41 research outputs found
Concept of Constitutional Rights
This article aims at defining what is constitutional right. In the area of
constitutional law, it has not been clear what the constitutional right means,
whereas there are many topics of the constitutional rights.
In defining the concept of constitutional right, it is necessary to discriminate
natural right and human right from the constitutional right. There are many
constitutional rights which are not natural as the right of voting and access to a
court. The term human right is used in many cases with conceptual ambiguity.
The concept of human right is ambiguous, so it should be emphasized that
constitutional right should be understood clearly separate from human right.
I analysed the concept of constitutional right. The constitutional right has its
elements in three dimension: individual right, positive right and constitutionguaranteed
right. The constitutional right has individuality, claim, liberty, power
and immunity as a individual right. The claim is an essential element of right,
so having a right means having a claim. The people who have a constitutional
right, can have a claim to something and against someone. The government has
a duty to realize the constitutional right. The people who have a right, can
assign or renounce the right, but the constitutional right can not be assigned or
renounced with the exception of extraordinary cases. This right also has a
immunity, so nobody can enforce an individual who has such a right to do
something against the right in the area where the right is effective.
The constitutional right is a positive right that is guaranteed by the positive
constitution. This positivity makes the constitutional right to be distinguished
from natural right and human right. The constitutional rights get the character of...์ด ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์์ธ๋ํ๊ต ๋ฐ์ ๊ธฐ๊ธ ๋ฐ ๊ฐ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฝ๋น์์ ์ง์๋ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋น์ ์ํด ์ํ๋จ
The Special Prosecutor Act of 1999 and Its Problems
I introduced the Special Prosecutor System of the U.S. and suggested my
opinion that this system is very useful and effective in the democratization
of Korea. The Special Prosecutor Act was enacted at the beginning of 1999.
However, it was limited to investigating just two cases: political corruption
involving the Chief prosecutor and a senior prosecutor's role in forcing a
strike by a labor union. This Act lasted for only 6 months.
The aim of this article is to review the problems of this Act and suggest
some ideas for improving the effectiveness of the Special Prosecutor System
in Korea.
The Special Prosecutor System is helpful in solving conflicts of interest,
keeping investigation and prosecution independent from political influence in
prosecuting higher officers, controlling the exercise of power effectively and
carrying out impeachment. The 1999 Special Prosecutor Act has several
problems. The object of the investigation is limited to the above two cases.
The special prosecutor is appointed by the President. The jurisdiction of the
prosecutor is limited. The release of investigative process is prohibited. The
