731 research outputs found

    The X-ray Spectrum of Soft Gamma Repeater 1806-20

    Full text link
    Soft Gamma Repeaters (SGRs) are a class of rare, high-energy galactic transients that have episodes of short (~0.1 sec), soft (~30 keV), intense (~100 Crab), gamma-ray bursts. We report an analysis of the x-ray emission from 95 SGR1806-20 events observed by the International Cometary Explorer. The spectral shape remains remarkably constant for bursts that differ in intensity by a range of 50. Below 15 keV the number spectrum falls off rapidly such that we can estimate the total intensity of the events. Assuming that SGR1806-20 is associated with the supernova remnant G10.0-0.3 (Kulkarni and Frail, Murakami \etal), the brightest events had a total luminosity of ~1.8 x 10^42 erg sec^-1, a factor of 2 x 10^4 above the Eddington limit. A third of the emission was above 30 keV. There are at least three processes that are consistent with the spectral rollover below 15 keV. (1)The rollover is consistent with some forms of self absorption. Typical thermal temperatures are ~20 keV and require an emitting surface with a radius between 10 and 50 km. The lack of spectral variability implies that only the size of the emitting surface varies between events. If the process is thermal synchrotron the required magnetic field might be too small to confine the plasma against the super Eddington flux. (2)The low energy rollover could be due to photoelectric absorption by ~10^24 Hydrogen atoms cm^-2 of neutral material with a cosmic abundance assuming a continuum similar to TB with T= ~22 keV. (3) Emission in the two lowest harmonics from a 1.3 x 10^12 Gauss field would appear as Doppler broadened lines and fall off rapidly below 15 keV.Comment: TeX: 32 pg+ 8 appended postscript figures, in press ApJ(9/94

    Constraints on the Gamma-ray Burst Luminosity Function from PVO and BATSE

    Get PDF
    We examine the width of the gamma-ray burst luminosity function through the distribution of GRB peak fluxes as detected by the Pioneer Venus Orbiter (PVO) and the Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE). The strength of the analysis is greatly enhanced by using a merged catalog of peak fluxes from both instruments with good cross-calibration of their sensitivities. The range of peak fluxes is increased by approximately a factor of 20 relative to the BATSE catalog. Thus, more sensitive investigations of the logNlogP\log N-\log P distribution are possible. We place constraints on the width of the luminosity function of gamma-ray bursts brighter than the BATSE completeness limit by comparing the intensity distribution in the merged catalog with those produced by a variety of spatial density and luminosity functions. For the models examined, 90%90\% of the {\em detectable\/} bursts have peak luminosities within a range of 10, indicating that the peak luminosities of gamma-ray bursts span a markedly less wide range of values than many other of their measurable properties. We also discuss for which slopes of a power-law luminosity function the observed width is at the upper end of the constrained range. This is important in determining the power-law slopes for which luminosity-duration correlations could be important.Comment: 10 pages latex + 2 uuencoded figures; APJL accepte

    Gamma-ray Bursts, Classified Physically

    Full text link
    From Galactic binary sources, to extragalactic magnetized neutron stars, to long-duration GRBs without associated supernovae, the types of sources we now believe capable of producing bursts of gamma-rays continues to grow apace. With this emergent diversity comes the recognition that the traditional (and newly formulated) high-energy observables used for identifying sub-classes does not provide an adequate one-to-one mapping to progenitors. The popular classification of some > 100 sec duration GRBs as ``short bursts'' is not only an unpalatable retronym and syntactically oxymoronic but highlights the difficultly of using what was once a purely phenomenological classification to encode our understanding of the physics that gives rise to the events. Here we propose a physically based classification scheme designed to coexist with the phenomenological system already in place and argue for its utility and necessity.Comment: 6 pages, 3 figures. Slightly expanded version of solicited paper to be published in the Proceedings of ''Gamma Ray Bursts 2007,'' Santa Fe, New Mexico, November 5-9. Edited by E. E. Fenimore, M. Galassi, D. Palme

    GRB990123: Evidence that the Gamma Rays Come from a Central Engine

    Get PDF
    GRB990123 was a long complex gamma-ray burst with an optical transient that started early within the gamma-ray phase. The peak and power law decay of the early optical emission strongly indicates the presence of a decelerating relativistic shell during that phase. Prior to this burst, it was not known if the shell decelerated during the burst, so an external shock origin for the gamma rays was still possible. If the gamma-rays are produced in the external shock, then the pulse widths should reflect the observed deceleration of the shell and increase by about 2.3. We analyze the fine time structure observed in the gamma-ray data from BATSE and determine that the width of the peaks do not increase as expected for a decelerating shell; the later pulses are, at most, a factor of 1.15 longer than the earlier pulses. We also analyze the variability to determine what fraction of the shell's surface could be involved in the production of the gamma rays, the so-called surface filling factor. For GRB990123 we find a filling factor of 0.008. The lack of pulse width evolution eliminates the only remaining kinematically acceptable external shock explanation for the gamma-ray phase and, thus, the gamma rays must originate at a central engine.Comment: 14 pages, 3 embedded figues, Latex, Submitted to ApJ

