2 research outputs found

    GPS L1, L2C Signal Acquisition Performance of GPS Software Receiver with respect to Pseudolite Pulsing Scheme

    No full text
    μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ€ μš°μ£Όμƒκ³΅μ˜ GPS μœ„μ„±κ³ΌλŠ” 달리 μ§€μƒμ΄λ‚˜ 비행체에 μ„€μΉ˜λ˜μ–΄ GPS μœ„μ„±κ³Ό 같이 거리λ₯Ό μΈ‘μ •ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” ranging μ‹ ν˜Έλ₯Ό μ „μ†‘ν•˜λŠ” 전솑기이닀. μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ€ μ •ν™•μ„±, κ°€μš©μ„±, 무결성을 ν–₯μƒμ‹œν‚¬ 수 μžˆμœΌλ‚˜ GPS μœ„μ„±μ‹ ν˜Έμ— λŒ€ν•΄ μ‹ ν˜Έμ˜ 포화 λ˜λŠ” 간섭을 μΌμœΌν‚¨λ‹€. μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ˜ 근원거리 문제λ₯Ό ν•΄κ²°ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ˜ μ‹ ν˜Έλ₯Ό νŽ„μ‹±μ΄ μžˆμ„ λ•Œλ§Œ λ‚΄λ³΄λ‚΄λŠ” 기법을 주둜 μ‚¬μš©ν•œλ‹€. λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ˜ 정적 νŽ„μ‹±, 이동 νŽ„μ‹±, 랜덀 νŽ„μ‹± 기법과 μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ˜ κ°œμˆ˜κ°€ GPS μ†Œν”„νŠΈμ›¨μ–΄ μˆ˜μ‹ κΈ°μ˜ L1 및 L2C μ‹ ν˜Ένšλ“μ— λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 영ν–₯을 λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. GPS L1μ‹ ν˜Έμ˜ 경우 μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ΄ 1κ°œμΌλ•ŒλŠ” μ •μ νŽ„μ‹±μ— λŒ€ν•œ GPS μ†Œν”„νŠΈμ›¨μ–΄ μˆ˜μ‹ κΈ°μ˜ μ‹ ν˜Έ νšλ“ 및 좔적 μ„±λŠ₯이 κ°€μž₯ μ’‹μ•˜κ³  2개 이상일 λ•ŒλŠ” λžœλ€νŽ„μ‹±μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ„±λŠ₯이 κ°€μž₯ μ’‹μ•˜λ‹€. L2C μ‹ ν˜ΈλŠ” 세가지 νŽ„μ‹±μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ„±λŠ₯이 λΉ„μŠ·ν•˜κ²Œ μ•ˆμ •μ μœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜μ™”λŠ”λ° μ •μ νŽ„μ‹±μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ„±λŠ₯이 μ•½κ°„ μ’‹κ²Œ λ‚˜μ™”λ‹€. L1, L2C λͺ¨λ‘ μœ„μ‚¬μœ„μ„± 3κ°œκΉŒμ§€λŠ” λͺ¨λ“  νŽ„μ‹±μ— λŒ€ν•΄μ„œ μΈ‘μœ„κ°€ κ°€λŠ₯ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜μ™”λ‹€.N

    μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ˜ νŽ„μ‹±λ°©λ²•μ— λŒ€ν•œ GPS μ†Œν”„νŠΈμ›¨μ–΄ μˆ˜μ‹ κΈ°μ˜ L1, L2C μ‹ ν˜Ένšλ“ μ„±λŠ₯뢄석