investigation duration and transition is restricted to six months, which is not
sufficient for the special prosecutor to be effective. Against the
non-cooperation of the agency that coordinates and supports the
investigation, the use of force is option. An ordinary prosecutor can
participate in the special prosecutor's investigation.
We need to discuss and solve the above problems. In my opinion, the
American Special Prosecutor System will be useful in the development of
the Korean system. My suggestions for solving these problems are based on
a comparison with the U.S. system
Review on the ๆ้ฎฎๅปบๅๆฒๆณ่ๆก็ง็จฟ
์ด ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์ ๅธๆฝ่พฐๆฒป์ ๏ฝขๆ้ฎฎๅปบๅๆฒๆณ่ๆก็ง็จฟ๏ฝฃ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ๊ตดํ์ฌ ๊ทธ ๋ด์ฉ์ ์๊ฐํ
๊ณ ๋ถ์ํ ๊ฒ์ด๋ค. ํ๊ตญํ๋ฒ์ฌ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์ 1945๋
ํด๋ฐฉ ์งํ ์๋ก์ด ๋
๋ฆฝ๊ตญ๊ฐ๋ฅผ
๊ฑด๊ตญํ๋๋ฐ ํ์ํ๋ ํ๋ฒ์ ์ ์ ๋๊ณ ์ ๊ฐ๋์๋ ํ๋ฒ๋
ผ์์ ๋ํ ์กฐ์ฌ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ
๋ ์ค์ํ๋ค. ๅธๆฝ่พฐๆฒป๋ ์ผ๋ณธ์ด ์กฐ์ ์ ์๋ฏผํต์นํ๋ ์๊ธฐ์ ์กฐ์ ์ ์ด์ต๊ณผ ๋
๋ฆฝ์ ์ํ์ฌ ์ ๊ทน ํ๋ํ ์ฌ๋์ด๋ค. 1945๋
8์ ์ 2์ฐจ ์ธ๊ณ๋์ ์ด ์ผ๋ณธ์ ํญ๋ณต
์ผ๋ก ์ข
๋ฃ๋์ ๊ทธ๋ ๏ฝขๆ้ฎฎๅปบๅๆฒๆณ่ๆก็ง็จฟ๏ฝฃ๋ฅผ ๊ทธํด 12์์ ๋์ธ์ ์ผ๋ก ๊ณต๊ฐํ
์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ ๏ฝขๆ้ฎฎๅปบๅๆฒๆณ่ๆก็ง็จฟ๏ฝฃ๋ฅผ ๋ฐํํ๊ณ ์ผ๋ณธ์ ์ ์ฉํ ํ๋ฒ์ ๊ดํ์ฌ๋
๏ฝขๆฒๆณๆนๆญฃ็งๆก๏ฝฃ์ ๋ฐํํ์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฐ๋ฐ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋ก์ด ๊ฒ์ ๏ฝขๆ้ฎฎๅปบๅๆฒๆณ่ๆก็ง็จฟ๏ฝฃ์
์๋ ๋ํต๋ นโ
๋ถํต๋ น ์ง์ ์ ํผํฉ์ ์ ๋ถํํ๋ฅผ ์ทจํ๊ณ ๏ฝขๆฒๆณๆนๆญฃ็งๆก๏ฝฃ์์๋ ๊ตญ
๋ฏผ์ฃผ๊ถ์ ์ ์ ๋ก ํ ์ฒํฉ์ ๋ฅผ ์ทจํ ๊ฒ ์ด์ธ์๋ ๊ตญ๋ฏผ์ ๊ถ๋ฆฌ์ ์๋ฌด, ์ํ์ ๋,
์ฌ๋ฒ์ ๋ ๋ฑ์์ ์ผ๋ณธ๊ตญ๊ณผ ์กฐ์ ์ ์ ์ฉํ ๋ด์ฉ์ด ๋ชจ๋ ๋์ผํ๋ค๋ ์ ์ด๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฐ
์ ์์ ๏ฝขๆ้ฎฎๅปบๅๆฒๆณ่ๆก็ง็จฟ๏ฝฃ๊ฐ ์์ ํ ์กฐ์ ๋ง์ ์ํ์ฌ ๊ตฌ์ํ ๊ฒ์ ์๋๋ค.
์ด๋ฐ ์ ์์ ๏ฝขๆ้ฎฎๅปบๅๆฒๆณ่ๆก็ง็จฟ๏ฝฃ์ ๋ํด์๋ ๊ทธ ๊ตฌ์์ ๊ณผ์ , ๊ตฌ์์ ์ฐธ์ฌํ
์ฌ๋, ๅธๆฝ่พฐๆฒป์ ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ ๋ํ ํ์์ ์๊ฐ, ํ๋ฒ๊ด, ์ํ์ ๋์ ์ฌ๋ฒ์ ๋์ ๋ํ
ๅธๆฝ่พฐๆฒป์ ์ฌ์๊ณผ ๊ตฌ์ ๋ฑ์ ๋ํ์ฌ ๋ ๊น์ด ์ถ์ ํ ํ์๊ฐ ์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ ๏ฝขๆ
้ฎฎๅปบๅๆฒๆณ่ๆก็ง็จฟ๏ฝฃ๊ฐ ์กฐ์ ์ ํด๋ฐฉ ์ ๊ตญ์ ์ด๋ค ์ํฅ์ ์ฃผ์๋์ง, ๋ ๋์๊ฐ
1948๋
ํ๋ฒ์ ์ ๊ณผ์ ์ ๅธๆฝ่พฐๆฒป์ ๊ตฌ์์ด ์ด๋ค ์ํฅ์ ์ฃผ์๋์ง ๋ฑ์ ๋ํ์ฌ
์ถ๊ฐ์ ์ธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ ํ์ํ๋ค.์ด ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์ ์์ธ๋ํ๊ต ๋ฒํ๋ฐ์ ์ฌ๋จ ์ถ์ฐ ๋ฒํ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๊ธฐ๊ธ์ 2010ํ๋
๋ ํ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋น
์ง์์ ๋ฐ์์
The Character of 1948 National Assembly in Korean Constitutional History
This article aims at reviewing the character of the 1948 National Assembly
which made the first Korean Constitution. After the liberation from Japanese
colonial ruling, US Military Government began to rule South Korea on
September 11, 1945. During the US Military Government period, South Korea
tried to build a new sovereign nation. As the first step, the National Assembly,
which should make a constitution to build a nation, was composed of members
elected by universal, equal, direct ballot. This election was carried out on May
10, 1948.
