3 research outputs found

    Effect of Decellularization and Polyethylene Glycol pretreatment on Physico-mechanical Properties and Anticalcification of Glutaraldehyde Cross-linked Bovine Pericardium

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ, 2012. 2. ๊น€์šฉ์ง„.Objectives: Decellularization is known to decrease antigenicity of xenogenic tissue, which leads to decreased calcification. But this process can alter tissue structure and cause change in physicomechanical properties and integrity of the prosthesis. This study was performed to investigate the effects of decellularization and polyethylene glycol pretreatment on physicomechanical properties and anticalcification of glutaraldehyde cross-linked bovine pericardium. Methods: As control group, bovine pericardium underwent cross-linking using glutaraldehyde, ethanol with octanol, and glycine. There were three case groups which underwent the cross-linking process following various combination of decellularization and polyethylene pretreatment. We measured tensile strength, permeability, and compliance of the prostheses to evaluate physicomechanical properties. We implanted these tissue prostheses in subcutaneous spaces of 4-week old rats, harvested the prostheses two months after the implantation, then measured the quantity of calcium formed on the prosthesis. And additionally, we evaluated the effect of ฮฑ-Galactosidase pretreatment on xenogenic antigen formation. Results: Polyethylene glycol pretreatment after decellularization decreased tensile strength of the tissue prostheses, whice could be affected by increased thickness of the prostheses after multiple pretreatment processes. Decellularization increased permeability and compliance of the prostheses, but after polyethylene glycol pretreatment there was no difference of permeability and compliance compared to control group. Decellularization and polyethylene pretreatment did not reveal significant anticalcification effect. ฮฑ- 3 2 galactosidase pretreatment did not precipitate increase of anti-ฮฑ-Gal IgM and IgG antibodies. Conclusion: Decellularization did not affect tensile strength of bovine pericardium, but increased permeability and compliance. Polyethylene glycol pretreatment following decellularization decreased tensile strength of bovine pericardium, but maintained permeability and compliance without increase. Decellularization and polyethylene glycol pretreatment did not reveal significant anticalcification effect. More investigations for various pretreatment methods and anticalcification methods are needed to improve long-term integrity of the tissue prostheses.๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ชฉ์ : ๋ฌด์„ธํฌํ™”๋Š” ์กฐ์งํŽธ์˜ ํ•ญ์›์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผœ ์„ํšŒํ™”๋ณ€์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด์ง€๋งŒ ๋ฌด์„ธํฌํ™” ๊ณผ์ •์ค‘ ์กฐ์ง์˜ ์น˜๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผœ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ-์—ญํ•™์  ์„ฑ์งˆ์„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œํ‚ค๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋‚ด๊ตฌ์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ผ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” cross-linking ์ „์— ๋ฌด์„ธํฌํ™”๊ณผ์ •์ค‘ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ์ฑ„์›Œ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” space-filler์ธ polyethylene glycol(PEG)์ด ์ด์‹ ์กฐ์งํŽธ์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ-์—ญํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ์„ํšŒํ™”์— ๋ผ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•ด๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•: Glutaraldehyde, ethanol๊ณผ octanol, glycine detoxification์œผ๋กœ cross-linking์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋งŒ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ตฐ๊ณผ ๋ฌด์„ธํฌํ™”, polytethylene glycol ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ›„ cross-linking์„ ์กฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•œ 3 ๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ตฐ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์žฅ๋ ฅ, ํˆฌ๊ณผ๋„, ์œ ์ˆœ๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์—ญํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์ƒํ›„ 4์ฃผ๋ น์˜ ์ฅ์˜ ํ”ผํ•˜์— ๊ฐ ์กฐ์งํŽธ์„ ์ด์‹ํ•˜์—ฌ 2๊ฐœ์›” ํ›„ ์ˆ˜๊ฑฐํ•œ ๋’ค ๋ณ‘๋ฆฌ์กฐ์งํ•™์  ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์นผ์Š˜์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ํšŒํ™”์˜ ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ , ฮฑ-Galactosidase ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์ด์ข… ํ•ญ์ฒด ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š”์ง€ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ: ๋ฌด์„ธํฌํ™” ํ›„ polyethylene glycol ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‹ฌ๋‚ญํŽธ์˜ ์žฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผฐ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ด๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ํ›„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋œ ๋‘๊ป˜์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด์„ธํฌํ™” ํ›„ ์กฐ์ง์˜ ํˆฌ๊ณผ๋„ ๋ฐ ์œ ์ˆœ๋„๋Š” ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ๋ฌด์„ธํฌํ™” ํ›„ polyethylene glycol ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ๊ณผ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์–ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด์„ธํฌํ™” ๋ฐ polyethylene glycol ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์„ํšŒํ™” 5 ์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋‚˜ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ํ•ญ์„ํšŒํ™”ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ฮฑ-galactosidase ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ›„ ์ธก์ •ํ•œ ํ˜ˆ์ค‘ anti-ฮฑ-galactose IgM๊ณผ IgG์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ๋ณด์ด์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก : ๋ฌด์„ธํฌํ™”๋Š” ์ด์‹ํŽธ์˜ ์žฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์œผ๋‚˜ ํˆฌ๊ณผ๋„์™€ ์œ ์ˆœ๋„๋Š” ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด์„ธํฌํ™” ํ›„์˜ polyethylene glycol space-filler์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์กฐ์ง์˜ ์žฅ๋ ฅ์€ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผฐ์œผ๋‚˜ ํˆฌ๊ณผ๋„ ๋ฐ ์œ ์ˆœ๋„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด์„ธํฌํ™” ๋ฐ polyethylene glycol ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ํ•ญ์„ํ™” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ์ด์‹ ์กฐ์งํŽธ์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ ๋‚ด๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ž์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์กฐ์ง๋ณด์กด ๋ฐ ํ•ญ์„ํšŒํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋œ๋‹ค.Maste

    Is Hypertrophic or Keloid Wound Scar a Risk Factor for Stricture at Esophagogastric Anastomosis Site after Esophageal Cancer Operation?

    No full text
    Background/Aims: Anastomotic stricture at the esophagus and the conduit anastomosis site after the surgical resection of esophageal cancer is relatively common. This study examined whether a hypertrophic scar or keloid formation at a surgical wound is related to an anastomotic stricture. Methods: From March 2007 to July 2017, 59 patients underwent curative surgery for esophageal cancer. In 38 patients, end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) of the esophagus and the conduit was performed using EEA 25 mm. A hypertrophic wound scar was defined when the width of the midline laparotomy wound scar exceeded 2 mm. The relationship between the hypertrophic scar and stricture and the other risk factors for anastomotic stricture in these 38 patients was analyzed. Results: Of the 38 patients, eight patients (21.1%) had an anastomotic stricture, and a hypertrophic skin scar was observed in 14 patients (36.8%). Univariate analysis revealed lower BMI and hypertrophic scars as risk factors (p=0.032, p=0.001 respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed a hypertrophic scar as an independent risk factor for an anastomotic stricture (p=0.010, OR=27.06, 95% CI 2.19-334.40). Conclusions: Hypertrophic wound scars can be a risk factor for anastomotic stricture after surgery for esophageal cancer. An earlier prediction of anastomotic stricture by detecting hypertrophic wound healing in patients undergoing esophagectomy may improve the patients' quality of life and surgical outcomes by earlier treatments.N
    corecore