21 research outputs found

    살인범죄λ₯Ό μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : μ‚¬νšŒκ³Όν•™λŒ€ν•™ 언둠정보학과, 2019. 2. μœ€μ„λ―Ό.언둠은 λͺ¨λ“  사건을 κ³΅μ •ν•˜κ²Œ 보도해야 함에도 λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³ , νŠΉμ • 사건은 맀우 μ„ μ •μ μœΌλ‘œ λ³΄λ„ν•˜λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ 보이며, 특히 λ²”μ£„λ³΄λ„λŠ” 맀번 λ˜ν’€μ΄λ˜λ“― κ·Έ 선정성이 문제둜 μ§€μ λ˜μ–΄μ™”μŒμ—λ„ λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  μ–΄λ–€ 범죄듀이 μ„ μ •μ μœΌλ‘œ λ³΄λ„λ˜λŠ”μ§€ μ²΄κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μ—°κ΅¬λ˜μ–΄μ˜¨ λ°”κ°€ μ—†λ‹€. 이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 범죄 보도에 μ΄ˆμ μ„ 두어, 언둠이 μ–΄λ–€ 범죄사건을 μ„ μ •μ μœΌλ‘œ λ³΄λ„ν•˜λŠ”μ§€ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄μ•˜λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ λ¨Όμ € λ²”μ£„μ˜ λ‚΄μš©μ„ λ²”μ£„μž 차원, ν”Όν•΄μž 차원, 범죄 ν–‰μœ„ μ°¨μ›μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬λΆ„ν•˜κ³  차원 λ³„λ‘œ μ μ ˆν•œ λΆ„μ„μœ λͺ©λ“€μ„ λ‘μ—ˆλ‹€. λ‹€μŒμœΌλ‘œ 각쒅 μ–Έλ‘ μ˜ μœ€λ¦¬κ·œλ²”λ“€μ„ μ°Έκ³ ν•˜μ—¬ λ‚΄μš©μ  μ°¨μ›μ˜ 선정성을 5개의 ν•˜μœ„ κ°œλ…λ“€μ„ 톡해 μ •λ¦¬ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , 각 ν•˜μœ„κ°œλ… λ³„λ‘œ 3-4개의 세뢀적인 선정적 λ³΄λ„ν–‰νƒœ ν•­λͺ©λ“€μ„ 두어 총 17개의 ν•­λͺ©μœΌλ‘œ 선정적 λ²”μ£„λ³΄λ„μ˜ 기쀀을 μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이듀을 가지고 κ΅­λ‚΄ λŒ€ν‘œμΌκ°„μ§€ 3μ‚¬μ—μ„œ 2015λ…„λΆ€ν„° 2017λ…„κΉŒμ§€ λ³΄λ„λœ 살인사건 기사λ₯Ό λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ μ‚΄μΈλ²”μ£„μ˜ λ‚΄μš©κ³Ό μ–Έλ‘ μ˜ 선정적 λ³΄λ„ν–‰νƒœ κ°„μ˜ 관계에 λŒ€ν•œ 뢄석을 μ‹œλ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό, 언둠은 남성·전과가 μžˆλŠ” λ²”μ£„μžμ²˜λŸΌ μ‚¬λžŒλ“€μ΄ μΈμ‹ν•˜κΈ°μ— μ „ν˜•μ μΈ λ²”μ£„μžκ°€ 저지λ₯Έ 사건을 더 μ„ μ •μ μœΌλ‘œ λ³΄λ„ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. ν•œνŽΈ ν”Όν•΄μž μ°¨μ›μ—μ„œλŠ” μ•„λ™Β·μ²­μ†Œλ…„ ν”Όν•΄μž, 친쑱 ν˜Ήμ€ 타인에 μ˜ν•΄ μ‚΄ν•΄λœ ν”Όν•΄μž, μ—¬λŸ¬ λͺ…이 μ‚΄ν•΄λ‹Ήν•œ μ‚¬κ±΄μ˜ ν”Όν•΄μžμ™€ 같이 비ꡐ적 더 비인간적이고 비도덕적인 범죄 사건을 μ„ μ •μ μœΌλ‘œ λ³΄λ„ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 범죄 ν–‰μœ„ μ°¨μ›μ—μ„œλŠ” κ³„νšλœ 범죄λ₯Ό 그렇지 μ•Šμ€ 범죄보닀 μ„ μ •μ μœΌλ‘œ λ³΄λ„ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” κ·Έκ°„ μ²΄κ³„ν™”λ˜μ–΄ μ˜€μ§€ λͺ»ν•œ λ‚΄μš©μ  μ°¨μ›μ˜ 선정성을 μ²΄κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ κ°œλ…ν™”ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€λŠ” 점, 이λ₯Ό λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ 싀증적이고 쒅합적인 연ꡬλ₯Ό μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜μ—¬ μ–Έλ‘ μ˜ 선정적 보도 ν–‰νƒœλ₯Ό μ’…ν•©μ μœΌλ‘œ κ΄€μ°°ν•  수 있게 된 점, 선정적 λ²”μ£„λ³΄λ„μ˜ ν•œ μ›μΈμœΌλ‘œμ„œ λ²”μ£„μ˜ λ‚΄μš©μ„ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄μ•˜λ‹€λŠ” μ μ—μ„œ κ·Έ 의의λ₯Ό κ°–λŠ”λ‹€.제 1 μž₯ 문제제기 1 제 2 μž₯ 선행연ꡬ κ²€ν†  5 제 1 절 범죄 5 제 2 절 범죄보도 9 제 3 절 λ³΄λ„μ˜ μ„ μ •μ„± 16 제 4 절 선정적 범죄보도 26 제 3 μž₯ μ—°κ΅¬λ¬Έμ œ 및 연ꡬ방법 41 제 1 절 μ—°κ΅¬λ¬Έμ œ 41 제 2 절 연ꡬ방법 42 1. λΆ„μ„μœ λͺ©μ˜ μ‘°μž‘μ  μ •μ˜ 43 2. 자료의 μˆ˜μ§‘κ³Ό 뢄석 54 제 4 μž₯ 연ꡬ결과 59 제 1 절 언둠이 λ³΄λ„ν•œ 범죄사건 59 1. 기사 νŠΉμ„± 59 2. λ²”μ£„μž 62 3. ν”Όν•΄μž 68 4. 범죄 ν–‰μœ„ 72 제 2 절 μ–Έλ‘ μ˜ 범죄보도 μ„ μ •μ„± ν–‰νƒœ 75 1. μ–Έλ‘ μ˜ μ „λ°˜μ  범죄보도 μ„ μ •μ„± ν–‰νƒœ 75 2. 언둠사별 범죄보도 μ„ μ •μ„± ν–‰νƒœ 83 3. κΈ°μ‚¬μ‹œκΈ°λ³„ 범죄보도 μ„ μ •μ„± ν–‰νƒœ 87 제 3 절 μ—°κ΅¬λ¬Έμ œ κ²°κ³Ό 94 1. λ²”μ£„μž 차원 94 1) λ²”μ£„μž 수 94 2) λ²”μ£„μžμ˜ μ„± 98 3) λ²”μ£„μžμ˜ ꡭ적 102 4) λ²”μ£„μžμ˜ μ „κ³Ό μ—¬λΆ€ 106 5) μ†Œκ²° 110 2. ν”Όν•΄μž 차원 112 1) ν”Όν•΄μž 수 112 2) ν”Όν•΄μžμ˜ μ„± 116 3) ν”Όν•΄μžμ˜ λ‚˜μ΄ 120 4) λ²”μ£„μžμ™€ ν”Όν•΄μž κ°„ 관계 126 5) μ†Œκ²° 131 3. 범죄 ν–‰μœ„ 차원 132 1) 범죄 κ³„νšμ„± μ—¬λΆ€ 133 2) μ‹œμ‹ μœ κΈ° μ—¬λΆ€ 137 3) μ†Œκ²° 141 제 5 μž₯ λ…Όμ˜ 142 1. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μš”μ•½ 142 2. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ 의의 147 3. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•œκ³„ 148 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 150 뢀둝 161 Abstract 168Maste

    κ΅¬κ°•μ•…μ•ˆλ©΄ μ˜μ—­μ— λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜λŠ” 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ 치료

