Clinical outcomes of tumor bleeding in duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a 20-year single-center experience

Background: Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare, and reports on duodenal GIST bleeding are few. We analyzed the risk factors and clinical outcomes of hemorrhagic duodenal GISTs and compared them with those of gastric GISTs. Methods: Primary duodenal GISTs surgically diagnosed between January 1998 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Furthermore, patients with duodenal GIST were compared with those with primary gastric GIST histopathologically diagnosed between January 1998 and May 2015 using previously published data. Results: Of the 170 total patients with duodenal GISTs, 48 (28.2%) exhibited tumor bleeding. Endoscopic intervention, embolization, and non-interventional conservative treatment were performed for initial hemostasis in 17, 1, and 30 patients, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 81.9% in the bleeding group and 89.4% in the non-bleeding group (P = 0.495). Multivariate analysis showed that p53 positivity was a significant risk factor for duodenal GIST bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 2.781, P = 0.012), and age ≥ 60?years (HR 3.163, P = 0.027), a large maximum diameter (comparing four groups: < 2, 2?5, 5?10, and ≥ 10?cm), and mitotic count ≥ 5/high-power field (HPF) (HR 3.265, P = 0.032) were risk factors for overall survival. The incidence of bleeding was significantly higher in duodenal GISTs than in gastric GISTs (28.2% vs. 6.6%, P < 0.001), and the re-bleeding rate after endoscopic hemostasis was also higher in duodenal GISTs than in gastric GISTs (41.2% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.118). Conclusion: In patients with duodenal GIST with old age, large tumor diameter, and mitotic count ≥ 5/HPF, a treatment plan should be established in consideration of the poor prognosis, although tumor bleeding does not adversely affect the prognosis. Duodenal GISTs have a higher incidence of tumor bleeding and re-bleeding rate after endoscopic hemostasis than gastric GISTs

Associations of Serum Lipid Level with Gastric Cancer Risk, Pathology, and Prognosis

Purpose The association of serum lipids with gastric cancer is controversial. We clarified the role of serum lipids in the development, progression, and prognosis of gastric cancer. Materials and Methods In total, 412 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer were prospectively recruited, and 2,934 control subjects who underwent screening endoscopy were enrolled from December 2013 to March 2017 to conduct a case-control study in a tertiary center. Serum lipid profiles, including total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride (TG), apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I), and apolipoprotein B, and clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed. Results The gastric cancer group showed significantly lower HDL-C, higher LDL-C, and lower apoA-I level than the control group. In multivariate analysis, old age (odds ratio [OR], 1.051; p < 0.001), smoking (OR, 1.337; p < 0.001), a family history of gastric cancer (OR, 2.038; p < 0.001), Helicobacter pylori seropositivity (OR, 4.240; p < 0.001), lower HDL-C (OR, 0.712; p=0.020), and higher LDL-C (p=0.002) were significant risk factors for gastric cancer. Lower HDL-C and higher LDL-C remained significant after adjustments for covariates, including age and sex. In a subgroup analysis of the gastric cancer group, lower TG levels were associated with undifferentiated histology. No serum lipids were associated with overall survival. Conclusion Lower HDL-C and higher LDL-C were associated with the risk of gastric cancer, even after adjusting for age, sex, and other factors. In the gastric cancer group, undifferentiated histology was associated with lower TG levels