27 research outputs found
νλ μλ³Έμ£Όμμ λ³νμ μ μ°μ± λ Όμμ κ΄ν μ°κ΅¬
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(μμ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :μ¬ννκ³Ό,1995.Maste
A Study on Policy and Act Making Process History of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act
Social Policy Change and Reconstruction of Consensus in Sweden since the 1990s: An Analysis from the Perspective of Governance
μ€μ¨λ΄μ κ³Όκ±° μ½ν¬λΌν°μ¦ ν©μλͺ¨λΈμ μ νμ΄μμΌλ, 1970λ
λ μ΄ν μλΉν λ³νλ₯Ό κ²½ννμλ€. κ±°λ²λμ€μ κ΄μ μμ λ³Ό λ, μ€μ¨λ΄ κ±°λ²λμ€μ λ³νλ μ¬λ―Όμ£Όμ μ±μ₯μ£Όμ λͺ¨λΈμ΄ λ μ΄μ μλνκΈ° μ΄λ ΅κ² λλ©΄μ, μμ νμ κ²½λ‘μμ κ±°λ²λμ€μ νμμλ€μ΄ μ§μκ°λ₯ν λͺ¨λΈμ λͺ©νλ‘ νμ¬, μ΄ν΄λΉμ¬μλ€ κ°μ κ°λ±μ μ‘°μ νλ λ°©λ²λ€μ λͺ¨μν΄μ¨ κ²°κ³Όμ΄λ€. μ€μ¨λ΄μμ 1990λ
λ μ΄ν κ±°λ²λμ€λ μ¬νμ μ±
λ€μ μ§μκ°λ₯μ±μ λλ¬μΌ νμκ³Ό ννμ μν μ‘°μ κΈ°μ λ‘μ μ±κ²©μ΄ κ°ν΄μ‘λ€. μ λΆμ μ λΉμ±μ΄ μ°μΆμ§ν₯μ μ λΉμ±, μ¦ μ μ±
μ μ±κ³Όμ μ μ°¨ λ μμ‘΄νκ² λ λ§νΌ μ μ±
λ€μ μ’μ μ±κ³Όλ₯Ό μ§μμ μΌλ‘ λΌ μ μλ κ³Όμ κ³Ό μ μ°¨, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μ΄μ λν ν©μκ° λ μ€μν΄μ‘λ€. λ°λΌμ μ λΉ κ° μ°ν©λΏλ§ μλλΌ, ν©μμ μ΄λ₯΄λ κ³Όμ μμ μ λΆκΈ°κ΅¬λ€ λλ μ λ¬Έκ΄λ£λ€μ μν μ΄ λ³΄λ€ μ€μν΄μ‘λ€. κ·Έλ¬λ μ μ±
μμλ³λ‘, ν©μ μ μΉμ μ±κ³΅μ μ°¨μ΄κ° λνλ¬λ€. 첫째, ν¬κ΄μ μ±κ²©μ μ¬νμ μ±
μΈ μλμ μ±
κ³Ό 볡μ§μ μ±
μμλ μ λΆκΈ°κ΅¬μ μ€μ¬μ μ λ¬Έκ΄λ£λ€μ μν μ΄ μ€μνλ©°, κ±°λ²λμ€λ μλμ μΌλ‘ ν©μμ μ΄λ€. λμ§Έ, λ
Έμ¬ μμμ μ§μ μ μΈ μ μ±
κ΄μ¬κ° λμ λ
Έλμμ₯μ μ±
μμ κ±°λ²λμ€λ μλμ μΌλ‘ κ°λ±μ μ΄λ€. λ
Έλμμ₯μ μ±
μ μμμμ κ°λ±μ κ±°λ²λμ€λ₯Ό λ°κ²¬ν μ μμμλ λΆκ΅¬νκ³ , μ€μ¨λ΄μ κ΅κ° μ 체μ±μΌλ‘λ μΈμλλ 보νΈμ 볡μ§κ΅κ°λ μ¬μ ν μ λ λ€μ μλ―Όμ κ°ν μ§μ§λ₯Ό λ°μΌλ©΄μ, μ¬νμ°λμ ν©μλ₯Ό μ μ§νλ κ°ν λ²νλͺ©μ΄ λμ΄ μ£Όκ³ μλ€.
