35 research outputs found
μ 곡곡κ΄λ¦¬λ‘ μ 곡λ²μ λ¬Έμ - 곡무μμΈμ¬μ λκ°νμ μ€μ¬μΌλ‘ -
νμ μ κ²½μν(Managerialisierung der offentlichen Verwaltung) λλ κ²½μνμ μ μ λνλ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ γμκ³ ν¨μ¨μ μ΅ μ λΆγ λλ γμκ³ κ°λ ₯ν μ λΆγλ₯Ό μ€ννλ €λ μ 곡곡κ΄λ¦¬λ‘ (New Public Management: NPM)μ λ°°κ²½μΌλ‘ μμμ μ΄κ³ λΆν©λ¦¬ν κ·μ μ μ² νμ μ μ±
κ²°μ λ° μ§νκ³Όμ μ κ°μ , μ‘°μ§μ΄μμ κ°μ μ μν κΆνμ νλΆμ΄μ, κ³μ½μ μ μ€μ νκ°μ μ λμ
, μΈμ¬Β·μμ°μ λμ κ°λ°©νΒ·μμ¨ν, λ―Όκ°μν λ° λ―Όμνμ νλ, μ§λ°©λΆκΆν λ±μ ν¬ν¨νλ μ λΆκ°ννλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ΄ ꡬ체νλκ³ μλ€. μ λΆνμ μ ν΅μ¬μμλ₯Ό μ΄λ£¨λ κ²μ΄ 곡무μμΈμ¬μ λμ κ°νμ΄λ€. 곡무μμΈμ¬μ λμ κ°νμ μ λΆκ°νμ λΆκ°νΌν νμμ건μΌλ‘ κ°μ£Όλκ³ μλ€. νμ¬ μΆμ§λκ³ μλ 곡무μμΈμ¬μ λμ μ΄μ μ κ³μ½μ λ± κ°λ°©ν μΈμ¬μ λμ μ€μ νκ°μ , μ±κ³ΌκΈμ μ λμ
μ ν΅ν μΈμ¬μ λμ μ μ°ν μ λ΅κ³Ό μΈλ ₯κ°μΆμ λ§μΆμ΄μ Έ μλ€. 곡무μμΈμ¬μ λμ κ°νμ΄ μ§μ
곡무μμ μ μ€λν λ³νλ₯Ό κ°μ Έμ¬ κ²μμ λΆμ λ³΄λ― λͺ
ννλ€. κ·Έλ¬λ κ·Έλ¬ν λ³νκ° κ³Όμ° μ§μ
곡무μμ λλ₯Ό 보μ₯ν νλ²μ λΆν©λλμ§ μ¬λΆμ λν΄μλ λ³λ° λ
Όμκ° μ΄λ£¨μ΄μ§μ§ μμλ€. μ΄λ μμ§λ μ°λ¦¬λλΌκ° λ²μΉκ΅κ°λ‘ μ±μλμ§ λͺ»νλ€λ κ²μ μμ¬ν΄ μ€λ€λ μ μμ λλ¨ν μ κ°μ€λ¬μ΄ μΌμ΄λ€. μ΄λ¬ν λ¬Έμ μμμλ μ 곡곡κ΄λ¦¬λ‘ μ 곡λ²μ λ¬Έμ μ μ 곡무μμΈμ¬μ λκ°νκ³Ό μ§μ
곡무μμ λμ κ΄κ³λ₯Ό μ€μ¬μΌλ‘ κ²ν νμλ€
Legal Policy Considerations for Reforming Korean Construction Law - focusing on Laws and regulations governing construction industry in Korea -
Law is often blamed to be one of the main causes for the depression of construction industry in Korea. Construction law, that is, laws and regulations governing construction and construction industry, hasn't been studied seriously and academically in depth thus far. This paper tries to review the current status of construction law in Korea and suggests some policy alternatives for reform. It analyzes general problems of Korea construction law, such as systemic and structural inconsistencies, fragmentation and imbalance of legal regime and then proceeds to find out ways to innovate the existing construction laws. In order to achieve an advanced system of law, laws and regulations governing construction have to be reviewed as a whole and evaluated in terms of real outcomes and impacts upon industry and business. More thorough, zero-base initiatives for regulatory reform, which enhance economic competitiveness of construction industry as well as minimize environment and security risks of construction activities, are especially needed in this sector. The paper concludes by emphasizing need for a standing institutional arrangement for review and innovation like construction law review commission composed of public officials, legal experts and representatives from construction industry sector
