7 research outputs found

    ์ƒ์•…๋™์˜ ์—ผ์ฆ์„ฑ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€ ์ง„๋‹จ ์‹œ Waters ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์˜์ƒ์˜ ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ ํ‰๊ฐ€

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์น˜์˜ํ•™๊ณผ, 2012. 2. ์ตœ์ˆœ์ฒ .1. ๋ชฉ ์  ์ƒ์•…๋™ ๋‚ด์˜ ์—ผ์ฆ์„ฑ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€ ์ง„๋‹จ ์‹œ Waters ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์˜์ƒ์˜ ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„์˜ ๋‘๊ป˜์™€ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๋ฉฐ ํŒ๋…์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 2. ๋ฐฉ ๋ฒ• ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” CT ์˜์ƒ๊ณผ Waters ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์˜์ƒ์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ดฌ์˜ํ•œ 106๋ช…์˜ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ 189๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ์•…๋™์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. CT ์˜์ƒ์—์„œ ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์—ผ์ฆ์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ์ƒ์•…๋™๊ณผ ๋ณด์ด์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ƒ์•…๋™์„ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. CT ์˜์ƒ์—์„œ ์ƒ์•…๋™ ๋ฒฝ์˜ ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„ ๋‘๊ป˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ 5๊ตฐ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋Š”๋ฐ ์ƒ์•…๋™ ๋ฒฝ์˜ ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„๊ฐ€ 1~5 mm์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„๊ฐ€ 6~10 mm์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„๊ฐ€ 11 mm ์ด์ƒ์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„๊ฐ€ ์ƒ์•…๋™์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ฑ„์šด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ƒ์•…๋™์—์„œ ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ์œ„์น˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ 7๊ตฐ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋Š”๋ฐ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด ๋‘ ๋ฒฝ ์ด์ƒ์—์„œ ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ค‘๋ณต์œผ๋กœ ํฌํ•จ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ์ „๋ฒฝ, ํ›„๋ฒฝ, ๋‚ด๋ฒฝ, ์™ธ๋ฒฝ, ์ƒ๋ฒฝ, ์ƒ์•…๋™์ €, ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ฒฝ์—์„œ ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„๊ฐ€ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Waters ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์˜์ƒ์˜ ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒ๋…์ž๋Š” ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ์น˜์˜ํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™์› 4ํ•™๋…„ ํ•™์ƒ๊ณผ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ•์•…์•ˆ๋ฉด๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ํ•™ ์ „๊ณต์ž์˜ ๋‘ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๋‹น 3๋ช…์˜ ํŒ๋…์ž๊ฐ€ ํ™˜์ž์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ „ ์ง€์‹ ์—†์ด 5๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ฒด๊ณ„๋กœ ์ผ์ฃผ์ผ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ 2ํšŒ์”ฉ Waters ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์˜์ƒ์—์„œ ๋ณ‘์†Œ์˜ ์œ ๋ฌด๋ฅผ ROC๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ํŒ๋…์ž์˜ ํŒ๋…๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ t-test๋กœ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„ ๋‘๊ป˜์™€ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด์™€ ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„์˜ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ANOVA๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์˜ ํŒ๋…์ž๊ฐ„ ์ผ์น˜๋„์™€ ํŒ๋…์ž๋‚ด ์ผ์น˜๋„๋ฅผ kappa value๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 3. ๊ฒฐ ๊ณผ ์ „๊ณต์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน(0.817)์ด ํ•™์ƒ ๊ทธ๋ฃน(0.701)์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ „์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ์ด ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค(p<0.05). ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๋‚ด ํŒ๋…์ž๊ฐ„ ์ผ์น˜๋„๋Š” ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „๊ณต์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน(0.653)์ด ํ•™์ƒ ๊ทธ๋ฃน(0.335)์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๊ณ , ํŒ๋…์ž๋‚ด ์ผ์น˜๋„๋„ ์ „๊ณต์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน(๋ชจ๋‘ 0.7์ด์ƒ)์—์„œ ํ•™์ƒ ๊ทธ๋ฃน(3๋ช… ์ค‘ 2๋ช…์ด 0.4 ์ด์ƒ)์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋†’์€ ์ผ์น˜๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„ ๋‘๊ป˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ์€ ์ „๊ณต์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน๊ณผ ํ•™์ƒ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„ ๋‘๊ป˜๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ๋ถˆํˆฌ๊ณผ์ƒ์ด ์ „์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ฑ„์šด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค (p<0.05). ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ์€ ์ „๊ณต์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน๊ณผ ํ•™์ƒ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๋ชจ๋‘ ํ›„๋ฒฝ์— ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋‚˜ ํ•™์ƒ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ ์˜์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ด์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค(p>0.05). 4. ๊ฒฐ ๋ก  Waters ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์˜์ƒ์€ ์ƒ์•…๋™์˜ ์—ผ์ฆ์„ฑ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ์— ์ข‹์€ ์ง„๋‹จ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ์ ๋ง‰๋น„ํ›„์˜ ๋‘๊ป˜๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ง„๋‹จ์ด ์šฉ์ดํ•˜๋‚˜ ๋งŽ์€ ํŒ๋… ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ํŒ๋…์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ Waters ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์˜์ƒ์—์„œ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์ด ์˜์‹ฌ๋  ๋•Œ๋Š” ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.1. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of Waters radiograph in the diagnosis of inflammatory changes in the maxillary sinus and the effect of observers experience on their diagnostic performance. 2. Material and methods The study was performed on 189 maxillary sinuses observed with Waters radiographs and CT. Maxillary sinuses monitored by CT were divided into 5 groups based on the degree of mucosal thickening, including 115 cases with no mucosal thickening, 29 cases with thickening of 1~5 mm, 16 cases with thickening of 6~10 mm, 12 cases with thickening of more than 11 mm, and 17 cases of total radiopacity. Also, maxillary sinuses were categorized into 7 groups according to the location of mucosal thickening. Because most sinuses had mucosal thickening on more than two walls, groups of sinuses were overlapping. The results were comprised of 38 cases with mucosal thickening on the anterior wall, 33 cases with thickening on the posterior wall, 37 cases with thickening on the medial wall, 45 cases with thickening on the lateral wall, 30 cases with thickening on the superior wall, 50 cases with thickening on inferior wall, and 28 cases with thickening on all walls. These CT results were used as the gold standard. Three oral maxillofacial radiologists and three dental students participated in this study. Each observer made a diagnosis based on the Waters radiographs twice at an interval of one week blinded. The presence or absence of antral mucosal thickening was scored using 5-grade scale system. ROC analysis with calculation of the area under the ROC curve was performed. Inter/intra-observer agreement was calculated using a kappa value. 3. Results The diagnostic ability of the oral maxillofacial radiologist group was significantly superior to that of the dental student group (p<0.05). Inter/intra-observer agreement of the oral maxillofacial radiologist group was also higher than in the student group. The diagnostic ability of the oral maxillofacial radiologist and dental student groups improved as the thickness of mucosal thickening increased (p>0.05). However, their diagnostic ability was decreased in cases of total radiopacity (p>0.05). The diagnostic ability of the two groups was highest in sinuses with mucosal thickening on the posterior wall. Statistical differences were not observed in student group (p>0.05). 4. Conclusion The Watersradiograph alone allows facile diagnosis of inflammatory changes in maxillary sinus, especially when mucosal thickening is increased. In addition, sufficient observer experience is warranted since the diagnostic utility of Waters radiographs strongly depends on the skill and knowledge of the observer. Therefore, further examination is recommended when an inflammatory lesion is suspected from Waters radiographs.Maste

