280 research outputs found

    The Environment of ``E+A'' Galaxies

    Get PDF
    The violent star formation history of ``E+A'' galaxies and their detection almost exclusively in distant clusters is frequently used to link them to the ``Butcher-Oemler effect'' and to argue that cluster environment influences galaxy evolution. From 11113 spectra in the Las Campanas Redshift Survey, we have obtained a unique sample of 21 nearby ``E+A" galaxies. Surprisingly, a large fraction (about 75%) of these ``E+A''s lie in the field. Therefore, interactions with the cluster environment, in the form of the ICM or cluster potential, are not essential for ``E+A'' formation. If one mechanism is responsible for ``E+A''s, their existence in the field and the tidal features in at least 5 of the 21 argue that galaxy-galaxy interactions and mergers are that mechanism. The most likely environments for such interactions are poor groups, which have lower velocity dispersions than clusters and higher galaxy densities than the field. In hierarchical models, groups fall into clusters in greater numbers at intermediate redshifts than they do today. Thus, the Butcher-Oemler effect may reflect the typical evolution of galaxies in groups and in the field rather than the influence of clusters on star formation in galaxies. This abstract is abridged.Comment: 39 uuencoded, compressed pages (except Fig 1), complete preprint at ftp://ociw.edu/pub/aiz/eplusa.ps, ApJ, submitte

    The Luminosity Function of Galaxies in the Las Campanas Redshift Survey

    Get PDF
    We present the RR-band luminosity function for a sample of 18678 galaxies, with average redshift z=0.1z = 0.1, from the Las Campanas Redshift Survey. The luminosity function may be fit by a Schechter function with M∗=−20.29±0.02+5log⁥hM^* = -20.29 \pm 0.02 + 5 \log h, α=−0.70±0.05\alpha = -0.70 \pm 0.05, and $\phi^* = 0.019 \pm 0.001 \ h^3 Mpc~Mpc^{-3},forabsolutemagnitudes, for absolute magnitudes -23.0 \leq M - 5 \log h \leq -17.5.Wecompareourluminosityfunctiontothatfromotherredshiftsurveys;inparticularournormalizationisconsistentwiththatoftheStromlo−APMsurvey,andisthereforeafactoroftwobelowthatimpliedbythe. We compare our luminosity function to that from other redshift surveys; in particular our normalization is consistent with that of the Stromlo-APM survey, and is therefore a factor of two below that implied by the b_J \approx 20brightgalaxycounts.Ournormalizationthusindicatesthatmuchmoreevolutionisneededtomatchthefaintgalaxycountdata,comparedtominimalevolutionmodelswhichnormalizeat bright galaxy counts. Our normalization thus indicates that much more evolution is needed to match the faint galaxy count data, compared to minimal evolution models which normalize at b_J \approx 20.Also,weshowthatourfaint−endslope. Also, we show that our faint-end slope \alpha = -0.7,though‘‘shallowerâ€Čâ€Čthantypicalpreviousvalues, though ``shallower'' than typical previous values \alpha = -1,resultsprimarilyfromfittingthedetailedshapeoftheLCRSluminosityfunction,ratherthanfromanyabsenceofintrinsicallyfaintgalaxiesfromoursurvey.Finally,using[OII]3727equivalentwidth, results primarily from fitting the detailed shape of the LCRS luminosity function, rather than from any absence of intrinsically faint galaxies from our survey. Finally, using [OII] 3727 equivalent width W_{\lambda} = 5 A˚ asthedividingline,wefindsignificantdifferencesintheluminosityfunctionsofemissionandnon−emissiongalaxies,particularlyintheir~\AA \ as the dividing line, we find significant differences in the luminosity functions of emission and non-emission galaxies, particularly in their \alphavalues.EmissiongalaxieshaveSchechterparameters values. Emission galaxies have Schechter parameters M^* = -20.03 \pm 0.03 + 5 \log hand and \alpha = -0.9 \pm 0.1,whilenon−emissiongalaxiesaredescribedby, while non-emission galaxies are described by M^* = -20.22 \pm 0.02 + 5 \log hand and \alpha = -0.3 \pm 0.1$. (abridged abstract)Comment: 41 pages, including 13 postscript figures, uses AASTEX v4.0 style files. Important clarification of R-band definition, plus correction of luminosity densities and updated references. Main conclusions unchanged. Final version to appear in Ap

    At the Vigintennial of the Butcher-Oemler Effect

    Full text link
    In their study of the evolution of galaxies within clusters, Butcher and Oemler discovered evidence for a strong evolution in star-formation rate with redshift. Later studies confirmed this conclusion and uncovered several aspects of the effect: photometric, spectroscopic, and morphological. This article reviews a broad sample of these works and discusses selection effects, biases, and driving mechanisms that might be responsible for the changes in star-formation rate.Comment: 15 pages. 4 figures. Refereed review based upon colloquia delivered at UQ. Accepted for publication in PASA; Minor alterations made to conform more closely to published versio

    An XMM and Chandra view of massive clusters of galaxies to z=1

    Full text link
    The X-ray properties of a sample of high redshift (z>0.6), massive clusters observed with XMM-Newton and Chandra are described, including two exceptional systems. One, at z=0.89, has an X-ray temperature of T=11.5 (+1.1, -0.9) keV (the highest temperature of any cluster known at z>0.6), an estimated mass of (1.4+/-0.2)x10^15 solar masses and appears relaxed. The other, at z=0.83, has at least three sub-clumps, probably in the process of merging, and may also show signs of faint filamentary structure at large radii,observed in X-rays. In general there is a mix of X-ray morphologies, from those clusters which appear relaxed and containing little substructure to some highly non-virialized and probably merging systems. The X-ray gas metallicities and gas mass fractions of the relaxed systems are similar to those of low redshift clusters of the same temperature, suggesting that the gas was in place, and containing its metals, by z=0.8. The evolution of the mass-temperature relation may be consistent with no evolution or with the ``late formation'' assumption. The effect of point source contamination in the ROSAT survey from which these clusters were selected is estimated, and the implications for the ROSAT X-ray luminosity function discussed.Comment: 9 pages, in Carnegie Observatories Astrophysics Series, Vol. 3: Clusters of Galaxies: Probes of Cosmological Structure and Galaxy Evolution, ed. J. S. Mulchaey, A. Dressler, and A. Oemler. See http://www.ociw.edu/ociw/symposia/series/symposium3/proceedings.html for a full-resolution versio
    • 

    corecore