28 research outputs found
Fabrication of Fluorescent Hybrid Nanoparticles and Their Specific Ion and Molecule Detection Applications
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ (λ°μ¬)-- μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ : ννμ물곡νλΆ, 2016. 8. μ₯μ μ.Various nanoprobe systems are being developed to explore their potential in biomedical fields, with many applications to the diagnosis or monitoring of various diseases. There are many advantages of nano-size probes for the application in biomedical field. First, the scale of cell and tissue structures is meaningful. Since most nanoprobes are about 10β500nm which are generally over 100 fold smaller than cells. Second, the building blocks of nanoprobes like proteins, carbohydrates, nucleic acids, synthetic polymers or small inorganic particles are generally smaller than about several scores of nanometers. Third, nanoprobes have potential for wide application because they can easily contain useful molecules such as imaging agents, active targeting moieties, or drugs by simple loading or conjugation. Consequently, it is still challenging to produce fluorescent hybrid nanoparticles for detecting and imaging target analytes in living systems.
This dissertation describes the three different ways in the synthetic methodology of fluorescent hybrid nanoparticles. First, PAN nanomaterials as novel bioimaging agents without additional fluorophores were developed by ultrasound induced emulsion polymerization, and it could be applied for the fluorescence sensors of copper ion and cell imaging. Second, a dual emission Au-PAN NPs sensor was prepared for sensitive detection of mercury ions in aqueous solution. The Au-PAN nanoparticles showed significant intensity change by addtion of mercury ions and higher binding affinity toward mercury ion than other metal ions. Lastly, a novel fluorescent Au-GQDs nanoparticle was synthesized for use as a probe that can selectively detect Cys in living cells. The dual emission fluorescence peak ratio changed when the Au-GQDs nanoparticles reacted with Cys. This fluorescence behavior was highly specific for Cys. Most importantly, these novel approaches can be used as an alternative tool for specific ions and molecule detection in environmental condition, and may offer an opportunity for the further investigation of industrial applications, and might be expanded to allow the fluorescence sensor applications of hybrid nanoparticles in a wide range of areas.1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. Background 1
1.1.1. Nanoprobe 1
1.1.2. Materials of Nanoprobe 4
1.1.3. Fluorescent Nanoprobe for Bioimaging applications 20
1.2. Objectives and Outlines 28
1.2.1. Objectives 28
1.2.2. Outlines 28
2. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS 32
2.1. Amidine/Schiff Base Dual-Modified PAN Nanoparticles and Their Application 32
2.1.1. Fabrication of Amidine/Schiff Base Dual-Modified PAN Nanoparticles 32
2.1.2. Application for Intracellular Copper Ion Detection 35
2.2. Au-decorated PAN Nanoparticles with Dual-Emission and Their Application 37
2.2.1. Fabrication of Au-decorated PAN Nanoparticles with Dual-Emission 37
2.2.2. Application for Mercury Ion Detection 40
2.3. Au-decorated Graphene Quantum Dots with Dual-Emission and Their Application 41
2.3.1. Fabrication of Au-decorated Graphene Quantum Dots with Dual-Emission 41
2.3.2. Application for Intracellular Cysteine Detection 44
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 46
3.1. Amidine/Schiff Base Dual-Modified PAN Nanoparticles and Their Application 46
3.1.1. Fabrication of Amidine/Schiff Base Dual-Modified PAN Nanoparticles 46
3.1.2. Application for Intracellular Copper Ion Detection 63
3.2. Au-decorated PAN Nanoparticles with Dual-Emission and Their Application 68
3.2.1. Fabrication of Au-decorated PAN Nanoparticles with Dual-Emission 68
3.2.2. Application for Mercury Ion Detection 77