The National Assembly began to work for making a constitution. It elected 30
members for drafting a constitution on June 1, 1948. The members of the
National Assembly deliberated and debated on the Draft from June 23. They
passed a vote of the Draft on July 12. The president of National Assembly
promulgated the first Constitution on July 17. The article 102 of this
Constitution prescribed that the National Assembly should be converted to a
legislative body.
It was usually said that the 1948 National Assembly had double characters as
a constituent assembly and a legislative body during its all period. However, my
opinion is this like understanding is not correct. In this article, I make the new
suggestion that the 1948 National Assembly had the character of a constituent
assembly from May 31 to July 17 and the character of a legislative body after
July 17, 1948. I made a comparison between Korea and US in a
constitution-making to clear up this point.์ด ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์ 2002๋
๋ ํ์ ์งํฅ์ฌ๋จ์ ์ง์์ ์ํ์ฌ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋์๋ค.
(KRF-2002-073-BM1020
Korean Presidentialism and Its Sustainability
๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ๋ํ๋ฏผ๊ตญ ํํ ํ๋ฒ์ด ์ฑํํ๊ณ ์๋ ๋ํต๋ น์ ์ ๋ถ๊ฐ ๋ฏธ๋์๋ ํ๊ตญ์์ ์ง์๊ฐ๋ฅํ ๊ฒ์ธ์ง์ ๋ํ์ฌ ๊ฒํ ํด๋ณด๋ ๊ฒ์ ๋ชฉ์ ์ผ๋ก ํ๋ค.
1990๋
๋์ ๋ฏผ์ฃผํ๊ฐ ์ด๋ฃจ์ด์ง๊ณ ์ธ๊ถ์ด ์ ์ฅ๋์์ผ๋ฉฐ ์ ๋ถ๊ฐ ๋ค ์ฐจ๋ก๋ ๋ฐ๋์์์๋ ๋ถ๊ตฌํ๊ณ , ํ๊ตญ์ ์ฌ์ ํ ๋ค์ํ ์ ์น์ โค์ฌํ์ ๋ฌธ์ ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๊ณ ์๋ค. ์ ๋น์ ์น๊ฐ ์คํจํ๊ณ ๋์๋ฏผ์ฃผ์ฃผ์๊ฐ ์ฑ๊ณตํ์ง ๋ชปํ๊ณ ์๋ค. ์ฌํ์ ๊ฐ๋ฑ์ ๋์ฑ ์ฌ๊ฐํด์ง๊ณ ๊ตญ๊ฐ๋ ์ด๋ฅผ ํด๊ฒฐํ์ง ๋ชปํด๋ด๊ณ ์๋ค. ์ ์น๋ฏผ์ฃผํ ์ดํ ํ๊ตญ ์ฌํ๊ฐ ๋ฐ์ ์ ์ธ ๊ฒฝ๋ก๋ฅผ ๋ฐ๋ผ ์์กฐ๋กญ๊ฒ ์ดํํ์ง ๋ชปํ๊ณ , ์ฌํ ๊ฐ๋ฑ๊ณผ ๋ถ์ด, ๋ํต๋ น1์ธ๊ณผ ์ง๊ถ์ธ๋ ฅ์ ์ํ ๊ตญ์ ์ ๋
๋จ์ ์ด์, ์ง์ญ์ฃผ์์ ์ํ ๊ตญ์ ์ด์์์์ ํํ๊ณผ ์ ์น์ ๋์ ์๊ณก, ์ง์ญ์ฃผ์์ ์ํ ์์๋ฐฐ๋ถ์ ์๊ณก์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง์ญ๊ณผ ์ฌํ๊ตฌ์ฑ์๊ฐ์ ๊ฐ๋ฑ, ์ง๊ถ์ธ๋ ฅ๋ค์ ์ํ ๋ถ์ ๊ณผ ๋ถํจ์ ๋ฐ๋ณต, ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ด์์์์ ๋ฆฌ์คํฌ์ ์ฆ๋, ์น์๋
์์ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ๋ฌธํ์ ์ฌํ ๋ฑ์ ์ด๋ํ ๊ฒ์๋ ๋ํต๋ น์ ์ ๋ถ๋ฅผ ์ ์งํ๊ณ ์๋ ๊ฒ์ ๊ฐ์ฅ ํฐ ์์ธ์ด ์๋ค๊ณ ๋ณธ๋ค.
๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ๋ํต๋ น์ ์ ๋ถ๊ฐ ์๊ณ ์๋ ์ ๋๋ด์ฌ์ ์ธ ๋ฌธ์ ์ ๊ณผ ํ๊ตญ ์ฌํ์์ ๋ํต๋ น์ ์ ๋ถ๊ฐ ์์ฉํจ์ ์์ด ์ด๋ํ๊ฑฐ๋ ์ฌํ์ํจ ์ฌ๋ฌ ๊ฐ์ง ๋ฌธ์ ์ ์ ์ง์ ํ์๋ค. ์ด๋ฌํ ๋ฌธ์ ์ ์ ์ ์น์ธ๋ค์ ๊ฐ์ธ์ ์์ค์์์ ๋ฐ์ฑ์ด๋ ์
๋ฒ์ ํตํด ํด๊ฒฐํ ์ ์๋ ์์ค์ ๊ฒ์ด ์๋๋ค. ํ๊ตญ์ด ๋ณด๋ค ์ฑ์ํ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์ฃผ์์ฌํ๋ก ๋์๊ฐ๊ณ ๊ตญ์ ์ด์์ด ์ ์ํ๋๊ณ , ๊ตญ์ ์ด์์ ๋ฆฌ์คํฌ์ ์ฌํ์ ๋น์ฉ์ ์ค์ด๋ ๋ฐฉ์์ผ๋ก๋ ๋ํต๋ น์ ์ ๋ถํํ๋ฅผ ํ์งํ๊ณ , ์ฌํ ๊ตฌ์ฑ์์ ๊ณต์กด์ ๊ฐ๋ฅํ๊ฒ ํ๊ณ ์์ ํ๋จ์ ์ค์ผ ์ ์๋ ๊ธธ์ ๋ชจ์ํ๋ ๊ฒ์ด ํ์ํ๋ค. ํผํฉ์ ์ ๋ถ ๋๋ ์ํ์ฃผ์์ ์ ๋ถ๋ก์ ๋ณ๊ฒฝ์ด ๊ทธ ๋์์ด ๋ ์ ์์ ๊ฒ์ด๋ค. ์ด ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ํ๊ตญ์์ ๋ํต๋ น์ ์ ๋ถ๋ ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ด์๊ณผ ์ฌํ ๋ฐ์ ์ ์์ด ํจ์ฉ์ฑ์ ์ ์งํ๊ธฐ ์ด๋ ค์ฐ๋ฉฐ ์ง์๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ๋ ๋ฎ๋ค๊ณ ์ ์ํ๋ค.
This article explores the validity and sustainability of the presidential
government that is adopted by the current Korean Constitution.