    No full text
    μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ€ μš°μ£Όμƒκ³΅μ˜ GPS μœ„μ„±κ³ΌλŠ” 달리 μ§€μƒμ΄λ‚˜ 비행체에 μ„€μΉ˜λ˜μ–΄ GPS μœ„μ„±κ³Ό 같이 거리λ₯Ό μΈ‘μ •ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” ranging μ‹ ν˜Έλ₯Ό μ „μ†‘ν•˜λŠ” 전솑기이닀. μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ€ μ •ν™•μ„±, κ°€μš©μ„±, 무결성을 ν–₯μƒμ‹œν‚¬ 수 μžˆμœΌλ‚˜ GPS μœ„μ„± μ‹ ν˜Έμ— λŒ€ν•΄ μ‹ ν˜Έμ˜ 포화 λ˜λŠ” 간섭을 μΌμœΌν‚¨λ‹€. μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ˜ 근원거리 문제λ₯Ό ν•΄κ²°ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ˜ μ‹ ν˜Έ λ₯Ό νŽ„μ‹±μ΄ μžˆμ„ λ•Œλ§Œ λ‚΄λ³΄λ‚΄λŠ” 기법을 주둜 μ‚¬μš©ν•œλ‹€. λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ˜ 정적 νŽ„μ‹±, 이동 νŽ„μ‹±, 랜덀 νŽ„μ‹± 기법과 μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ˜ κ°œμˆ˜κ°€ GPS μ†Œν”„νŠΈμ›¨μ–΄ μˆ˜μ‹ κΈ°μ˜ L1 및 L2C μ‹ ν˜Ένšλ“μ— λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 영ν–₯을 λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. GPS L1μ‹ ν˜Έμ˜ 경우 μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ΄ 1κ°œμΌλ•ŒλŠ” μ •μ νŽ„μ‹±μ— λŒ€ν•œ GPS μ†Œν”„νŠΈμ›¨μ–΄ μˆ˜μ‹ κΈ°μ˜ μ‹ ν˜Έ νšλ“ 및 좔적 μ„±λŠ₯ 이 κ°€μž₯ μ’‹μ•˜κ³  2개 이상일 λ•ŒλŠ” λžœλ€νŽ„μ‹±μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ„±λŠ₯이 κ°€μž₯ μ’‹μ•˜λ‹€. L2C μ‹ ν˜ΈλŠ” 세가지 νŽ„μ‹±μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ„± λŠ₯이 λΉ„μŠ·ν•˜κ²Œ μ•ˆμ •μ μœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜μ™”λŠ”λ° μ •μ νŽ„μ‹±μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ„±λŠ₯이 μ•½κ°„ μ’‹κ²Œ λ‚˜μ™”λ‹€. L1, L2C λͺ¨λ‘ μœ„μ‚¬μœ„μ„± 3개까 μ§€λŠ” λͺ¨λ“  νŽ„μ‹±μ— λŒ€ν•΄μ„œ μΈ‘μœ„κ°€ κ°€λŠ₯ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜μ™”λ‹€.Pseudolites are ground-based transmitters that can be configured to emit GPS-like signals for enhancing the GPS by providing increased accuracy, integrity, and availability. However, a pseudolite (PL) can interfere with GPS satellite signals while it is transmitting or cause saturation to automatic gain control circuit. To solve these problems pulsing scheme is used, which transmits PL signal during a short period of time. In this paper the effect of the number of PL and pulsing scheme on the software GPS L1 and L2C signal acquisition performance is studied for the three pulsing schemes such as static pulsing, sweep pulsing, and pseudo random pulsing. For GPS L1 signal, static pulsing shows the best signal acquisition and tracking performance with one PL, and random pulsing shows the best performance with more than or equal to two PLs. For GPS L2C signal, all three pulsing schemes show the similar signal acquisition and tracking performance, but static pulsing shows a little better performance. For GPS L1 and L2C signals, software GPS receivers can do positioning with up to three PLs.OAIID:oai:osos.snu.ac.kr:snu2012-01/102/0000003405/8SEQ:8PERF_CD:SNU2012-01EVAL_ITEM_CD:102USER_ID:0000003405ADJUST_YN:NEMP_ID:A000360DEPT_CD:446CITE_RATE:0FILENAME:μ˜μ‚¬μœ„μ„±μ˜ νŽ„μ‹±λ°©λ²•μ— λŒ€ν•œ GPS μ†Œν”„νŠΈμ›¨μ–΄ μˆ˜μ‹ κΈ°μ˜ L1, L2C μ‹ ν˜Ένšλ“ μ„±λŠ₯뢄석.pdfDEPT_NM:기계항곡곡학뢀EMAIL:[email protected]_YN:NCONFIRM:
    corecore