3.3. Au-decorated Graphene Quantum Dots with Dual-Emission and Their Application 84
3.3.1. Fabrication of Au-decorated Graphene Quantum Dots with Dual-Emission 84
3.3.2. Application for Intracellular Cysteine Detection 97
4. CONCLUSIONS 101
REFERENCES 104
κ΅λ¬Έ μ΄λ‘ 110Docto
μΆλ ₯μ‘°μ μ΄ κ°λ₯ν μ‘체μ€μ¬ λμΆν μ€μ λΆμ¬κΈ°μ λΆλ¬΄νΉμ±μ κ΄ν μ€νμ μ°κ΅¬
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ (μμ¬)-- μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ : κΈ°κ³ν곡곡νλΆ, 2014. 2. μ€μλΉ.In liquid rocket engine, the study on throttling have been conducted since 1930s. The throttleable rocket engine enables the operational possibilities, for example docking of spacecraft, maneuvering in certain orbit and landing on a surface of planet, attitude control, entrance to atmosphereless of planet and etc. To achieve throttling in liquid rocket engine, methods are classified by target variable, such as high pressure drop, change in discharge coefficient, various density, and change in nozzle area
Meanwhile, as rocket engine employed bi-propellant instead of mono-propellant, mixing efficiency became a major criteria in engine design stage. In order to mix fuel and propellant, impinging type injector, coaxial type injector, etc. were developed. For a coaxial type injector, the injector, such as shear coaxial injector and swirl coaxial injector, could be classified by injection type. And liquid centered injector and gas centered could be classified by injection position.
To investigate the characteristics of injector, lots of method have been studied. In liquid rocket engine, rocket engine do not employed a single injector, but tens or hundreds of injector are installed in injector plate. So, interference between spray from injector could be occurred. To avoid the interference, prediction of spray angle is important variable in characteristics of liquid rocket injector. Also the diameter of droplets is considered in design stage since it could influence on combustion instability.
In this study, dual manifold, one of controlling discharge coefficient, was used to control the thrust in liquid phase. And liquid centered coaxial injector was employed to mix liquid and gas simulant. To investigate variation of mixture ratio F/O ratio increased 0, 1/10, 1/8, and 1/6 in the experience. In order to comparative study between dual manifold injector and single manifold injector, the spray angle, mass flow rate, diameters of droplets, and mean diameter of droplets which are representative characteristics in spray, were investigated.Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1
Chapter 2 APPARATUS AND EXPERIMENTAL METHOD 5
2.1 Experimental Appraatus 5
2.2 Indirect Photograghy 7
2.3 Image Processing Method 8
2.4 Experimental Condition 11
Chapter 3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION 13
3.1 Mass Flow Rate 13
3.2 Spray Pattern 16
3.3 SMD Distribution 23
Chapter 4 CONCLUSION 32
Bibliography 34
Abstract in Korean 36Maste
μ μ μμ μν μΊ νΌμ€ μ μ, μ§λ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨ - λͺ μκ΅μ λ©ν λ§
μμΈλνκ΅ λͺ
μκ΅μνμνλ λͺ
μκ΅μλ€μ΄ μ§λ μ§μ μ¬μ°μ μ¬νμ νμνκΈ° μν νλμ μΌνμΌλ‘ μΌλ° λνμμ λ―Έμ² ν¬κ΄νμ§ λͺ»νλ νμ κ°μ λ€μν νμ νλ¬Έ μμμ κ°λ°νκ³ , λΉ λ₯΄κ²λ 40λλ‘λΆν° μμλλ λ€μν μ°λ ΉμΈ΅μ ν΄μ§μλ€μ΄ μ¬μμ μν μλ‘μ΄ μ§μ
μ λμ ν μ μλλ‘ λμμ μ£ΌκΈ° μνμ¬μ 3κΈ° μΈμλν(μ λ
ν μλ‘μ΄ μ·¨μ
κΈΈμ λͺ¨μνλ μ¬λλ€μ λμμΌλ‘ ν κ΅μ‘)μ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ κ°λ°νκ±°λ, νμκ΅μ‘ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ μ°Έμ¬νλ μΌ, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μ€λμ λν νμ€μ²λΌ κ³Όμ€ν μ°κ΅¬μ κ΅μ‘μ μ
λ¬΄λ‘ μΈνμ¬ νμ§ κ΅μλ€μ μμ΄ λ―ΈμΉμ§ λͺ»νλ μμΈλ νμλ€λ λνμνμ μ±κ³΅μ μΌλ‘ μ μν μ μλλ‘ λμμ μ£Όλ κ°λ³μ μΈ μ μ
μ λ©ν λ§ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨ λ±μ μ°Έμ¬νκ³ μλ€
Regulation of CD4+CD8βCD25+ and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells by gut microbiota in chicken