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ μΉ˜μ˜ν•™λŒ€ν•™μ› : μΉ˜κ³ΌλŒ€ν•™ μΉ˜μ˜ν•™κ³Ό, 2016. 2. 김홍희.신경병변성 톡증은 μ‹ κ²½κ³„μ˜ 일차적인 손상 λ˜λŠ” κΈ°λŠ₯이상에 μ˜ν•΄ λ°œμƒν•œ ν†΅μ¦μœΌλ‘œ μ •μ˜ν•œλ‹€. 신경병변성 톡증은 κ·Έ 원인과 μž„μƒ 양상에 따라 삼차신경톡(trigeminal neuralgia), 포진후 신경톡(postherpetic neuralgia), 외상후 신경톡(traumatic neuropathy)으둜 λΆ„λ₯˜ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€. μž„μƒμ μœΌλ‘œ 신경병변성 톡증은 자발적이며 지속적인 λ°œμž‘μ„±μ˜ 톡증 λ˜λŠ” 일상적인 μžκ·Ήμ— μ˜ν•΄ κ°•ν•˜κ²Œ μ΄‰λ°œλ˜λŠ” ν†΅μ¦μœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œλ‹€. μ΄λŠ” ν™˜μžμ˜ μΌμƒμƒν™œμ„ λ°©ν•΄ν•˜μ—¬ μ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆμ„ μ €ν•˜μ‹œν‚€κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ— μ‹¬κ°ν•œ μ˜ν•™μ , μ‚¬νšŒμ  문제둜 이어진닀. 역학쑰사에 λ”°λ₯΄λ©΄ ν˜„μž¬ 신경병변성 톡증을 κ²ͺλŠ” λ§Žμ€ ν™˜μžλ“€μ΄ 톡증에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ μ μ ˆν•œ 치료λ₯Ό 받지 λͺ»ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ μ•Œλ €μ‘Œλ‹€. μ΄λŠ” 신경병변성 톡증에 λŒ€ν•œ ν†΅μΌλœ λΆ„λ₯˜ μ²΄κ³„μ˜ λΆ€μž¬μ™€ 신경병변성 톡증이 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜κΈ°κΉŒμ§€μ˜ λ³‘νƒœ 생리에 λŒ€ν•œ μ΄ν•΄μ˜ λΆ€μ‘±, 그리고 치료 방법에 λŒ€ν•œ κ·Όκ±° μ€‘μ‹¬μ˜ 치료 방법이 μΆ©λΆ„νžˆ λ§ˆλ ¨λ˜μ–΄ μžˆμ§€ μ•ŠκΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€. ν˜„μž¬μ˜ 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ μΉ˜λ£ŒλŠ” 약리학적(전신적, κ΅­μ†Œμ ), 수술적, λ‹€λ₯Έ 보완적인 방법이 μ‚¬μš©λ˜κ³  있으며 주된 μΉ˜λ£ŒλŠ” 전신적인 μ•½λ¬ΌμΉ˜λ£Œλ₯Ό 톡해 이루어진닀. λ§Žμ€ μ•½μ œλ“€μ΄ 연ꡬλ₯Ό 톡해 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ 경감에 νš¨κ³Όκ°€ μžˆλ‹€κ³  λ°ν˜€μ‘Œκ³  μ΄λŠ” μ‚Όν™˜κ³„ ν•­μš°μšΈμ œ(tricyclic antidepressants), μ„Έλ‘œν† λ‹Œ-λ…Έλ₯΄μ—ν”Όλ„€ν”„λ¦° 재흑수 μ–΅μ œμ œ(serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) , carbamazepine, gabapentin, pregabalinκ³Ό μ˜€ν”Όμ˜€μ΄λ“œ(opioids)λ₯Ό ν¬ν•¨ν•œλ‹€. 이 논문은 μ—¬λŸ¬ λ¬Έν—Œ 쑰사λ₯Ό 톡해 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ 효과적인 μ•½λ¬Ό μΉ˜λ£Œμ— λŒ€ν•œ κ·Όκ±° 기반의 치료 κ³„νšμ„ μ œμ‹œν•˜λŠ” 것을 λͺ©μ μœΌλ‘œ ν•œλ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ λ³‘νƒœ 생리에 λŒ€ν•œ 이해가 ν•„μš”ν•˜λ―€λ‘œ λ¨Όμ € 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ 원인과 λ°œλ³‘ 기전에 λŒ€ν•΄ μ•Œμ•„λ³΄μ•˜λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ λ¬΄μž‘μœ„ λŒ€μ‘°μ‹œν—˜(randomized controlled trial)을 톡해 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ μΉ˜λ£Œμ— νš¨κ³Όκ°€ μžˆλ‹€κ³  μ•Œλ €μ§„ μ•½μ œλ“€μ„ μ‘°μ‚¬ν•˜κ³  κ·Έ νš¨κ³Όμ™€ λΆ€μž‘μš©μ„ κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ 각 ν•˜μœ„λΆ„λ₯˜μ— 따라 일차, 이차, μ‚Όμ°¨λ‘œ 선택할 수 μžˆλŠ” μ•½μ œλ₯Ό μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ μΉ˜λ£ŒλŠ” μ•½λ¬Ό 치료λ₯Ό μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ μ—¬λŸ¬ ν•™λ¬Έ λΆ„μ•Όμ˜ ν˜‘λ™μ΄ ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€. 신경병변성 톡증에 λŒ€ν•œ λ”μš± μ •ν™•ν•œ 이해와 이λ₯Ό λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ ν•œ κ·Όκ±° μ€‘μ‹¬μ˜ μΉ˜λ£ŒλŠ” 미래의 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ 치료λ₯Ό μ’€ 더 효과적으둜 이루어지도둝 ν•  것이닀.1. μ„œ λ‘  1 2. 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ λΆ„λ₯˜ 3 3. 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ 진단 4 4. 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ λ°œλ³‘ κΈ°μ „κ³Ό λ³‘νƒœ 생리 6 4.1. Ectopic nerve activity 6 4.2. μ€‘μΆ”κ°μž‘(Central sensitization) 7 5. 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ μΉ˜λ£Œμ— μ‚¬μš©λ˜λŠ” μ•½μ œλ“€ 9 5.1. μ „μ‹ μž‘μš© μ•½μ œ . 9 5.1.1. ν•­μš°μšΈμ œ 11 5.1.2. ν•­μ „κ°„μ œ 11 5.1.3. ν•­λΆ€μ •λ§₯μ•½ 13 5.1.4. μ˜€ν”Όμ˜€μ΄λ“œ 13 5.1.5. 기타 μ•½λ¬Ό 14 5.2. κ΅­μ†Œμž‘μš© μ•½μ œ 14 6. 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ 치료λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ 수술 16 7. κ΅¬κ°•μ•…μ•ˆλ©΄ μ˜μ—­ 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ ν•˜μœ„λΆ„λ₯˜μ— λ”°λ₯Έ 효과적인 치료 κ³„νš 17 7.1 삼차신경톡 17 7.1.1 μž„μƒ 증상 17 7.1.2. λ°œλ³‘ 원인 18 7.1.3. 치료 18 7.2. 포진후 신경톡 20 7.2.1 μž„μƒ 증상 20 7.2.2. λ°œλ³‘ 원인 20 7.2.3. 치료 21 7.3. 외상후 신경톡 22 7.3.1 μž„μƒ 증상 22 7.3.2. 외상후 μ‹ κ²½ν†΅μ˜ λ‹€λ₯Έ λΆ„λ₯˜μ™€ μš©μ–΄ 23 7.3.3. λ°œλ³‘ 원인 24 7.3.4. 치료 25 8. 신경병변성 ν†΅μ¦μ˜ 예방 27 9. κ³  μ°° 29 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 33 ν‘œ 45 초둝 46Maste

    An Empirical Study on Effects of the Cap-and-Trade System on Air Pollutants in the Seoul Metropolitan Area Industrial Settings

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사) -- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅λŒ€ν•™μ› : ν™˜κ²½λŒ€ν•™μ› ν™˜κ²½κ³„νšν•™κ³Ό, 2023. 2. ν™μ’…ν˜Έ.ν™˜κ²½λ¬Έμ œμ— λŒ€ν•œ ꡭ민적 관심 증가와 ν•¨κ»˜ μ§€λ‚œ 50μ—¬ λ…„κ°„ ν•œκ΅­μ˜ λŒ€κΈ° μ˜€μ—Όλ²•μ€ λ‹€μ–‘ν•˜κ²Œ λ°œμ „ν•΄μ™”λ‹€. 특히 2003λ…„λΆ€ν„° 2019λ…„κΉŒμ§€ μ‹œν–‰ν•œ μˆ˜λ„κΆŒ λŒ€κΈ°ν™˜κ²½κ°œμ„ μ— κ΄€ν•œ νŠΉλ³„λ²•μ€ μˆ˜λ„κΆŒ μ§€μ—­λ§Œμ„ νŠΉμ •ν•œ 지역 λ‹¨μœ„ ν™˜κ²½λ²•μ΄λΌλŠ” μ μ—μ„œ κ·Έ μ˜λ―Έκ°€ κΉŠλ‹€. ν•΄λ‹Ή 법 ν•˜ μ‹€μ‹œν•œ μˆ˜λ„κΆŒ 사업μž₯ λŒ€κΈ°μ˜€μ—Όλ¬Όμ§ˆ μ΄λŸ‰κ΄€λ¦¬μ œλŠ” μˆ˜λ„κΆŒ λŒ€κΈ°μ˜€μ—Όλ¬Όμ§ˆ λ°°μΆœμ‚¬μ—…μž₯λ“€μ˜ SOx, NOx, 먼지 λ°°μΆœμ΄λŸ‰μ„ κ·œμ œν•˜λŠ” 양적 규제 정책이닀. μ΄λŠ” κ³Όκ±° λ†λ„κ·œμ œ λ°©μ‹μ˜ ν•œκ³„λ₯Ό κ·Ήλ³΅ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ μ‹œλ²”μ  μ •μ±…μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. μ •μ±… μ‹€μ‹œ ν›„ 20μ—¬ 년이 μ§€λ‚œ ν˜„μž¬, μ΄λŸ‰μ œλŠ” κ·Έ νš¨κ³Όμ„±μ„ 인정받아 μ „κ΅­λ‹¨μœ„λ‘œ ν™•λŒ€ μ‹€μ‹œλ˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. μ •λΆ€λŠ” μ΄λŸ‰μ œμ˜ λŒ€κΈ°μ˜€μ—Όλ¬Όμ§ˆ μ €κ°νš¨κ³Όμ— κ΄€ν•œ λ³΄κ³ μ„œλ₯Ό λ‹€μˆ˜ λ°œκ°„ν•΄μ™”λ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ ν•΄λ‹Ή λ³΄κ³ μ„œλ“€μ˜ μ •μ±… 후속 ν‰κ°€λŠ” λŒ€μƒ 사업μž₯의 λŒ€κΈ°μ˜€μ—Όλ¬Όμ§ˆ λ°°μΆœλŸ‰μ„ λ‹¨μˆœ κ΄€μ°°ν•˜λŠ” λ°©μ‹μœΌλ‘œ μ§„ν–‰λ˜μ–΄ μ •μ±… μ‹œν–‰κ³Ό μ˜€μ—Όλ¬Όμ§ˆ 농도 κ°„ 인과성을 λͺ…ν™•νžˆ 보여주지 λͺ»ν•˜λŠ” ν•œκ³„κ°€ μ‘΄μž¬ν•œλ‹€. 