μ λνλ νμ κ΅κ°μ λ²μΉμ£Όμ
μ λνλ νμ κ΅κ° (Institutionalized Administrative State)μ κ°λ
μ νκ΅μ μμ΄ λ²μΉμ£Όμμ νμ€μ Β·λ²μ λμ νκ²½μ μ€λͺ
ν΄μ£Όλ μ€κ±°μ΄λ€. μ λνλ νμ κ΅κ°λ νμ κ΅κ°λΌλ νλκ΅κ°μ 보νΈμ κ²½ν₯μ νμν΄ μ£Όλ νμμ΄ νκ΅νμ μ¬μ μμ΄ εΈΈη΄ λ‘ μ‘΄μν΄μλ μ¬μ€μ μΈμ§νκ³ κ·Έ μμΈμ νλ²μ λνμ κ³κΈ°λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μ€λͺ
νκ³ μ νλ μλλ₯Ό μ§μ½ν΄ μ€λ€. κ΅κ°νμ± (nation-building) κ³Όμ μμ μꡬλ νμ κ΅κ°μ μꡬλ₯Ό λ·λ°μΉ¨ν΄μ£ΌκΈ° μν΄ νκ΅νλ²μ μΆλ²λΉμλΆν° λν΅λ Ήκ³Ό νμ λΆμ μ°μλ₯Ό μ λνμμΌ°λ€. μ λνλ νμ κ΅κ°λ κ΅μ μ λ₯λ₯ νλΌλ λΉμ κ°λ°λ
μ¬μ μμ²μ μΆ©μ€ν μ΄ννμ¬ μ λΆμ£Όλν μΈνμ κ²½μ μ±μ₯μ μ 리ν νκ²½μ μ 곡νμ λΏλ§ μλλΌ λΉλ‘ μ§μ°λ νλͺ
μ ννμμμ§λΌλ νκ΅μ¬νκ° λ¬Έλ―Όν΅μ (civilian control)λ‘ μ΄ννλ κ³Όμ μμ μ°λ €λμλ μ μΉλΆμμ 리μ€ν¬λ₯Ό μμΆ©ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ μμ€μ μΌλ‘ λ―Όμ£Όμ£Όμλ‘μ μ΄νμ κΈ°μ¬νλ€. μ λνλ νμ κ΅κ°λ κ°λ ₯ν λν΅λ Ήμ (strong presidency)λ₯Ό ꡬννλλ° μ±κ³΅ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨, νΉν μ 3μΈκ³μ μμ΄ λν΅λ Ήμ μ μ€ν¨μμΈμ΄ λ μ½ν λν΅λ Ήκ³Ό κ·Έλ‘ μΈν μ μΉμ νΌλμ ννΌν μ μλ ν¨κ³Όμ μΈ λ²μ λμ νκ²½μ μ 곡νκ³ , μ¬μ§μ΄λ λ¬Έλ―Όν΅μ κ° μ€νλ μ΄νμμ μ κ±°λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μ§κΆν μλ‘μ΄ μ μΉμΈλ ₯λ€μκ² μμ μ μΈ κ΅μ μνμ κ°λ₯μΌ ν΄μ£Όλ μ°νΈμ μΈ μ¬κ±΄μΌλ‘ μμ©νλ€. κ·Έλ¬λ μκ°μ΄ μ§λλ©΄μ μ λνλ νμ κ΅κ°μ μκΈ°λ₯μ΄ λ λλλ¬μ§κ² λνλκΈ° μμνλ€. νμ λΆμ λΉλν, κ²½μ κ°μμ£Όμ, μ κ²½μ μ°©, λ²μΉμ£Όμμ νν΄ν λ±κ³Ό κ°μ κ³ μ§μ νλ¨μ΄ μΌμνλμλ€. μ λνλ νμ κ΅κ°μμλ νμ λΆ, μ
λ²λΆ λ° μ¬λ²λΆμ μν κ³Ό μνΈκ΄κ³κ° νλ²μ μνμ¬ κ΅μ μ μ€μΉμΌλ‘ μ²λ°©λ μ
νλ―Όμ£Όμ£Όμμ λ²μΉμ£Όμμ μꡬλ₯Ό μ곑μν¬ κ°λ₯μ±μ΄ ν¬λ€. μ΄ λ¬Έμ μ μ κ΅κ°κΆλ ₯κ°μ κ΄κ³λ₯Ό λΆκ· ννκ² κ°νλ λν΅λ Ήκ³Ό λΉλνν κ΄λ£κΈ°κ΅¬μ μν μλ‘μ΄ ννμ κΆλ ₯μ§μ€μ κ·Έκ²μΌλ‘ κ³ μ°©Β·νμνμν€κ³ κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό μλ‘μ΄ κ²½μνκ²½μμ μꡬλλ κ΅κ°λ²μ λμ μ μ°μ±κ³Ό μ μλ₯λ ₯μ μμμν€λ©°, λμκ° νλ²μ κΆλ¦¬μ 보μ₯μ μνλ‘κ² λ§λ λ€. λΉλ©΄κ³Όμ λ κ΅νμ νμ λΆ, μ¬λ²λΆκ°μ κ΄κ³λ₯Ό μλμ μΈ κ²¬μ μ κ· νμ κ·Έκ²μΌλ‘ μ¬κ΅¬μΆνλ μΌμ΄λ€. μ λνλ νμ κ΅κ°μμ μ΄λ€κ°μ μ‘°μ©νκ³ μΌμ¬λΆλν λͺ
λ Ήκ³ν΅μ κ°μ‘°νλ κ²μ ν λ κ΅μ μ λ₯λ₯ νλ₯Ό μν΄ κΈ°μ¬νμμ§ λͺ¨λ₯΄μ§λ§, κ°λ°©μ±κ³Ό ν¬λͺ