Despite the democratization in politics and human rights in 1990s and the
change of government for four times, Korea still holds various social and
political problems. These are the consequence of the following issues: the
Korean societys incapability of carrying out democratic development, conflicts
within the society, the arbitrary operation of the government by a president and
his presidential administration, the failure of countrys affairs due to Korean
regionalism/localism regarding distribution of resources and communication
among citizens, distortion of civil service system, the winner-takes-all social
ideal and others. Furthermore, Koreas authoritarian tendency embedded within
its political sphere and frequent corruptions and embezzlement done by a president
and politicians also restrain the development of true democratic society.
This article proves that these reasons significantly contribute the practicality of
Koreas current presidential government. However, these problems can be solved
neither by the individual-level apologies of politicians nor through legislation
that Korea should repeal its presidential government and seek to find a proper
and practical form of a government that can encompasses its unique political,
social and cultural properties. The possible forms could be something similar to
the semi-presidentialism or the parliamentarism. This article concludes that the
current Korean presidentialism is difficult to remain valid for the administration
and social development of Korea in the near future and therefore, its sustainability is questionable.์ด ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์์ธ๋ํ๊ต ์ธ๋ฌธโค์ฌํ๊ณ์ด ํด์ธ์ฐ์ ์ง์๊ธ์ผ๋ก ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋์์
Origin of Korean Prime Minister System
Throughout Korean constitutional history, the status and power of Prime
Minister(ๅๅ็ธฝ็) are unique comparing with other presidential governments. The
concept of Prime Minister was first adopted in the Constitution of 1948 and sustained
in each revised Constitution from 1952 to 1987. The basic structure of this system is
as follows:
1. The Prime Minister is appointed by the President with or without the consent of
the National Assembly.
2. The Prime Minister assists the President.
3. The Prime Minister directs the Ministries of the Executive Branch under order
of the President.
