12 research outputs found

    The research on the Factors affecting the quantity of automobile industry exported to USA

    Get PDF
    Korean automotive industry has occupied as a major industry and charged 3.3% of GDP, 7.3% of total employment in South Korea. Also it has become major export goods from korea to USA. However, in the US automotive market share was rated by nations as US 45.3%, Japan 37%, Germany 8.2%, south Korea 7.9%, others 1.5% in 2014. This shows Korean market share is much lower than that of Japan and US. The percentage of Korean automotive production in global market position decreased from 5.4% to 5.2% in 2012 to 2013. This decrease influenced adverse effect to export volume. For this reason, this thesis focused on the analysis of the determinants of influencing factor to export volume of automotive industry. Nevertheless, there is a limited literature on the influencing factors of automotive industry. This thesis, the analyze on inputs of GDP, exchange rate, oil price and strategic foreign direct investment, on the export of automotive industry to US. In addition, It derived the implication of automotive market based on the results.β… . μ„œ λ‘  1 β…‘. 이둠적 κ³ μ°° 3 2.1 선행연ꡬ 3 2.2 μ‹œμ‚¬μ  4 β…’. ν•œΒ·λ―Έ μžλ™μ°¨μ‚°μ—… ν˜„ν™© 3.1 ν•œκ΅­ μžλ™μ°¨μ‚°μ—… ν˜„ν™© 6 3.1.1 ν•œκ΅­ μžλ™μ°¨μ‚°μ—… μˆ˜μΆœμž… ν˜„ν™© 6 3.1.2 ν•œκ΅­ μ™„μ„±μ°¨μ‚°μ—… ν˜„ν™© 8 3.1.3 ν•œκ΅­ μžλ™μ°¨λΆ€ν’ˆμ‚°μ—… ν˜„ν™© 12 3.1.4 ν•œκ΅­ μžλ™μ°¨μ‚°μ—…μ˜ 해외생산 및 λŒ€λ―Έ μ§μ ‘νˆ¬μž ν˜„ν™© 14 3.2 λ―Έκ΅­ μžλ™μ°¨μ‚°μ—… ν˜„ν™© 17 3.2.1 λ―Έκ΅­ μ™„μ„±μ°¨μ‚°μ—… ν˜„ν™© 17 3.2.2 λ―Έκ΅­ μžλ™μ°¨λΆ€ν’ˆμ‚°μ—… ν˜„ν™© 19 3.2.3 일본 μžλ™μ°¨κΈ°μ—…μ˜ λ―Έκ΅­ν˜„μ§€μƒμ‚° ν˜„ν™© 22 β…£. 싀증뢄석 4.1 연ꡬ방법 24 4.1.1 쀑λ ₯λͺ¨ν˜• 24 4.1.2 νšŒκ·€λΆ„μ„ 25 4.2 뢄석λͺ¨ν˜• 및 κ°€μ„€μ„€μ • 26 4.2.1 뢄석λͺ¨ν˜• 26 4.2.2 κ°€μ„€μ„€μ • 27 4.3 μžλ£Œκ΅¬μ„± 29 4.4 κΈ°μ΄ˆν†΅κ³„λŸ‰ 및 상관뢄석 31 4.5 μΆ”μ •κ²°κ³Ό 33 4.6 μ‹œμ‚¬μ  37 β…€. κ²°λ‘  39 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 4

    κ΅­μ„Έμ²­ 세무쑰사에 κ΄€ν•œ 연ꡬ : λ‚©μ„Έμžμ˜ ꢌ리보호 츑면을 μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ ν–‰μ •λŒ€ν•™μ› :ν–‰μ •ν•™κ³Ό 정책학전곡,2005.Maste

    An Outdoor Learning Model Through the Scientific Inquiry and Discussion Contest on the Subject for the Coronet Formation of Milk Drop

    No full text
    The '98 Scientific Inquiry and Discussion Contest organized by the Department of Physics Education has been performed for the subject analysing the coronet formation of milk drop. This study examined the feasibility to construct an outdoor learning model in the secondary or primary school, on the basis of the results of the '98 Scientific Inquiry and Discussion Contest. In this study, the hypotheses suggested by students who performed the inquiry contest were introduced. These explained how students approach the proposed problem. As outdoor learning models for the coronet formation by milk drop, the study suggested three types, such as 1) observation of the phenomena occurring in a very short time, 2) analysis of the phenomena by controlling external parameters, 3) understanding of the phenomena through model construction. These three types of inquiring approach may not apply to all levels of students equally. Thus this study suggest that teachers select an appropriate type of approach for their students.이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 1998년도 μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ μ‚¬λ²”λŒ€ν•™ λ°œμ „κΈ°κΈˆ 연ꡬ비 지원에 μ˜ν•΄ 이루어진 κ²ƒμž„