μ±μ΄ κ°μλλ μλ‘μ΄ μ§μνμμλ μ€νλ € μ μΉμ νμ±μ μ₯μ μμΈμ΄ λλ€λ κ²μ μΈμν νμκ° μλ€
Linking Administrative Law and Public Policy -cherishing the memory of Professor Suh Won-Woo for the first anniversary of his passing-
This paper illuminates academic achievements of Professor Suh Won-Woo as a
scholar, particularly in terms of impact upon and contribution to the
administrative law, law and public policy in Korea. Reviewed and evaluated are
his lifelong efforts to perceive the originality of Korean administrative law and
to try to build a new scientific administrative law which is a indispensable,
integral component of the comprehensive science of administration. Study of law
and public policy in Korea got into its stride thanks to Professor Suh's
persevering endeavors to link both fields into a policy science of public law as
a comprehensive science of public administration as he calls it. Much remains
unfinished and yet to be developed by the succeeding generations of public law
and policy science, while his works and ambitions still guide us forth in search
of a new realm of social science where administrative law meets public policy
A Legal Approach to Policy Instruments
νμ λ²νμ μμ΄ νμνμλ‘ μ νμ νβ€μ μ±
ν λΆμΌμμμ μ μ±
μλ¨μ λν λ
Όμμμλ κ±°μ κ³ λ €λμ§ μμλ€κ³ ν΄λ κ³ΌμΈμ΄ μλλ€. μ΅κ·Ό μ μ±
μλ¨λ‘ μ΄ λ€μ νμ±νλλ κ³Όμ μμλ νμνμλ‘ μ λν κ΄μ¬μ μ°Ύμ λ³Ό μ μμλ€. νμ ν λΆμΌμμ μ μ±
μλ¨μ λν μ°κ΅¬κ΄μ¬μ΄ μ μ°¨ κ³ μ‘°λκ³ μλ κ²κ³Όλ λμ‘°μ μΌλ‘ λ²ν, νΉν νμ λ²νμ μμ΄ μ μ±
μλ¨μ λν λ
Όμλ μΌκ²¬ νΉλ³ν μ°κ΅¬λμ λλ μμμΌλ‘ λΆκ°λκ³ μμ§λ μλ€. μ΄μ κ°μ 견μ§μμ μ μ±
μλ¨μ λν λ²μ μ κ·Όμ μΈμκ΄μ¬, μ°κ΅¬λν₯κ³Ό μ±κ³Ό, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μ μ±
μλ¨λ‘ μ 곡λ²μ νκ³λ₯Ό κ³ μ°°νμλ€. μ μ±
μλ¨λ‘ κ³Ό νμνμλ‘ μ΄ νμ°μ μΌλ‘ λμΌν κΆ€λλ₯Ό λ°μΌλ©° 곡λ보쑰λ₯Ό μ·¨ν΄μΌ νλ κ²μ μλμ§λ§, μ μ±
μλ¨λ‘ κ³Ό μ μ±
μλ¨μ λν λ²μ μ κ·ΌμΌλ‘μ νμνμλ‘ κ³Όμ μ°κ³μ μ μ μ λͺ¨μν νμκ° μλ€. μ μ±
μλ¨λ‘ μ΄ μ΄λ‘ μ΄λ μ€λ¬΄μμ λμ± λ νμ€μ±κ³Ό μ€λλ ₯μ κ°μ§λ €λ©΄ νμνμλ‘ κ³Όμ μ°κ³μ μ ν©μ΄ 무μ보λ€λ νμμ μ΄λ€. The "Handlungsformenlehre", which has been developed within the field of administrative law as a theory of the legal form of administrative activities, could hardly be taken into consideration in discussing policy instruments recently revitalized in the realm of policy science in Korea. The paper tries to illustrate why and how these two different approaches should be linked together, by showing aconceptual framework, development