4. The State Council deliberates on important policies that fall within the power of
the Executive. This Council is composed of the President, the Prime Minister, and
other members. The other members of this Council are appointed by the President on
the recommendation of the Prime Minister.
5. The President shall be the Chairman of the State Council, and the Prime
Minister shall be the Vice-Chairman.
6. The Prime Minister may issue ordinances of his/her own concerning with
matters that are within his/her jurisdiction under the powers delegated by Act or
Presidential Decree or ex officio.
7. If the office of President is vacant or the President is unable to discharge the
powers and duties for any reason, the Prime Minister first acts for him/her.์ด ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์ 2002๋
๋ ํ์ ์งํฅ์ฌ๋จ์ ์ง์์ ์ํ์ฌ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋์๋ค(KRF-2002-073-BM1020)
The Democratization of South Korea and the Contribution of the Constitutional Court: 1988-1998
The Constitutional Court of Korea began its operation from 1988. The Court is an important working mechanism of the 1987 Constitution, which itself is the symbol of the people's victory against the authoritarian regime. From its inception the Court had to face the almost antagonistically unsympathetic attitudes of the judiciary and the prosecution. However, the Court has successfully overcome the hurdles to play an important role during the transition period to the full democracy.
This article aims at legally evaluating the degree of the Constitutional Court's contribution in the realization of people's constitutional rights for the first decade of its operation(1988-1998). To achieve this goal, the decisions of the Court have been analysed with focuses on the problematic issues as habeas corpus, the rights in the criminal procedure, the rights of expression, the labor rights, and the right to know. Generally speaking, the Court' attitude has been active to expand the traditional span of liberties, the rights of the prisoner and the right to know, as contrasted with the cases involving the labours' rights. In conclusion, this article shows that the contribution of Constitutional Court as the guardian of the human rights, although fall short of the high public expectation, has been significant by legal standards. The spirit of judicial activism persistent within the Court since its inception has played as an important factor in its successful working
