13 research outputs found

    εΈ‚ε…§λ²„μŠ€ι‹ι€δΊ‹ζ₯­μ— λŒ€ν•œ ζ”ΏεΊœζ”―ζ΄ ζ–Ήζ‘ˆη‘η©Ά

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ ν–‰μ •λŒ€ν•™μ› :ν–‰μ •ν•™κ³Ό 정책학전곡,1997.Maste

    Exploratory study on conceptualization and implementation of Emotionally-intelligent Government: focusing on analogy with aesthetics and methodological operation

    No full text
    λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” νš¨μœ¨μ„±μ„ κ°•μ‘°ν•˜λŠ” 신곡곡관리와 λ³΄μ™„μ μœΌλ‘œ ν™œμš©λ  수 μžˆλŠ” 행정관리적 νŒ¨λŸ¬λ‹€μž„μ˜ ν•˜λ‚˜λ‘œ 감성지λŠ₯적 μ •λΆ€λ₯Ό 이둠적으둜 κ°œλ…ν™”ν•˜κ³ , 이λ₯Ό κ΅¬ν˜„ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ 방법둠을 μ˜ˆμ‹œν•˜λŠ” 것을 λͺ©μ μœΌλ‘œ ν•œλ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ 미적 νƒœλ„, μ²œμž¬μ™€ μ°½μ‘°μ„±, κ°μ •μ΄μž…κ³Ό ν•΄μ„μ΄λΌλŠ” 미학적 μ•„λ‚˜λ‘œκΈ°λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•œ κ°μ„±μ •λΆ€μ˜ μœ λΉ„μΆ”λ¦¬λ₯Ό μ‹œλ„ν•˜κ³ , μ‹€ν˜„μ„ μœ„ν•œ 도ꡬ적 λ°©λ²•λ‘ μœΌλ‘œ 감성지λŠ₯의 μΈ‘μ •κ³Ό ν™œμš©, 데이터 λ§ˆμ΄λ‹κ³Ό μ‹œμŠ€ν…œ 사고λ₯Ό μ œμ•ˆν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ°μ„±μ˜ 이성적 이해λ₯Ό λͺ©μ μœΌλ‘œ ν•˜λŠ” 미학적 μ•„λ‚˜λ‘œκΈ°λ₯Ό λŒ€μž…ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ 감성지λŠ₯적 μ •λΆ€κ°€ κ΅¬ν˜„ν•΄μ•Ό ν•  κ³΅κ°ν•˜λŠ” μ •λΆ€, μ˜ˆμˆ κ°€ λ˜λŠ” 후원가적 μ •λΆ€, 그리고 μ•Œμ•„μ±„λŠ” μ •λΆ€λ₯Ό 논리적 λͺ¨μˆœ 없이 κ°œλ…ν™”ν•  수 μžˆμŒμ„ μ„€λͺ…ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ λ―Όκ°„λΆ€λ¬Έμ—μ„œ μ†ŒλΉ„μžμ˜ μˆ˜μš”μ™€ κ°μ„±νŒŒμ•…μ— 많이 ν™œμš©λ˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 데이터 λ§ˆμ΄λ‹κ³Ό μ‹œμŠ€ν…œ 사고λ₯Ό μ†Œκ°œν•˜κ³  주택정책을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•œ ν™œμš©λ°©μ•ˆμ„ μ˜ˆμ‹œν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨, 이둠적 μ„€λͺ…에 그치기 μ‰¬μš΄ 감성지λŠ₯적 μ •λΆ€λ₯Ό κ΅¬ν˜„ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 방법둠적 λŒ€μ•ˆμ„ μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ 연ꡬ가 감성지λŠ₯적 정뢀에 λŒ€ν•œ λ…Όμ˜κ°€ λ³Έκ²©ν™”ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ μƒν™©μ—μ„œ μ‹œλ‘ μ  μ—°κ΅¬λ‘œμ„œμ˜ ν•œκ³„λ₯Ό κ°–κ³  μžˆμœΌλ‚˜ 이성과 λŒ€λ¦½μ μœΌλ‘œ μ΄ν•΄λ˜κΈ° μ‰¬μš΄ 감성을 μ •λΆ€μ˜ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 행정관리 νŒ¨λŸ¬λ‹€μž„μœΌλ‘œ μ œμ‹œν•˜λ €κ³  μ‹œλ„ν•œ μ μ΄λ‚˜, 감성관리λ₯Ό μ •λΆ€λΆ€λ¬Έμ—μ„œ λ„μž…ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” λ°©μ•ˆμ„ λͺ¨μƒ‰ν•œ μ μ—μ„œ μ˜μ˜κ°€ μžˆλ‹€κ³  λ³Έλ‹€. This study aims to conceptualize emotionally-intelligent government as a public management paradigm, and to introduce exemplary methods for realizing it. For the first aim, it employs aesthetic analogies such as aesthetic attitude, genius and originality, and empathic hermeneutics as well as emotional intelligence, data mining and systematic thinking for the second. By applying aesthetic analogies, it finds that emotionally-intelligent government is sensitive, artistic and patronal, and that sensible government can be conceptualized without logical contradiction. It also gives examples of measurement methods like data mining and systematic thinking, which are widely used in the private sector for emotional management, to evaluate housing policy and thus helps achieve the theoretical concept of emotionally-intelligent government. Although it inevitably carries theoretical limitations due to the lack of previous literature, it is still meaningful in terms of trying to create a new public management paradigm based on emotional intelligence and in scrutinizing ways of introducing emotional management into the public realm
    corecore