Use of a Urine Anastrozole Assay to Determine Treatment Discontinuation Among Women With Hormone-Sensitive Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study

Purpose: Multiple studies have shown that adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy in women with breast cancer is suboptimal. Measurements of compliance with self-report, pill counts, and/or pharmacy records are susceptible to bias. We assessed the feasibility of using a urine anastrozole assay as an objective biomarker of nonadherence to anastrozole treatment. Patients and Methods: We recruited consecutive postmenopausal women, age ≥ 18 years, with hormone-sensitive nonmetastatic breast cancer who were prescribed anastrozole at least 3 months before enrollment. Each completed a short survey to gather information on demographics, anastrozole compliance history, and self-reported medication history, tumor characteristics, and treatment received. A single, random 15-mL urine sample was collected and tested for the presence of anastrozole using a previously validated assay. Patients were told they were part of a study to determine if anastrozole could be detected in the urine. Results: Among 96 participants, mean age was 63.7 years (range, 51 to 70 years). The population was diverse, with 56.5% white, 57.6% US born, 59.8% unemployed, and 56.6% college educated. Prior treatment included chemotherapy (50%) and/or radiotherapy (58.7%). Mean duration of anastrozole treatment was 2.2 years (standard deviation, 1.6). Four participants reported nonadherence and declined to submit urine samples, and two had no detectable level of anastrozole (six of 96; 6.3%). Detectable levels among adherent women ranged from 49.3 to 632.8 ng/mL. Conclusion: We demonstrated that collection of urine to measure anastrozole levels is feasible and reliable. Identifying biomarkers to measure adherence is critical for studies investigating interventions to improve hormonal therapy compliance

Can phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition ERase them all?

Seventy percent of breast tumors are estrogen receptor (ER) positive. Although endocrine therapy is successful for the majority of patients with ER-positive tumors, approximately 30% show de novo or acquired resistance and the underlying molecular mechanisms and biomarkers that predict such resistance remain elusive. Two recent papers report that hyperactivation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway produces resistance to tamoxifen. This raises the possibility that combining endocrine therapy and PI3K inhibition may be more effective than monotherapy for treating ER-positive breast tumors, either as first-line therapy for tumors with high PI3K activity or after the development of resistance to endocrine therapy

The role of neuroplasticity in the psychoemotional disorders formation in the chronic tension-type headache

The study was devoted to investigation of relationship between level of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the peripheral blood and pain, psychoemotioal state in patients with chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). The chronic form of TTH had a well-marked anxiety and depressive and asthenic symptoms, which leads to a significant deficiency of BDNF in the peripheral blood.Исследование посвящено изучению взаимосвязи уровня нейротрофического фактора головного мозга (BDNF) в периферической крови с показателями болевого и психоэмоционального статуса у пациентов с хронической головной болью напряжения (ХГБН). В ходе проведенного исследования выявлено, что хроническая форма ГБН имеет в своей клинической картине отчетливую тревожно-депрессивную и астеническую симптоматику, при этом в сыворотке периферической крови выявляется выраженный дефицит BDNF

If we build it they will come: targeting the immune response to breast cancer.

Historically, breast cancer tumors have been considered immunologically quiescent, with the majority of tumors demonstrating low lymphocyte infiltration, low mutational burden, and modest objective response rates to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Tumor and immunologic profiling has shed light on potential mechanisms of immune evasion in breast cancer, as well as unique aspects of the tumor microenvironment (TME). These include elements associated with antigen processing and presentation as well as immunosuppressive elements, which may be targeted therapeutically. Examples of such therapeutic strategies include efforts to (1) expand effector T-cells, natural killer (NK) cells and immunostimulatory dendritic cells (DCs), (2) improve antigen presentation, and (3) decrease inhibitory cytokines, tumor-associated M2 macrophages, regulatory T- and B-cells and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). The goal of these approaches is to alter the TME, thereby making breast tumors more responsive to immunotherapy. In this review, we summarize key developments in our understanding of antitumor immunity in breast cancer, as well as emerging therapeutic modalities that may leverage that understanding to overcome immunologic resistance

Use of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, metastatic breast cancer: a roundtable discussion by The Breast Cancer Therapy Expert Group (BCTEG)

Purpose: To provide an overview of clinical data supporting the use of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−), metastatic breast cancer (mBC), from the perspective of the practicing oncologist community. Methods: A recent roundtable discussion was convened by The Breast Cancer Therapy Expert Group (BCTEG) to review existing data on this topic and its impact on their current practice. Results: Level 1 evidence now supports use of a CDK 4/6 inhibitor in combination with endocrine therapy for patients with HR+, HER2−, mBC. Currently, there are no biomarkers that reliably define patients who will, or will not, benefit from the addition of a CDK 4/6 inhibitor to their endocrine therapy. Additional research is needed to identify the optimal sequencing of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in relation to other therapies as well as the optimal duration of therapy; at present, evidence suggests that use in the upfront setting is better than waiting for a later line of therapy, or adding after endocrine therapy has started. Conclusions: Thus far, three CDK 4/6 inhibitors—palbociclib, ribociclib, and more recently, abemaciclib—have been approved for use in the setting of HR+, HER2−, mBC. The degrees to which these agents differ in terms of CDK4/6 affinity, side-effect profiles, dosing, degree of central nervous system (CNS) penetration, optimal use in combination with antiestrogen therapy, and across other subsets of breast cancer, remain an active area of investigation

A tale of 3 tracers : contrasting uptake patterns of 18F-fluciclovine, 68Ga-PSMA, and 18F-FDG in the uterus and adnexa

A 41-year-old woman with newly diagnosed invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast underwent sequential 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT as part of an ongoing clinical trial (NCT04750473). 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed increased radiotracer uptake in the uterine endometrium and left adnexa. 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT showed increased radiotracer uptake in an enlarged uterus in a known uterine leiomyoma. A clinical 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated radiotracer uptake in the endometrium and a circumferential area of uptake in the left adnexa, a pattern more similar to the 68Ga-PSMA uptake pattern. This case highlights the discordance in the uptake pattern of two radiotracers in different benign gynecological conditions. While these tracers are approved for prostate cancer imaging, they are increasingly being used in other malignancies.http://journals.lww.com/nuclearmed/pages/default.aspxhj2023Nuclear Medicin

Surgical Standards for Management of the Axilla in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials with Pathological Complete Response Endpoint.

Advances in the surgical management of the axilla in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially those with node positive disease at diagnosis, have led to changes in practice and more judicious use of axillary lymph node dissection that may minimize morbidity from surgery. However, there is still significant confusion about how to optimally manage the axilla, resulting in variation among practices. From the viewpoint of drug development, assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains paramount and appropriate assessment of residual disease-the primary endpoint of many drug therapy trials in the neoadjuvant setting-is critical. Therefore decreasing the variability, especially in a multicenter clinical trial setting, and establishing a minimum standard to ensure consistency in clinical trial data, without mandating axillary lymph node dissection, for all patients is necessary. The key elements which include proper staging and identification of nodal involvement at diagnosis, and appropriately targeted management of the axilla at the time of surgical resection are presented. The following protocols have been adopted as standard procedure by the I-SPY2 trial for management of axilla in patients with node positive disease, and present a framework for prospective clinical trials and practice

Erratum: Author Correction: Surgical Standards for Management of the Axilla in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials with Pathological Complete Response Endpoint.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/s41523-018-0074-6.]