사업μž₯ λ°°μΆœλŸ‰μ€ μ •μ±… μ‹œν–‰ μ—¬λΆ€λΏλ§Œ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ ν•΄λ‹Ή μ—°λ„μ˜ κ²½μ œμ„±μž₯λ₯ , 기술 λ°œμ „, μ‹œλ―Όμ‚¬νšŒμ˜ ν™˜κ²½ 인식 λ“± λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ™ΈλΆ€ μš”μΈμ˜ 영ν–₯을 받을 수 μžˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ μ •μ±… μ‹œν–‰μ˜ 순효과λ₯Ό ν‰κ°€ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 외생 λ³€μˆ˜μ˜ μ μ ˆν•œ ν†΅μ œκ°€ ν•„μˆ˜μ μ΄λ‹€. λ³Έ 논문은 2007λ…„λΆ€ν„° 2019λ…„κΉŒμ§€μ˜ μž₯κΈ°νŒ¨λ„λ°μ΄ν„°λ₯Ό κ΅¬μΆ•ν•˜μ—¬ κ³ μ •νš¨κ³Όλͺ¨ν˜•μ„ ν™œμš©ν•œ μ΄μ€‘μ°¨λΆ„λ°©μ‹μœΌλ‘œ μˆ˜λ„κΆŒ μ΄λŸ‰μ œμ˜ μ •μ±… 순효과λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό 1, 2μ°¨ μ΄λŸ‰μ œ ν• λ‹Ήκ³Ό 2μ°¨ κ³„νšμ—°λ„ μ‹œν–‰ 이후 μˆ˜λ„κΆŒ μ§€μ—­μ˜ NOx λ†λ„λŠ” μœ μ˜μˆ˜μ€€ 1%μ—μ„œ κ°μ†Œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ 배좜ꢌ ν• λ‹ΉλŸ‰ κ°μ†Œ, μ°Έμ—¬ 사업μž₯ μ¦λŒ€ λ“± κ°•ν™”λœ μ •μ±… μ‹œν–‰κ³Ό ν•¨κ»˜ 농도 κ°μ†ŒμΉ˜κ°€ μ¦κ°€ν•˜λŠ” 양상을 λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. 단, μ„ ν–‰μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ μ§€μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ μ œκΈ°ν•œ 배좜ꢌ κ³Όμž‰ ν• λ‹Ή, κ±°λž˜λŸ‰ μ €μ‘°μ˜ λ¬Έμ œλŠ” μ—¬μ „νžˆ 일뢀 μ‘΄μž¬ν•˜μ—¬ ν–₯ν›„ μ΄λŸ‰μ œ μ‹œν–‰ μ„±κ³Ό ν–₯상을 μœ„ν•œ 정책적 μž¬κ³ κ°€ ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€.With the growing public interest in environmental issues, South Koreas air pollution regulations have developed in various ways over the past 50 years. In particular, the Cap-and-Trade system on air pollutants in the Seoul metropolitan area industrial settings is meaningful in that it is the first air quality regulation conducted at the regional level and controls the total amount of SOx, NOx, and TPS emitted by industrial settings. More than 20 years after the implementation, the system is being expanded nationwide in recognition of its effectiveness. The government has published a number of papers regarding the achievements of the regulation. However, these papers have limitations in showing the causal relationship between policy implementation and air quality improvement in the Seoul metropolitan area. Air quality can be affected not only by policy implementation, but also by various external factors such as economic growth rate for the year, technological progress, and environmental awareness of people. Therefore, appropriate control of exogenous variables is essential to evaluate the net effect of policy implementation. This paper empirically investigates the net effect of the Cap-and-Trade system on air quality improvement in the Seoul metropolitan area industrial settings using the fixed effect model with difference-in-difference. The results reveal that the concentration of NOx in the Seoul metropolitan area decreased after the first and second credit allocation and the implementation of the second year plans at the significance level of 1%. In addition, the decrease levels were increased which implies strengthening measures such as gradual reduction in credit allocation improves political efficiency. Nevertheless, several limitations are remained, so continuous improvement is still needed.제 1 μž₯ μ„œλ‘  1 제 1 절 연ꡬ λ°°κ²½ 1 제 2 절 연ꡬ λͺ©μ  3 제 2 μž₯ μ •μ±… ν™˜κ²½ 및 μ„ ν–‰ 연ꡬ 5 제 1 절 κ΅­λ‚΄ λŒ€κΈ°ν™˜κ²½λ²•μ˜ λ³€μ²œ 5 제 2 절 사업μž₯ μ΄λŸ‰κ΄€λ¦¬μ œ 8 제 3 절 선행연ꡬ 12 제 3 μž₯ 연ꡬ λ²”μœ„μ™€ 방법 17 제 1 절 연ꡬ λ²”μœ„ 17 제 2 절 λ³€μˆ˜ μ„ μ • 20 제 3 절 연ꡬ 방법 23 제 4 μž₯ 연ꡬ 결과와 κ³ μ°° 27 제 1 절 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Ό 27 제 2 절 κ²°κ³Ό 뢄석 29 제 5 μž₯ 연ꡬ μš”μ•½ 및 κ²°λ‘  30 제 1 절 연ꡬ μš”μ•½ 및 ν•¨μ˜ 30 제 2 절 연ꡬ ν•œκ³„ 및 후속 연ꡬ μ œμ–Έ 31 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 34 Abstract 38석

    κ°€μ—΄ μ˜¨λ„κ°€ λ…Ήλ‘λ¬΅μ˜ ν…μŠ€μ³ νŠΉμ„±μ— λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 영ν–₯

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈε€§ε­Έζ ‘ 倧學陒 :ι£Ÿε“η‡Ÿι€Šε­Έη§‘,1996.Maste

    A Study on Counterargument Integration Teaching and Learning in Argumentative Writing Education

