Post-resection prognosis of combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma cannot be predicted by the 2019 World Health Organization classification

Background: Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) has wide histologic diversity. This study investigated the prognostic impacts of cHCC-CCA histology according to the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 153 patients who underwent surgical resection for cHCC-CCA at Asan Medical Center between August 2012 and July 2019. Results: During the study period, 153 patients, 112 (73.2%) men and 41 (26.8%) women with a mean age of 56.4 +/- 10.8 years, underwent R0 resection for cHCC-CCA. Mean tumor diameter was 4.2 +/- 2.6 cm, and 147 (96.1%) patients had solitary tumors. According to 2019 WHO classification, 111 (72.5%) patients had cHCC-CCA alone, and 29 of them (26.1%) showed stem cell features. cHCC-CCA-intermediate cell carcinoma and cHCC-CCA-cholangiolocellular carcinoma were identified in 27 (17.6%) and 15 (9.8%), respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year tumor recurrence and patient survival rates were 31.8% and 92.1%, 49.8% and 70.9%, and 59.0% and 61.7%, respectively. Univariate analyses revealed that significant prognostic factors were tumor size >5 cm, microscopic and macroscopic vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor stage, and status of stem cell features. Multivariate analysis revealed 8th AJCC tumor stage and status of stem cell features as independent prognostic factors. 2019 WHO classification was not associated with post-resection prognosis. Conclusions: 2019 WHO classification was not associated with post-resection prognosis, thus was considered as simplified histologic classification requiring prognostic validation. We suggest that stem cell features should be included as an essential component of the pathology report for cHCC-CCA. (c) 2021 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Prognostic Accuracy of the ADV Score Following Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis

Background WeassessedtheprognosticaccuracyofADVscore(α-fetoprotein[AFP]-des-γ-carboxyprothrombin[DCP]-tumor volume [TV] score) following resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). Methods This was a retrospective observational study. This study included 147 patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC with PVTT. They were followed up for ≥ 66 months or until patient death. Results The grades of PVTT were Vp1 in 121 (14.3%), Vp2 in 41 (27.9%), Vp3 in 71 (48.3%), and Vp4 in14 (9.5%) cases. PreoperativeHCCtreatmentwasperformedin48(32.7%)patients.R0andR1resectionswereperformedin119(81.0%)and28 (19.0%)cases,respectively.The5-yeartumorrecurrence,HCC-specificsurvival,andpost-recurrencesurvivalrateswere79.2%, 43.5%, and 25.4%, respectively. Neither PVTT grade nor history of preoperative HCC treatment was a significant prognostic indicator. Stratification in accordance with ADV scores of 1log- and 3log-intervals resulted in high prognostic accuracy in predicting tumor recurrence and patient survival. Following cluster analysis, the cutoff for ADV score was determined at 9log and was more prognostically significant in terms of tumor recurrence and patient survival than surgical curability or microvascularinvasion.FurthercomparisonsrevealedthatprognosticpredictionwithanADVscorecutoffat9logwasmoreaccuratethan that using the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital-PVTT score. Conclusions ADV score is an integrated surrogate biomarker for post-resection prognosis in HCC with PVTT. Our prognostic prediction model using ADV scores provides reliable post-resection prognosis for patients with various grades of these tumors

Quantitative Prognostic Prediction Using ADV Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Background We assessed the prognostic impact of the ADV score (alpha-fetoprotein [AFP]-des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin [DCP]-tumor volume [TV] score) for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and patient survival after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods This study included 843 HCC patients who underwent LDLT between January 2006 and December 2015 at Asan Medical Center. These cases were divided into treatment-naive (TN, n = 256]) and pretransplant-treated (PT, n = 587 [69.6%]) groups. Results There were weak or nearly no correlations among AFP, DCP, and TV. There existed high correlations between the pretransplant and explant findings regarding tumor number, size, and ADV score. Right lobe grafts were implanted in 760 (90.2%) patients. HCC recurrence and all-cause patient death occurred in 182 (15.9%) and 126 (15.0%) respectively during the follow-up period for 75.6 +/- 35.5 months. The 5-year tumor recurrence (TR) and overall patient survival (OS) rates were 21.5% and 86.2%, respectively. The PT group showed higher TR (p < 0.001) and lower OS rates (p < 0.001). TR and OS were closely correlated with both pretransplant and explant ADV scores in the TN and PT groups. The ADV score enabled further prognostic stratification of the patients within and beyond the Milan, UCSF, and Asan Medical Center criteria. Compared with the 7 pre-existing selection criteria, ADV score with a cutoff of 5log showed the highest prognostic contrast regarding TR and OS. Conclusions Our prognostic prediction model using ADV scores is an integrated quantitative surrogate biomarker for posttransplant prognosis in HCC patients and can provide reliable information that assists the decision-making for LDLT

Outflow vein venoplasty of left lateral section graft for living donor liver transplantation in infant recipients

