15 research outputs found

    In Search of Thought: Japans Viewpoint on China and Its Sinology

    No full text
    21세기에 듀어와 경제적으둜 κ΅°μ‚¬μ μœΌλ‘œ μ„Έκ³„μ‚¬μ˜ λ¬΄λŒ€μ— κΈ‰κ²©ν•˜κ²Œ λΆ€μƒν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 쀑ꡭ을 λ°”λΌλ³΄λ©΄μ„œ, 일본은 쀑ꡭ을 ꡰ사적 μœ„ν˜‘μœΌλ‘œ λ•Œλ‘œλŠ” μ—¬μ „νžˆ 일본보닀 λ’€μ²˜μ§„ 혼돈의 μ„Έκ³„λ‘œ 보기도 ν•œλ‹€. 일본의 쀑ꡭ μΈμ‹μ΄λž€ 일본의 λ…μžμ  μ‚¬μœ κ³Όμ •μ΄λΌκΈ°λ³΄λ‹€λŠ” 일본과 쀑ꡭ μƒν˜Έκ°„μ˜ 쑰건에 μ˜ν•΄ λ³€ν™”ν•˜λŠ” 상관적 ν•¨μˆ˜μ΄λ‹€. κ·Έ μ‘°κ±΄μ΄λž€ κ·ΌλŒ€ λ―Όμ‘±κ΅­κ°€ 건섀 κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ μƒκ²¨λ‚œ 역사적 μš”μ†Œμ™€ 자본주의적 μ„Έκ³„μ²΄μ œκ°€ κ°€μ†ν™”λ˜μ–΄ κ°€λŠ” ν˜„μ‹€ μ†μ—μ„œ μ•ΌκΈ°λœ λ™μ•„μ‹œμ•„μ§ˆμ„œμ˜ 패ꢌ λ¬Έμ œμ™€λ„ κ΄€λ ¨λ˜μ–΄ μžˆλ‹€. μΌλ³Έμ—μ„œ 쀑ꡭ을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•˜λŠ” κ΄€μ°°κ³Ό μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 싀체λ₯Ό νŒŒμ•…ν•˜λŠ” 것보닀 쀑ꡭ을 λ°”λΌλ³΄λŠ” 관점과 κ΄€λ…μ˜ λ¬Έμ œκ°€ 보닀 μ€‘μš”ν•œ μš”μΈμœΌλ‘œ μž‘μš©ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. 즉 쀑ꡭ을 λ°”λΌλ³΄λŠ” μ‹œμ„ κ³Ό 인식, 그리고 상상λ ₯의 λ¬Έμ œμ΄κΈ°λ„ ν•˜λ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ μ–Έλ‘ μ΄λ‚˜ λ―Όκ°„μ—μ„œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜λŠ” λ°˜μ€‘κ³Ό μΉœμ€‘, ν˜μ˜€κ°μ™€ μΉœλ°€κ° λ“±κ³Ό 같은 ν‰κ°€λŠ” μΈμ‹μƒμ˜ ν‘œλ©΄μ μΈ 속성에 λΆˆκ³Όν•  뿐이닀. μΈμ‹μ΄λž€ 인식 주체와 인식 λŒ€μƒ μ‚¬μ΄μ—μ„œ μ•ΌκΈ°λ˜λŠ” λ³΅μž‘ν•œ 관계이며, ν‘œν”Όμ  μ†μ„±μœΌλ‘œ μΈμ‹μ˜ 문제λ₯Ό λ‹€λ£¨κ²Œ 되면 κ·ΈλŸ¬ν•œ 관계λ₯Ό μ§€λ‚˜μΉ˜κ²Œ λ‹¨μˆœν™”ν•  뿐이닀. λ”°λΌμ„œ μΈμ‹μ˜ λ¬Έμ œλŠ” ν‘œλ©΄μ μΈ κ°μ •μ˜ 차원을 λ„˜μ–΄μ„œ 인식 주체의 μ‹œμ„ κ³Ό 인식 λŒ€μƒμ˜ λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό κ³ λ €ν•΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€. 인식 주체의 μ‹œμ„ μ„ κ²€ν† ν•˜λŠ” 일은 쀑ꡭ을 λ°”λΌλ³΄λŠ” μ‹œμ μ„ 어디에 두고 μžˆλŠ”κ°€λ₯Ό λ”°μ Έλ³΄λŠ” μž‘μ—…μ΄λ©°, λ°˜μ„±μ  μ‚¬μœ  μ†μ—μ„œ μ „κ°œλ˜λŠ” 학적인 탐ꡬ에 μ†ν•œλ‹€. κ³ λŒ€ 일본의 ν•œν•™(ζΌ’ε­Έ)μ—μ„œ μ‹œμž‘ν•˜μ—¬, 메이지 μ‹œλŒ€μ˜ μ§€λ‚˜ν•™, μ „ν›„μ˜ 쀑ꡭ학 ν˜Ήμ€ 쀑ꡭ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μ€‘κ΅­μ΄λΌλŠ” λŒ€μƒμ˜ 싀상을 μ•Œλ €λŠ” λ…Έλ ₯μ΄λ©΄μ„œ, ν•œνŽΈμœΌλ‘œλŠ” μ™œ 쀑ꡭ을 λ§ν•˜λŠ”κ°€λΌλŠ” μΈμ‹μ£Όμ²΄μ˜ μžκΈ°λ°˜μ„±μ„ μš”μ²­ν•˜λŠ” κ³ λ‡Œμ— μ°¬ μž‘μ—…μ΄κΈ°λ„ ν–ˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ 이 글은 μ „ν›„ 일본 μ€‘κ΅­ν•™μ˜ 성립과 μ „κ°œ κ³Όμ • μ†μ—μ„œ μΌλ³Έμ΄λΌλŠ” 인식 주체의 μ‹œμ„ μƒμ˜ λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό 보여 μ£ΌλŠ” ν…μŠ€νŠΈλ₯Ό κ±°μ‹œμ  κ΄€μ μ—μ„œ λΆ„μ„ν•œλ‹€. λ‚˜μ•„κ°€ 일본의 쀑ꡭ학이 쀑ꡭ을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œμ„œ, ν•œνŽΈμœΌλ‘œλŠ” λ°©λ²•μœΌλ‘œμ„œ, ν˜Ήμ€ μ‚¬μƒκ³Όμ œλ‘œμ„œ μ„€μ •ν•˜λŠ” 과정을 λ°Ÿμ•„ κ°€κ³  