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ (λ°μ¬)-- μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ : λμλͺ
곡νλΆ, 2017. 2. μ€μ² ν¬.Gut microbiota in chicken has long been studied and considered for mostly growth performance point of view. And therefore, immunological studies regarding gut homeostasis in chicken have been insufficiently achieved. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a notable subtype of CD4+ T cells playing an important role to maintain gut homeostasis in humans and animals. Intestinal Tregs are induced by gut microbiota, such as, Clostridium spp. cluster IV and XIVa strains, altered Schaedler flora (ASF), or Bacteroides fragilis in mice. Although it has been suggested that CD4+CD25+ T cells act as Tregs, there are no such studies showing the relationship between gut microbiota and Tregs in chickens.
The first, I established the model for ABX-treated chickens by the administration of various concentrations of antibiotic cocktail consisting of ampicillin, gentamycin, neomycin, metronidazole, and vancomycin in water. Cecal contents from chickens treated with antibiotic cocktail consisting of 100 g/ml of ampicillin, gentamycin, neomycin and metronidazole, and 50 g/ml of vancomycin for 7 days eliminated colony forming unit (CFU) over 99%. These chickens treated by certain concentration of antibiotics cocktail (ABX) were referred as ABX-treated chickens. There were no changes on physiological traits, for example, weight of body and immune organs (spleen, bursa and liver), length of intestine (duodenum, jejunum, ileum and large intestine) and the concentration of glucocorticoid in the serum. Furthermore, the population and MHC class II expression on B cells and macrophages in the cecal tonsils and spleen were not changed. I concluded that physiological traits, B cells and macrophages were not changed in ABX-treated chickens.
The second, I examined whether subtype of CD4+ T cells was changed in ABX-treated chickens. In cecal tonsil, CD4+CD8βCD25+ and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells were significantly decreased in ABX-treated chickens, however these cells in the spleen were not changed. The expression of IL-10 and IFN-g was significantly decreased in CD4+CD8βCD25+ T cells from cecal tonsils of ABX-treated chickens. It was noting that CD4+CD8βCD25+ and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells from ABX-treated chickens did not suppress the proliferation of CD4+CD25β T cells. The reduction of CD4+CD8βCD25+ and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells in cecal tonsils from ABX-treated chickens expressed high level of CD5hi. Interestingly, the percentage of thymic CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells was not changed in ABX-treated chickens. Conclusively, the population and suppressive function of peripheral CD4+CD8βCD25+ and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells decreased in ABX-treated chickens.
The third, I examined what factors affected the population of CD4+CD8βCD25+ and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells. ABX-treated chickens co-housed with wild type chickens recovered the number of gut microbiota, and the proportion of CD4+CD8βCD25+ or CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells in cecal tonsils to similar levels as those of wild type chickens. The results further showed that Gram-positive bacteria appeared to be responsible for the changes of CD4+CD8βCD25+ or CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells in cecal tonsils. Feeding acetate, one of the short chain fatty acids, in ABX-treated chickens recovered CD4+CD8βCD25+ T cells and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells in cecal tonsils. Both butyrate and propionate did not show the effect to recover these cells. Interestingly, GPR43 mRNA level was highly expressed in CD4+CD8βCD25+ T cells.