    ๋ผ์ง€ ์‹ฌ๋ง‰์—์„œ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ฝœ๋ผ๊ฒ ์ฐจํ๋ง‰์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์  ํšจ์œจ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„, ์ด์ค‘ ๋งน๊ฒ€ ์ž„์ƒ ๋น„๊ต ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์น˜์˜ํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์น˜์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2018. 8. ๊น€์„ฑํƒœ.Purpose : The aim of this study was to radiographically and clinically compare dimensional alterations during ridge preservation using two extracellular matrix (ECM) membranes. Methods : A widely used ECM membrane (Bio-Gideยฎ) and newly developed ECM membrane (Lyso-Gideยฎ) were applied during the ridge preservation procedure in control and test groups, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken at surgery day and 6 months after the ridge preservation procedure. Alginate impressions were obtained at 1 week and 6 months after the ridge preservation procedure. Results were statistically analyzed using the independent t-test and the nonparametric Whitney U test. Results : Change of extraction socket dimension from master casts showed no significant difference between two ECM membranes. Likewise, differences of width, height and quantity of bone tissue from CBCT scans showed no significant difference. The mean VAS of characteristics of test group was shown higher than that of control group. Conclusions : Newly developed ECM membrane in ridge preservation procedure showed comparable clinical/ radiographical result to widely used ECM membrane. 1. Introduction . 1 2. Material & Methods . 6 3. Results . 12 4. Discussion 14 5. References 19 6. Tables . 24 7. Figures . 27 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 33Docto

    Preparation of silica based core/shell nanostructures for bioimaging and drug delivery

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋‚˜๋…ธ์œตํ•ฉํ•™๊ณผ, 2012. 2. ๋ฐ•์›์ฒ .In recent years, the development of nanostructured materials for biomedical applications has been continued by many researchers. Various nanomaterials have been studied as promising candidates and among them, silica based core/shell nanostructured materials were conducted to study actively due to their low toxicity, easy modification, inexpensive process, etc. In this research, we synthesized two types of silica based core/shell nanostructured materials. First, RITC-doped core/mesoporous shell silica nanostructured materials were synthesized for investigating the possibility to act as theranostic nanocarriers. RITC-encapsulated core silica nanoparticles were prepared by sol-gel process. The cores were further grown to various size by coating with pure silica through the Stรถber method. Furthermore, mesoporous shells were coated again by using cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as porous guiding agent. The shape, size, and fluorescence of the as-prepared nanostructured materials were confirmed by using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic laser scattering (DLS), and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. Ibuprofen loading and release experiments in buffer solution (pH 7.4) showed that these nanostructured materials were available for drug delivery system. In addition, cytotoxicity test and fluorescent imaging were carefully conducted to investigate the cell-level behavior of the nanostructured materials. From these results, we demonstrated that the as-synthesized nanostructured materials had the potential applicability as theranostic nanocarriers. Second, iron oxide core/RITC-doped silica shell nanostructured materials were prepared. The as-prepared nanostructured materials were suitable for dual imaging. The synthesis of the nanostructured materials was based on reverse micelle method and iron oxide nanocrystals coat with RITC-doped silica. The as-prepared nanostructured materials were analyzed to confirm the shape, size, and distribution by TEM and DLS. In addition, fluorescent properties were discussed through the analysis of PL. By WST-1 assay, we confirmed that the as-prepared nanostructured materials showed low toxicity to cells. Finally, through in vivo and in vitro MR and fluorescent imaging, we verified that the as-prepared nanostructured materials could be used as dual imaging contrast agents. The as-prepared nanostructured materials were intended to improve the diagnostic accuracy and broaden the diagnostic scope of diseases by performing both MR and fluorescence imaging.Maste
    corecore