[Epidemiology and aetiological agents of occupational asthma]

introduction Occupational asthma is, by definition, a disease that can be prevented through appropriate protective strategies. Epidemiological information is required to guide these interventions, and we here examine epidemiological data on the burden, causes, and risk factors for this condition. State of the art Population-based surveys indicate that approximately 15% of adult asthma is attributable to the workplace environment. The most common occupational agents implicated include flour, isocyanates, latex, and persulihate salts. The occupations in which occupational asthma has been most commonly reported are bakers, spray painters, health-care workers, hairdressers, and cleaners. The level of exposure to sensitizing agents seems to be the most relevant risk factor. Atopy is a significant risk factor only for the development of sensitization to high molecular weight agents. The role of other individual determinants, such as genetic factors, has been ess consistently established. Occupational asthma is associated with a substantial adverse impact on the employment and financial status of affected workers. Perspectives Methodological improvements are required in order to distinguish more accurately between occupational and work-exacerbated asthma. Further investigations of the effectiveness of primary and secondary preventive interventions are also needed

Épidémiologie et étiologies de l’asthme professionnel

Introduction Occupational asthma is, by definition, a disease that can be prevented through appropriate protective strategies. Epidemiological information is required to guide these interventions, and we here examine epidemiological data on the burden, causes, and risk factors for this condition. State of the art Population-based surveys indicate that approximately 15% of adult asthma is attributable to the workplace environment. The most common occupational agents implicated include flour, isocyanates, latex, and per-sulphate salts. The occupations in which occupational asthma has been most commonly reported are bakers, spray painters, health-care workers, hairdressers, and cleaners. The level of exposure to sensitizing agents seems to be the most relevant risk factor. Atopy is a significant risk factor only for the development of sensitization to high molecular weight agents. The role of other individual determinants, such as genetic factors, has been less consistently established. Occupational asthma is associated with a substantial adverse impact on the employment and financial status of affected workers. Perspectives Methodological improvements are required in order to distinguish more accurately between occupational and work-exacerbated asthma. Further investigations of the effectiveness of primary and secondary preventive interventions are also needed

Fever and neutrophilic alveolitis caused by a vanadium based catalyst

Methods: The investigation included inhalation challenge with the suspected compound combined with monitoring of lung function tests and post-challenge bronchoalveolar lavage. Results: Exposure to the vanadium containing catalyst for 120 minutes resulted in a sustained decline in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second, while the transfer factor for carbon monoxide did not change significantly. The subject developed fever and peripheral blood neutrophilia. Bronchoalveolar lavage performed 48 hours after the end of challenge exposure showed a marked increase in neutrophils (60% of total cell count). Conclusions: Exposure to vanadium can cause a metal fume fever-like syndrome associated with neutrophilic alveolitis

Latex-induced occupational asthma: time trend in incidence and relationship with hospital glove policies.

These national compensation-based data confirm that a persistent decline in the incidence of NRL-induced OA has occurred since late 1990s. This downward trend has temporally been associated with a decreasing usage of powdered NRL, further supporting a beneficial role of changes in glove policies

Occupational asthma in symptomatic workers exposed to natural rubber latex: evaluation of diagnostic procedures.

BACKGROUND: Natural rubber latex (NRL) has been increasingly identified as a cause of occupational asthma (OA). OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the accuracy of the clinical history, immunologic tests, and assessment of nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness in diagnosing OA caused by latex compared with that of the specific inhalation challenge (SIC). METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients referred for investigation of possible OA caused by latex underwent a diagnostic protocol, including an open medical questionnaire, skin prick testing against latex, measurement of bronchial responsiveness to histamine, and inhalation challenge with latex gloves. Recorded clinical history was judged retrospectively by 4 physicians who were blinded for the results of other objective tests. RESULTS: The clinical history, skin prick testing against NRL, and assessment of nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness showed a high sensitivity (87%, 100%, and 90%, respectively) but a low specificity (14%, 21%, and 7%, respectively) when compared with the results of the SIC. Logistic regression analysis showed that combining the results of skin prick tests against latex with the clinical history enhanced the negative predictive value from 50% to 71%, whereas the positive predictive value remained virtually unchanged (75% vs 76%). CONCLUSION: The clinical history and immunologic tests were the most useful procedures in diagnosing NRL-induced asthma, although combining the 2 procedures remained less accurate than SIC. Further examination of the predictive values of available tests is warranted to recommend diagnostic strategies that are specific to the various agents causing OA