    Cooperative Inquiry on the Physiological Effects of Electricity and Magnetism

    No full text
    The 5th Science Inquiry and Discussion Contest" was held in May 1999 in the Department of Physics Education as a part of the open-learning model curriculum. The topics are three (l) Physiological Effects of Magnetism, (2) Physiological Effects of Electricity, and (3) Optical characteristics of the Meridian Points. The students from freshmen to seniors were grouped into nine teams to compete in the inquiry on the subject by collaboration of twelve members. The research outputs were reported by papers and also to the Website. Three teams were prescreened among the nine teams through the evaluation of their reports, and those three teams had contests of presentation and discussion in the audience of other students. Their research results were not complete, but showed some creative and new aspects from which further research should be encouraged. The students were very sincere and enthusiastic in this open-learning course.이 논문은 1999λ…„ μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ μ‚¬λ²”λŒ€ν•™ λ°œμ „κΈ°κΈˆμ˜ 지원을 λ°›μ•˜μŒ

    Researches on the Characteristics of the Studies of Physics Education : research area, international trends, and the role of physics education

    No full text
    The characteristics of physics education (research, international trends, and the role of physics education) are studied through this article. As an introduction, the major differences between the nature of the physics studies and the nature of the physics education studies are clarified: (l) The physics is the study of science knowledge itself. (2) The physics education is to lay emphasis on the reorganization of the physics knowledges not only to meet the needs of the sutdents of various levels but also to facilitate the learning process of the students. A suggestion is offered for models to explain these characteristics of the physics education. One of the models puts the four different areas of the studies of the physics education through a solid sphere: (l) Physics dimension, (2) Psychology dimension, (3) Philosophy dimension and (4) Practice dimension. The studies of physics education is to fulfill these four different dimensions more densely. Resource materials are collected and processed to introduce the area of physics education from a broad perspective: (1) Curricula to award doctoral degrees of science education mainly in the USA education systems. (2) Research topics for the doctoral degrees awarded to the Korean science education scholars (3) Statistics to show the area where the 900 graduates of the physics education departments in the past are currently working: The statstics shows that half of the graduates directly work in the area of secondary school science education

    Proposing A New Model of Inquiring Process and Analysing College Students' Inquiry Behavior via Scientific Inquiry and Discussion Contest

    No full text
    We analyse the inquiring behavior of college students via 97 Scientific Inquiry and Discussion Contest held at the Department of Physics Education of Seoul National University. The participants to the contest were the students belonging to the Department of Physics Education of Seoul National University. There were 9 teams in the beginning and department professors selected 3 teams for the final contest according to the reports submitted by each team. The subject of inquiry was "Light emerges when we put an electric bulb into microwave oven and tum it on. What is the source of the light?" We examine all the reports of 9 teams and try to find students' process of inquiry for this subject. We find that there is a crucial step in between the stage of observing phenomenon and the stage of setting hypothesis. These two stages have been considered as the first two stages in the conventional inquiring process. The very crucial stage for the subject of 97 inquiring contest, which is a little bit complicated phenomenon, is constructing the structure of inquiry. The teams who made this structure have clearly shown successful inquiry for the subject, while other teams who did not construct the structure of inquiry appropriately have met serious difficulties in the later stages of inquiring process. On the basis of this analysis, we suggest a more refined inquiring process for the students who treat complicated phenomena for their inquiry subjects. The new process is composed of 7 stages. We also analyse special aspects of Korean college students discussion behavior exposed in the 97 contest, which are main drawbacks of Korean students. Since these drawbacks are mostly stem from the problems in basic education in Korea, we strongly recommend that a similar kind of inquiry and discussion contest we did for college students be conducted in the period of primary and secondary schools.이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 1997λ…„ μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ μ‚¬λ²”λŒ€ν•™ λ°œμ „κΈ°κΈˆμ˜ 지원에 μ˜ν•œ κ²ƒμž„

    The Educational Meaning of Scientific Discussion and Cooperative Inquiry Method in Physics Education Department

    No full text
    The Science Inquiry & Discussion Contest was held in 1993 as a part of The 1st Students' Scientific Inquiry Olympic. This contest was consisted of students cooperative inquiry and discussion in the form of game. The contest was successful and positively evaluated in science education, but it was originally designed for junior high school students. So we tried to apply the method of this event program(scientific discussion and cooperative inquiry) into curriculum of Physics Education Department in Seoul National University(SNU). The Science Inquiry & Discussion Contest was reorganized for undergraduate students and has been held since 1995 in Physics Education Department on SNU. All of undergraduate students and staffs in Physics Education Department participated in this program. In this report the results of 96 the Science Inquiry & Discussion Contest were introduced in detail with the evaluation and discussion. Through the application and evaluation of this program we came to get many positive implications. The first implication is that the cooperative inquiry with inter-grades students was possible. Second, the opportunity of long-term study was given to the students by this program. Third, Students could have chance to study in the different manner rather than those of classroom lecture style. And the last implication is that this program can be developed into a new style assessment of undergraduate physics education courses. In conclusion, the scientific discussion and cooperative inquiry method though The Science Inquiry & Discussion Contest had many positive results in undergraduate physics education curriculum, and such activities will be a kind of new style curriculum of undergraduate physics education courses.이 논문은 1996λ…„ μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ μ‚¬λ²”λŒ€ν•™ λ°œμ „κΈ°κΈˆμ˜ 지원에 μ˜ν•œ κ²ƒμž„
    corecore