The orifice size of the LHV trunk in LLS grafts is often too small for direct anastomosis. Several methods were developed to enlarge the graft and recipient hepatic vein orifices. This study described our surgical techniques to secure hepatic vein reconstruction in infant recipients and analyzed the patency outcomes. Twelve infants undergoing pediatric LDLT were selected during 2-year study period between January 2018 and December 2019. Surgical techniques and vascular complications of graft hepatic vein outflow were analyzed. The mean recipient age was 12.5 +/- 4.5 months; mean body weight was 9.4 +/- 1.0 Kg; and mean graft-recipient weight ratio was 2.8 +/- 0.6%. Primary diseases were biliary atresia in six patients, metabolic diseases in two, hepatoblastoma in two, and acute liver failure in two. Eight LLS grafts were recovered through an open method, and four LLS grafts were recovered through a laparoscopic method. A small superficial LHV branch was present in five of 12 LLS grafts, which was opened to widen the graft hepatic vein orifice. Incision-and-patch venoplasty was performed in 10, unification venoplasty in 1 and no venoplasty in 1. All four LLS grafts recovered through a laparoscopic approach required circumferential vein patch because of very short hepatic vein stump. No patient experienced graft hepatic vein-associated vascular complications during the follow-up period of 19.3 +/- 9.3 months. Our surgical techniques with incision-and-patch venoplasty for LLS grafts is beneficial to reduce the risk of hepatic vein outflow obstruction in recipients receiving LLS grafts

Salvage living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy: Quantitative prediction using ADV score

Background: Salvage liver transplantation is a definite treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. ADV score is calculated by multiplying α-fetoprotein and des-γ-carboxyprothrombin concentrations and tumor volume. Prognostic accuracy of ADV score was assessed in patients undergoing salvage living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and their outcomes were compared with patients undergoing primary LDLT. Methods: This study was a retrospective, single-center, case-controlled study. Outcomes were compared in 125 patients undergoing salvage LDLT from 2007 to 2018 and in 500 propensity score-matched patients undergoing primary LDLT. Results: In patients undergoing salvage LDLT, median intervals between hepatectomy and tumor recurrence, between first HCC diagnosis and salvage LDLT, and between hepatectomy and salvage LDLT were 12.0, 37.2, and 29.3?months, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS, P?=?.98) and overall survival (OS, P?=?.44) rates did not differ significantly in patients undergoing salvage and primary LDLT. Pretransplant and explant ADV scores were significantly predictive of DFS and OS in patients undergoing salvage and primary LDLT (P

Post-resection prognosis of patients with hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

Purpose: Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare borderline vascular tumor. This retrospective, single-center study evaluated the outcomes of hepatic resection (HR) in patients with hepatic EHE. Methods: Over the 10-year period from 2009 to 2018, 11 patients with hepatic EHE underwent HR, accounting for 0.1% of the 11,979 adults who underwent HR at our center. Diagnosis of hepatic EHE was confirmed by immunohistochemical staining for CD34, CD31, and factor VIII-related antigen. Results: The 11 patients included 9 females (81.8%) and 2 males (18.2%) with mean age of 43.5 +/- 13.6 years. Preoperative imaging resulted in a preliminary diagnosis of suspected liver metastasis or EHE, with 9 patients (81.8%) undergoing liver biopsy. No patient presented with abnormally elevated concentrations of liver tumor markers. The extents of HR were determined by tumor size and location from trisectionectomy to partial hepatectomy. All patients recovered uneventfully from HR. Five patients showed tumor recurrence, with 4 receiving locoregional treatments for recurrent lesions. The 1-, 3 -and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 90.9%, 54.5%, and 54.5%, respectively. Currently, all patients remain alive and are doing well. Univariate analysis on tumor recurrence showed that tumor size >_ 4 cm was significantly associated with tumor recurrence (P = 0.032), but tumor number >_ 4 was not related to (P = 0.24). Conclusion: Hepatic EHE is a rare form of primary liver tumor often misdiagnosed as a metastatic tumor. Because of its malignant potential, HR is indicated if possible. HR plus, when necessary, treatment of recurrence yields favorable overall survival rates in patients with hepatic EHE. [Ann Surg Treat Res 2021;100(3):137-143

Renal Recovery After Liver Transplantation Alone in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis and Severe Chronic Kidney Disease With Normal Kidney Size

Background. Most guidelines recommend simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) over liver transplantation alone (LTA). CKD, however, is not irreversible. This study evaluates the reversibility of kidney disease after LTA based on kidney size. Materials and methods. In this single-center retrospective study, we classified 90 patients with LC and severe CKD into 3 groups: the normal kidney (NK)-LTA group (n=39), small kidney (SK)-LTA group (both kidneys <9 cm at the time of LTA, n=40), and SK-SLKT group (n=11). Results. The NK-LTA group had a lower percentage of hepatocellular carcinoma and a higher pre-liver transplantation (LT) estimated glomerular filtration rate. This group, however, was older, received livers from a higher percentage of deceased donors, and had a higher Child-Pugh score. Renal recovery, defined as the return of creatinine to their baseline, or a persistent change from baseline but not persistent (>3 months) need for renal replacement therapy after LT, was found in 79% in the NK-LTA group, which was higher than 7.5% in the SK-LTA group. Renal and patient survival was found in 56% of the NK-LTA group, which was higher than 2.5% of the SK-LTA group. Conclusions. There is a high percentage of renal recovery in the NK-LTA group, and accordingly, this does not justify SLKT, since this would result in a "waste" of kidneys. Therefore, KT after LT is recommended over SLKT for the LC patients with NK size