Conclusively, my study demonstrated that gut microbiota can regulate the population and suppressive function of CD4+CD8βCD25+ or CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells, and acetate can induce CD4+CD8βCD25+ T cells in cecal tonsils via GPR43.I. Review of Literature 1
1. Gut homeostasis 1
1.1. Regulatory T cells 1
1.2. T helper 17 cells 3
1.3. Immunoglobulin A 4
1.4. Innate lymphoid cells 6
2. Gut microbiota in chicken 7
2.1. Intestine 7
2.2. Establishment of gut microbiota 8
2.3. Gut microbiota on growth performance 9
2.4. Effects of gut microbiota on immunological aspect 10
II. Introduction 13
III. Materials and Methods 16
1) Experimental animal and ABX treatment 16
2) Measurement of colony forming unit 17
3) Examination of physiological changes in ABX-treated chickens 17
4) Flow cytometric analysis for immune cells 18
5) Measurement of mRNA level using RT-qPCR 19
6) Changes on the subtype of CD4+ T cells treated with antibiotics in vitro 21
7) T cell suppression assay 21
8) Co-housing experiment 22
9) The elimination of Gram positive and negative bacteria 23
10) Administration of short chain fatty acids 23
11) Statistical Analysis 23
IV. Results 25
1) Elimination of gut microbiota in chicken 25
2) Verification of physiological alteration in ABX-treated chickens 28
3) Change of B cells and macrophages in ABX-treated chickens 30
4) Change of CD4+ T cells in ABX-treated chickens 32
5) Change of IL-10 and IFN-g from subtype of CD4+ T cells in ABX-treated chickens 36
6) Direct effect of antibiotics on the change of CD4+CD8βCD25+ and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells 38
7) Changes of CD4+CD8βCD25+ and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells in periphery of ABX-treated chickens 40
8) Suppressive function of CD4+CD8βCD25+ and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells in ABX-treated chickens 43