Reform of Legal Education and Law School System
๋ฒํ๊ต์ก๊ฐํ์ ํ ๋ฐฉ์์ผ๋ก 1995๋
๊ฒฝ๋ถํฐ ๋
ผ์๋์ด์จ ๋ฒํ์ ๋ฌธ๋ํ์์ ๋ํด์๋ ๊ทธ ๋ช
์นญ์ด ๋ฌด์จ ๋ด์ฉ์ ๊ฐ์ง๊ณ ์๋๊ฐ ํ๋ ์ ์ ์์ด ๋ค์ ๋ช
ํํ์ง ์์ ๊ฒ์ด ์๊ณ , ๋ฐ๋ผ์ ์ฌ๋๋ง๋ค ๋ค๋ฅด๊ฒ ์ดํดํ๊ณ ์๋ ์์๋ ๋ณด์ธ๋ค. ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ ๋ฒํ์ ๋ฌธ๋ํ์์ ๋ํ ์คํด์ ๋ฒํ์ ๋ฌธ๋ํ์์ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์ ์ ๋๋ผ๋ ๊ฒ๋ง์ผ๋ก ๋์ธ์ ์ฐ์ด ๋๋ฅ๋ฒ(civil law)๊ณ์ ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ์๋ ๋ง์ง ์๋ ๊ฒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ ํ ๋
ผ๋์ ์ฅ์ด ํผ์ณ์ก๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์, ๋ฒํ์ ๋ฌธ๋ํ์์ law school์ด๋ผ๊ณ ํ๋ฉด ๋
ผ์๊ฐ ์๊ณก๋ ๊น ํ์ฌ ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์ law school๊ณผ๋ ๋ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ ํ๊ธฐ๋ ํ๊ณ , ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์ law school์ ์ ๋ชจ๋ฅด๊ฑฐ๋ ์์ํ ์ฌ๋๋ค์ ์คํด๋ฅผ ํผํ๊ธฐ ์ํ์ฌ ๋ก์ค์ฟจ์ด๋ผ๋ ์ฉ์ด๋ ๊ฐ๋ฅํํ ํผํ๊ณ ๋ฒํ์ ๋ฌธ๋ํ์์ด๋ผ๋ ์ฉ์ด๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฌ๋ค ๋ณด๋, ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ์์ ๋ฒํ๊ต์ก๊ฐํ์ ํ ๋ฐฉ์์ผ๋ก ๊ฑฐ๋ก ๋๋ ๋ฒํ์ ๋ฌธ๋ํ์๊ณผ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์ law school๊ณผ ๊ฐ์ ๊ฒ์ธ์ง ๋ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒ์ธ์ง ํ๋ ์ ์์๋ ํผ์ ์ด ์๊ธฐ๊ธฐ๋ ํ๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฐ๋ฐ ๋จผ์ ์ง์ ํด๋ ๊ฒ์, ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ์ ๋ฒ์ฒด๊ณ๋ฅผ ๋๋ฅ๋ฒ๊ณ๋ผ๊ณ ๋จ์ ํ๋ ๊ฒ์ด ํ์ฌ ์ฐ๋ฆฌ์ ๋ฒ์์คํ
์ ์ ํฉํ์ง ์๋ฌธ์ด๊ฑฐ๋์, ๋๋ฅ๋ฒ๊ณ์ ์๋ฏธ๋ฒ(common
law)๊ณ๊ฐ ๋ฒํ๊ต์ก์ ์์คํ
์ ๊ฒฐ์ ํ๋๋ฐ ๋ฌด์จ ๊ฒฐ์ ์ ์ธ ์์ธ์ด ๋๋์ง๋ ์๋ฌธ์ด๋ค. ๊ฐ์ฌ ์๋ฏธ๋ฒ๊ณ๋ผ๊ณ ํ๋๋ผ๋ law school์ ๋ฐฉ์์ ๊ฐ์ ธ์ผ ํ๋ ๊ฒ๋ ์๋๊ณ , ๋๋ฅ๋ฒ๊ณ๋ผ๊ณ ํ๋๋ผ๋ law school์ ๋ฐฉ์์ ๊ฐ์ง์ง ๋ง๋ผ๋ ๋ฒ๋ ์๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ด๋ค. ๊ทธ ๋์ ๊ตญ๋ด์์ ๋ฒํ์ ๋ฌธ๋ํ์์ ๋์
์ ๋ฐ๋ํ๋ ๊ฒฌํด ๊ฐ์ด๋ฐ๋ ์ผ๋ณธ์ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ๊ฐ ์ฐ๋ฆฌ์ ๊ฐ์ด ๋๋ฅ๋ฒ๊ณ์ธ๋ฐ, ์ด๋ฐ ์ผ๋ณธ๋ law school๋ก ๋ฐ๊พธ์ง ์๊ณ 4๋