있으며, κ·ΈλŸ¬ν•œ κ³Όμ • μ†μ—μ„œ 일본 특히 μ§€μ‹μΈλ“€μ˜ λ°˜μ„±μ  μ‚¬μœ μ™€ μ‚¬μƒκ³Όμ œμ˜ 기획이 역사와 ν˜„μ‹€μ˜ μ—­ν•™ 관계 μ†μ—μ„œ λ³€ν™”ν•˜κ³  μžˆμŒμ„ μ£Όμž₯ν•˜κ³ μž ν•œλ‹€.From economic and military perspectives, China is now emerging as leading power on the international political stage, but some of the Japanese critics still consider it as a mere military threat or even a country of chaos. This Japanese view of China can not be regarded as belonging to the independent thought process on its own. Rather, it is kind of a correlated function which is changing with the two countriess mutual conditions. And the nature of the mutual conditions has close connection with the issues over the hegemony in the East Asian international world order, which appeared amid the building of modern nation-state and the rising of capitalistic world system. More prominent in the Japanese observation and research on China are the elements of its viewpoint and idea than the grasping of the actual conditions of China; it is actually a problem concerning Japanese perspective on China and its awareness and imagination. Accordingly, some descriptions like anti- or pro-China(dislike or intimacy) is only superficial aspects of Japanese perception of China. Perception is a complex relation between the perceiver and the perceived, and depending on superficial aspects is apt to simplify the relation. It is necessary for perception to take into consideration the perceivers viewpoint and the change of the perceived beyond superficiality. Examining the perceivers viewpoint should include inquiring into where the viewpoint on China stands in time, and it should belong to scientific interrogation in a reflective vein. Researches concerning the study of the Chinese Classics in ancient Japan, Sinology in the Meiji period and the China study before and after the war were only attempts to grasp the actual conditions of China and endeavor full of agony to demand the selfreflection of the perceiver; Why we the Japanese talk of China?. The present essay analyzes in broad perspective those texts which show the changing viewpoint of the perceiver, Japan, in the midst of the formation and development of China study in Japan before and after the war. Furthermore, it suggests that China study confronts China as object and method of study on the one hand and task of thought on the other, and that Japanese intellectuals reflective thought and their setting-up of task of thought are changing amid the dynamic relation of history and reality