9) Changes of CD4+CD8βCD25+ and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells in ABX-treated chickens after co-housing with control chickens 45
10) Effect of Gram-positive or negative bacteria on the population changes of CD4+CD8βCD25+ and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells 47
11) Effect of SCFAs on CD4+CD8βCD25+ and CD4+CD8+CD25+ T cells 49
V. Discussion 51
VI. Literature Cited 60
VII. Summary in Korean 78Docto
Detection of an anthrax biomarker by screen-printed fluorescent sensors
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ (μμ¬)-- μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ : ννμ물곡νλΆ(μλμ§νκ²½ ννμ΅ν©κΈ°μ μ 곡), 2013. 8. μ₯μ μ.μ€ν¬λ¦° νλ¦°ν
κΈ°λ²κ³Ό λ κ°μ λνμ‘± μ΄μ¨μ μ΄μ©ν΄ μ μ‘°λ νκ΄ μΌμμ νμ κ· κ²μΆμ λνμ μΈ νμ κ· λ°μ΄μ€λ§μ»€μΈ λνΌμ½λ¦°μ°μ μ΄μ©ν΄ μμ보μλ€. λ μ’
λ₯μ μλ‘ λ€λ₯Έ λνμ‘± μ΄μ¨(μ λ‘νΌμ κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ ν°λΉμ)μ μνΈλ λμλ―Ό μ¬μ΄μ°κ³Ό μμ©μ‘ μνμμ κ²°ν©μν€κ³ ν΄λ¦¬λΉλμμ½μ¬μ λ£μ΄ μ λλ₯Ό λμΈ ν ν΄λ¦¬μν°μ ν° νλ¦ μλ‘ μ€ν¬λ¦° νλ¦°ν
μ μννμλ€. λνμ‘± μ΄μ¨κ³Ό μνΈλ λμλ―Ό μ¬μ΄μ°κ³Όμ κ²°ν©μ ν΅μ기곡λͺ
λΆκ΄λ²κ³Ό νΈλ¦¬μ λ³ν μ μΈλΆκ΄λ²μ μ΄μ©ν΄ κ΄μ°°νλ€. λνμ‘± μ΄μ¨μ μ΅μ λλ μΈ‘μ κ³Ό μ μ‘°λ νκ΄ μΌμμ λνΌμ½λ¦°μ° λΉμ¨ μΈ‘μ μ μμΈμ λ±κ³Ό νκ΄λΆμκΈ°λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ 체κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ‘°μ¬λμλ€. μ λ‘νΌμμ μ΄μ©ν νκ΄ μΌμμ ν°λΉμμ μ΄μ©ν νκ΄ μΌμ λͺ¨λ λλΌμ΄ κ²μΆ νκ³ (κ°κ° 0.5 λλ
Έλͺ°, 0.1 λλ
Έλͺ°)λ₯Ό 보μ¬μ£ΌμμΌλ©° ν°λΉμμ μ΄μ©ν νκ΄ μΌμκ° λ³΄λ€ λμ κ°λλ₯Ό 보μ¬μ£Όμλ€. μ΄λ μμ μλμ§ κ°κ³Ό λνΌμ½λ¦°μ° μΌμ€ μνμ λ€λ¬ μνμ ν°λΉμ μ¬μ΄μ κ°κ²°ν©μ μν κ²μ΄λΌ μ¬λ£λλ€. μΆκ°μ μΌλ‘ μ λ‘νΌμκ³Ό ν°λΉμμ μ¬μ©ν λ νκ΄ μΌμμ λ€μν λ°©ν₯μ‘± 리κ°λμ κ²μΆ λ₯λ ₯μ λΉκ΅ν΄λ³΄μμ λ λνΌμ½λ¦°μ°μ λν΄μ λ°μ΄λ μ νμ±(κ°κ° 135λ°°, 200λ°°)μ λνλ΄μλ€. μ΄λ¬ν κ²°κ³Όλ€μ μ€ν¬λ¦° νλ¦°ν
λ°©λ²κ³Ό λ μ’
