Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition

The idea that noncrop habitat enhances pest control and represents a win–win opportunity to conserve biodiversity and bolster yields has emerged as an agroecological paradigm. However, while noncrop habitat in landscapes surrounding farms sometimes benefits pest predators, natural enemy responses remain heterogeneous across studies and effects on pests are inconclusive. The observed heterogeneity in species responses to noncrop habitat may be biological in origin or could result from variation in how habitat and biocontrol are measured. Here, we use a pest-control database encompassing 132 studies and 6,759 sites worldwide to model natural enemy and pest abundances, predation rates, and crop damage as a function of landscape composition. Our results showed that although landscape composition explained significant variation within studies, pest and enemy abundances, predation rates, crop damage, and yields each exhibited different responses across studies, sometimes increasing and sometimes decreasing in landscapes with more noncrop habitat but overall showing no consistent trend. Thus, models that used landscape-composition variables to predict pest-control dynamics demonstrated little potential to explain variation across studies, though prediction did improve when comparing studies with similar crop and landscape features. Overall, our work shows that surrounding noncrop habitat does not consistently improve pest management, meaning habitat conservation may bolster production in some systems and depress yields in others. Future efforts to develop tools that inform farmers when habitat conservation truly represents a win–win would benefit from increased understanding of how landscape effects are modulated by local farm management and the biology of pests and their enemies

Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition

The idea that noncrop habitat enhances pest control and represents a win–win opportunity to conserve biodiversity and bolster yields has emerged as an agroecological paradigm. However, while noncrop habitat in landscapes surrounding farms sometimes benefits pest predators, natural enemy responses remain heterogeneous across studies and effects on pests are inconclusive. The observed heterogeneity in species responses to noncrop habitat may be biological in origin or could result from variation in how habitat and biocontrol are measured. Here, we use a pest-control database encompassing 132 studies and 6,759 sites worldwide to model natural enemy and pest abundances, predation rates, and crop damage as a function of landscape composition. Our results showed that although landscape composition explained significant variation within studies, pest and enemy abundances, predation rates, crop damage, and yields each exhibited different responses across studies, sometimes increasing and sometimes decreasing in landscapes with more noncrop habitat but overall showing no consistent trend. Thus, models that used landscape-composition variables to predict pest-control dynamics demonstrated little potential to explain variation across studies, though prediction did improve when comparing studies with similar crop and landscape features. Overall, our work shows that surrounding noncrop habitat does not consistently improve pest management, meaning habitat conservation may bolster production in some systems and depress yields in others. Future efforts to develop tools that inform farmers when habitat conservation truly represents a win–win would benefit from increased understanding of how landscape effects are modulated by local farm management and the biology of pests and their enemies

Relation entre la composition du vitellus des oeufs et l'alimentation imaginale chez quelques Hyménoptères parasitoïdes

International audienc

Comparative morphology of the ovipositor of some parasitic hymenoptera in relation to characteristics of their hosts

International audienc

Host range limitation caused by incomplete host regulation in an aphid parasitoid

Defining host ranges in parasitoid insects is important both from a theoretical and an applied point of view. Based on the literature, some species seem able to use a wide range of hosts, while field studies indicate possible local host specialization. In koinobiont endoparasitoid species, such specialization could involve physiological processes. We tested the ability of two strains of the cosmopolitan and polyphagous parasitoid Diaeretiella rapae, to develop in three of its recorded aphid host species. Both strains produced high parasitism rates on the cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae and the green peach aphid Myzus persicae but almost no progeny on the cherry-oat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. This last species was less attacked by female parasitoids. Moreover, parasitoid eggs and larvae were smaller than in the two other host aphid species and their development was delayed. This abnormal development appeared to be due to an incomplete host regulation process, probably related to the low number and the size of teratocytes produced by D. rapae in R. padi individuals. Such a failure as far as gaining control of the host's metabolism is concerned could play an important role in shaping the host range of parasitoid insects, leading to local variation of the host spectrum in populations from various geographical areas. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Can imperfect host discrimination explain partial patch exploitation in parasitoids ?

International audienc

Selecting volatiles to protect brassicaceous crops against the cabbage root fly, Delia radicum

Publication Inra prise en compte dans l'analyse bibliométrique des publications scientifiques mondiales sur les Fruits, les Légumes et la Pomme de terre. Période 2000-2012. http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/256699International audienceVolatiles resulting from plantherbivore interactions play an important role in the behavioral decisions of phytophagous, predatory, and parasitoid insects and could be used for managing pest insects. However, to date and after about 40 years of research, documented studies on applications in the field remain extremely scarce. Delia radicum L. (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), the cabbage root fly, is a major pest of brassicaceous crops for which classical control strategies are currently lacking. Our previous studies showed that dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), a compound emitted by roots heavily infested by D. radicum larvae, was attractive for the flys main natural enemies and could lead to a reduction of 60% in number of eggs laid on treated plants in the field. As a follow-up of this work, we conducted another field study to select additional volatiles that could be used in a pushpull approach. Several synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles, selected on the basis of their potential action on the behavior of both the fly and its natural enemies, were placed in odor dispensers in experimental broccoli plots and their influence on oviposition by D. radicum and egg predation by ground-dwelling predators was assessed. Our results confirmed the role of DMDS in reducing D. radicum egg numbers on broccoli plants and revealed that (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, a green leaf volatile released by recently damaged plants, strongly stimulated fly oviposition. Also, two of the compounds tested slightly modified predation activity of ground-dwelling predators: acetophenone decreased the proportion of predated patches, whereas methyl salicylate increased it. This study is a first step in designing a pushpull strategy to control the cabbage root fly

Variability in the development of cereal aphid parasitoids and hyperparasitoids in oceanic regions as a response to climate and abundance of hosts

International audienc