peer-review of the sampling designs and iden-
tified where improvements could be made. WGCATCH provided guidelines for de-
signing a sampling survey and summarized earlier guidelines provided by the 2010
Workshop on methods for merging métiers for fishery based sampling (WKMERGE)
The other main subject addressed by WGCATCH concerns the provision of advice on
adapting sampling protocols to deal with the impact of the introduction of the land-
ing obligation, which will alter discarding practices and result in additional catego-
ries of catch being landed. A second questionnaire was circulated before the meeting
to allow the group to identify the fleets that will be affected and possible issues that
are anticipated, as well as to propose solutions to adapt existing monitoring and
sampling schemes and to quantify bias resulting from the introduction of this regula-
tion. WGCATCH outlined a range of likely scenarios and the expected effects of
these on fishery sampling programmes, and developed guidelines for adapting sam-
pling schemes. The group also explored a range of analyses that could be conducted
in order to quantify bias resulting from the introduction of the landing obligation.
Finally a number of pilot studies/case studies were summarized, highlighting the
practical issues involve
Report of the Regional Co-ordination Meeting for the North Sea and Eastern Arctic (RCM NS&EA) 2014
Report of the Regional Co-ordination Meeting for the North Sea and Eastern Arctic (RCM NS&EA) 2014
Swedish University of Agriculture Sciences (SLU Aqua)
Lysekil, Sweden
08-12 September 2014The RCM NS&EA met in Lysekil (Sweden) between 8-12 September 2014. The main purpose of the RCM is coordinate the National Programmes (NP) of the Member States (MS) in the North Sea region for 2015
Report of the Regional Co-ordination Meeting for the North Sea and Eastern Arctic (RCM NS&EA) 2013
Report of the Regional Co-ordination Meeting for the North Sea and Eastern Arctic (RCM NS&EA) 2013 final report
European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA)
Vigo, Spain
09/09/2013-13/09/2013The Regional Coordination Meeting for the North Sea & Eastern Arctic (RCM NS&EA) was held in September 2013 in Vigo (Spain). The main task of the RCM’s is to coordinate the National Programmes (NP), which propose the national data collection to be carried out by the Member States (MS) under the EU Data Collection Framework (DCF). It was envisaged that, from 2104 onwards, data collection by the MS would be carried out under a new framework (DC-MAP). However, the legislation for this framework is not ready yet. Therefore the Commission has decided to extend the present DCF for the time being and the most recent NPs have been adopted for 2014. Since these NP have been adopted without any changes, there is no need for major coordinatio
Report of the Regional Co-ordination Meeting for the North Sea and Eastern Arctic (RCM NS&EA) 2015
The RCM NS&EA met 31st August - 4th September 2015 at den Haag, Netherlands with 27 participants form 11 member states and autonomous regions attending, including representatives of ICES and the Commission. National correspondents from Spain, UK, Denmark, Lithuania, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands were present. The meeting was co-chaired by Katja Ringdahl (Sweden) and Alastair Pout (Scotland).
The RCM N&SEA considered the recommendations from the 11th Liasion meeting and summaries were presented of the work of expert groups and end users for the 2014-15 period to the plenary session of the meeting. The expert groups included WGCATCH, PGDATA, WKISCON2, WKRDB 2014-01, RDB–SC, STECF and the Zagreb meeting on transversal variables. ICES, as a main end user, provided feedback.
A summary was presented of the progress in the regional coordination project (fishPi). This project involves over 40 participants from 12 members states from NS&EA, NA and Baltic regions, two external statistical experts, and ICES. The project has a wide scope of regional cooperation issues including sampling designs, data formats, code lists, PETS, stomach sampling, small scale and recreational sampling, and data quality software production. It has a budget of €400,000, and a one year time line and with a planned completion date of April 2016. A project with identical aims is running in paralleled in the Mediterranean and Black Sea regions
The majority of the ToRs of the RCM NS&EA were addressed by three subgroups: one concerned with data analysis, one with the landing obligation, and one with issues particularly related to role and work of national correspondents
- …