서울시 거주 1인가구와 다인가구의 주관적 건강수준의 차이

학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 보건대학원 : 보건학과, 2015. 2. 조성일.Introduction : Since 1960s, Korea has achieved such an advancement on economic growth with industrialization and urbanization. As a result, the proportion of single-person households in Seoul has been rising sharply from 4.5% in 1980 to 24.4% in 2010 (Population and Housing Census, Korea National Statistical Office). The majority of the single-person households consist of 20s to 30s under 64-year-old people especially in Seoul. Therefore, the characteristics related with young and middle-aged single-person households could be the key to prepare the future health policies for the single-person households. The aim of this study is to investigate the difference of self-rated health level between single-person households and non single-person households and figure out the influence factors acting on the difference of self-rated health level between single-person households and non single-person households. Methods : This study used the Korea Community Health Survey(KCHS) data of 2011. To explore the association between household type and self-rated health level, 8,565 adults aged 19-64 (997 adults who were in the single-person households and 7,568 adults who were in the non single-person households) who lived in Seoul, Korea were randomly selected from each household as a study population. All variables were from the KCHS(the Korea Community Health Survey) questionnaire. To achieve the objectives of this study, descriptive statistics, age stratification, and logistic regression analysis were carried out. Results : According to the results of univariate logistic regression analysis, the association between household type and self-rated health level was statistically significant(OR : 1.27, CI : 1.03-1.57). And, the odds ratio in the 50-64 age group is also statistically significant(OR : 1.64, CI : 1.21-2.22) among the age groups results. As to the results of the multiple logistic regression analysis, the subjects who are older, low household income earner, less-educated, economically inactive(unemployed), never drinker and have had experiences of diagnosis with chronic disease and dissatisfaction of medical needs are associated with poor self-rated health level significantly. Moreover, regular participation in leisure activities is considerably associated with poor self-rated health level. However, frequent contacts with family, friends and neighbors is not statistically significant in the association with poor self-rated health level. In addition, the association between type of household and poor self-rated health level in each age group are not statistically significant after adjusting other factors. Conclusion : The results of the study reaches the certain conclusion that the powerful factors effects on the difference of self-rated health level between two household types are socio-demographic factors, experiences of disease diagnosis and dissatisfied medical needs and social participation rather than household type. In addition, the factors can decrease effects of the single-person household on the poor self-rated health level in each age group varies considerably. Therefore, if the health policies for the single-person households can be focused on the significant factors in each age group, the policies will be effective in terms of customized single-person households interventions. As a result, this study can contribute to build the baseline data for the proper health policies targeting single-person households.-Contents- Ⅰ. Introduction ....................................................1 1. Background .....................................................1 2. Objectives .......................................................5 Ⅱ. Methods .........................................................6 1. Study design and Hypotheses ............................6 2. Data Collection ..................................................8 3. Measures ........................................................10 4. Data Analysis ...................................................15 Ⅲ. Results ...........................................................16 1. General characteristics of subjects by household types and age groups ...........................................16 2. Analysis of related factors for difference of self-rated health level between single-person households and non single-person households ...............................29 3. Analysis of related factors for difference of self-rated health level between single-person households and non single-person households by age groups ..........36 Ⅳ. Discussion and Conclusion ...............................48 1. Interpretation of the results ..................................48 2. Limitations ........................................................54 3. Conclusion .......................................................55 References ..........................................................56 Korean Abstract ....................................................60Maste

Michael Oakeshott`s theory of education with reference to his concepts of reality and practice

학위논문(박사)--서울대학교 대학원 :교육학과 교육학전공,2000.Docto

M. Oakeshott's theory of education : The relation of liberal education and moral education

오우크쇼트의 형이상학과 정치철학은 각각 자유교육의 근거와 도덕교육의 기반에 관한 이론적 설명을 제시한다. 자유교육(또는 교과교육)의 근거로서의 實在와 도덕교육(또는 사회화)의 기반으로서의 實際는 각각 총체의 무시간적 차원과 시간적 차원을 나타낸다는 점에서는 구분되지만, 특정한 개념이나 행위로 표현되기 이전의 궁극적 기준(또는 원천)을 지칭한다는 점에서는 동일한 의미를 가진다. 교과교육과 사회화를 포괄하는 교육의 이상은 표현 이후의 양상(理解의 言語와 行爲의 傳統)을 통하여 표현 이전의 기준(實在와 實際)을 추구하는 데에 있으며, 그 교육의 과정은 한 개인의 자아가 세계를 내면화함으로써 自我와 世界가 일치된 상태로 나아가는 과정으로 규정될 수 있다. M. Oakeshott's metaphysics and political philosophy can be interpreted as theoretical explanations as to the ultimate value of liberal education and moral education. According to his view, the Reality' as logical criterion of experience and the Practice' as tacit source of activity are conceptually independent; they designate two different dimensions of the concrete totality which may be called as the atemporal in the former, and the temporal in the latter. However, these two dimensions are the two axes sustaining education as a whole, and further, they point to the ultimate standard of all human knowledge and behavior. It is concluded in this study that the ideal of education is the realization of the unmanifested standard (Reality and Practice) through learning the manifestations of knowledge and activity (languages of understanding and traditions of behavior in Oakeshott's terms), and the educational process is the process of continuing approach toward the state of the unification of self and world by way of the self's internalization of the world