    γ€Œ λ…Όν˜• 」 에 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œ μžμ—°κ³Ό 기의 사상

    No full text
    이 글은 μ€‘κ΅­μ‚¬μƒμ‚¬μ—μ„œ μ΄λ‹¨μžλ‘œ μ•Œλ €μ§„ μ™•μΆ©μ˜ 사상을 ν† ν•˜μ—¬ μ˜λŒ€μ‚¬μƒμ‚¬μ—μ„œ κ·Έ μ˜λ―Έμ™€ μœ„μΉ˜λ₯Ό κ³ μ°°ν•˜κ³ μž ν•œλ‹€. κ·ΈλŠ” λ‹Ήμ‹œ 일반인 뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ 지식인 집단이 κ°–κ³  있던 일련의 기본적 관념듀 -천과 μΈκ°„μ˜ 관계, κ·€μ‹  Β· μ œμ‚¬μ™€ κ΄€λ ¨λœ μ£½μŒμ΄ν›„μ˜ 세계, μžμ—°μ˜ μ§ˆμ„œμ™€ μž¬ν•΄ν˜„μƒ, μš°μ£Όμ™€ 천체-에 λŒ€ν•΄ μ €μ‹ μ˜ 철학적 기반 μœ„μ—μ„œ λΉ„νŒμ˜ κ°€μΉ˜λ₯Ό λ“€μ—ˆλ‹€. λ¬Όλ‘  기쑴의 신념체계에 λŒ€ν•œ κ²©λ ¬ν•œ λΉ„νŒμ€ λ™μ‹œλŒ€μΈλ“€μ˜ ν˜Έμ‘μ΄λ‚˜ 지지λ₯Ό 얻지 λͺ»ν–ˆμœΌλ©° κ·Έ μžμ‹ μ€ μ§€λ°©μ˜ ν•˜κΈ‰κ΄€λ¦¬λ‘œμ„œ μˆœνƒ„ν•˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•œ 생애λ₯Ό λ³΄λƒˆλ‹€

    Yanfu : Searching for the Principle of Western Society

    No full text
    이글은 19μ„ΈκΈ° 말 쀑ꡭ이 μ™ΈλΆ€λ‘œ μ‹œμ„ μ„ μ „ν™˜ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜λŠ” μ‹œκΈ°μ— ν™œλ™ν•œ 엄볡(嚴復, 1854~1921)μ΄λΌλŠ” ν•œ μ§€μ‹μΈμ˜ μ™Έκ΅­ κ²½ν—˜μ„ 사상사적 λ§₯λ½μ—μ„œ λΆ„μ„ν•˜κ³ μž ν•œλ‹€. 엄볡은 μ€‘κ΅­μΈμœΌλ‘œμ„œλŠ” 졜초둜 영ꡭ의 λŒ€ν•™μ— μœ ν•™ν•œ 인물이닀. κ·Έκ°€ μ˜κ΅­μ— μœ ν•™ν•œ 1877λ…„μ—λŠ” 마침 졜초의 쀑ꡭ인 외ꡐ관이라고 ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” κ³½μˆ­λ„κ°€ μ˜κ΅­μ—μ„œ κ³΅μ‚¬λ‘œμ„œ κ·Όλ¬΄ν•˜κΈ° μ‹œμž‘ν•œ λ•Œμ˜€λ‹€. λ‹Ήμ‹œμ˜ 외ꡐ관은 μ†Œμˆ˜μ˜ μœ ν•™μƒλ“€μ˜ ν•™μ—…κ³Ό μƒν™œμ„ μ§€λ„ν•˜λŠ” 역할을 맑고 μžˆμ—ˆκ³ , κ³½μˆ­λ„λŠ” μžμ‹ μ˜ 일기에 λ‹Ήμ‹œ ν•™μƒλ“€μ˜ 상황을 μƒμ„Έν•˜κ²Œ κΈ°λ‘ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. 이 κΈ€μ—μ„œλŠ” 주둜 κ³½μˆ­λ„μ˜ 일기 λ“±μ˜ 자료λ₯Ό 톡해 엄볡이 μ˜κ΅­μ— μœ ν•™ν•œ κΈ°κ°„ λ™μ•ˆμ˜ ν•™μ—…κ³Ό μƒν™œ 등을 μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄λ©΄μ„œ, 엄볡이 μ²­λ…„ μ‹œμ ˆμ— μ„œμ–‘μ˜ 학문을 μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ ν‰κ°€ν•˜κ³  μ„œμ–‘μ˜ μ‚¬νšŒλ₯Ό μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ μ΄ν•΄ν•˜μ˜€λŠ”μ§€ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄κ³ μž ν•œλ‹€. λ‚˜μ•„κ°€ 영ꡭ μœ ν•™μ΄λΌλŠ” 그의 개인적 μ²΄ν—˜μ΄ κ·€κ΅­ ν›„ μ˜μ‹μ μœΌλ‘œ λ˜ν’€μ΄ λ˜λ©΄μ„œ 그의 사상 ν˜•μ„±μ— 미친 영ν–₯ 관계도 κ²€ν† ν•΄λ³΄κ³ μž ν•œλ‹€.This paper is an intellectual approach of Yanfu foreign experience, who went to study overseas in the late Qing dynasty for the first time in Chinese history. When he went to the British Empire for training to become a naval officer in 1877, China began to dispatch a diplomat to foreign countries. Guo Songtao, the first diplomatic minister to England, took on the position of guidance for the students studying abroad at London, he wrote all matters pertaining to the students minutely in his diary. I am going to give a detailed explain about Yanfus life and study while he was in Royal Naval College, mainly making use of Guos diary. Furthermore, this paper aims to investigate how he understood Western learning and Western societies when he was young, furthermore, to review how his personal experience of studying abroad made an influence on his thought after returning China.OAIID:RECH_ACHV_DSTSH_NO:T201606639RECH_ACHV_FG:RR00200001ADJUST_YN:EMP_ID:A078932CITE_RATE:0DEPT_NM:μžμœ μ „κ³΅ν•™λΆ€EMAIL:[email protected]_YN:NCONFIRM:

