Incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing minimally invasive valve surgery

BackgroundWe hypothesize that minimally invasive valve surgery in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is superior to a conventional median sternotomy.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1945 consecutive patients who underwent isolated valve surgery. Included were patients with CKD stages 2 to 5. In-hospital mortality, composite complication rates, and intensive care unit and total hospital lengths of stay of those who underwent a minimally invasive approach were compared with those who underwent a standard median sternotomy. Resource use was approximated based on intensive care unit and total hospital lengths of stay.ResultsThere were 688 patients identified; 510 (74%) underwent minimally invasive surgery, and 178 (26%) underwent a median sternotomy. There was no significant difference in mortality. Minimally invasive surgery was associated with fewer composite complications (33.1% vs 49.4%; odds ratio, 0.5; P ≤ .001), shorter intensive care unit (48 [interquartile range {IQR}, 33-74] hours vs 71 [IQR, 42-96] hours; P < .01), and hospital (8 [IQR, 6-9] days vs 10 [IQR, 8-15] days; P < .001) lengths of stay, and a lower incidence of acute kidney injury (8% vs 14.7%; odds ratio, 0.5; P = .01), compared with median sternotomy. In a multivariable analysis, minimally invasive surgery was associated with a 60% reduction in the risk of development of postoperative acute kidney injury.ConclusionsIn patients with CKD undergoing isolated valve surgery, minimally invasive valve surgery is associated with reduced postoperative complications and lower resource use

The Use of Nitrates in the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Hospitalized After Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and effective strategies for its prevention are greatly needed. The purpose of this retrospective, single-center study was to investigate whether nitrate use during percutaneous coronary artery intervention reduces the incidence of CIN. Chart review of all individuals who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from April 2010 to March 2011 was done. Included in the study were patients who were admitted to the hospital after percutaneous coronary artery intervention and had baseline and follow-up creatinine measured. Patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis and those patients with insufficient information to calculate Mehran score were excluded. There were 199 patients who met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this study. In the identified population, postprocedure renal function was compared between 112 patients who received nitrates prior to coronary intervention and 87 who did not. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Contrast-induced nephropathy was defined as either a 25% or a 0.5 mg/dL, or greater, increase in serum creatinine during the first 48 to 72 hours after contrast exposure. Overall, 43 (21.6%) patients developed CIN post-PCI. Of the patients who received nitrates, 15.2% developed renal impairment when compared to 29.9% in those who did not (odds ratio [OR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.84, P = .014). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that nitrate use was independently correlated with a reduction in the development of contrast nephropathy (OR = 0.334, 95% CI 0.157-0.709, P = .004). Additionally, of the various methods of nitrate administration, intravenous infusion was shown to be the most efficacious route in preventing renal impairment (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.90, P = .03). In conclusion, the use of nitrates prior to PCI, particularly intravenous nitroglycerin infusion, may be associated with a decreased incidence of CIN. </jats:p

Late Intervention on an Occluded Infarct-Related Artery: A Meta-analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials

Context Late intervention to open an occluded infarct-related artery (IRA) after initial acute myocardial infarction was postulated to lead to clinical benefit. Objective To conduct a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Study Selection Eligibility criteria were: 1) randomized trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a totally occluded artery (TIMI flow 0-1) versus medical therapy, 2) in stable post myocardial infarction (MI) patients without spontaneous or low level exercise induced ischemia, 3) trials with a time from the onset of symptoms to randomization >24 hours, but <6 weeks, and 4) trials reporting mortality and recurrent MI as an endpoint. Of 961 citations reviewed, 3 disagreements were easily resolved by discussion and 6 trials were selected for inclusion. Data Synthesis The primary endpoint was the composite of recurrent MI or death. The secondary endpoints were the development of heart failure or recurrent myocardial infarction. In a meta-analysis of the 6 trials, which included 2642 patients, late intervention of an IRA had a RR of death or recurrent MI of 1.12 (95% CI 0.91-1.38). Data regarding the development of heart failure was available for 4 trials. In a meta-analysis of these 4 trials, which included 2527 patients, late intervention of an IRA had a RR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.58-1.08). Data regarding the occurrence of recurrent MI was available for 5 trials. In a meta-analysis of these 5 trials, which included 2598 patients, late intervention of an IRA had a RR of 1.28 (95% CI 0.91-1.79). Conclusions Our meta-analysis of the currently available randomized data addressing late intervention of an occluded IRA failed to reveal clinical benefit with regard to the clinical endpoints of death, heart failure or reinfarction. The trend towards an increase in reinfarction among the PCI treated patients suggested by the Open Artery Trial (OAT) investigators persisted, but did not achieve statistical significance