and diversification of the legal form of administrative instruments such as the 'administrative act' (Verwaltungsakt), contract, administrative rule-making, and other informal administrative activities, including administrative guidance. Discussing legal limitations of policy instrument approaches from legal perspective, it explores possibility to solve those limitations and suggests an alternative way of integrating legal chapters into the policy instrument discussions
μ λ½ν΅ν©μ 곡λ²μ μν₯μ κ΄ν μ°κ΅¬: μ λ½ν΅ν©μ΄ λ μΌνμ λ²μ λ―ΈμΉ μν₯μ μ€μ¬μΌλ‘
Impact of the European Integration on national public laws of member states turns out to be unique and remarkable, which this article analyzes with its influence upon the German Administrative Law. European Administrative Law, which emerged originally as a discrete body of those special laws governing the organs of the European Community encompasses now broader elements like public laws of each member state to be applied to the Community relevant issues and cases as well as those public laws formed by various instances of the European Union like the Commission, Court of Justice of the European Communities etc. It exercises great influence upon the German administrative law primarily through the direct effect (Direktwirkung) and principle-guided reception of european laws and legal doctrines (prinzipiengeleitete Rezeption). At this moment it is almost impossible to understand the German administrative law without comprehending the influence of the European Integration upon it. So long as German administrative law plays a role as a reference model for Korean Administrative law, still in many ways, the changes in its legal doctrines and theories brought about by the European integration need to be correctly reviewed and analyzed with its current status of development. This article reviews those changes, especially in those legal doctrines and theories regarding legal forms of administrative activity (Rechtsformenlehre: including source of law and forms of administrative acts: Redusquellenlehre and Handlungsformenlehre), subjective public rights (subjective οΌffentliche Rechie), administrative discretion (Beurteilungsspielraum und Ermesseru and Administrative Guidelines and Standards (Verwaltungsvorschriten)
Analyzing the Process of Parliamentary Participation Institutionalization in Administrative Law
λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ 2015λ
κ΅νλ² κ°μ μ λ±μ₯κ³Ό ν΄μ₯μ κ³Όμ μ Kingdonμ λ€μ€νλ¦λͺ¨νκ³Ό Sabatierμ μ μ±
μΉνΈμ°ν©λͺ¨νμ κ²°ν©, λΆμνμ¬ νμ μ
λ²μ λν κ΅ν κ΄μ¬ μ λν κ³Όμ μ λ³΄λ€ μ ν©μ± μκ² μ΄ν΄λ³΄κ³ μ νμλ€. νμ μ
λ²μ λν κ΅ν κ΄μ¬ μ λλ 1997λ
λΆν° μ μ¦μ μΌλ‘ ν λλμ΄ μμΌλ©° 2015λ
κ΅νλ² κ°μ μλ μ΄λ¬ν νλ¦μμ μ§νλμ΄ μλ€κ³ λ³Ό μ μλ€. νμ μ
λ² μ μ¦κ° λ° λ²λ₯ μ μ·¨μ§μ λ€λ₯Έ νμ μ
λ²μ λν κ΅νμ λΆλ§μ΄ λ¬Έμ μ νλ¦μΌλ‘ μμ©νμκ³ , 2015λ
곡무μμ°κΈλ² κ°μ μκ³Ό μ°κ³μ²λ¦¬λ₯Ό κ²ν νλ©΄μ μ μ±
μ μ°½μ΄ μ΄λ¦° κ²μΌλ‘ λ³Ό μ μλ€. μ΄ κ³Όμ μμ λν΅λ Ήκ³Ό μλ΄μ§λλΆ λ° κ΅νμμ₯μ κ°λ±μ΄λΌλ μ μΉμ νλ¦μ΄ μμ©νμ¬ 2015λ
κ΅ν λ² κ°μ μμ κ΅νλ₯Ό ν΅κ³Όνμμ§λ§ λν΅λ Ήμ κ±°λΆκΆ νμ¬λ‘ ν΄μ₯νκ² λμλ€. μ μ±
μ μ°½μ΄ μ΄λ¦° κ²½μ°μλ κ°μ λμ§ μμ μ΄μ λ λΆμμ ν μ μΉ νλ¦μ΄ μ μ±
μ μ°½κ³Ό μ°κ²°λμλ κ²μ΄ μμΈμ΄ λμλ€. λΆμμ ν μ μΉ νλ¦μ Sabatierμ μ μ±
μΉνΈμ°ν©λͺ¨νμ νμ©νμ¬ μ΄ν΄λ³΄λ©΄ κ΅νλΌλ μ μ±
μ§μ§μ°ν© λ΄λΆμμ μ μΉμ μ΄λ
κ³Ό μμμ΄ μμΆ©λμκΈ° λλ¬ΈμΌλ‘ λ³Ό μ μλ€. λν μ μ±
μ νλ¦μ μλ μ¬λ¬ μ μ±
λμ μ€μμ λ³νμ νμ΄ ν° μ μ±
λμμ΄ κ°μ μμΌλ‘ μ νλμλ€λ μ μ΄ νκ³λ‘ μμ©νμλ€κ³ λ³Ό μ μλ€. νμ μ
λ²μ λν κ΅ν κ΄μ¬ μ λλ μΆν λ€μ λ
Όμλ μ¬μ§κ° μλ μ°μ μ± μλ μ μ±
μ΄μμ΄λ―λ‘ ν₯ν 2015λ
κ°μ μμ λλ¬μΌ λΆμμ ν μ μΉνλ¦μ 보μνκΈ° μν΄ μ μ§μ μΈ μ μ±
λμμ μ μκ° νμν κ²μΌλ‘ 보μΈλ€.This study aims to examine the process of institutionalization in the National Assembly in 2015 through Kingdon's multiple streams framework and Sabatier' s advocacy coalition framework. The system of parliamentary participation in administrative law has been increasing gradually since 1997, and the revision of the National Assembly Act in 2015 has also been underway. The increase in administrative law, the effect of the law and the dissatisfaction of the National Assembly with other administrative law acted as a problem, and a policy window was opened when examining the revision of the civil service pension law in 2015. The politics of the conflict between the president and the presidential leadership and the speaker of the National Assembly acted in this process,, and the revision of the National Assembly Act passed in 2015.The reason for the failure to pass the amendment is that an incomplete political stream was linked to the policy window even though it was open. Additional analysis using Sabatier's model of policy advocacy coalition showed that the relationship between the executive branch and the National Assembly