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :μ‚¬λ²”λŒ€ν•™ κ΅­μ–΄κ΅μœ‘κ³Ό(κ΅­μ–΄κ΅μœ‘μ „κ³΅),2019. 8. 민병곀.λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ λ°©μ•ˆμ„ μ„€κ³„ν•˜μ—¬ κ·Έ 효과λ₯Ό κ²€μ¦ν•˜λŠ” 데 λͺ©μ μ΄ μžˆλ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” κ·Έκ°„μ˜ 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° κ΅μœ‘μ—μ„œ ν•™μŠ΅μžκ°€ 논증적 ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ— 반둠 및 반둠 λŒ€μ‘κ³Ό κ΄€λ ¨ν•œ 논증을 효과적으둜 μ œμ‹œν•˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•œλ‹€λŠ” ν˜„μ‹€νƒœμ— λŒ€ν•œ 문제 μ œκΈ°κ°€ μ§€μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ 이루어져 온 데에 λΉ„ν•΄, ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ κ·ΈλŸ¬ν•œ 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° μˆ˜ν–‰ 양상을 λ³€ν™”μ‹œν‚€κΈ° μœ„ν•œ 체계적이고 기획적인 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ κ΅¬μ•ˆμ— λŒ€ν•œ λ…Όμ˜λŠ” λΆ€μ‘±ν–ˆλ‹€λŠ” 점에 λ¬Έμ œμ˜μ‹μ„ 가지고, 반둠 톡합과 κ΄€λ ¨ν•œ 이둠적 λ…Όμ˜λ₯Ό λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œμ˜ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ λ°©μ•ˆμ„ μ„€κ³„ν•˜μ—¬ μ€€μ‹€ν—˜ 연ꡬλ₯Ό 톡해 κ·Έ 효과λ₯Ό κ²€μ¦ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. β…‘μž₯μ—μ„œλŠ” 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ„ μœ„ν•œ 이둠적 κΈ°λ°˜μ„ κ΅¬μΆ•ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ λ¬Έν—Œ 연ꡬλ₯Ό λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ 반둠의 κ°œλ… 및 μΈ΅μœ„λ₯Ό μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€κ³ , 반둠 ν†΅ν•©μ˜ κ°œλ… 및 과정을 μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄μ•˜λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ 반둠 톡합을 λ…Όμ œμ— λŒ€ν•œ μ°¬μ„± ν˜Ήμ€ λ°˜λŒ€μ˜ μž…μž₯을 λ°νžˆλŠ” 논증적 ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œ λ“œλŸ¬λ‚˜λŠ”, ν•„μž μž…μž₯의 수용 κ°€λŠ₯성을 μ¦μ§„μ‹œν‚€λŠ” 데 κΈ°μ—¬ν•˜λŠ” 반둠의 ν™œμš©κ³Ό λ°˜λ‘ μ— λŒ€ν•œ λŒ€μ‘μœΌλ‘œ μ •μ˜ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 반둠 ν†΅ν•©μ˜ 과정을 반둠의 μΈ΅μœ„λ₯Ό κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ μ‹€μž¬ 반둠 인식, μ˜ˆμƒ 반둠 ꡬ성, ν…μŠ€νŠΈ λ‚΄ 반둠 ν™œμš©μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬λΆ„ν•˜μ—¬ κ³ μ°°ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 그리고 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 의의λ₯Ό 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° μˆ˜ν–‰μ— λŒ€ν•œ 메타적 인식 촉진과 ν™•μ¦νŽΈν–₯ κ°μ†Œλ₯Ό ν†΅ν•œ 논증적 ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ˜ μˆ˜μ€€ 제고의 μΈ‘λ©΄μ—μ„œ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄μ•˜λ‹€. β…’μž₯μ—μ„œλŠ” 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ λ°©μ•ˆμ„ μ„€κ³„ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ β…‘μž₯μ—μ„œμ˜ 반둠 톡합과 κ΄€λ ¨ν•œ 이둠적 λ…Όμ˜μ™€ λ”λΆˆμ–΄, κ΅­μ–΄κ³Ό κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ • 및 κ΅κ³Όμ„œλ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ—¬ 기쑴의 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° κ΅μœ‘μ„ λ°˜μ„±μ μœΌλ‘œ κ²€ν† ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , μ˜ˆλΉ„μ‘°μ‚¬λ₯Ό 톡해 고등학ꡐ 2ν•™λ…„ ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° μˆ˜ν–‰ 양상을 μœ ν˜•ν™”ν•˜μ—¬ λΆ„μ„ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ ꡐ윑 섀계λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ μ‹œμ‚¬μ μ„ μ΄λŒμ–΄λ‚΄κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄μƒμ˜ λ¬Έν—Œ 연ꡬ, κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ • 및 κ΅κ³Όμ„œ 뢄석, ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° 양상에 κΈ°λ°˜μ„ λ‘” ꡐ윑적 μ‹œμ‚¬μ μ„ λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ—¬ 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 톡합을 μœ„ν•œ κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ ν™œλ™μ„ κ΅¬μ•ˆν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. ν…μŠ€νŠΈ μ€‘μ‹¬μ˜ λ‚΄μš© μš”μ†Œ μ΄ˆμ ν™”λ₯Ό 섀계 μ›λ¦¬λ‘œ ν•˜μ—¬ ꡐ윑 λ‚΄μš© μš”μ†Œλ₯Ό μΆ”μΆœν•˜μ˜€κ³ , 각 ꡐ윑 λ‚΄μš©μ— λŒ€ν•œ κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ ν™œλ™μ„ κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 첫째, μ‹€μž¬ 반둠 인식을 μœ„ν•œ κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ ν™œλ™μœΌλ‘œ 논증 κ³Όμ œμ— λ‚΄μž¬ν•œ λ…ΌμŸμ„± 이해λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ 논증적 ν…μŠ€νŠΈ 탐ꡬ와 논증 μ‹ λ…μ˜ λ°˜μ„±μ  성찰을 μœ„ν•œ 자기 μ κ²€ν‘œ μž‘μ„±μ„ μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έ, μ˜ˆμƒ 반둠 ꡬ성을 μœ„ν•œ κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ ν™œλ™μœΌλ‘œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ κ΄€μ μ˜ 이해λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ μƒν˜Έ 관계적 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ λͺ¨ν˜•μ˜ ν™œμš©κ³Ό 쟁점 μ€‘μ‹¬μ˜ 반둠 ꡬ성을 μœ„ν•œ 찬반 논증 λΆ„μ„ν‘œ μž‘μ„±μ„ μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ…‹μ§Έ, ν…μŠ€νŠΈ λ‚΄ 반둠 ν™œμš©μ„ μœ„ν•œ κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ ν™œλ™μœΌλ‘œ 반둠 λŒ€μ‘ μ „λž΅ 이해λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ 직접 ꡐ수 λͺ¨ν˜•μ˜ ν™œμš©κ³Ό 반둠 λŒ€μ‘ 논증 ꡬ성을 μœ„ν•œ κ΅¬μ‘°ν™”λœ λΉ„κ³„μ˜ μž‘μ„±μ„ μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. β…£μž₯μ—μ„œλŠ” β…’μž₯μ—μ„œ μ„€κ³„ν•œ 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 효과λ₯Ό μ‹€μ¦μ μœΌλ‘œ κ²€μ¦ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ μ‹€ν—˜ 집단, 비ꡐ 집단, ν†΅μ œ 집단 ꡬ성을 ν†΅ν•œ μ€€μ‹€ν—˜ 연ꡬλ₯Ό μ„€κ³„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ‹€ν—˜ μ§‘λ‹¨μ—λŠ” 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œμ˜ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ„ μ‹€μ‹œν–ˆκ³ , 비ꡐ μ§‘λ‹¨μ—λŠ” 기쑴의 화법과 μž‘λ¬Έ κ΅κ³Όμ„œλ₯Ό ν™œμš©ν•œ 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ„ μ‹€μ‹œν–ˆμœΌλ©°, ν†΅μ œ μ§‘λ‹¨μ—λŠ” ꡐ윑적 μ²˜μΉ˜κ°€ 이루어지지 μ•Šμ•˜λ‹€. κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ 효과의 검증은 ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ 반둠 톡합 μˆ˜ν–‰ μ–‘μƒμ˜ μΈ‘λ©΄κ³Ό 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° 결과물의 츑면으둜 κ΅¬λΆ„λ˜μ–΄ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ‘Œλ‹€. 반둠 톡합 μˆ˜ν–‰ μ–‘μƒμ˜ μΈ‘λ©΄μ—μ„œλŠ” μ‹€μž¬ 반둠 인식, μ˜ˆμƒ 반둠 ꡬ성, ν…μŠ€νŠΈ λ‚΄ 반둠 ν™œμš©μ—μ„œ κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 효과λ₯Ό 확인할 수 μžˆμ—ˆμœΌλ©°, 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° 결과물의 μΈ‘λ©΄μ—μ„œλŠ” μ£Όμž₯ 및 근거의 μ„ μ •, μˆ˜μ‚¬μ  상황에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식, κΈ€μ˜ ꡬ쑰 ν•­λͺ©μ—μ„œ κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 효과λ₯Ό 확인할 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€.The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effect of counterargument integration teaching and learning in argumentative writing education. Even though previous studies have addressed the issue that students can not effectively deal with the counterargument in argumentative writing, there has been lack of discussion about how to promote the use of counterargument that contributes to promoting acceptability of the authors position in argumentative writing. In this regard, this study focuses on counterargument integration and examines the educational effect of counterargument integration teaching and learning for argumentative writing. In chapter β…‘, this study tried to construct the theoretical basis for the counterargument integration teaching and learning for argumentative writing. Based on literature review, this study examined the concept of counterargument integration and various factors of it. Counterargument integration is defined as the use of counterargument and response on that counterargument which contributes to promoting the acceptability of the author's position in the argumentative writing that copes with the pros and cons of the argument. In addition, various factors of counterargument integration are discussed based on the level of recognizing actual counterargument, constructing expected counterargument, and using counterargument on the text. In chapter β…’, this study focused on designing the counterargument integration teaching and learning for argumentative writing. First of all, this study examined how argumentative writing education has been conducted now in South Korea by analyzing Korean language education curriculum and textbooks. Next, this study analyzed the argumentative writing data of 59 high school second grade students. The writing patterns were analyzed and typed, and some implications were discussed. Based on literature review, curriculum and textbook analysis, and educational implications based on the students argumentative writing patterns, the counterargument integration teaching and learning activities were designed. Firstly, as for the educational activities for recognizing actual counterargument, exploring argumentative texts for understanding the controversial essence of argumentation and filling in a self-checklist for recognizing argumentative writing metacognitively were suggested. Secondly, as for the educational activities for constructing expected counterargument, conducting a small group discussion to understand pros and cons of arguments and making a list of pros and cons of arguments were suggested. Thirdly, as for the educational activities for using counterargument on the text, using a direct teaching model for learning counterargument responding strategies and using scaffolds for constructing arguments which respond to the counterargument were suggested. In Chapter β…£, this study tried to demonstrate the effect of the counterargument integration teaching and learning for argumentative writing which is designed in chapter β…’. For this purpose, a quasi-experimental