λ₯μ λνμ‘± μ΄μ¨μ΄ ν¨κ» νμ κ· κ²μΆμ μ΄μ©λμμ λ λμ κ²μΆ κ°λμ μ νμ κ²μΆμ λν μ€μν μ 보λ€μ μ 곡νκ² λ κ²μΌλ‘ νλ¨λλ€.Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Anthrax disease 1
1.2 Lanthanide luminescence 4
1.3 Anthrax biomarker detection via lanthanide luminescence 11
1.4 Lanthanide-macrocycle complex 14
1.5 Screen-printing method 15
Chapter 2 Experimental Details 18
2.1 Materials 18
2.2 Preparation of ink pastes for screen-printing 18
2.3 Lanthanide-based anthrax detectors via screen-printing 19
2.4 Quantum yield 19
2.5 DPA detection 20
Chapter 3 Results and Discussion 22
3.1 Fabrication of screen-printed anthrax biomarker detectors 22
3.2 Characterization of anthrax biomarker detectors 31
3.3 Optimal concentration of lanthanide metals 35
3.4 Sensitivity of screen-printed anthrax biomarker detectors 38
3.5 Selectivity of screen-printed anthrax biomarker detectors 44
Chapter 4 Conclusions 50
References 51
κ΅λ¬Έμ΄λ‘ 53Maste
μκ°μ λ μμ λνλ‘μ Vanity Fair : 19μΈκΈ° μμ€ λ μμ ν μλ―Έμ κ΄λ ¨νμ¬
νλμμ€μ λΉνμ¬ 19μΈκΈ° μμ€μ μ½λ μ¦κ±°μμ νλλ μ°λ¦¬κ° μΌμ’
μ νΈμν¨μ κ°μ§κ³ μνμ λν μ μλ€λ λ°μ μλ€. λ¬Όλ‘ μ΄λ νΈμνλ€λ λ§μ λ€λΆν μ 보μ μΈ κ²μ΄λ€. μλνλ©΄ νλμμ€μ μ΅μν λ
μλ λμ²΄λ‘ κΈΈμ΄κ° κ±Έκ³ κ΅¬μ±μ΄ λμ¨νλ©° νλλ λλ‘ μκ°μ λͺ©μλ¦¬κ° νμ΄λμ€λ 19μΈκΈ° μμ€μ μ½μ λ μ€νλ € λΆλ΄μ€λ½κ³ μ§λ¦¬νλ©° λΆμμ μ€λ½κ² λλΌκΈ°κ° μ½κΈ° λλ¬Έμ΄λ€. μ¬μ€ Henry James μ΄ν μ κ°λ νλμμ€λ‘ μ μμ΄ μκ°μ κ°μ
μ κ°λ₯ν ν μ΅μ νκ³ λ±μ₯μΈλ¬Όλ€λ‘ νμ¬κΈ μ€μ€λ‘λ₯Ό 보μ¬μ£Όλλ‘ νλ κ²μ΄ μμ€λ―Ένμμ μ₯μ μΌλ‘ μμ€λμ΄μ¨ λ°, λ
μλ μκ°μ κ°μμΌλ‘λΆν° λ²μ΄λ μμ μ κ°μμ±κ³Ό μμλ ₯μ μν΄ μμ λ‘μ΄ μνμ μ½μ μ μκ² λμλ€. κ·Έλ¬λ λ
μμ μ΄λ¬ν μμ λ‘μμ κΆλ¦¬νλμ΄ λ°λμ μμ€μ½κΈ°μ νΈμν¨μ κ°μ Έμ¨ κ²μ μλλΌκ³ ν μ μλ€. μμ λ‘μμ§λ€λ κ²μ κ·Έκ²μ μλ°λλ μ무μ μ건μ κ°μΆλ νμμλ§ κ°λ₯νκΈ° λλ¬Έμ΄λ€. μκ°λ λ
μμκ² μμ λ‘μμ νμ©νλ λμ μνλ€μ μ¨μ΄λ€μ΄κ° νμΆ© μ κ΅νκ³ μ¬μΈν μΈμ΄μ ꡬμ±μΌλ‘ 볡μ‘νκ³ μΈλ ¨λ μΆμ λͺ¨μ΅μ μ§λκ³ μ, λ
μμκ² κ·Έκ²μ μ λλ‘ μ½μ΄λ΄κ³ νλ¨ν μ μλ κ°μμ±κ³Ό μμλ ₯μ λ μΉ΄λ‘μκ³Ό κΈ΄μ₯λ λ
Έλ ₯μ κ°μΆλλ‘ λμμμ΄ μꡬνλ κ²μ΄λ€. κ²°κ΅ λ
