한국산 집게상과(갑각아문: 십각목: 이미하목)의 계통분류학적 연구

학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 자연과학대학 생명과학부, 2017. 8. 김원.In this study, the author present a systematic discussion of Korean hermit crabs by analysis of morphologic and DNA barcoding characteristics. The author performed a taxonomic examination of 61 species, 18 genera, and 3 families of Korean paguroid. Based on the findings of this study, the exclusive presence of 3 species in Korea could be called into question, 2 species were found to be synonymized, the Korean names of 5 species could be confirmed and the author could expand the geographical distributions for 6 species. A checklist, distribution maps, and identification keys were also designed for this study. In the DNA barcoding study, 159 individuals of 9 species of Paguroidea specimens in Korea were analyzed using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and 16S rRNA sequences. The results show that the 5 species do not fit into the existing taxonomic scheme i.e., Pagurus minutus group, P. brachiomastus and P. simulans group, and P. quinquelineatus and P. rectidactylus group.SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF KOREAN PAGUROIDEA BY USING MORPHOLOGICAL EXAMINATION AND DNA BARCODE 1 INTRODUCTION 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 6 MATERIALS 6 CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS 8 RESULT 15 SYSTEMATICS ACCOUNTS 15 CHECKLIST OF KOREAN PAGUROIDEA 15 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 20 KEYS TO THE KOREAN PAGUROIDEA FAMILY 24 FAMILY PYLOCHELIDAE 24 GENUS POMATOCHELES 25 1. POMATOCHELES JEFFREYSII 25 FAMILY DIOGENIDAE 27 GENUS AREOPAGURISTES 28 2. AREOPAGURISTES NIGROAPICULUS 28 3. AREOPAGURISTES JAPONICUS 32 GENUS PAGURISTES 35 4. PAGURISTES SEMINUDUS 35 5. PAGURISTES ACANTHOMERUS 38 6. PAGURISTES VERSUS 41 7. PAGURISTES DIGITALIS 43 8. PAGURISTES ORTMANNI 45 GENUS CILIOPAGURUS 48 9. CILIOPAGURUS STRIGATUS 48 10. CILIOPAGURUS KREMPFI 51 GENUS CLIBANARIUS 54 11. CLIBANARIUS VIRESCENS 54 GENUS DIOGENES 56 12. DIOGENES PENICILLATUS 56 13. DIOGENES EDWARDSII 59 14. DIOGENES NITIDIMANUS 62 15. DIOGENES DEFLECTOMANUS 64 GENUS DARDANUS 66 16. DARDANUS LAGOPODES 66 17. DARDANUS ARROSOR 69 18. DARDANUS CRASSIMANUS 72 19. DARDANUS ASPERSUS 74 20. DARDANUS IMPRESSUS 74 21. DARDANUS PEDUNCULATUS 77 FAMILY PAGURIDAE 80 GENUS PORCELLANOPAGURUS 81 22. PORCELLANOPAGURUS NIHONKAIENSIS 81 GENUS LOPHOPAGURUS 84 23. LOPHOPAGURUS (AUSTRALEREMUS) TRISERRATUS 84 GENUS DISCORSOPAGURUS 87 24. DISCORSOPAGURUS MACLAUGHLINAE 87 25. DISCORSOPAGURUS TUBICOLA 90 GENUS NEMATOPAGURUS 92 26. NEMATOPAGURUS LEPIDOCHIRUS 92 GENUS BONINPAGURUS 94 27. BONINPAGURUS PILOSIPES 94 GENUS LABIDOCHIRUS 96 28. LABIDOCHIRUS ANOMALUS 96 GENUS ELASSOCHIRUS 99 29. ELASSOCHIRUS CAVIMANUS 99 GENUS DIACANTHURUS 103 30. DIACANTHURUS OPHTHALMICUS 103 GENUS CATAPAGUROIDES 105 31. CATAPAGUROIDES FRAGILIS 105 GENUS PAGURIXUS 107 32. PAGURIXUS FASCIATUS 107 GENUS PAGURUS 108 33. PAGURUS DECIMBRANCHIAE 112 34. PAGURUS NIGRIVITTATUS 114 35. PAGURUS QUINQUELINEATUS 116 36. PAGURUS RECTIDACTYLUS 123 37. PAGURUS MACULOSUS 128 38. PAGURUS LANUGINOSUS 132 39. PAGURUS PROXIMUS 135 40. PAGURUS SIMULANS 138 41. PAGURUS BRACHIOMASTUS 144 42. PAGURUS MINUTUS 147 43. PAGURUS NIGROFASCIA 153 44. PAGURUS FILHOLI 156 45. PAGURUS JAPONICUS 159 46. PAGURUS RUBRIOR 162 47. PAGURUS SIMILIS 166 48. PAGURUS PARVISPINA 168 49. PAGURUS PECTINATUS 170 50. PAGURUS CONFORMIS 174 51. PAGURUS EXIGUUS 174 52. PAGURUS SPINA 175 53. PAGURUS IMAII 178 54. PAGURUS CONSTANS 179 55. PAGURUS TRIGONOCHEIRUS 182 56. PAGURUS OCHOTENSIS 185 57. PAGURUS RATHBUNI 189 58. PAGURUS GRACILIPES 191 59. PAGURUS NIPPONENSIS 194 60. PAGURUS UNDOSUS 194 61. PAGURUS MIDDENDORFFII 197 DISCUSSION 201 CONCLUSION 213 REFERENCES 215 ABSTRACT (KOREAN) 245 LIST OF PLATES 247 PLATE 256Docto

Conflict and Settlement in Siting Policy: Comparative Study of Radioactive Waste Management Facilities in Korea and Sweden

방폐장 입지 선정 문제는 다양한 입지갈등 문제 중에서 가장 어려운 문제 중 하나다. 일반적으로 입지갈등 문제의 주요 원인은 공간적·시간적·집단적 형평성의 문제, 폐쇄적 입지선정 절차에 따른 민주성의 문제 등이다. 경주와 스웨덴의 방폐장 입지 문제는 이러한 사례의 전형을 보여주는 가장 중요하면서 대표적인 갈등 사례로 볼 수 있다. 두 사례 공히 성공의 요인은 보상을 통한 형평성 문제의 해결, 개방적 절차를 통한 자발성의 고양, 적절한 수준의 경쟁의 활용, 주민 친숙성을 고려한 위험소통 정책 등을 들 수 있다. 우리나라 경우 중저준위 방폐장 입지는 성공했으나 향후 고준위방폐장 입지문제가 남아 있는 상황을 고려할 때 보다 진전된 절차로서 스웨덴의 방폐장 입지 사례는 매우 중요한 시사점을 던져주고 있다. Siting a radioactive waste management facility is the most difficult of the many siting controversies. In general, the main reasons for siting controversy are spatial, temporal, and group inequalities as well as a lack of democratic procedures in closed top-down siting methods. Siting radioactive waste management facilities in Korea and Sweden can be very good and important examples showing all of these conflicts. The successl factors in both cases are resolution of the inequality problem through compensation, boosting voluntarism by local governments with an open approach, using competition between local governments, and risk communication policy considering the familiarity of local residents. In Korea, the low and intermediate level radioactive waste management facility has been selected. However, the siting problem for the high level one is still ongoing. Considering this situation, the Sweden case of more advanced siting procedures, will give very good lessons to Korea.이 논문은 2010학년도 서울대학교 한국행정연구소의 기획논문으로 지원을 받았음