study was designed, which consists of an experimental group, a comparative group, and a control group (25 students for each group). As a result of one-way ANOVA on the students prior argumentative writing level, it was confirmed that each group had the same level. As for the experimental group, the counterargument integration education was conducted. As for the comparative group, the argumentative writing education using the pre-existing Speaking and Writing textbooks. As for the control group, there was no educational instruction given. In order to demonstrate the effect of education, mixed research method was used to confirm argumentative writing level after the education. As a result of quantitative analysis, there was a difference between the groups on the level of argumentative writing. Based on this, it was confirmed that the counterargument integration teaching and learning for argumentative writing education was effective. Qualitative analysis was conducted by selecting the average level of students argumentative writing in each group in order to point out the qualitative aspects of argumentative writing before and after the education. The qualitative aspects of the argumentative writing at the average and superior level of argumentative writing in the experimental group were also examined. The result of this study suggests that further research on the counterargument integration teaching and learning in argumentative writing education is needed.β… . μ„œλ‘  1 1. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ  및 ν•„μš”μ„± 1 2. μ„ ν–‰ 연ꡬ κ²€ν†  4 1) 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° ꡐ윑 κ΄€λ ¨ μ„ ν–‰ 연ꡬ 4 2) 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œμ˜ 반둠 κ΄€λ ¨ μ„ ν–‰ 연ꡬ 8 3. 연ꡬ λŒ€μƒ 및 연ꡬ 방법 12 β…‘. 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 이둠적 기반 18 1. 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠의 κ°œλ… 및 μΈ΅μœ„ 18 1) 반둠의 κ°œλ… 18 2) 반둠의 μΈ΅μœ„ 22 2. 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 ν†΅ν•©μ˜ κ°œλ…κ³Ό κ³Όμ • 26 1) 반둠 ν†΅ν•©μ˜ κ°œλ… 26 2) 반둠 ν†΅ν•©μ˜ κ³Όμ • 30 (1) μ‹€μž¬ 반둠의 인식 31 (2) μ˜ˆμƒ 반둠의 ꡬ성 33 (3) ν…μŠ€νŠΈ λ‚΄ 반둠 ν™œμš© 35 3. 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 의의 38 1) 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° μˆ˜ν–‰μ— λŒ€ν•œ 메타적 인식 촉진 38 2) ν™•μ¦νŽΈν–₯ κ°μ†Œλ₯Ό ν†΅ν•œ 논증적 ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ˜ μˆ˜μ€€ 제고 39 β…’. 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 섀계 43 1. κΈ°μ‘΄ 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° κ΅μœ‘μ— λŒ€ν•œ λ°˜μ„±μ  κ²€ν†  43 1) κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ • κ²€ν†  43 2) κ΅κ³Όμ„œ κ²€ν†  49 2. μ˜ˆλΉ„μ‘°μ‚¬λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•œ ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° 양상 및 μ‹œμ‚¬μ  53 1) ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° 양상 57 (1) μ‹€μž¬ 반둠 μΈμ‹μ˜ λΆ€μž¬λ‘œ μΈν•œ ν™•μ¦νŽΈν–₯ 57 (2) μ˜ˆμƒ 반둠 ꡬ성 λ―ΈλΉ„λ‘œ μΈν•œ λΆ€μ μ ˆν•œ 반둠 ν™œμš© 60 (3) μ˜ˆμƒ 반둠 ꡬ성과 ν…μŠ€νŠΈ λ‚΄ 반둠 ν™œμš© κ°„μ˜ 괴리 63 (4) λΆ€μ μ ˆν•œ 반둠 λŒ€μ‘ λ…Όμ¦μ˜ ν™œμš© 66 2) ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° μ–‘μƒμ˜ μ‹œμ‚¬μ  70 3. 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 섀계 74 1) 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 섀계 원리 74 2) μ‹€μž¬ 반둠 인식을 μœ„ν•œ κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ ν™œλ™ 80 (1) 논증 과제의 λ…ΌμŸμ„± 이해λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ 논증적 ν…μŠ€νŠΈ 탐ꡬ 80 (2) 논증 μ‹ λ…μ˜ λ°˜μ„±μ  성찰을 μœ„ν•œ 자기 μ κ²€ν‘œ μž‘μ„± 85 3) μ˜ˆμƒ 반둠 ꡬ성을 μœ„ν•œ κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ ν™œλ™ 89 (1) λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 관점 이해λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ μƒν˜Έ 관계적 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ λͺ¨ν˜• ν™œμš© 89 (2) 쟁점 μ€‘μ‹¬μ˜ 반둠 ꡬ성을 μœ„ν•œ 찬반 논증 λΆ„μ„ν‘œ μž‘μ„± 94 4) ν…μŠ€νŠΈ λ‚΄ 반둠 ν™œμš©μ„ μœ„ν•œ κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ ν™œλ™ 96 (1) 반둠 λŒ€μ‘ μ „λž΅ 이해λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ 직접 ꡐ수 λͺ¨ν˜• ν™œμš© 96 (2) 반둠 λŒ€μ‘ 논증 ꡬ성을 μœ„ν•œ κ΅¬μ‘°ν™”λœ λΉ„κ³„μ˜ μž‘μ„± 103 β…£. 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ°μ—μ„œ 반둠 톡합 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 효과 106 1. 자료 μˆ˜μ§‘ 방법 106 1) 자료 μˆ˜μ§‘ κ³Όμ • 106 2) 논증적 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° 과제 섀계 107 3) 집단별 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ λ°©μ•ˆ 섀계 109 2. 