μμ μμ λ‘μμ΄λ μμ€μ½κΈ°μ μλΉν μ΄λ €μμ ν΅κ³Όν λ€μμΌ λΉλ‘μ μ»μ΄λΈ μμλ¬Όμ λ€λ¦μλ κ²μ΄λ€. λ°λΌμ μ΄λ₯Έλ° νλμ λ
μκ° 19μΈκΈ° μμ€μ λν λ κ°λ λΆνΈν¨μ κΈ°μ€ μ΄λ €μ΄ νλ ¨κ³Όμ κ³Ό μ격μ건μ κ±°μ³ κ²¨μ° νλν μμ λ‘μμ κΆλ¦¬λ₯Ό νμ¬ν μ μλ€λ λν¨κ°μμ κΈ°μΈνλ κ²μ λΆκ³Όνλ€. μ΄κ²μ λ§νμμλ©΄ μ°λ¦¬κ° μ΄μκ°μ΄ μ΄μ¨λ°°λ°μ μΈ νλλ
μλ‘μμ κΆλ¦¬μ μ무λ₯Ό μ 보νλ μκ° 19μΈκΈ° μμ€μ λ
μλ μ€λ‘ νΈμν΄μ§ μ μλ€λ κ²μ μλ―Ένλ€. κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μ΄ λμ 19μΈκΈ° μμ€μ κΈ΄ λΆλκ³Ό λμ¨ν μ΄μΌκΈ° μ κ°λ λΆλ΄μ€λ¬μκ³Ό λ΅λ΅ν¨λ³΄λ€ λκΈν¨κ³Ό μ¬μ κ° λκ³ μμ‘΄νλ μκ°μ λͺ©μ리λ κ°μμμ κΆμμμ κ²μ΄ μλλΌ μΉλ°ν λλ°μμ΄μ μμ°μ€λ €μ΄ λνμμ κ²μ΄ λλ κ²μ΄λ€
κ΅κ°μ μΈ μ§μ μμ° μΆμ μ μν μ μΈ
κ³Όν κΈ°μ μ λ°λ¬λ‘ μ°λ¦¬μ νκ· μλͺ
μ΄ λ λ‘ λ€λ₯΄κ² μ°μ₯λκ³ μλ€λ κ²μ κ²°μ½ μμΌμ€λ¬μ΄ μ΄μΌκΈ°κ° μλλ€. λ¨μν νκ· μλͺ
λ§ λμ΄λλ κ²μ΄ μλλΌ κ±΄κ°νκ² μ΄ μ μλ μΆμ μ§λ λμμ Έμ, μ€λμ 70λλ κ³Όκ±° μ°λ¦¬ μ μΉ μΈλκ° νκ°μ λ§μ λλ³΄λ€ λ 건κ°νκ³ νλμ μμ λͺ¨λκ° μΈμ§νλ λ°λ€. κ·ΈλΌμλ λΆκ΅¬νκ³ μ°λ¦¬ μ¬νλ κ°μΈμ μΈ λ₯λ ₯μ΄λ κ±΄κ° μ¬κ±΄μ λΆλ¬Έμ λΆμΉκ³ μ λ
μ΄λΌλ νμΌμ μΈ μ£λλ‘ κ³΅μ νλμ μ μ§μν€κ³ μμΌλ, μ΄λ‘ μΈν κ΅κ°μ μΈ μμ€μ λ§ν μ μμ΄ ν¬κ² λμλ€. λνμ κ²½μ° κ·Έκ²μ κ³ κΈ λλκ° μ§λ μ§μ μμ°μ μ¬μ₯μν€λ μΌλ‘ μ§κ²°λκ³ μμ΄, μ΄μ λ ν λ²μ―€ μ΄ λ¬Έμ λ₯Ό μ¬κ°νκ² λ
Όμν΄μΌ ν μμ μ μ΄λ₯΄λ λ€κ³ μκ°νλ€. μ°λ¦¬λλΌ μ¬ν μ λ°μ΄ μ΄μ²λΌ 물리μ μΈ μ°λ ΉμΌλ‘ μ λ
μ μ¬λ¨νκ³ μμΌλ, λνλ§μ μμΈλ‘ νλΌκ³ λ ν μ μμ κ²μ΄λ€. λμ±μ΄ λνμ λ§ 65μΈλΌλ κ°μ₯ λ¦μ λμ΄κΉμ§ νλμ 보μ₯νκ³ μμ΄. λ μ΄μ 무μμ μꡬνλ€λ κ²μ κ³Όμμ΄λΌκ³ λ§ν μλ μμ κ²μ΄λ€. κ·ΈλΌμλ λΆκ΅¬νκ³ μ΄μ κ°μ λ¬Έμ λ₯Ό κ³΅λ‘ νκ³ μ νλ κ²μ μ€λ² μΈλκ° κΈκ²©νκ² λμ΄λ μ€λμ μ¬νμ μΈ μ¬κ±΄μ μΈλ©΄ν μ μκΈ° λλ¬Έμ΄λ€
μλμ°¨ ν€λλΌμ΄νΈμ© κ³ μ λ°©μ λ± μμ κΈ° μμ€ν μ λͺ¨λΈλ§ λ° μ μ΄κΈ° μ€κ³
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(μμ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :μ 기곡νλΆ,2000.Maste
Analysis and Design of an Electronic Ballast for MHD Lamps
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(λ°μ¬) --μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :μ κΈ°. μ»΄ν¨ν°κ³΅νλΆ,2007.Docto