3 research outputs found
A Study on the Improvements of Tax Support System on the Small and Medium Business in Korea
Today, the importance of small and medium enterprises as the leader in creating jobs and technical innovation is being reappraised, and the needs of it's nurture is brought into relief internationally. Boosted by continuous revitalization policy after the economic crisis, small and medium enterprises in Korea is taking much space in national economy such as employment, exportation, production and added value creation, too. Hence the government has been enforcing many taxation support system as to elevate competitive power and intensify industrial structure of small and medium enterprises which not only is being the driving force of the development of national economy, but also is contributing to the development of the society with efficient distribution of resources, balanced distribution of income and stabilization of employment.
Korea has as many systems to support small and medium sized companies as other countries. Korean government has provided various tax supporting system to encourage the economy adapting to the changes of domestic and foreign economic environment through strengthening the competitiveness of small and medium sized companies, cultivating growth potential and improving industry structure. But small and medium sized companies of Korea are not well aware of tax information, have difficulty in entering accounts and are hard to acquire professionals of tax area. So they are hard to make use of tax supporting system efficiently.
The relative importance and role of the small and medium enterprises in the national economy is increasing.
These are to prove the just of the small and medium enterprises rearing. It is necessary that the efficient and practical support is made for developing the small and medium enterprises.
The support means for the small and medium enterprises are the rationality of system, the apt support of finance and the support of tax system.
This paper has the purpose to analysis the problem has the present tax support system and to suggest the development of this problem limited the part of tax support system.
Making full use of the small and medium enterprises tax incentive every year turned out to be beneficial for the financial position improvement. The primary reasons for the low application of tax incentives are that some applicants are not qualified for the program and that others are not aware of the details of the system and its application processes.
This research, on the ground of this analysis, has made several suggestions: the extension of application range, the simplification of tax support system and its application through relaxing restrictions of tax reduction, and the automatic program to calculate the tax saving relating to the small and medium enterprises incentive systems.
This study is valuable to the effect that we have evaluated the small and medium enterprises incentive systems of the past and have made suggestions for improvements in the future, verifying that the effect of tax incentive programs has increased since the economic crisis.
์ 1์ฅ ์๋ก 1
์ 1์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๋ชฉ์ 1
1. ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ 1
2. ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๋ชฉ์ 2
์ 2์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ด์ฉ๊ณผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ 3
1. ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ด์ฉ 3
2. ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ 3
์ 2์ฅ ์ค์๊ธฐ์
๋ฐ ์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ๊ตญ๋ด์ธ ํํฉ 4
์ 1์ ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์ ์ ์ ๋ฐ ๋ฒ์ 4
1. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์ ์ ์ 4
2. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์ ๋ฒ์ 5
3. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
ํด๋น์ฌ์
์ ๋ฒ์ 7
4. ์ ์ง๊ตญ ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์ ๋ฒ์ 10
์ 2์ ๊ตญ๋ด ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์ ํํฉ ๋ฐ ๋น๊ต 15
1. ๊ตญ๋ด ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์ ํํฉ 15
2. ๊ตญ๋ด์ธ ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์ ํํฉ๋น๊ต 18
์ 3์ ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ์ ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ํํฉ 20
1. ์กฐ์ธํน๋ก์ ํ๋ฒ์ ์ง์์ ๋ 20
2. ๋ฒ์ธ์ธ๋ฒ์ ์ง์์ ๋ 21
3. ์ง์๋ด์ฉ๋ณ ๋ถ๋ฅ 22
์ 4์ ์ ์ง๊ตญ์ ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ํํฉ 23
1. ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์ ์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋ 23
2. ์๊ตญ์ ์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋ 27
3. ์ผ๋ณธ์ ์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋ 30
4. ๋๋ง์ ์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋ 36
์ 5์ ๊ตญ๋ด์ธ์ ์ฑ
ํํฉ์ ์ ํ๋ณ ๋น๊ต 39
1. ์ฐฝ์
๋ฐ ๋ฒค์ฒํ์ฑํ ์ง์์ ๋ 39
2. ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ๋ฐ ์ง์์ ๋ 41
3. ์ค๋นํฌ์ ์ง์์ ๋ 42
4. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
ํฌ์์ ์ง์์ ๋ 44
5. ๊ธฐํ ์ง์์ ๋ 46
6. ๊ตญ๋ด์ธ์ ์ฑ
๋น๊ต๋ฅผ ํตํ ์ ๋ง 48
์ 3์ฅ ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ์ด๋ก ์ ๊ณ ์ฐฐ๊ณผ ์ ํ์ฐ๊ตฌ 50
์ 1์ ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ๋ด์ฉ๊ณผ ์ง์๋ฐฉ๋ฒ 50
1. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ๋ด์ฉ 50
2. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ์ง์๋ฐฉ๋ฒ 61
์ 2์ ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ๊ดํ ์ ํ์ฐ๊ตฌ 63
1. ๊ธฐ์
๊ท๋ชจ์ ์กฐ์ธ๋ถ๋ด๊ณผ์ ๊ด๊ณ์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ 63
2. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ์ ํจ์ฑ์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ 64
3. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ํฌ์์ด์งํจ๊ณผ์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ 66
4. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋๊ฐ ์ฌ๋ฌด๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ๋ฏธ์น ์ํฅ์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ 67
5. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์
๊ฐ์นํ๊ฐ ๋ฑ์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ์ํฅ์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ 68
์ 3์ ์ ํ์ด์ฉ์คํ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ๋ณ ํ๋ฆ์ ๊ดํ ๋ถ์ 70
1. ์ ํ์ฐ๊ตฌํ๋ณธ์ ๊ตฌ์ฑ 70
2. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ํ์ฉํํฉ 70
์ 4์ฅ ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ์ด์ฉ์คํ ๋ฐ ๊ฐ์ ๋ฐฉ์ 84
์ 1์ ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ์ด์ฉ์คํ 84
1. ์ค๋ฌธํ๋ณธ์ ๊ตฌ์ฑ 84
2. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์ ๊ธฐ์ฅ์คํ ๋ฐ ์ธ๋ฌด์ ๊ณ ํํฉ 88
3. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์ ์ธ๋ฌดํ์ ์ถ์ง๊ณผ์ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ๊ณผ ์ธ๋ฌด์กฐ์ฌ ๋ฑ ํํฉ 89
4. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋ ํ์ฉํํฉ 92
5. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ํ์ฉ์ ๋ ๋ฐ ํ๊ฐ 93
6. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ์ธ์ ์ง์๋ฐฉ์ ๋ฐ ๊ฐ์ ์ฌํญ 95
์ 2์ ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ๊ฐ์ ๋ฐฉ์ 97
1. ์กฐ์ธ์ง์์ ๋์ ์ ๋น 97
2. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์ ํต์ฌ์ญ๋์ ๊ณ ๋ฅผ ์ํ ์ ๋ ๊ฐ์ 100
3. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
๋ฒ์ธ์ธ์จ ์ฒด๊ณ์ ๊ฒํ 105
4. ์ค์๊ธฐ์
์ง์์ธ์ ์ ๊ต์ก ๋ฐ ํ๋ณด๊ฐํ 108
์ 5์ฅ ๊ฒฐ๋ก 110
1. ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ์์ฌ์ 110
2. ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ์์ฝ 111
3. ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ํ๊ณ์ ๊ณผ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๋ฐฉํฅ 11
Evaluation of North Korean Agricultural Sustainability and Its Implications for Agricultural Cooperation
๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ๋ถํ ๋์
์ ์ง์๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ์ ํ๊ฐํ๊ธฐ ์ํ ๋ชฉ์ ์ผ๋ก ์ํ๋์๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ํด ๋ถํ ๋์
์ ์ง์๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ ๊ด๋ จ ์งํ๋ OECD์ ํ์ , ๋์
์์ฐ์ฑ ๋ฐ ์ง์๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ๋ถ์ํ๊ณผ ์ด๋ฅผ ํ์ฉํ ์ ํ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๋ฐํ์ผ๋ก ์ ์ ํ์๊ณ , ์งํ๋ณ ์ฑ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์ค์๋์๊ดํ ์ธ์์กฐ์ฌ๋ ๊ตญ๋ด์ ๋ถํ ๋์
๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ์ ยท์ฌํ ๋ถ์ผ ์ ๋ฌธ๊ฐ๋ฅผ ๋์์ผ๋ก ์ค๋ฌธํ์๋ค. ๊ณ์ธตํ ๋ถ์๊ธฐ๋ฒ(AHP)์ ํ์ฉํ์ฌ ์กฐ์ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ ๋ํํ๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ์ค์๋-์ฑ๊ณผ ๋ถ์(IPA)ํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ถํ ๋์
์ ์ง์๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ์ ๋ํ ์ํฅ์์ธ๋ณ ์ค์๋๋ ์ค์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฑ์ฅ๋ฅ , ์ ์ฑ
์ถ์ง ์ญ๋, ์ธํ๋ผ(SOC), ์ดํฌ์์จ ๋ฑ ์์ฅ ๋ฐ ์ ๋, ์ผ๋ฐ๊ฒฝ์ ์ฌ๊ฑด ๋ถ๋ฌธ์ ์ํ ์งํ์์ ๋๊ฒ ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ ๋ถํ์ ์ง์๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ ์ข
ํฉ์ง์๋ 42.9์ ์ผ๋ก ์ถ์ ๋์๊ณ , ์ ํ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์ ๋ถ์๋ ๋จํ ์ข
ํฉ์ง์ ์ถ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ(56.1์ )๋ณด๋ค ๋ฎ์๋ค. ๋ณธ ๋ถ์๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ ํฅํ ๊ตญ์ ์ฌํ์ ์์กฐ, ๋ถํ์ ์์ฅ๊ฒฝ์ ์ฒด์ ์์๋ฅผ ํ์ฉํ์ฌ ํ๋ฐ๋ ์ฐจ์์๋จ๋ถ ๋์
ํ๋ ฅ ์ฌ์
์ ์ถ์งํด์ผ ํ๋ค๋ ๊ฒ์ ์๋ฏธํ๋ค. ์ด์ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ๋ถํ์ ํ๊ฒฝ๋ณด์ ๊ณผ ์์ฐ์ฑ ์ฆ๋ ํจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋์์ ์ด๋ฃฉํ ์ ์๋ ๋จ๋ถ๋์
ํ๋ ฅ ์ฌ์
๋ฐฉ์์ ์ ์ํ๊ณ , ์ฅ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ๊ด์ ์์ ํ๋ฐ๋ ๋์
ํ๋ ฅ์ ๋๋ชจํ ์ ์๋ ๋ฐฉํฅ ์ญ์ ์ ์ํ๋ค.N
An Analysis of the Economic Effects of the Pilot Project for Multiple-Purpose Utilization of Paddy Fields Focusing on Income and Welfare Changes
The food self-sufficiency rate of agricultural products in Korea, excluding rice, is around 20%, and the government is promoting various policies including a Multiple-Purpose Utilization of Paddy Fields project, to increase the self-sufficiency rate of major grains. The project for Multiple-Purpose Utilization of Paddy Fields is being promoted as a part of a program to create farmland infrastructure to facilitate the cultivation of crops other than rice in rice paddies, and pilot projects were started in four regions in 2020. The purpose of this study is to analyze the economic effects of the pilot project for Multiple-Purpose Utilization of Paddy Fields, and to propose policies to increase the effectiveness of the project. In order to analyze the economic effect, we estimated the change in farm income generated by switching from rice to other crops, and measured the effect of welfare change using the Equilibrium Displacement Model (EDM). As a result of the analysis, social welfare is expected to increase when the pilot project for Multiple-Purpose Utilization of Paddy Fields is implemented, and the income of the beneficiary farmers is also expected to improve compared to that of single-cropping when double-cropping is implemented. However, it was found that the economic feasibility of the project differs depending on the crops converted. Juksan-myeon, Gimje-si, which is an area where soybean production was successful, was analyzed from the viewpoint of increasing the economic feasibility of the pilot project. Their success factors were analyzed into four major factors: infrastructure, farming methods, education, and collaboration with local agricultural organizations. If such a success story can be utilized in the future project implementation process, it can contribute to the improvement of farm household income and national economic welfare.N