반둠 톡합 츑면의 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ 효과 뢄석 112 1) μ‹€μž¬ 반둠 인식 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 효과 뢄석 112 2) μ˜ˆμƒ 반둠 ꡬ성 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 효과 뢄석 121 3) ν…μŠ€νŠΈ λ‚΄ 반둠 ν™œμš© κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ 효과 뢄석 124 3. κΈ€μ“°κΈ° κ²°κ³Όλ¬Ό 츑면의 κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ 효과 뢄석 128 1) 자료 뢄석 κΈ°μ€€ 및 방법 129 2) κΈ€μ“°κΈ° 결과물에 λŒ€ν•œ 뢄석 134 (1) κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ 이전 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° 결과물에 λŒ€ν•œ 뢄석 134 (2) κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ 이후 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° 결과물에 λŒ€ν•œ 뢄석 138 β…€. κ²°λ‘  153 1. μš”μ•½ 153 2. μ œμ–Έ 155 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 157 【뢀둝】 167 Abstract 191Maste

    Paradise as Alien Future in Mary Shelley's The Last Man

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : μ˜μ–΄μ˜λ¬Έν•™κ³Ό, 2013. 2. ν•œμ„œλ¦°.이 논문은 γ€Žμ΅œν›„μ˜ μΈκ°„γ€μ—μ„œ 메리 셸리가 μƒμƒν•˜λŠ” λ―Έλž˜μ— μ£Όλͺ©ν•˜μ—¬ μ†Œμ„€μ— κ·Έλ €μ§€λŠ” 이상 μ‚¬νšŒμƒμ˜ ν•œκ³„μ™€ κ°€λŠ₯성을 μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³Έλ‹€. 18μ„ΈκΈ° ν›„λ°˜μ—μ„œ 19μ„ΈκΈ° μ΄ˆλ°˜μ— 이λ₯΄λŠ” μ‹œκΈ° 영ꡭ의 μ •μΉ˜ λ‹΄λ‘ μ—λŠ” ν”„λž‘μŠ€ 혁λͺ…이 μ΄‰λ°œμ‹œν‚¨ κΈ°λŒ€μ™€ λΆˆμ•ˆμ„ λ‘˜λŸ¬μ‹Έκ³  세계 쒅말둠적 두렀움과 세계쒅말 λ’€μ˜ μ²œλ…„μ™•κ΅­μ²˜λŸΌ μ°Ύμ•„μ˜¬ 이상 μ‚¬νšŒμ—μ˜ κΈ°λŒ€κ°€ κ³΅μ‘΄ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. μ‹œκ°„μ  거리λ₯Ό 두고 κΈ°λŒ€μ™€ λΆˆμ•ˆλ“€λ‘œ κ°€λ“ν–ˆλ˜ 과거의 μ˜κ΅­μ„ λŒμ•„λ³΄λŠ” 메리 μ…Έλ¦¬λŠ” νŒŒλΌλ‹€μ΄μŠ€μ  λ―Έλž˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ 확신이 사싀 λ‚―μ„  λ―Έλž˜μ—μ˜ 두렀움을 숨기고 있으며 λ”°λΌμ„œ 배타적 폭λ ₯μ„±μœΌλ‘œ μ΄μ–΄μ§ˆ 수 μžˆμŒμ„ λΉ„νŒν•˜μ§€λ§Œ, μ΄μƒμ˜ μ‹€νŒ¨μ— λŒ€ν•œ 반발둜 미래λ₯Ό 두렡고 μ λŒ€μ μΈ μ˜μ—­μœΌλ‘œ κ·œμ •ν•΄λ²„λ¦¬λŠ” 것도 κ±°λΆ€ν•œλ‹€. 과거의 μ‹€νŒ¨λ₯Ό 극볡할 수 μžˆλŠ” μ—΄μ‡ λŠ” λΆˆμ•ˆν•˜λ©΄μ„œ 희망적인 미래λ₯Ό λ°›μ•„λ“€μ΄λŠ” 데 μžˆλ‹€λŠ” 것을 이 μ†Œμ„€μ€ 보여쀀닀. 1μž₯μ—μ„œλŠ” μ…Έλ¦¬μ˜ 주인곡듀이 κ°€μ§€λŠ” λ―Έλž˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ κΈ°λŒ€μ™€ κ·Έ λ¬Έμ œμ μ— λŒ€ν•΄ μ•Œμ•„λ³Έλ‹€. γ€Žμ΅œν›„μ˜ μΈκ°„γ€μ˜ 주인곡듀은 인간이 μ„œλ‘œ 영ν–₯을 주고받을 수 있게 ν•΄μ£Όλ©° κ²°κ΅­μ—λŠ” 인간 μƒν˜Έ κ°„μ˜ 경계λ₯Ό ν—ˆλ¬Όμ–΄λœ¨λ¦¬λŠ” 감응 λŠ₯λ ₯이 μΈκ°„μ˜ 본성이라고 μ—¬κΈ΄λ‹€. 그듀은 이 감응 λŠ₯λ ₯을 μΌκΉ¨μ›€μœΌλ‘œμ¨ 인λ₯˜ 전체λ₯Ό λ¬΄ν•œν•œ μ‚¬λž‘κ³Ό κ°μ‚¬μ˜ μ—°λŒ€λ‘œ λŒμ–΄λ“€μΌ 것을 κΏˆκΎΌλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ μ‚¬λž‘κ³Ό κ°μ‚¬μ˜ 쑰건을 이듀이 일방적으둜 κ·œμ •ν•˜κ³  κ΅μœ‘ν•˜λŠ” 것이 될 경우 이 이상은 μ‰½κ²Œ νŠΉμ •ν•œ κ΄€μŠ΅κ³Ό 전톡을 의무둜 κ°•μš”ν•˜λŠ” 힘으둜 λ³€ν™”ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€. 주인곡듀이 꿈꾸던 이상적인 μ‚¬νšŒ μ—­μ‹œ μ§„μ •ν•œ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ λŒ€μ•ˆμ΄ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ, κ·Έλ“€ μ‚¬νšŒμ˜ λ¬Έμ œμ λ“€μ„ μ§€μ†μ‹œν‚¬ 뿐 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μ •λ‹Ήν™”μ‹œν‚€λŠ” λ―Έλž˜μž„μ΄ λ“œλŸ¬λ‚˜κ²Œ λœλ‹€. 2μž₯은 μ˜ˆμƒμΉ˜ λͺ»ν•œ μž¬μ•™ 전염병에 μ˜ν•΄ 이런 λ―Έλž˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ κΈ°λŒ€κ°€ λ¬΄λ„ˆμ§€λŠ” 과정에 μ£Όλͺ©ν•œλ‹€. 세계 멸망을 λΆˆλŸ¬μ˜€λŠ” 전염병은 μΈκ°„μ˜ 감응 λŠ₯λ ₯에 희망을 κ±Έμ§€λ§Œ μ •μž‘ μ™ΈλΆ€μ˜ 영ν–₯을 λ°›κ³  λ³€ν™”λ˜λŠ” 것은 κ±°λΆ€ν•˜λŠ” μΈκ°„μ˜ μ΄μƒμ£Όμ˜μ˜ λͺ¨μˆœμ— μ§ˆλ¬Έμ„ λ˜μ§„λ‹€. 전염병은 μΈκ°„μ˜ 감응 λŠ₯λ ₯이 치λͺ…적인 감염 κ°€λŠ₯μ„±, 즉 μ˜ˆμΈ‘ν•  수 μ—†λŠ” 외적 영ν–₯λ ₯에 μ—΄λ € μžˆλŠ” 취약성이기도 ν•˜λ‹€λŠ” 것을 보여쀀닀. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ―€λ‘œ 전염병과 λ§žμ„œ μ‹Έμ›Œ 자의적으둜 ν˜‘μ†Œν•˜κ²Œ μ •μ˜λœ 인간닀움과 인간 μ‚¬νšŒλ₯Ό μˆ˜ν˜Έν•˜λ €λŠ” μ‹œλ„λŠ” μ‹€νŒ¨ν•  μˆ˜λ°–μ— μ—†λ‹€. 3μž₯μ—μ„œλŠ” 예츑 λΆˆκ°€λŠ₯ν•œ λ―Έλž˜μ—μ„œ μ§„μ •ν•œ 보편적 νŒŒλΌλ‹€μ΄μŠ€μ˜ κ°€λŠ₯성을 λ°œκ²¬ν•  수 μžˆμŒμ„ 밝히렀고 ν•œλ‹€. 전염병이 νœ©μ“Έκ³  μ§€λ‚˜κ°„ λ’€ 인λ₯˜κ°€ μ—†λŠ” μžμ—°μ˜ λͺ¨μŠ΅μ€ 마치 μ™„λ²½ν•œ μ‘°ν™”λ₯Ό 이룬 νŒŒλΌλ‹€μ΄μŠ€ κ°™μ§€λ§Œ 이 μ‘°ν™”μ—μ„œ μ†Œμ™Έλœ μœ μΌν•œ 인간 μƒμ‘΄μž λΌμ΄μ˜€λ„¬μ—κ²ŒλŠ” κ°€μž₯ λ”μ°ν•œ μ•…λͺ½μ΄λ‹€. 이 νŒŒλΌλ‹€μ΄μŠ€λŠ” μ†Œμ™Έμ‹œν‚€κ³  λ°°μ œν•˜λŠ” 것이 있던 μ£ΌμΈκ³΅λ“€μ˜ κ±°μ§“λœ 보편적 이상 μ‚¬νšŒμƒμ˜ 뒀집어진 λͺ¨μŠ΅μ΄λ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ 이런 괴둜운 κ²½ν—˜μ„ κ³„κΈ°λ‘œ λΌμ΄μ˜€λ„¬μ€ λ‚―μ„  미래의 예츑 λΆˆκ°€λŠ₯성이 νŒŒλΌλ‹€μ΄μŠ€μ  λ―Έλž˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ ν™•μ‹  뿐 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ 인간 κ³΅λ™μ²΄μ˜ κ°€λŠ₯μ„±μ‘°μ°¨ λ‚¨μ•„μžˆμ§€ μ•Šλ‹€λŠ” 절망 μ—­μ‹œ λΆˆκ°€λŠ₯ν•˜κ²Œ λ§Œλ“ λ‹€λŠ” 것을 κΉ¨λ‹«λŠ”λ‹€. λ―Έμ§€μ™€μ˜ μ‘°μš°μ—λŠ” μ–Έμ œλ‚˜ 두렀움이 μˆ˜λ°˜λ˜μ§€λ§Œ 이 λ§Œλ‚¨μ€ μ΅œν›„μ˜ 인간이 절망적인 ν˜„μž¬λ₯Ό λ„˜μ–΄μ„€ 수 μžˆλŠ” μœ μΌν•œ κ°€λŠ₯성이기도 ν•˜λ‹€.This thesis explores the formal possibilities and impossibilities of the ideal society portrayed in Mary Shelleys The Last Man, focusing on how Shelley imagines the future. Surrounding the anxieties and expectations triggered by the French Revolution, the political