was that that of governing party and opposition, competitors in the policy support coalitions, though they did not necessarily have interest conflicts. In addition, the policy stream was also limited by the fact that policy alternatives, somewhat more varied, were selected as the revised proposals. The National Assembly system of involvement in administrative law is a continuing policy issue that can be discussed again. Therefore, it is necessary to show gradual policy alternatives in order to complement the imperfect political trend surrounding the 2015 revised bill
μ¬νλ³λ¦¬μ λ²μ λμ : μ 3μ£Όμ μ§μ ν λ‘
μ¬μ€μ νμ λΆν¨(νΉμ 곡무μ λΆν¨)μ λν λ²μ λμμ κ΄ν μ°κ΅¬λ κ·Έλ κ² λ§μ§ μμ μ€μ μ΄λ€. κ·Έκ²μ κ·Έ λμ νμ λΆν¨λ₯Ό λ²μ μΈ μΈ‘λ©΄μμ 보λ€λ μ€λ¦¬(κ°μΈ νΉμ μ¬νμμ€μ μ€λ¦¬)μ μΈ μΈ‘λ©΄ νΉμ μ μΉμ μΈ μΈ‘λ©΄μμ μ κ·ΌνμκΈ° λλ¬Έμ΄λ€. μ΄λ¬ν μκ°μμμ νμ λΆν¨μ μ€λͺ
λ ₯μ λλ¦λλ‘ μλΉν λλ€κ³ ν μ μμ§λ§, λ¬Έμ λ λΆμμ κ²°κ³Όλ‘μ κ·Έλ¬λ©΄ κ³Όμ° μ΄λ ν μ²λ°©μ μ μν κ²μΈκ°μ λν΄μλ λ§μ°νκ³ μΆμμ μΈ κ²°λ‘ μ μ μνμμ λΏ λ³΄λ€ μ€ν¨μ±μκ³ κ΅¬μ²΄μ μΈ λμμ μ μμλ νκ³κ° μμλ€. μ΄μ κ°μ λ©΄μμ νμ λΆν¨μ λν λ²μ μ κ·Όμ λ§€μ° μλ―Έμλ κ²μ΄λ©°, λν μμΌλ‘ μ§μμ μΈ μ°κ΅¬κ° νμνλ€κ³ ν μ μλ€.
λν μ΄λ¬ν νμ λΆν¨λ₯Ό μ΅κ·Όμ λΉλ²νκ² λ°μνκ³ μλ μ§λ¨λΆμμ λ¬Έμ μ μ°κ³μν¨ μλλ νμ€λ¬Έμ μ λνμ¬ λ¬΄κ΄μ¬νκ³ λ±νμνλ νμλ€μκ² λ§μ μμ¬μ μ λμ Έμ£Όκ³ μλ€λ μ μμ λ§€μ° κΈμ μ μΈ μλ―Έλ₯Ό μ§λκ³ μλ€.
μ΄μ κ°μ λ°μ ν κ΅μμ μλμ 곡κ°νλ©°, λ³΄λ‘ μ μ°¨μμμ λͺ κ°μ§ μΆκ°λ
Όμλ₯Ό νκ³ μ νλ€
Empirical study on the lawmaking competency of public officer
κΈλ³νλ μΈκ³κ²½μ , λΉμ½μ μΈ κΈ°μ λ°μ , μ λΆμ±κ³Όμ λν κΈ°λμ μ¦κ°λ 곡곡μλΉμ€μ κΈ°μ κ³Ό λ₯λ ₯μ λν μλ‘μ΄ κ΄μ¬μ μꡬνκ³ μλ€. μ΄λ¬ν νκ²½λ³νμ λμνκ³ μ λΆμ μμ°μ±μ μ κ³ νκΈ° μν΄μλ 곡무μμ μλμ μ μ₯μν€λ κ²μ΄ 무μ보λ€λ μ€μνλ€λ μΈμμ΄ νμ°λκ³ μλ€. 1970λ
λ νλ° κ³΅λ¬΄μμ λ₯λ ₯κ³Ό κΈ°μ μ λͺ
νν νκ³ κ°μ νκΈ°μν΄ λ―Έκ΅μμ κ³ μλμ΄ 1979λ
λΆν° λ―Έκ΅ κ³ μ곡무μλ¨ (the U.S. Senior Executive Service)μ μ μ©λμκ³ 1990λ
λμ μκ΅, λ
μΌ, μΌλ³Έ λ± μ μ§κ΅μ μν΄ λμ
λ μλ μ κ·Ό'(competency approach)μ λ°λ‘ κ·Έλ¬ν μΈμμ λ°°κ²½μΌλ‘ νλ€. μ°λ¦¬λλΌλ μλ μ κ·Ό(competency approach)μ 2006λ
μ€μ μμ μΈ κ³ μ곡무μμ λμ μ€ν¨μ±μ μ κ³ νκΈ° μν΄ κ³ μ곡무μμκ² μ μ©νμ¬ νμ©ν μμ μΈ κ²μΌλ‘ μλ €μ§κ³ μλ€. 곡무μμ μλ μ€ νΉν μ
λ²μλ(law-making competency)μ λ²μΉνμ μ κ·λ²κ³Ό μ€μ μλ©΄μμ νμλΆκ°κ²°ν μμμ΄λ€. μ
λ²μλμ΄λ μ μ±
μ μ
λ²μ μΌλ‘ ꡬ체ννλ κ³Όμ μμ μ΄λ£¨μ΄μ§λ λ²λ Ήμ μ μ , κ°μ , μ λΉ λ±μ κ΄λ ¨λ μλμ μ΄μΉνλ€. μ°λ¦¬λλΌμ κ²½μ°, νμ λΆκ° κ΅νμ ν¨κ» λ²λ₯ μμ μΆκΆμ 곡μ ν΄ μκ³ νμ κ΅κ°μ μ κ° λ± μμ¬μ μΈ μ΄μ μμ νμ λΆκ° μ