    Functional biases in GRB's spectral parameter correlations

    Full text link
    Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) show evidence of different spectral shapes, light curves, duration, host galaxies and they explode within a wide redshift range. However, the most of them seems to follow very tight correlations among some observed quantities relating to their energetic. If true, these correlations have significant implications on burst physics, giving constraints on theoretical models. Moreover, several suggestions have been made to use these correlations in order to calibrate GRBs as standard candles and to constrain the cosmological parameters. We investigate the cosmological relation between low energy α\alpha index in GRBs prompt spectra and the redshift zz. We present a statistical analysis of the relation between the total isotropic energy EisoE_{iso} and the peak energy EpE_p (also known as Amati relation) in GRBs spectra searching for possible functional biases. Possible implications on the EisoE_{iso} vs EpE_p relation of the α\alpha vs (1+z)(1+z) correlation are evaluated. We used MonteCarlo simulations and the boostrap method to evaluate how large are the effects of functional biases on the EisoE_{iso} vs EpE_p. We show that high values of the linear correlation coefficent, up to about 0.8, in the EisoE_{iso} vs EpE_p relation are obtained for random generated samples of GRBs, confirming the relevance of functional biases. Astrophysical consequences from EisoE_{iso} vs EpE_p relation are then to be revised after a more accurate and possibly bias free analysis.Comment: 6 pages, 6 figures, conference poster session: "070228: The Next Decade of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows", Amsterdam, March 2007, MNRAS submitte

    GRBs and the thermalization process of electron-positron plasmas

    Full text link
    We discuss the temporal evolution of the pair plasma created in Gamma-Ray Burst sources. A particular attention is paid to the relaxation of the plasma into thermal equilibrium. We also discuss the connection between the dynamics of expansion and the spatial geometry of the plasma. The role of the baryonic loading parameter is emphasized.Comment: 4 pages, 3 figures, in the Proceedings of the "Gamma Ray Bursts 2007" meeting, November 5-9, 2007, Santa Fe, New Mexico, US

    Direct and bulk-scattered forward-shock emissions: sources of X-ray afterglow diversity

    Full text link
    I describe the modifications to the standard forward-shock model required to account for the X-ray light-curve features discovered by Swift in the early afterglow emission and propose that a delayed, pair-enriched, and highly relativistic outflow, which bulk-scatters the forward-shock synchrotron emission, yields sometimes a brighter X-ray emission, producing short-lived X-ray flares, X-ray light-curve plateaus ending with chromatic breaks, and fast post-plateau X-ray decays.Comment: 6 pages, submitted to the proceedings of 2007 GRB meeting, Santa Fe, NM, Nov 5-9 200

    The hidden X-ray breaks in afterglow light curves

    Get PDF
    Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) afterglow observations in the Swift era have a perceived lack of achromatic jet breaks compared to the BeppoSAX, or pre-Swift era. Specifically, relatively few breaks, consistent with jet breaks, are observed in the X-ray light curves of these bursts. If these breaks are truly missing, it has serious consequences for the interpretation of GRB jet collimation and energy requirements, and the use of GRBs as standard candles. Here we address the issue of X-ray breaks which are possibly 'hidden' and hence the light curves are misinterpreted as being single power-laws. We show how a number of precedents, including GRB 990510 & GRB 060206, exist for such hidden breaks and how, even with the well sampled light curves of the Swift era, these breaks may be left misidentified. We do so by synthesising X-ray light curves and finding general trends via Monte Carlo analysis. Furthermore, in light of these simulations, we discuss how to best identify achromatic breaks in afterglow light curves via multi-wavelength analysis.Comment: 4 pages, contributed talk, submitted to the proceedings of Gamma Ray Bursts 2007, Santa Fe, New Mexico, November 5-9 200

    Gamma Ray Burst Central Engines

    Full text link
    I review aspects of the theory of long-duration gamma-ray burst (GRB) central engines. I focus on the requirements of any model; these include the angular momentum of the progenitor, the power, Lorentz factor, asymmetry, and duration of the flow, and both the association and the non-association with bright supernovae. I compare and contrast the collapsar and millisecond proto-magnetar models in light of these requirements. The ability of the latter model to produce a flow with Lorentz factor ~100 while simultaneously maintaining a kinetic luminosity of ~10^50 ergs/s for a timescale of ~10-100 s is emphasized.Comment: 6 pages; proceedings for "Gamma-Ray Bursts 2007," Santa Fe, New Mexico, November 5-9; edited by M. Galassi, D. Palmer, and E. Fenimor
    corecore