discourse of England in the late 1700s and early 1800s consisted of apocalyptic fear along with millenarian hope. Mary Shelley, looking back to the national past teeming with expectations and anxieties about the future, criticizes blind faith for paradisiacal future, which hides fear of the alien future and can lead to violent exclusion of the alienhowever, she also refuses to succumb to the fear that the ideal may fail by redefining the future as essentially fearful and hostile. This novel shows that the key to overcoming the past failure lies in embracing the insecure but hopeful nature of the future. Chapter 1 examines the utopian expectations Shelleys characters hold for the future and their limits. The leading characters of The Last Man define human nature as the sensibility that enables man to influence each other and ultimately melts down the boundary between men. They endeavor to awaken this sensibility so as to draw the whole humanity into the bond of unconditional love and gratitude. The blueprint for the ideal society, however, can easily turn into the pressure to conform to the a specific cultural convention when unconditional love and gratitude become an ideal that is one-sidedly defined and educated. Their version of the ideal society, failing to provide the an alternative to the preexisting society, instead functions to sustain and justify it. Chapter 2 focuses on the process through which unexpected disaster, the plague, dismantles the leading characters expectations of the future. The plague that brings about the apocalypse questions the contradictory premises of their idealism, which relies for its hope on human sensibility but refuses to be influenced and changed in turn. The plague reveals relying on the human sensibility entails the lethal possibility of infection: a weakness open to external influence. Wherefore an attempt to defend human society and the human against the plague is doomed to failure. Chapter 2 focuses on the process in which an unexpected disaster, the plague, dismantles the leading characters expectations of the future. The apocalyptic plague questions the contradictory premises of their idealism, which depends on the possibility of human sensibility but meets its limit in the refusal to be influenced and changed in turn by the other. The plague reveals that relying on human sensibility entails the lethal possibility of infection and the vulnerability of being open to external influence. Therefore, an attempt to defend the human and human society against the plague is doomed to failure. Chapter 3 argues that the unforeseeable future holds the possibility for an authentic universal paradise. A post-pestilential nature rid of humanity takes on the form of a perfectly harmonized paradise, while at the same time being the nightmarish and completely alienating environment for the sole human survivor Lionel. This paradise parodies and discloses the selective universality of the version o ideal society cherished by Lionel and his friends. The painful experience of the post-pestilential world, however, leads Lionel to the realization that the unpredictability of the alien future that thwarted their vision of future paradise also precludes the despair that no chance is left for human society. While an encounter with the unknown is always accompanied by a fearful possibility, this encounter offers the chance for the last man to reach beyond the painful present. Chapter 3 argues that the unforeseeable future holds the possibility for an authentic, universal paradise. The post-pestilential nature rid of humanity takes on the form of perfectly harmonized paradise, while at the same time providing a nightmarish environment for the sole human survivor Lionel and thereby completely alienating him. This paradise parodies and discloses the selective universality of Lionel and his friends version of ideal society. The painful experience of the post-pestilential world, however, leads Lionel to the realization that the unpredictability of the alien future that thwarted their vision of the future paradise also precludes despair for the future of human society. While an encounter with the unknown always accompanies fear, this encounter offers the last man a chance to reach beyond the painful present.ꡭ문초둝 μ„œλ‘  1. κ·Έλ“€λ§Œμ˜ νŒŒλΌλ‹€μ΄μŠ€: 보편적 μ΄μƒμ£Όμ˜μ˜ ν•œκ³„ 2. 세계쒅말 μ•žμ˜ νŒŒλΌλ‹€μ΄μŠ€: κ°€λΆ€μž₯적 이데올둜기λ₯Ό μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ 3. λΆˆν™•μ‹€μ„±μ˜ λ―Έν•™: λ‚―μ„  미래의 νŒŒλΌλ‹€μ΄μŠ€μ  κ°€λŠ₯μ„± κ²°λ‘  μΈμš©λ¬Έν—Œ AbstractMaste
    corecore