λ² μ λ¬Έμ± λ©΄μμ κ΅νμ λΉν΄ μλμ μ°μμ±μ μ§λλ μν©μ΄ μ§μλμ΄ μλ€. κ·Έλ¬λ μ΄μ κ°μ μ
λ²μμμ μ λΆ μ£Όλκ²½ν₯, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μ λΆμ
λ² μ΄κ΄κΈ°κ΅¬μΈ λ²μ μ²μ λ²μ μ
무κ·μ λ±μ μν λ²μ μ
무μ μ€μμ±μ λν κ΄μ¬μλ λΆκ΅¬νκ³ κ³΅λ¬΄μμ μ
λ²μλμ΄ κ·Έμ μμνλ μμ€μΌλ‘ ν보λμλμ§λ λλ¨ν μμ¬μ€λ¬μ΄ μ€μ μ΄λ€ 곡무μμ μ
λ²μλ μ κ³ λ₯Ό μν μ μ±
μ λ
Έλ ₯μ μ΄κ΅¬νλ λͺ©μλ¦¬κ° λμ΄μ§ μλ μ΄μ λ λ°λ‘ κ±°κΈ°μ μλ€. The ever changing global economy, dramatic technological changes, and increased expectations about government performance demand a new attention to public service skills and capacity. Based on the perception, the Competency Approach designed to clarify and improve the capabilities and skills of senior bureaucrats in the U.S. has been applied to the U.S. Senior Executive Service, introduced to the U.K. Germany and Japan in 1990's. In Korea, The Competency Approach is supposed to be applied to more than 3 upper-level public servants introducing Senior Executive Service in July, 2006. The competency of public officer , particularly law-making competency is a requisite to increase central or local government's productivity. Law-making competency is defined as the total competency related with making, reforming and putting in order administrative rules. This study, through the survey on the lawmaking competency of public officer in central and local government, measured their lawmaking competency and analyzed the factors to affect their lawmaking competency. The result of the analysis was that while personal factors such as majoring in law in undergraduate or graduate school, the period of the education related with legislative affairs or the number of dealing with legislative affairs are positively significant. Lawyer certification or Doctor of laws, total work period as a public officer and rank difference within middle-level government posts are insignificant. Among organization factors, the level of the organization's professionalism in regards to lawmaking and the interest in improving employee's lawmaking competency are both significant, the former positively and the latter negatively. The result of this analysis implies that the strengthening of education about lawmaking theories and skills and cultivating professionals in this field are both required to improve the lawmaking competency of public officer