์ ๋ฒ๊ณผ๋ํ์ฒด์ ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์ง๊ณ ์๋ค๋ ๊ฒ์ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ก ํ์ฌ, ์ ์ผ๋ณธ์ผ๋ก๋ถํฐ ์์ฉํ ๋๋ฅ๋ฒ์ฒด๊ณ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์ง ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ ์๋ฏธ๋ฒ๊ณ์ธ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์ law school๋ก ๋ฐ๊พธ์ด์ผ ํ๋๊ฐ ํ๊ณ ๋นํ์ ํ์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฌ๋ ์ผ๋ณธ์ด ์ฌ๋ฒ๊ฐํ์ ํ๋ฉด์ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์ law school์ ๋ณํํ์ฌ ์ผ๋ณธ์ ๋ก์ค์ฟจ์ ๋(๋ฒ๊ณผ๋ํ์์ด๋ผ๊ณ ๋ถ๋ฅด๊ณ ์์)๋ฅผ ์ฑํํ์, ์ด๋ฐ ์ฃผ์ฅ์ ์ธ์ ๊ทธ๋ฌ๋๋ ํ๋ฏ์ด ์ฅ ๋ค์ด๊ฐ๊ณ , ๋ฒํ๊ต์ก์ ๋๋ฅผ ๋๊ณ ๋๋ฅ๋ฒ๊ณ๋ ์๋ฏธ๋ฒ๊ณ๋ ํ๋ ์์ ๋
ผ์๋ ์์ด ๋ฒ๋ ธ๋ค. 10๋
์ ๊ณผ ๋น๊ตํ์ฌ, ๊ทธ ๋์ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์ law school์ ๋์ ๋ํ ์ ๋ณด์ ์ดํด๋ ๋์ด์ก๊ณ , law school์ด๋ผ๊ณ ๋งํด๋ ์ด์ ๋ ๋์ธ์ ์ฐ์ด ๊ณต๊ฒฉํ๋ ์์์ ์์ค์ ๊ทน๋ณต์ด ๋์๋ค๊ณ ๋ณด์ด๋ฏ๋ก, ๋ค์ ์ด์ฑ์ ์ธ ์ํฉ์์ ๋ฒํ์ ๋ฌธ๋ํ์์ด ๋ฌด์์ ์๋ฏธํ๋์ง๋ฅผ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์ law school์ ๋์ ๋น์ถ์ด ๋งํ๋ ๊ฒ์ด ๋ณด๋ค ๋
ผ์๋ฅผ ๋ถ๋ช
ํ๊ฒ ํด์ค๋ค๊ณ ์๊ฐ๋๋ค
Power of the Constitutional Court in Impeachment
ํ๋ฒ์ฌํ์๋ 2004๋
5์ 14์ผ ๏ฝข2004ํ๋1๏ฝฃ์ ํํต์ฌํ์ฌ๊ฑด(ไธปๅฏฉ: ์ฌํ๊ด ๅจๅๆ)์์ ์ฐ๋ฆฌ ํ์ ์ฌ์ ์ฒ์์ผ๋ก ๋ํต๋ น์ ๋ํ ํํต์ฌํ์ ํ์๋ค. ๋
ธ๋ฌดํ์ ๋ถ์ ์ถ๋ฒ์ดํ 1๋
๋ฐ ์ ๋ ๋์ ์ผ์ด๋ ๋
ธ๋ฌดํ๋ํต๋ น์ ๋์ธ์ ์ธ ์์ฌํ์์ ํ๋์ด ์ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ฌํ์ ๋ง์ ๊ฐ๋ฑ์ ์ผ๊ธฐ์ํค๋ฉด์ ๋
ธ๋ฌดํ๋ํต๋ น์ ๋ํ ์ง์ง์ ๋ฐ๋๋ ๋ํต๋ น์ ๊ฑฐ ๋น์๋ณด๋ค ๋์ฑ ์ฌํ๊ฒ ๋๋ฆฝ์ ์ด๊ณ ์ ํฌ์ ์ผ๋ก ๋์๋๋ฐ, ๊ทธ๋ฌํ ์ํฉ์์ ๊ตญํ๋ ๋ํต๋ น์ ๋ํ์ฌ ํํต์์ถ๋ฅผ ํ๊ธฐ์ ์ด๋ฅด๋ ๋ค. ์ด๋ฌํ ๊ณผ์ ์๋ ๋ํต๋ น์ ๊ฑฐ ๋น์ ๋
ธ๋ฌดํํ๋ณด์๊ฐ ์์ํ๋ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ๋น์์ ๋
ธ๋ฌดํ๋ํต๋ น์ ์ง์งํ๋ ์ธ๋ ฅ๋ค์ด ํ๋นํ์ฌ ์๋ก ์ด๋ฆฐ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋น์ ์ฐฝ๋นํ๋ ๋ฑ ์ ์น์ ์ธ ์์ฉ๋์ด๋ ์์๋ค. ๋ณธ์ ๋ํต๋ น์ ์์ ์ํ๊ฐ ๋ํต๋ น์ ๋ํ์ฌ ํํต์์ถ๋ฅผ ํ ์ ๋๋ก ์ํ์ ๋ํต๋ น์ด ๊ฐ๋ฑ์ ๋น์ผ๋ฉด ์ ์น๊ถ์์ ๋ํต๋ น์ ์๋ฒํ์๋ฅผ ์ด๋ป๊ฒ ์ฒ๋ฆฌํ ๊ฒ์ธ์ง์ ๊ดํ์ฌ ํด๊ฒฐ์ ์ ์ฐพ๊ณ ์ ์น๋ ฅ์ ๋ฐํํ์ฌ ์ด ๋ฌธ์ ๋ฅผ ๋จผ์ ๋ค๋ฃจ๊ฒ ๋๋ค. ๋ํต๋ น์ ์๋ฒํ์๊ฐ ์๋ค๋ ๊ฒ๋ง์ผ๋ก ๋ฐ๋ก ํ๋ฒ์ฌํ์์ ํํต์์ถ๋ฅผ ํ๋ ๊ฒ์ ์ ์น๋ ฅ์ ์์ค์ ์๋ฏธํ๊ณ , ์ฌํ๊ธฐ๊ด์ธ ํ๋ฒ์ฌํ์์ ์์ฒญ๋ ๋ถ๋ด์ ์ง์ฐ๋ ๊ฒ์ด ๋๋ค. ๋ฐ๋ผ์ ํํต์ฌํ์๋ ํ๋ฒ์ฌํ์์ ๊ฒฐ์ ์ด ์ด๋ป๊ฒ ๋๋ ์ง ๊ฐ์ ์ด ๋ฌธ์ ๋ฅผ ์ ์น์ ์ผ๋ก ํด๊ฒฐํ์ง ๋ชปํ ๋ถ๋ด์ ์ ์น๊ถ์ด ๊ณตํต์ ์ผ๋ก ์ง ์๋ฐ์ ์๋ ์ ์ด ์๋ค. ์ ์น๊ถ์ด ์ด ๋ฌธ์ ๋ฅผ ๋ค๋ฃจ์ง ๋ชปํ๊ณ ํ๋ฒ์ฌํ์์ ์ฌํ์ ์ฒญ๊ตฌํ ํ ํ๋ฒ์ฌํ์์ ๊ฒฐ์ ์ด ์๊ธฐ๋ค์ ์ ์น์ ์ดํด๊ด๊ณ์ ํฉ์นํ๋๊ฐ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ํ๋ฒ์ฌํ์์ ๊ฒฐ์ ์ ๋น๋ํ๊ฑฐ๋ ์ง์งํ๋ ๊ฒ์ ์จ๋นํ์ง ์๋ค.์ด ๊ธ์ ์์ธ๋ํ๊ต ๋ฒํ๋ฐ์ ์ฌ๋จ ์ถ์ฐ ๋ฒํ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๊ธฐ๊ธ์ 2005ํ๋
๋ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ง์๋น์
๋ณด์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ์์