Sweden, which was an example of corporatist consensus model, has been experiencing great changes since the 1970s. From the perspective of governance, the changes in the form and characteristics of governance in Sweden resulted from great efforts made by social partners and the government to coordinate conflicting interests in the course of liberalization. The Swedish governance has been getting strongly characterized by the coordination of negotiations and compromises surrounding the sustainability of social policies since the 1990s. The legitimacy of the government relies much more on the output-oriented legitimacy, that is, the performance of social policies. The role of government agencies or professional bureaucrats needs to be emphasized in the changing governance. In addition to the inter-party coalition, it has been getting a stronger factor in generating consensus in Sweden. However, the success of consensus politics depends on the policy area. First, government agencies or professional bureaucrats take a crucial part in the consensus-making in broad-based income policy and welfare policy. Here the governance is more consensus-oriented. Compared to this, social partners are much more powerful actors in making a decision in labor market policies than the government. It is not easy for social partners to coordinate conflicts and concur with each other in the labor market. Even though both consensus and conflicts are found in the changing governance, the Swedish universal welfare state, strongly supported by the majority of the population, remains the essential element in sustaining the social solidarity and consensus
Does Good Society Increase Life Satisfaction?: Individual Life Satisfaction and Social Integration Capacity in Five Countries
μ΄ κΈμ 2012λ
λμ νκ΅, λ
μΌ, μ΄ν리μ, 그리μ€, ν°ν€ 5κ°κ΅μμ μ€μλ μλ£λ₯Ό λΆμνμ¬ μ¬νκ°λ±κ³Ό μ¬νμ κ°λ±ν΄μμλμ κ΄ν κ°μΈμ μΈμμ΄ μΆμ λ§μ‘±λμ λ―ΈμΉλ μν₯μ λΆμνλ€. μ΄ μ°κ΅¬λ μΆμ λ§μ‘±λμ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμΈμ μ£Όλ‘ κ΅κ°κ° κ±°μλΉκ΅μ μ¬λ¦¬νμ μΈ κ°μΈμ£Όμμ μ κ·ΌμΌλ‘ νꡬνλ κΈ°μ‘΄ μ°κ΅¬μ λ€λ₯Έ μ§λ¬Έμ λμ Έλ³΄κ³ μ νλ€. ꡬ체μ μΌλ‘ μ΄ μ°κ΅¬μμ μ£Όλͺ©νκ³ μ νλ κ²μ μΆμ λ§μ‘±λμ λ―ΈμΉλ μν₯μμΈμΌλ‘μ μ μ¬μ μΈ μ¬νκ°λ±κ³Ό μ΄λ¬ν κ°λ±μ ν΄μν μ μλ μ¬νμ μλμ΄λ€. μ΄ 5,232λͺ
μ μλ΅ μλ£λ₯Ό λΆμν κ²°κ³Ό, μ¬νκ°λ± μΈμμ μΈ‘λ©΄μμ 보면, κ²½μ μ μΌλ‘ μμ λκ³ , μ λ’°λ₯Ό κ°μ§λ©°, λ¬Όμ§μ£Όμμ μ΄κ³ μ±μ₯μ£Όμμ κ°μΉλ₯Ό μΆκ΅¬νλ κ°μΈλ€μ μΆμ λ§μ‘±λκ° κ·Έλ μ§ μμ κ°μΈλ€λ³΄λ€ λμ κ²μΌλ‘ λνλ¬λ€. κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μμν λ°λλ‘ μ¬νκ°λ±ν΄μμλμ λν κΈμ μ μΈμμ κ°μΈλ€μ μΆμ λ§μ‘±λλ₯Ό λμ΄λ κ²μΌλ‘ νμΈλμλ€. λ§μ§λ§μΌλ‘ μ¬νκ°λ± μΈμμμ€μμλ μλμμ€, κ²½μ μ μκΈ°μ κ²½ν, μ λ’°, νλ¬Όμ§μ£Όμ λλ 볡μ§μ§ν₯μ κ°μΉκ΄ λ±μ μν₯μμΈλ€κ³Ό μΆμ λ§μ‘±λ μ¬μ΄μ κ΄κ³κ° κ΅κ°μ λ°λΌ μν₯μ μ λλ λ¬Όλ‘ μ μμ±μ μμ΄μ μλ‘ λ¬λ¦¬ λνλ¬λ€. μ΄λ¬ν μ°¨μ΄μ μ μ¬νκ°λ±ν΄μμλ μΈμκ³Ό μΆμ λ§μ‘±λμ κ΄κ³μμλ μ μ¬νκ² νμΈλμλ€.
This article examines how individuals perceptions of social conflict and social integration influence their life satisfaction, using the survey data collected from Korea, Germany, Italy, Greece, and Turkey in 2012. This study, expanding the previous studies on life satisfaction, emphasizes the social dimension of factors that affect life satisfaction. We argue that there are three different levels of social conflict consisting of economic, relational, and value conflicts. Individual life satisfaction depends on each level of social conflict. At the same time, individual life satisfaction also depends on individual trust in social integration capacity to manage social conflicts. The overall findings are as follows. First, this study finds that affluent, trustful individuals with material and growth-oriented values tend to be satisfied with their lives. Second, if they have positive views on their societys capacity to deal with social conflicts, individuals tend to be satisfied with their lives. As we expected, some differences among countries are found when we compare each countrys results. Income level, experience of economic crisis, trust, value-orientation have different implications in explaining individual life satisfaction in each country. Furthermore, individuals views on the various dimensions of their societys capacity to deal with social conflicts affect their life satisfaction in a different way in each country