17 research outputs found

    Scholes and Wolfson의 μ„Έλ¬΄μ—°κ΅¬νŒ¨λŸ¬λ‹€μž„μ— λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œ μ£Όμš”κ°œλ… 및 뢄석틀

    No full text
    1999-03λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ„Έλ¬΄νšŒκ³„μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μœ ν˜• κ°€μš΄λ° 졜근 λ“€μ–΄ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ 접근방법에 μžˆμ–΄μ„œ μ»€λ‹€λž€ λ°œμ „μ„ 보이고 μžˆλŠ” 것은 μ„Έλ¬΄κ³„νš(tax planning)에 κ΄€ν•œ 연ꡬ이닀. 졜근 10μ—¬ 년에 걸쳐 λ§Žμ€ μ„Έλ¬΄μ—°κ΅¬μžλ“€μ΄ 전톡적인 μ—°κ΅¬λ°©λ²•μ—μ„œ λ²—μ–΄λ‚˜ μ „ν˜€ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 관점(perspective)μ—μ„œ μ„Έλ¬΄κ³„νšκ³Ό μ—°κ΄€λœ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ£Όμ œλ“€μ„ λΆ„μ„ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 것이닀. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 연ꡬ방법 및 관점은 κ·Έ μ€‘μš”μ„±κ³Ό μœ μš©μ„±μ΄ 높이 ν‰κ°€λ˜μ–΄ μ„Έλ¬΄νšŒκ³„μ˜ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ μ—°κ΅¬νŒ¨λŸ¬λ‹€μž„μœΌλ‘œ μΈμ •λ˜κ³  있으며 μ΅œκ·Όμ—λŠ” λ―Έμ‹œκ²½μ œν•™μ— κ·Όκ±°ν•œ 세무연ꡬ(microeconomics-based tax research)둜 ν†΅μΉ­λ˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. 이 νŒ¨λŸ¬λ‹€μž„μ€ κ·Έ λͺ…μΉ­μ—μ„œ μœ μΆ”ν•  수 μžˆλ“―μ΄ 기쑴의 세무연ꡬ에 λ―Έμ‹œκ²½μ œν•™, 특히 μž¬λ¬΄κ²½μ œν•™(financial economics)κ³Ό μ •λ³΄κ²½μ œν•™(information economics)μ—μ„œ λ‹€λ£¨μ–΄μ§€λŠ” κ°œλ…λ“€μ„ μ ‘λͺ©μ‹œν‚¨ μ—°κ΅¬μœ ν˜•μ΄λ‹€. 즉, μ„Έλ¬΄κ³„νšκ³Ό μ—°κ΄€λœ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 주제λ₯Ό 연ꡬ함에 μžˆμ–΄μ„œ λ―Έμ‹œκ²½μ œν•™μ μΈ 思考와 뢄석듀을 μ μš©ν•˜λŠ” 것이닀

    μ–‘λ„μ†Œλ“μ„Έ μ‹ κ³  λͺ¨ν˜•

    No full text
    1999-12우리 λ‚˜λΌμ˜ μ†Œλ“μ„Έμ œλŠ” λͺ¨λ“  μ†Œλ“μ— λŒ€ν•΄ μΌκ΄„μ μœΌλ‘œ κ³Όμ„Έν•˜λŠ” ν˜•νƒœλ₯Ό μ·¨ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šκ³  μ†Œλ“μ˜ 성격과 λ°œμƒν˜•νƒœμ— 따라 λ³„λ„μ˜ 과세방법을 μ •μš©ν•˜λŠ” λΆ„λ₯˜κ³Όμ„Έμ œλ„μ˜ ν˜•νƒœλ₯Ό κ°–λŠ”λ‹€. 과세상 μ†Œλ“μ˜ μœ ν˜•μ€ 크게 λ„€ κ°€μ§€λ‘œ λ‚˜λˆ„μ–΄ μ’…ν•©μ†Œλ“, ν‡΄μ§μ†Œλ“, μ–‘λ„μ†Œλ“, μ‚°λ¦Όμ†Œλ“μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬λΆ„ν•˜λ©° μœ ν˜•μ— 따라 κ³Όμ„Έν‘œμ€€ 계산방법 적용 μ„Έμœ¨κ΅¬μ‘° λ“±μ—μ„œ 차이가 λ‚œλ‹€. 이 κ°€μš΄λ° μš°λ¦¬λ‚˜λΌ μ–‘λ„μ†Œλ“ μ„Έμ œλŠ” 1λ…„ 이상 λ³΄μœ ν•œ μžμ‚°μ˜ 경우 ꡭ세청이 κ³ μ‹œν•œ κΈ°μ€€μ„œκ°€μ— μ˜ν•œ μ‹ κ³  방식을 원칙적인 λ°©λ²•μœΌλ‘œ κ·œμ •ν•˜κ³  λ‚©μ„Έμžμ˜ μ‹€μ œ κ±°λž˜κ°€κ²©μ— κ·Όκ±°ν•œ θ³£εƒΉ 신고방법을 μ˜ˆμ™Έμ μœΌλ‘œ μš©μΈν•œλ‹€. 즉, μžμ‚°μ„ 1λ…„ 이상 λ³΄μœ ν•œ λ‚©μ„ΈμžλŠ” μ–‘λ„μ†Œλ“μ„Έλ₯Ό λ‚©λΆ€ν•  λ•Œμ— 두 가지 신고방법 κ°€μš΄λ° ν•˜λ‚˜λ₯Ό 선택할 수 μžˆλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μ–‘λ„μ†Œλ“ μ„Έμ œμ˜ δΊŒε…ƒζ€§μ€ λ‚©μ„Έμž 및 κ΅­μ„Έμ²­μ˜ μ˜μ‚¬κ²°μ • ν–‰νƒœμ— κ΄€ν•΄ 연ꡬ할 수 μžˆλŠ” 맀우 쒋은 기회λ₯Ό μ œκ³΅ν•œλ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 우리 λ‚˜λΌ μ–‘λ„μ†Œλ“ μ„Έμ œ ν•˜μ—μ„œ λ‚©μ„Έμžμ™€ κ΅­μ„Έμ²­μ˜ 졜적 μ˜μ‚¬κ²°μ •μ„ 이둠적으둜 λͺ¨ν˜•ν™” ν•˜κ³ , μ΄λ‘œλΆ€ν„° 싀증검증이 κ°€λŠ₯ν•œ 가섀을 λ„μΆœν•˜λŠ” 것을 λͺ©μ μœΌλ‘œ ν•œλ‹€

    An Empirical Study on Implicit Taxes in Korean Capital Market: with a Focus on KOSDAQ Market

    No full text
    This study investigates whether tax favors lead to a decline of before-tax rate of returns of the firms traded in KOSDAQ market. In particular, the possibility of this implicit tax has been examined for venture firms separately from non-venture firms. Contrary to the implicit tax hypothesis, the empirical results demonstrate that most tax benefits are retained by the KOSDAQ firms. It is also discovered that the extent to which tax benefits are retained is higher for non-venture firms than for venture firms. These results could be an evidence that there are too many frictions and/or restrictions in the market in which most KOSDAQ firms operate, so that competition is essentially deterred. It is also observed that before-tax rate of returns of venture firms are more sensitive to tax benefits than those of non-venture firms
    corecore