5 research outputs found

    As[2]?5 keV ์ด์˜จ ์ฃผ์ž…์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์–•์€ ์ ‘ํ•ฉ์˜ 0.1 ใŽ› NMOSFET

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์ „๊ธฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2000.Maste

    ๋งŒ์„ฑ ์—ผ์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์งˆํ™˜์—์„œ Wnt์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ์กฐ์ ˆ์ธ์ž์ธ R-spondin-1๊ณผ Dickkopf-1์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์  ์˜๋ฏธ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ ๋‚ด๊ณผํ•™ ์ „๊ณต, 2013. 2. ์ด์œค์ข….์„œ๋ก : Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1)์€ Wnt ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์˜ ์–ต์ œ์ธ์ž๋กœ์„œ ์—ผ์ฆ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ด€์ ˆ ํŒŒ๊ดด์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. R-spondins (Rspo)๋Š” Dkk1์„ ๊ธธํ•ญํ•˜์—ฌ Wnt ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ „๋‹ฌ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ•์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ถ„๋น„ํ˜• ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ์ด๋‹ค. ์—ผ์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ์˜ ๋™๋ฌผ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ Rspo1์€ ๊ด€์ ˆ ํŒŒ๊ดด๋ฅผ ๋ณดํ˜ธํ•˜๋Š” ์ž‘์šฉ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ฅ˜๋งˆํ‹ฐ์Šค๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ๊ณผ ๊ฐ•์ง์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋งŒ์„ฑ ์—ผ์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์งˆํ™˜ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ๊ทธ ์—ญํ• ์€ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์ž˜ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฅ˜๋งˆํ‹ฐ์Šค๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ๊ณผ ๊ฐ•์ง์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ํ˜ˆ์ค‘ Rspo1๊ณผ Dkk1 ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทธ ์ž„์ƒ์  ์˜๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  Dkk1/Rspo1์˜ ๋น„๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋“ค ์งˆํ™˜์—์„œ Wnt ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ „๋‹ฌ์˜ ์–ต์ œ ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•: 100๋ช…์˜ ๋ฅ˜๋งˆํ‹ฐ์Šค๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ ํ™˜์ž์™€ 60๋ช…์˜ ๊ฐ•์ง์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ ๊ฒ€์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ „์ฒด ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์—ฐ๋ น๊ณผ ์„ฑ๋ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด 3:1๋กœ ์ง์ง€์€ 53๋ช…์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ• ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์˜ ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ ๊ฒ€์ฒด๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. 15๋ช…์˜ ๋ฅ˜๋งˆํ‹ฐ์Šค๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ ํ™˜์ž์™€ 10๋ช…์˜ ๊ฐ•์ง์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ TNF-ฮฑ ์–ต์ œ์ œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์‹œ์ž‘ ์ „๊ณผ 12์ฃผ ์ดํ›„์˜ ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ ๊ฒ€์ฒด๋ฅผ ๋ชจ์•˜๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ฌด๋ฆŽ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์ข…์ฐฝ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” 24๋ช…์˜ ํ™˜์ž(17๋ช…์˜ ๋ฅ˜๋งˆํ‹ฐ์Šค๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ ํ™˜์ž์™€ 7๋ช…์˜ ๊ณจ๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ ํ™˜์ž)๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ํ™œ์•ก ๊ฒ€์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•œ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž„์ƒ ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์งˆ๋ณ‘ ํ™œ์„ฑ๋„๋Š” Disease activities in RA and AS were measured by Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) ์ด๋‚˜ ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฅ˜๋งˆํ‹ฐ์Šค๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ •๋œ Sharp/Van der Heidje score (Sharp ์ ์ˆ˜)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ํ•™์  ๊ด€์ ˆ ์†์ƒ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒด์•ก ๋‚ด Rspo1๊ณผ Dkk1 ๋†๋„๋Š” sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ: ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ Rspo1์€ ๋ฅ˜๋งˆํ‹ฐ์Šค๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ๊ฐ•์ง์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผ์ด๋‚˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค(p0.001). ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ Dkk1/Rspo1์˜ ๋น„๋Š” ๋ฅ˜๋งˆํ‹ฐ์Šค๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ(p<0.0001), ๊ฐ•์ง์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฑด๊ฐ• ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๊ฐ์†Œ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฅ˜๋งˆํ‹ฐ์Šค๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ์—์„œ Dkk1/Rspo1 ๋น„๊ฐ€ Rspo1์ด๋‚˜ Dkk1 ๋‹จ๋… ๋ณด๋‹ค ESR(p=0.030), CRP (p=0.004) ๋ฐ DAS 28 (p=0.049)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์งˆ๋ณ‘ ํ™œ์„ฑ๋„๋ฅผ ๋”์šฑ ์ž˜ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณจ ๋ฏธ๋ž€์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ๋‹ค(p=0.026). ๋˜ํ•œ, TNF-ฮฑ ์–ต์ œ์ œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์ดํ›„์—๋„ Rspo1๊ณผ Dkk1 ๊ฐ๊ฐ์€ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, Dkk1/Rspo1์€ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค(p=0.001 by Wilcoxon signed rank test). ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ฐ•์ง์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผ์—์„œ๋Š” TNF-ฮฑ ์–ต์ œ์ œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ํ›„ ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ Rspo1 ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์ง€๋งŒ(p=0.022), Dkk1/Rspo1๋น„๋Š” ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฅ˜๋งˆํ‹ฐ์Šค๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ํ™œ์•ก Rspo1๊ณผ Dkk1 ๋†๋„๋Š” ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‚ฎ์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ(p<0.0001), ๊ณจ๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ํ™œ์•ก ๋†๋„์™€๋Š” ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก : ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ฒ˜์Œ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ํ˜ˆ์•ก์—์„œ Rspo1 ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, Wnt ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์–ต์ œ์˜ ํ‘œ์ง€์ž๋กœ Dkk1/Rspo1์ด ๋ฅ˜๋งˆํ‹ฐ์Šค๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ์—์„œ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๊ณ , ์งˆ๋ณ‘ ํ™œ์„ฑ๋„ ๋ฐ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์†์ƒ๊ณผ ์—ฐ๊ด€ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ Dkk1/Rspo1 ๋น„๋Š” Rspo1์ด๋‚˜ Dkk1 ๋‹จ๋…๋ณด๋‹ค ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์ธ Wnt ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ „๋‹ฌ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋œ๋‹ค.1. ์„œ ๋ก  1 1.1 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ 1 1.2 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉ์  4 2. ๋ณธ ๋ก  5 2.1 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• 5 2.1.1 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž ์„ ์ • 5 2.1.2 ์ž๋ฃŒ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๋ฐ ํ™˜์ž ํ‰๊ฐ€ 6 2.1.3 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒ€์ฒด์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๋ฐ ๋ณด๊ด€ 7 2.1.4 Rspo1 ๋†๋„์˜ ์ธก์ • 7 2.1.5 Dkk1 ๋†๋„์˜ ์ธก์ • 8 2.1.6 ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ๋ถ„์„ 9 2.2 ๊ฒฐ ๊ณผ 10 2.2.1 ํ™˜์ž ๊ตฐ์˜ ์ž„์ƒ ์–‘์ƒ 10 2.2.2 ์ •์ƒ์ธ์—์„œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ Rspo1๊ณผ Dkk1 ๋†๋„ ๋ถ„์„ 10 2.2.3 ์งˆํ™˜ ๋ณ„ ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ Rspo1, Dkk1 ๋ฐ Dkk1/Rspo1์˜ ๋น„ 11 2.2.4 ๋ฅ˜๋งˆํ‹ฐ์Šค๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ์˜ ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ Rspo1๊ณผ Dkk1 ๋†๋„ ๋ถ„์„ 12 2.2.5 ๊ฐ•์ง์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผ์˜ ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ Rspo1๊ณผ Dkk1 ๋†๋„ ๋ถ„์„ 14 2.2.6 TNF-ฮฑ์–ต์ œ์ œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์ „ํ›„ ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ Rspo1๊ณผ Dkk1 ๋†๋„ ๋น„๊ต 14 2.2.7 ๊ด€์ ˆ ํ™œ์•ก์—์„œ Rspo1๊ณผ Dkk1 ๋†๋„ ๋ถ„์„ 15 3. ๊ณ  ์ฐฐ 17 3.1 ์ฒด์•ก ๋‚ด Rspo1 ๋†๋„์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์  ์˜๋ฏธ 17 3.2 ์ฒด์•ก ๋‚ด Rspo1 ๋†๋„์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์  ์˜๋ฏธ 19 3.3 ํ˜ˆ์•ก ๋‚ด Dkk1/Rspo1 ๋น„์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์  ์˜๋ฏธ 22 3.4 ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ œํ•œ์  24 4. ์š”์•ฝ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฐ๋ก  26 5. ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ 27 6. ํ‘œ 37 7. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 43Maste

    ํŠธ์œˆ SONOS ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ํŠธ๋žœ์ง€์Šคํ„ฐ์˜ ็ธฎๅฐๅŒ– ๋ฐ 2-๋น„ํŠธ์…€ ้žๆฎ็™ผๆ€ง ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ็ด ๅญ ๆ‡‰็”จ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    No full text
    Thesis(doctoral)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์ „๊ธฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2006.Docto

    Effects of Message Framing, Eco-friendly Consciousness, and Advertising Appeal Types on Consumer Attitude toward Green Product

    No full text
    corecore