    Yen - fu`s Way of receiving of Western Sciences and Its revionistic Limits

    No full text
    엄볡은 ν™μˆ˜μ „μ€ νƒœν‰μ²œκ΅­ κ΅°λŒ€κ°€ 남경을 μ λ Ήν•˜λ˜ ν•΄, 볡건성 λ―Όν›„ν˜„μ—μ„œ νƒœμ–΄λ‚¬λ‹€. κ·ΈλŠ” μ•„νŽΈμ „μŸ(1840)이후 μ„œμ–‘ μ—΄κ°•μ˜ 침랡으둜 인해 μžκΈ°μ™„κ²°μ  'μ²œν•˜'λ‘œμ„œμ˜ 전톡적 μ§ˆμ„œκ°€ 미처 λŒ€μ‘ν•  겨λ₯Όλ„ 없이 λΆ•κ΄΄λ˜μ–΄κ°€μž, 이에 λŒ€ν•œ ν•΄κ²°μ±…μœΌλ‘œμ„œ μ„œμ–‘μ˜ 학문을 μˆ˜μš©ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ·Έλ¦¬ν•˜μ—¬ κ·ΈλŠ” γ€Œμ²œμ—°λ‘ γ€(1898, T.H. Huxley, Evolution and Ethics and other Essays), γ€Œμ›λ‹Ήγ€(1901-2,A.Smith, An Inquiry into Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations), γ€Œκ΅°ν•™μ΄μ–Έγ€(1903, H.spencer, The Study of Sociology), γ€Œκ΅°κΈ°κΆŒκ³„λ‘ γ€(1903, J.S. Mill, On Liberty), γ€Œμ‚¬νšŒν†΅μ „γ€(1903, E.Jenks, A History of Politics), γ€Œλ²•μ˜γ€(1904-9, Montesquieu, L'espirit des Lois), γ€Œλͺ©λŠ‘λͺ…학」(1905,J.S.Mill, A System of Logic μ „λ°˜λΆ€), γ€Œλͺ…학엄섀」(1909, Jevons, Logic The Primer)등을 μ€‘κ΅­μ˜ 고문으둜 λ²ˆμ—­ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ λ‹Ήμ‹œ μ„œμ–‘ν•™λ¬Έμ˜ μ†Œκ°œμ— μ œμΌμΈμžκ°€ λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€

    A Study on the Background and Characteristics of British Tea

    No full text

    The Analysis of β€œAh(ι›…)”, Translation Theory of Yan Fu

    No full text
    corecore